As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!
     

It Helps to Call

by Flexo on February 14, 2005. Saving 3 comments.

I noticed today that the bank where I hold my checking and one savings account, Wachovia, charged me a service fee of $15. Regular readers may remember that the discount brokerage department of the same corporation charged me a yearly fee last November, but this time the situation was different. According to their rules, I shouldn’t be charged a monthly low balance fee since I also hold (but don’t use) a credit card with them.

I called to find out if there was something I missed. At first the customer service representative, Mark, told me I did not meet the criteria to avoid the monthly fee. I maintained that I had the latest criteria on the computer screen in front of me, displaying the company’s web site, and I did in fact meet the criteria.

He disappeared to check with someone and he discovered that he was reading an old version of the rules. Mark gladly credited the $15 back into the account and “linked” my account to the new rules so I wouldn’t be charged again.

Thanks, Mark! I wonder how many people throughout the world lose money they don’t even know about because they are getting charged service fees when they should not be.

VN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Email Email Print Print
Share this article: Twitter | Tip'd | Facebook | Delicious | Reddit | Digg
About the Author

Flexo, the owner and creator of Consumerism Commentary, has been blogging and writing for the internet since 1995 and has been building online communities since 1991. Find out more about him and follow him on Twitter.

If you enjoyed this article, get the free RSS feed, get daily emails, and become our fan on Facebook.

Related Articles

Join the free Consumerism Commentary newsletter. Enter your email address here to receive weekly emails with behind-the-scenes information, exclusive giveaways, and money tips.



{ 3 comments }

1 Darren R. Sussman February 14, 2005 at 11:04 pm

And more than just because they don’t notice, but a lot of people probably wouldn’t have called because they would have figured it wasn’t worth the hassle for $15. Of course, it is, but a lot of people would have just let it go and lost the $15.

UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

2 Flexo February 14, 2005 at 11:14 pm

If they let it go, they’d continue to be charged $15 every month. It’s not like it would be just a one time thing. So it’s not that it’s whether it’s worth the hassle of $15, it’s whether it’s worth the hassle of $180 a year.

UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

3 Darren R. Sussman February 17, 2005 at 9:38 am

Oh, I thought it was just a $15 per year charge. Nevermind, then. :)

UN:F [1.8.5_1061]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: