The New Bankruptcy Bill

There’s a new bankruptcy bill that’s up for vote in the Senate. if it passes, and it probably will, filing for bankruptcy will be harder. More specifically, fewer people will be able to file under Chapter 7, where creditors will get nothing and all debt is liquidated, and instead will be forced to file under Chapter 13, which provides for a five-year maximum repayment plan.

Some people believe the bankruptcy laws have been abused and there should be tighter restrictions. Advocacy groups claim that it’s a gift to credit card companies, who stand to gain $1 billion or more.

Here is a basic list of the changes between the old law and the new bill. You can read CNN’s story for more information.

  • The test for qualification for bankruptcy
  • Determining what you can afford to pay back
  • The right for creditors to contest your claim
  • Liability for the filing lawyer
Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share!
Email this article to a friend Email this article to a friend | Add to: Tip'd | Facebook | Delicious | Reddit | Digg

Get the RSS feed or enter your email address:

Scroll down to read 4 comments on “The New Bankruptcy Bill.”

Related Entries on Consumerism Commentary

4 Comments on “The New Bankruptcy Bill.” To add your own comment, scroll down.

  1. jim
    Comment #1 on Thursday, March 10, 2005
    1:35 pm (reply)

    “Advocacy groups claim that it’s a gift to credit card companies, who stand to gain $1 billion or more.”

    I think they should make a point that the $1B isn’t really a gift, it’s money that’s owed to them anyway by foolish and irresponsible spenders. Making it harder for people to run up debt and simply run out on responsibility is a good thing. Credit card companies never forced anyone to use their cards.

  2. Darren R. Sussman
    Comment #2 on Thursday, March 10, 2005
    4:24 pm (reply)

    I’m inclined to agree with Jim. We live in an era where debt is the norm and there is no accountability for it. You can run up huge debts because it simply doesn’t matter anymore. Sure, there are consequences, but they’re not severe enough to make most people even think twice before spending money they don’t and never will have.

  3. Flexo
    Comment #3 on Friday, March 11, 2005
    10:12 am (reply)

    The $1B would be in the way of fees. That’s how the companies end up with a $1B gift—it’s money the credit card companies didn’t have to pay the retailers.

  4. Ron
    Comment #4 on Friday, March 25, 2005
    8:17 pm (reply)

    Let’s be a little more reasonable here.

    First of all not all people who have trouble paying their debts are “foolish and irresponsible” as you imply. They may have had a medical catastrophy for a member of their family or they may have lost their job. I can think of many instances that life thows our way where one can get caught up in economic trouble.

    Secondly, The banks who push credit cards on people who are bad risks are largely at fault for even offering credit to these people in the first place. This is especially true for elder retired Senior citizens who are living on fixed incomes and are facing outrageous medical costs and who do not understand the nature of a credit trap especially at 20% + interest rates. Credit cards are offered and maintained by these immoral stinking banks who do not care where their next sucker comes from. CitiBank is one of them.

Welcome to Consumerism Commentary

Consumerism Commentary is a blog for men and women who wish to make the most of their financial lives. Read more about Consumerism Commentary.


Cash Loans

Advertise on Consumerism Commentary

FNBO Direct

Recent Comments

Best of Consumerism Commentary

Recent Articles

Recent Topics on C3 Forums

Popular on pfblogs.org

Subscribe via E-mail

Tip'd
Click here to start saving with ING DIRECT!

Disclaimer

The authors of Consumerism Commentary are not professional financial advisers and no text within this website should be considered financial advice. Any individual who makes financial decisions based solely on the information contained within does so at his or her own risk. Always consult a financial professional.

About Advertising

This website contains advertisements, usually listed as “sponsors.” Some links are for products or services for which Consumerism Commentary is an "affiliate." No articles within the blog are advertisements disguised as blog entries. Consumerism Commentary is not compensated for any content, except for advertising sold. This site contains no Pay-Per-Post (or similar) articles.

Privacy Policy

Carnival of Personal Finance