If you took a typical family of four earning a total of $60,000 and moved them around the country, the city in which they would have to spend the most in order to maintain their lifestyle is, with no suprise, New York City.
According to the analysis by Runzheimer International, the annual cost for this family to live in Manhattan is $146,040, including housing, taxes, and costs of owning two vehicles or commutation depending on location.
Unless I’m missing something, a family earning $60,000 each year with $146,000 in expenses each year is in a very bad position.
At an annual cost of $146,060, Manhattan homeowners pay 137.9% more than the national average. And it costs $12,173 more a year to live in Manhattan than to live similarly in San Francisco, according to Runzheimer. The difference between the second and third locations, San Francisco and Los Angeles, is $16,161.
Email this article to a friend
Print this article
Share this article: Twitter | Tip'd | Facebook | Delicious | Reddit | Digg
About the Author
{ 4 comments }
But, if you live in Manhattan, you probably rent a place, not own it, and you probably don’t have a car because you don’t need it. So this report is ridiculous.
I thought the same thing at first, but the cost of owning two cars isn’t considered in cities where it’s not practical, like Manhattan. The cost of mass transit is factored in instead. I think the “$60,000 annual salary” is just to compare similar expenses across cities, not to really determine what an average family will actually spend.
It’s kind of a weird way to come up with the results, but that’s just for consistency. Definitely not one of the most accurate surveys, but it’s an interesting analysis and the ranking’s probably correct, even if the numbers seem odd.
Hm. I am suspect if Boston comes out as cheaper than DC…no way.
Gee, I sure feel better now. I’m saving over $12,000 per year by living in the Bay Area vs. liiving in NYC!
Comments on this entry are closed.