<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Possible Changes to Retirement Plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/01/possible-changes-to-retirement-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/01/possible-changes-to-retirement-plans/</link>
	<description>A premiere personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:42:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mbhunter</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/01/possible-changes-to-retirement-plans/#comment-1251</link>
		<dc:creator>mbhunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 08:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=664#comment-1251</guid>
		<description>Hmmmm...I don&#039;t know about the automatic 401(k) enrollment for the employees.  Why are they pushing for it?  Yes, it does get more people saving, but I&#039;d rather have more control over my money than less.  What&#039;s down the road?  A 50% tax on 401(k) distributions?  If my retirement money is in a 401(k) and I need it to live off of, what choice would I have but to give them half?  It&#039;s a tax-advantaged account now, but the flip side is that it&#039;s not a tax-advantaged account later.  Call me a cynic, but I suspect that Uncle Sam&#039;s debt will start to come due and they&#039;ll expect me to pay for it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm&#8230;I don&#8217;t know about the automatic 401(k) enrollment for the employees.  Why are they pushing for it?  Yes, it does get more people saving, but I&#8217;d rather have more control over my money than less.  What&#8217;s down the road?  A 50% tax on 401(k) distributions?  If my retirement money is in a 401(k) and I need it to live off of, what choice would I have but to give them half?  It&#8217;s a tax-advantaged account now, but the flip side is that it&#8217;s not a tax-advantaged account later.  Call me a cynic, but I suspect that Uncle Sam&#8217;s debt will start to come due and they&#8217;ll expect me to pay for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
