<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Possible Changes to Retirement Plans</title> <atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/01/possible-changes-to-retirement-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/01/possible-changes-to-retirement-plans/</link> <description>A premiere personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 14:09:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: mbhunter</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/01/possible-changes-to-retirement-plans/#comment-1251</link> <dc:creator>mbhunter</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 08:48:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=664#comment-1251</guid> <description>Hmmmm...I don&#039;t know about the automatic 401(k) enrollment for the employees.  Why are they pushing for it?  Yes, it does get more people saving, but I&#039;d rather have more control over my money than less.  What&#039;s down the road?  A 50% tax on 401(k) distributions?  If my retirement money is in a 401(k) and I need it to live off of, what choice would I have but to give them half?  It&#039;s a tax-advantaged account now, but the flip side is that it&#039;s not a tax-advantaged account later.  Call me a cynic, but I suspect that Uncle Sam&#039;s debt will start to come due and they&#039;ll expect me to pay for it. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmmm&#8230;I don&#8217;t know about the automatic 401(k) enrollment for the employees.  Why are they pushing for it?  Yes, it does get more people saving, but I&#8217;d rather have more control over my money than less.  What&#8217;s down the road?  A 50% tax on 401(k) distributions?  If my retirement money is in a 401(k) and I need it to live off of, what choice would I have but to give them half?  It&#8217;s a tax-advantaged account now, but the flip side is that it&#8217;s not a tax-advantaged account later.  Call me a cynic, but I suspect that Uncle Sam&#8217;s debt will start to come due and they&#8217;ll expect me to pay for it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/15 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cloud.consumerismcommentary.com

Served from: consumerismcommentary.com @ 2010-03-22 10:52:39 -->