<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You On Track?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2003/09/26/are-you-on-track/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2003/09/26/are-you-on-track/</link>
	<description>A premiere personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:42:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Darren R. Sussman</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2003/09/26/are-you-on-track/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren R. Sussman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2003 17:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=43#comment-17</guid>
		<description>Also, I remember reading an article at least a year ago that said that $1,000,000 was no longer a high enough goal for retirement and that the minimum should really be $2,000,000.  And, you&#039;re right, by the time we&#039;re of retiring age, it&#039;ll probably be closer to $4,000,000.  :/
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I remember reading an article at least a year ago that said that $1,000,000 was no longer a high enough goal for retirement and that the minimum should really be $2,000,000.  And, you&#8217;re right, by the time we&#8217;re of retiring age, it&#8217;ll probably be closer to $4,000,000.  :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
