Stocks Are For Suckers?

The book I recently reviewed focuses on investing in index funds and letting the portfolio sit for decades—“buy and hold.” It’s a strategy that has been popular since the market took a downward spin when the tech bubble gave out. Not everyone agrees that it’s the best strategy.

Mark Cuban, outspoken owner of the Dallas Mavericks and founder of Broadcast.com (which was later sold to Yahoo) believes the stock market is for suckers. According to Cuban, most of those who invest in the stock market aren’t buying real ownership, they are mostly buying a tiny portion of shares discarded by those closer to the company. The only real investment is buying a material percentage of a company, and if you can’t afford to do that, you’re better off in less risky investments like bonds and CDs.

Scroll down to read 11 comments on “Stocks Are For Suckers?.”

Add to: Facebook | Delicious | Reddit | Digg
Get the RSS feed or enter your email address:


Related Entries on Consumerism Commentary

11 Comments on “Stocks Are For Suckers?.” To add your own comment, scroll down.

  1. Comment #1 by Hazzard (reply)
    January 4th, 2006 at 9:59 am

    Too bad we aren’t billionaires who can heckle in the first row at the basketball game like he is. I can’t believe that’s good advice. The risk to return in the long term stock market seems reasonable. Invest at 4% in grandmas CD, or seek 9-10% returns in the market long term? I’m going to take the risk for an extra 5% and then just try to time my withdrawal from the market as I get close to retirement.
    Hazzard

  2. Comment #2 by Matt (reply)
    January 4th, 2006 at 10:19 am

    Did you read the whole article? His points were pretty valid. Would you be better off investing the money in yourself like starting your own business, or making sure that your investments are guaranteed not to lose money? I understand that the stock market is a fairly safe bet, but Cuban’s argument is that it is a bet- strictly gambling, unless you can invest enough to have a controlling interest. Should gambling be part of your retirement plan?

  3. Comment #3 by Flexo (reply)
    January 4th, 2006 at 11:11 am

    I read the entire blog entry. I wasn’t giving an opinion on the matter, just pointing out that Cuban believes “buy and hold” to be a marketing gimmick… an opinion generally bestowed upon salesman and those who favor “active trading.” Cuban talks more about investing in yourself and in low-risk CDs and bonds for those who can’t afford to buy controlling portions of companies.

  4. Comment #4 by FMF (reply)
    January 4th, 2006 at 11:25 am

    “Not everyone agrees that it’s the best strategy.”

    You?

  5. Comment #5 by Flexo (reply)
    January 4th, 2006 at 11:33 am

    Based on the data I’ve seen, “buy and hold” has (or would have) worked for most situations in the last century, on average. I can’t predict whether it’s going to work for me, but all I have to go on is past performance. Cuban makes great points—such as the fact that “buy and hold” doesn’t take real life issues into account, issues like major emergencies that necessitate withdrawals whether the market is up or down.

    The biggest issue I see is while averages say one thing, the world is full of varying individuals and no one is “average.”

  6. Comment #6 by klauss (reply)
    January 4th, 2006 at 1:45 pm

    I am sure the investors who had the equivalent of a controlling interest in Cuban’s reality show flop felt like they had made a horrible gamble. Was his money involved in that?

  7. Comment #7 by Dus10 (reply)
    January 4th, 2006 at 7:05 pm

    I can see both sides. If you are looking to start a business, invest in yourself. If you are not, however, stocks have been a viable option for investments. Period. People have become quite wealthy off of buying and holding…. just because Mark got lucky once… he thinks he is an expert (although I am being a synic, I do had a great deal of respect for him).

  8. Trackback #8 by Free Money Finance (reply)
    January 9th, 2006 at 5:56 am
  9. Comment #9 by Big Mike (reply)
    January 14th, 2006 at 10:09 am

    “most of those who invest in the stock market aren’t buying real ownership, they are mostly buying a tiny portion of shares discarded by those closer to the company. The only real investment is buying a material percentage of a company”

    This kind of sounds like something I wrote about recently in my own blog about overpaid CEOs. Yes, the CEOs and other execs and insiders make more money than you do by buying a tiny percentage of the company.

    But for the astute contrarian investor who knows what he’s doing, there’s a world of money to be made by investing in stocks. Although I’d agree that people who buy individual stocks and who don’t know how to read a balance sheet, those people are suckers.

  10. Comment #10 by Loi Tran (reply)
    January 30th, 2006 at 7:05 pm

    Stocks are still a good investment. Investors just need to do research before investing. Everyone has their own opinions and can do what they want with their money.

  11. Comment #11 by someone else (reply)
    August 8th, 2008 at 7:17 pm

    I know this is an old article, but I want to say that the stock market isn’t everyone’s answer to retirement. Some people invest in real estate (not just homes) and do fine. Others take a different route.

    I’m very wary of the herd mentality when it comes to the “right way” to retire with ease. Who knows: maybe the next 15 years will be the worst in the history of the stock market. There’s always a first time.

Leave a Comment

Enter your comments below. Please note: Use of a non-personal web site or blog in the field below and/or comments that are off-topic, personal attacks, or support requests will likely be removed at my discretion.

Copyright of comments belongs to the comment author, but I reserve the right to edit comments for formatting or content.

Add a photo or icon to your comment by creating an account on Gravatar.

Welcome to Consumerism Commentary

Consumerism Commentary is a blog for men and women who wish to make the most of their financial lives. Read more about Consumerism Commentary.


Cash Loans
SmartyPig. The Social Side of Savings
CSA 120x120 Animated

Advertise on Consumerism Commentary

Credit Card Offers

FNBO Direct

Recent Comments

Best of Consumerism Commentary

Recent Articles

Popular on pfblogs.org

Subscribe via E-mail

TradeKing.com

Contributors

Disclaimer

The authors of Consumerism Commentary are not professional financial advisers and no text within this website should be considered financial advice. Any individual who makes financial decisions based solely on the information contained within does so at his or her own risk. Always consult a financial professional.

About Advertising

This website contains advertisements, usually listed as “sponsors.” Some links are for products or services for which Consumerism Commentary is an "affiliate." No articles within the blog are advertisements disguised as blog entries. Consumerism Commentary is not compensated for any content, except for advertising sold. This site contains no Pay-Per-Post (or similar) articles.

Privacy Policy

Carnival of Personal Finance