As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

More on 401(k) Borrowing

by Flexo on March 30, 2005

in Uncategorized

Following up on the topic of 401(k) loans, which was discussed here, there is a new article on CNN Money by Walter Updegrave. This article compares a scenario for two options: borrowing $40,000 through a 401(k) loan and borrowing the same amount through a home equity line of credit. Assuming the two options are available to an individual in need, one comes out better when exercising the home equity line option.

Here’s their calculation:

Borrow from 401(k) Borrow from Home Equity Line
$40,000 4-year loan $40,000 4-year loan
Monthly payment $934

Monthly payment $926

$100,000  Beginning 401(k) balance $100,000  Beginning 401(k) balance
-  40,000  Loan  
$  60,000  401(k) balance after loan  
+  15,749  Earnings on 401(k)
                 at 6% annual return
+  26,248  Earnings on 401(k)
                 at 6% annual return
+  44,832  Loan repayment (48 X $934)  
+   5,773  Earnings on monthly loan payments
                 at 6% annual return
 
$126,354  Ending 401(k) Balance $126,248  Ending 401(k) Balance
  +       384  Savings from lower loan payments
                  ($926 vs. $934)
+    1,112  Tax savings on home
                  equity loan interest
$126,354  Final 401(k) balance $127,744  Final 401(k) balance
                  plus other savings

Source: CNN/Money

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


About the Author

Flexo, the owner and creator of Consumerism Commentary, has been blogging and writing for the internet since 1995 and has been building online communities since 1991. Find out more about him and follow him on Twitter.

If you enjoyed this article, get the free RSS feed or get daily emails.

Join the free Consumerism Commentary newsletter. Enter your email address here to receive weekly emails with behind-the-scenes information, exclusive giveaways, and money tips.



Related Entries on Consumerism Commentary

{ 4 comments }

1 erin March 30, 2005 at 12:15 pm

Makes sense, but the chart is assuming a couple things…

1. That the borrower has a home. I see from the article that this is the case.
2. That there are no closing costs or fees with the HELOC. In this case, the borrower already had one.
3. Interest rates stay relatively low. The interest rate on the HELOC was prime minus .25, while the 401(k) loan was fixed.

401(k) loans aren’t great, but they aren’t the evil “double-tax” loans that people like Suze Orman make them out to be.

erin
http://frugalgirl.blogspot.com/

UN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

2 Personal Finance Blog March 30, 2005 at 2:28 pm

I agree with Erin. If Prime rate increase 1% 12 months from now, which is very possible, the comparison will be up side down.

UN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

3 Flexo March 30, 2005 at 3:42 pm

I won’t deny that in many cases borrowing from a 401(k) loan is a better option, and that assumptions can be played with in order to get any result you want. The best option is never to have to borrow money in the first place. Wouldn’t that be nice?

UN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

4 erin March 30, 2005 at 4:52 pm

I agree! Just another reason we all should save three-six months of living expenses.

erin

UN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post: Six-Figure Yentl

Next post: Check Your Notices