Financial Urban Myths

Don’t fall for these popular “wives’ tales,” as compiled by Bankrate.com. Some of these are strange and unfamiliar to me, but maybe you’ve heard these rumors.

1. False: “You can float a check longer if you write in red ink.”
2. False: “You don’t have to pay income tax—it’s illegal.”
3. False: “I’m under 18, so I can’t be held accountable for a debt.”
4. False: “My hotel key card has my credit-card information.”
5. False: “Boycotting a few gasoline brands brings gas prices down.”
6. False: “It’s better if you don’t sign the back of your credit card.”
7. False: “You can make a pile of dough by helping a foreigner solve his money problems.”
8. False: “You can now opt out of having credit bureaus give your information to anyone who asks.”
9. False: “You can buy your way out of points on a speeding ticket.”
10. False: “Hotel Bibles often have $100 bills tucked into them.”

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share!
Email this article to a friend Email this article to a friend | Add to: Tip'd | Facebook | Delicious | Reddit | Digg

Get the RSS feed or enter your email address:

Scroll down to read 5 comments on “Financial Urban Myths.”

Related Entries on Consumerism Commentary

5 Comments on “Financial Urban Myths.” To add your own comment, scroll down.

  1. Caitlin
    Comment #1 on Friday, October 14, 2005
    7:20 pm (reply)

    I’ve never heard any of these! LOL

    Though I do think that #6 should be more specific and mention leaving the back of your card blank – I now put “Photo ID required” on the back in the signature panel and almost every merchant looks, then asks for ID (I am not yet in the habit of having my ID ready) and I always thank them for checking. Of course…there are the very few who don’t look, but they aren’t checking the signature either so they’re a lost cause either way.

  2. F. D. Bryant III
    Comment #2 on Sunday, October 16, 2005
    1:48 am (reply)

    I’ve never quite figured out how signing the card does anything to protect you.

  3. Alex Givant
    Comment #3 on Tuesday, October 18, 2005
    5:23 pm (reply)

    Not signing back of the credit card make sense. Put there “Photo ID required”. At least, if cashier try to compare signature, it’ll make life of the thief a bit more complicated.

  4. Jerry Kindall
    Comment #4 on Tuesday, October 25, 2005
    4:31 pm (reply)

    Actually, merchants are not supposed to accept the card if it’s not signed. Cards must be signed to be valid. “SEE PHOTO ID” is not a signature and a card so “signed” is not valid. The Post Office is one outfit, I’ve been told, that actually won’t accept a card that says “SEE PHOTO ID” on the back, but NO merchant should. Call your credit card issuer if you don’t believe me.

  5. Flexo
    Comment #5 on Tuesday, October 25, 2005
    5:16 pm (reply)

    What Jerry says is true—the card must be signed to be accepted—but most cashiers don’t know that or don’t care. If they see, “Ask for ID” or somesuch remark, they’ll do it (if they have half a brain). Even still, I don’t think it’s a good fraud deterrent. Leaving the back of the card blank is not suggested, even though it’s what I generally do until some cashier makes me sign it in front of him.

Welcome to Consumerism Commentary

Consumerism Commentary is a blog for men and women who wish to make the most of their financial lives. Read more about Consumerism Commentary.


FNBO Direct
Cash Loans

Advertise on Consumerism Commentary

FNBO Direct

Recent Comments

Best of Consumerism Commentary

Recent Articles

Recent Topics on C3 Forums

Popular on pfblogs.org

Subscribe via E-mail

Tip'd
Click here to start saving with ING DIRECT!

Disclaimer

The authors of Consumerism Commentary are not professional financial advisers and no text within this website should be considered financial advice. Any individual who makes financial decisions based solely on the information contained within does so at his or her own risk. Always consult a financial professional.

About Advertising

This website contains advertisements, usually listed as “sponsors.” Some links are for products or services for which Consumerism Commentary is an "affiliate." No articles within the blog are advertisements disguised as blog entries. Consumerism Commentary is not compensated for any content, except for advertising sold. This site contains no Pay-Per-Post (or similar) articles.

Privacy Policy

Carnival of Personal Finance