The latest information on the Carnival of Personal Finance is now located here. Please update your links.
VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Email this article
Print this article
Share this article: Twitter | Tip'd | Facebook | Delicious | Reddit | Digg
Flexo, the owner and creator of Consumerism Commentary, has been blogging and writing for the internet since 1995 and has been building online communities since 1991. Find out more about him and follow him on Twitter.
If you enjoyed this article, get the free RSS feed or get daily emails.
Join the free Consumerism Commentary newsletter. Enter your email address here to receive weekly emails with behind-the-scenes information, exclusive giveaways, and money tips.
Related Entries on Consumerism Commentary
- The Carnival is Up!: Blueprint for Financial Prosperity wins the award for Most Unique...
- Carnival of Personal Finance Reminder: Bloggers: If you're planning on submitting an article to the...
- Carnival of Personal Finance #5: The Carnival of Personal Finance #5 is up. Free...
- Carnival is Up!: The Carnival is Up! MightyBargainHunter is hosting the Carnival...
- The Carnival is Up!: The latest Carnival of Personal Finance is up at No...







{ 1 trackback }
{ 2 comments }
Overall excellent guidelines. While I agree that marketing is not personal finance, I think that there is enough of a connection that it shouldn’t be excluded outright. This week I submitted an article to the Carnival of the Capitalists and I noticed this at on their submission form: http://www.gongol.com/opinion/2004/dontexcludecontributors
It is a set of reasons and hosting guidelines that argue for openness rather than exclusion in their carnival. I tend to agree with their logic. Better to have the odd slightly off-topic post slide in than to create an atmosphere of exclusion.
Thanks for your efforts in this project.
Jon
Inclusion is the best policy. Off-topic posts aren’t offensive and inclusion is up to the host, but those that are advertisements should be frowned upon. The Carnival (and any traffic it might generate) shouldn’t be “used” in that manner, I believe. I changed the guidelines to incorporate more of an “inclusive” feel which I completely agree with.
Comments on this entry are closed.