<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Investment Holdings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/28/my-investment-holdings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/28/my-investment-holdings/</link>
	<description>A premiere personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:42:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fivecentnickel.com</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/28/my-investment-holdings/#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator>fivecentnickel.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 19:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=729#comment-1428</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Happy New Year!&lt;/strong&gt;

Just a quick note to wish you all a Happy New Year! No major resolutions for me this year. Just a couple of things that we have to get in order&#8230; First off, we still need to put together an estate plan. We&#8217;re currently living with wills tha...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Happy New Year!</strong></p>
<p>Just a quick note to wish you all a Happy New Year! No major resolutions for me this year. Just a couple of things that we have to get in order&#8230; First off, we still need to put together an estate plan. We&#8217;re currently living with wills tha&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blueprint for Financial Prosperity</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/28/my-investment-holdings/#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>Blueprint for Financial Prosperity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2005 04:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=729#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Personal in Personal Finance&lt;/strong&gt;

Part of the allure of reading a personal finance blog is reading about the personal experiences of other regular people struggling with the same issues you&#8217;re dealing with. This week, some of my favorite bloggers have been writing about their exp...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Personal in Personal Finance</strong></p>
<p>Part of the allure of reading a personal finance blog is reading about the personal experiences of other regular people struggling with the same issues you&#8217;re dealing with. This week, some of my favorite bloggers have been writing about their exp&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flexo</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/28/my-investment-holdings/#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator>Flexo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=729#comment-1425</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all the great thoughts here.  I&#039;m overly exposed to Large Caps without enough exposure to Mid and Small.  I&#039;ll adjust that this year, as it has been something I&#039;ve been thinking about.

Klauss, I opened up a Sharebuilder account to take advantage of a free $50 offer.  I&#039;m just letting it sit (there are no inactivity fees) and (hopefully) grow.  I&#039;ll let &quot;compounding&quot; do its job and I&#039;ll worry about fees for selling when that&#039;s an option.  Hopefully, at that time, the fee for selling will not eliminate gains.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the great thoughts here.  I&#8217;m overly exposed to Large Caps without enough exposure to Mid and Small.  I&#8217;ll adjust that this year, as it has been something I&#8217;ve been thinking about.</p>
<p>Klauss, I opened up a Sharebuilder account to take advantage of a free $50 offer.  I&#8217;m just letting it sit (there are no inactivity fees) and (hopefully) grow.  I&#8217;ll let &#8220;compounding&#8221; do its job and I&#8217;ll worry about fees for selling when that&#8217;s an option.  Hopefully, at that time, the fee for selling will not eliminate gains.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Money Finance</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/28/my-investment-holdings/#comment-1426</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Money Finance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=729#comment-1426</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Star Money Articles: Resolutions Abound&lt;/strong&gt;

As you all know, I&#039;ve been posting my 2006 financial resolutions here Free Money Finance, but I&#039;m not the only one doing that from around the blogosphere. Here are a few others you should check out: All Things Financial</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Star Money Articles: Resolutions Abound</strong></p>
<p>As you all know, I&#8217;ve been posting my 2006 financial resolutions here Free Money Finance, but I&#8217;m not the only one doing that from around the blogosphere. Here are a few others you should check out: All Things Financial</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klauss</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/28/my-investment-holdings/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator>klauss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=729#comment-1424</guid>
		<description>Flexo,

I relaize you just opened an account at sharbuilder, but I just ran accros a company called tradeking  www.tradeking.com.  It is a small company, but its platform is nice.  $4.95 limit orders, no minimums.  Here is there fee schedule.  What do you think.  The only thing I worry about with Sharebuilder is that to transfer out securities it is $50 and I would almost rather dollar cost every quarter rather than month to reduce commisions (after the $50 bonus) and I don&#039;t think they will let you do it in those increments.
&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.tradeking.com/PublicView/services/Services/commissionsPUB.tmpl&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://www.tradeking.com/PublicView/services/Services/commissionsPUB.tmpl&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flexo,</p>
<p>I relaize you just opened an account at sharbuilder, but I just ran accros a company called tradeking  <a href="http://www.tradeking.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tradeking.com</a>.  It is a small company, but its platform is nice.  $4.95 limit orders, no minimums.  Here is there fee schedule.  What do you think.  The only thing I worry about with Sharebuilder is that to transfer out securities it is $50 and I would almost rather dollar cost every quarter rather than month to reduce commisions (after the $50 bonus) and I don&#8217;t think they will let you do it in those increments.<br />
<a href="https://www.tradeking.com/PublicView/services/Services/commissionsPUB.tmpl" rel="nofollow">https://www.tradeking.com/PublicView/services/Services/commissionsPUB.tmpl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guyincognito</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/28/my-investment-holdings/#comment-1423</link>
		<dc:creator>guyincognito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=729#comment-1423</guid>
		<description>TCEIX is artificially holding down its expense ratio by subsidizing it until July 2006 - see the following article:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/Investing/Startinvesting/P38385.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;

Also, my broker told me to stay away from TIAA-CREF, not sure why though.  

Moreover, rabhison above had a point: Vanguard will charge you $10 a year and has minimums of 3,000 to 10,000 just to get into most of their funds.  

If anyone has a way to get a low cost Roth IRA besides Vanguard or Fidelity or using a fund like TCEIX (which does not have a minimum investment as long as one pays automatically but with the disadvantage of high expense ratio) without paying expensive commissions or service charges please post a comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TCEIX is artificially holding down its expense ratio by subsidizing it until July 2006 &#8211; see the following article:<br />
<a href="http://moneycentral.msn.com/content/Investing/Startinvesting/P38385.asp" rel="nofollow">link</a></p>
<p>Also, my broker told me to stay away from TIAA-CREF, not sure why though.  </p>
<p>Moreover, rabhison above had a point: Vanguard will charge you $10 a year and has minimums of 3,000 to 10,000 just to get into most of their funds.  </p>
<p>If anyone has a way to get a low cost Roth IRA besides Vanguard or Fidelity or using a fund like TCEIX (which does not have a minimum investment as long as one pays automatically but with the disadvantage of high expense ratio) without paying expensive commissions or service charges please post a comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karthik</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/28/my-investment-holdings/#comment-1422</link>
		<dc:creator>Karthik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 00:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=729#comment-1422</guid>
		<description>Flexo,

I used Morningstar&#039;s portfolio X-ray tool to look at your allocation. Here&#039;s what it reported (you probably knew this), rounded up, excluding company stock:

US stocks 78%
Foreign stocks 18%
Cash 3%
Bonds 
LV 27 LC 25 LG 22
MV 6 MC 6 MG 9
SV 2 SC 2 SG 1

OK, so here are my two cents:

1. You most definitely are overexposed to large caps, to the exclusion of midcaps and smallcaps. Now, mids and smalls may underperform in the near future simply because they have overperformed recently, but when you create a stable asset allocation, you&#039;re trying to get out of the guessing game. My understanding of your earlier comment is that your company does not offer a decent small cap fund (not even an index fund?) - not surprising for a 401k. Which is why I&#039;d plough your Roth money into a small cap fund. I prefer an index fund, but that&#039;s my bias, because when I advise friends on passively managed portfolios, I want it to be passively managed, not just by me.

2. Your exposure to foreign stocks seems a little skimpy. I don&#039;t know what your country exposure is. Foreign stocks includes Europe and Emerging Market. My preference would be 15% to Europe, 10% to emerging markets.

3. Yes, yes, I&#039;ve heard that at 29, you should be in an all-stock portfolio. I just don&#039;t buy it. Ben Graham, the father of Intelligent Investing, argued that you should always have 25% of each stocks or bonds, for insurance. Yes, much has been made of how great stocks are compared to bonds, but that&#039;s easy to claim at the end of one of the greatest bull markets in history. If you were an investor in the 20s, you could have made the same mistake, only to suffer a horrendous crash and decades of mediocre stock performance.

4.  You&#039;ve got a phenomenal amount of your money in company stock. When the opportunity presents itself, I&#039;d suggest offloading some of that stock. Your financial future is already significantly tied to that company, since hard times could put your earnings power in question. You don&#039;t need to be too much more tied to your company than you already are. Of course, make some judgements about the relative value of the company stock and your qualifications to make such a judgement (can you sell us on the basis of fundamentals why we should buy the stock, for example). But even if these criteria seem extremely positive, I&#039;d prefer to trim my position if I were you.

Well, those were my lengthy two cents! Finally, great job being aggresive enough to save so much at 29, and to have the humility to ask for advice!

Cheers,
Karthik</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flexo,</p>
<p>I used Morningstar&#8217;s portfolio X-ray tool to look at your allocation. Here&#8217;s what it reported (you probably knew this), rounded up, excluding company stock:</p>
<p>US stocks 78%<br />
Foreign stocks 18%<br />
Cash 3%<br />
Bonds<br />
LV 27 LC 25 LG 22<br />
MV 6 MC 6 MG 9<br />
SV 2 SC 2 SG 1</p>
<p>OK, so here are my two cents:</p>
<p>1. You most definitely are overexposed to large caps, to the exclusion of midcaps and smallcaps. Now, mids and smalls may underperform in the near future simply because they have overperformed recently, but when you create a stable asset allocation, you&#8217;re trying to get out of the guessing game. My understanding of your earlier comment is that your company does not offer a decent small cap fund (not even an index fund?) &#8211; not surprising for a 401k. Which is why I&#8217;d plough your Roth money into a small cap fund. I prefer an index fund, but that&#8217;s my bias, because when I advise friends on passively managed portfolios, I want it to be passively managed, not just by me.</p>
<p>2. Your exposure to foreign stocks seems a little skimpy. I don&#8217;t know what your country exposure is. Foreign stocks includes Europe and Emerging Market. My preference would be 15% to Europe, 10% to emerging markets.</p>
<p>3. Yes, yes, I&#8217;ve heard that at 29, you should be in an all-stock portfolio. I just don&#8217;t buy it. Ben Graham, the father of Intelligent Investing, argued that you should always have 25% of each stocks or bonds, for insurance. Yes, much has been made of how great stocks are compared to bonds, but that&#8217;s easy to claim at the end of one of the greatest bull markets in history. If you were an investor in the 20s, you could have made the same mistake, only to suffer a horrendous crash and decades of mediocre stock performance.</p>
<p>4.  You&#8217;ve got a phenomenal amount of your money in company stock. When the opportunity presents itself, I&#8217;d suggest offloading some of that stock. Your financial future is already significantly tied to that company, since hard times could put your earnings power in question. You don&#8217;t need to be too much more tied to your company than you already are. Of course, make some judgements about the relative value of the company stock and your qualifications to make such a judgement (can you sell us on the basis of fundamentals why we should buy the stock, for example). But even if these criteria seem extremely positive, I&#8217;d prefer to trim my position if I were you.</p>
<p>Well, those were my lengthy two cents! Finally, great job being aggresive enough to save so much at 29, and to have the humility to ask for advice!</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Karthik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flexo</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/28/my-investment-holdings/#comment-1421</link>
		<dc:creator>Flexo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=729#comment-1421</guid>
		<description>The 4.87% index APY refers to the S&amp;P 500.  The Russell 1000 Index, possibly a better comparison for TCEIX, as a YTD return of 6.12% as of 11/30, whereas TCEIX is 5.82% (as above).  The Russell 3000 -- the index that the fund tries to match -- YTD as of today is 6.02%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 4.87% index APY refers to the S&amp;P 500.  The Russell 1000 Index, possibly a better comparison for TCEIX, as a YTD return of 6.12% as of 11/30, whereas TCEIX is 5.82% (as above).  The Russell 3000 &#8212; the index that the fund tries to match &#8212; YTD as of today is 6.02%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FMF</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/28/my-investment-holdings/#comment-1420</link>
		<dc:creator>FMF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=729#comment-1420</guid>
		<description>Looks like your company has done well this year based on its stock price. Any tips for the rest of us? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like your company has done well this year based on its stock price. Any tips for the rest of us? ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rabhison</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/28/my-investment-holdings/#comment-1419</link>
		<dc:creator>rabhison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=729#comment-1419</guid>
		<description>Which index did you use to compare your funds?  I was surprised to see that your index fund beat your index -- if you used the S&amp;P 500, maybe using a total market index (such as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=%5EDWC&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DJ Wilshire 5000&lt;/a&gt;) would be more fair.  Since small-caps have outperformed large-caps, the total market has outperformed the S&amp;P 500.

Also, I&#039;ve heard that TIAA-CREF has been trying to increase management fees (see for example this Morningstar &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.morningstar.com/article/article.asp?id=152178&amp;phsection=Comm1&amp;pgid=wwhome1a&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt;.  I don&#039;t know if your index fund is one of those targeted for an expense hike, but if it is and the hike is significant, you may want to consider transfering to a Vanguard or Fidelity IRA.  (Incidentally, Vanguard charges an extra $10 a year for their index funds if the balance is below $10k, thus conceivably wiping out any cost advantage due to a lower expense ratio.)

Thanks for sharing your portfolio with us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which index did you use to compare your funds?  I was surprised to see that your index fund beat your index &#8212; if you used the S&amp;P 500, maybe using a total market index (such as the <a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=%5EDWC" rel="nofollow">DJ Wilshire 5000</a>) would be more fair.  Since small-caps have outperformed large-caps, the total market has outperformed the S&amp;P 500.</p>
<p>Also, I&#8217;ve heard that TIAA-CREF has been trying to increase management fees (see for example this Morningstar <a href="http://news.morningstar.com/article/article.asp?id=152178&amp;phsection=Comm1&amp;pgid=wwhome1a" rel="nofollow">article</a>.  I don&#8217;t know if your index fund is one of those targeted for an expense hike, but if it is and the hike is significant, you may want to consider transfering to a Vanguard or Fidelity IRA.  (Incidentally, Vanguard charges an extra $10 a year for their index funds if the balance is below $10k, thus conceivably wiping out any cost advantage due to a lower expense ratio.)</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing your portfolio with us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flexo</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/28/my-investment-holdings/#comment-1418</link>
		<dc:creator>Flexo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 20:53:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=729#comment-1418</guid>
		<description>My company offers a small cap account, and I invested in it for a few months before I realized it was an annuity fund (even though it&#039;s called a &quot;Small Company Stock Account,&quot; so I stopped investing in that fund.  It has performed quite well, though.  The little bit that was in that account was redistributed in the latest rebalancing.  I&#039;d like a small cap fund if the company offered something a little less costly and not an annuity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My company offers a small cap account, and I invested in it for a few months before I realized it was an annuity fund (even though it&#8217;s called a &#8220;Small Company Stock Account,&#8221; so I stopped investing in that fund.  It has performed quite well, though.  The little bit that was in that account was redistributed in the latest rebalancing.  I&#8217;d like a small cap fund if the company offered something a little less costly and not an annuity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2005/12/28/my-investment-holdings/#comment-1417</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 20:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=729#comment-1417</guid>
		<description>Emerging market funds have been great the last two years and the auto-rebalancing every quarter is a really nice feature of your 401(k). 

The only thing I&#039;d do different is, at 29, perhaps you put a higher percentage is small/mid cap or emerging mkt funds. Overall it seems like a high percentage of your retirement savings is in large cap funds. I&#039;d also buy a ton of google. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emerging market funds have been great the last two years and the auto-rebalancing every quarter is a really nice feature of your 401(k). </p>
<p>The only thing I&#8217;d do different is, at 29, perhaps you put a higher percentage is small/mid cap or emerging mkt funds. Overall it seems like a high percentage of your retirement savings is in large cap funds. I&#8217;d also buy a ton of google. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
