Bank Robbers Steal Worthless £50m

You’ve probably heard about the Great Tornbridge Robbery, in which £50 million (about US$85 million) was heisted from a bank in the United Kingdom last Tuesday. That’s a large sum of cash to have around; in fact, it’s so large, it might as well be Monopoly money. While the story has sparked discussions of what one might do with a vast pile like what was stolen, the robbers may not be able to do much.

According to a money laundering expert cited by CNN, the robbers have three options: stash it, try to spend it, or launder it. Spending it would be difficult. You can’t just go to a car dealer with tens of thousands in cash and expect to buy a car. There are rules put in place to protect the seller from money laundering.

The money would have to be broken into smaller sums and distributed in order to be more likely to evade detectives. Even so, getting away with the job is going to be extremely difficult. Last week, a woman tried to open an account
in southeast London with just a few thousands of pounds in cash. Whether or not she has anything to do with the heist, she has now been taken into custody as a suspect.

While £50 million is a lot of money to have, when you can’t use the money for anything, it has no value.

Scroll down to read 11 comments on “Bank Robbers Steal Worthless £50m.”

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share!
Add to: Tip'd | Facebook | Delicious | Reddit | Digg

Get the RSS feed or enter your email address:

Related Entries on Consumerism Commentary

11 Comments on “Bank Robbers Steal Worthless £50m.” To add your own comment, scroll down.

  1. #1: Sean
    Saturday, February 25, 2006
    12:33 pm (reply)

    Tonbridge Robbery….one thing British bank staff are trained to death on is detecting Money Laundering.

    Is it the same in the US?

  2. #2: samerwriter
    Saturday, February 25, 2006
    3:06 pm (reply)

    I get a chuckle every time I think about these 10 guys sitting around the perimeter of a room with $85 million sitting in the middle of the floor, looking at each other and thinking, “now what?”

    It reminds of “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner”:
    “Water, water, everywhere, nor any drop to drink.”

    Of course right now they’re probably still at the stage of trying to figure out how to knock off their cohorts (or, alternately, how to avoid getting knocked off).

  3. #3: jim
    Saturday, February 25, 2006
    3:07 pm (reply)

    I’ll take a worthless $85M any day… :)

  4. #4: retireat30
    Saturday, February 25, 2006
    4:39 pm (reply)

    So because they have $85 million it is worthless. Let’s think out the logic here:

    If they had stolen $1 million, they would have about $1 million.

    Because they stole an additional $84 million, they now have less than $1 million?

    Uhm… No. It makes for a fun story, but these people were smart enough to pull off the largest heist in british history. Lets give them some credit for being able to extract at least half: $42 million out of their $84.

    Nevertheless, talk about diminishing returns to scale.

  5. #5: george.hardwicke
    Saturday, February 25, 2006
    4:44 pm (reply)

    Dear Sir,

    I am a personal accountant of George Hardwicke, who recently came upon $85 million due to a personal windfall. Due to some misunderstandings with the British Exchequer and Scotland Yard, Mr. Hardwicke requires that the monies be repatriated to your country. I seek your partnership in assisting Mr. Hardwicke with this transaction.

    For your efforts, Mr. Hardwicke is prepared to offer you the generous sums of 30%, or $25.5 million. To facilitate the transaction, I will require from you only your bank account number. Please provide this to me posthaste and I will initiate the transfer of $85 million to your account forthwith.

    ...

  6. #6: jim
    Saturday, February 25, 2006
    4:59 pm (reply)

    They make it sound like they have to launder all $85m in one shot… heck, I can launder a few grand every week and be perfectly content. Plus, don’t you think there are “services” out there that can launder money for a fee? Of course there are.

  7. #7: Flexo
    Saturday, February 25, 2006
    8:15 pm (reply)

    “George,”

    Very amusing. :-)

  8. #8: jim
    Saturday, February 25, 2006
    8:26 pm (reply)

    Who’s “george”? :)

  9. #9: Empty Spaces
    Saturday, February 25, 2006
    9:32 pm (reply)

    I was thinking exactly the same thing when i heard it on tv. how the hell are they going to dispose of the money. they’ll probably have to bury it and leave it for several years or try to smuggle it abroad.

    i think they’ll get caught pretty soon. someone’s bound to get sloppy.

  10. #10: RS
    Sunday, February 26, 2006
    1:29 pm (reply)

    Sure would be fun to try to spend that much money. Reminds me of that movie Brewsters Millions where Richard Prior has to spend a certain amount of money in a specific way.

    They could just use it for a lot of small things such as groceries and clothes…stuff that you just pay cash for.

  11. #11: Curios
    Tuesday, June 26, 2007
    4:35 pm (reply)

    $85 Million in toilet paper and toothpaste? Sounds like a fun Friday night to me.

Leave a Comment

Enter your comments below. Please note: Use of a non-personal web site or blog in the field below and/or comments that are off-topic, personal attacks, or support requests will likely be removed at my discretion.

Copyright of comments belongs to the comment author, but I reserve the right to edit comments for formatting or content.

Add a photo or icon to your comment by creating an account on Gravatar.

Welcome to Consumerism Commentary

Consumerism Commentary is a blog for men and women who wish to make the most of their financial lives. Read more about Consumerism Commentary.


FNBO Direct
Cash Loans
TradeKing.com

Credit Card Offers

Recent Comments

FNBO Direct

Best of Consumerism Commentary

Recent Articles

Recent Topics on C3 Forums

Popular on pfblogs.org

Subscribe via E-mail

Tip'd
Click here to start saving with ING DIRECT!

Contributors

Disclaimer

The authors of Consumerism Commentary are not professional financial advisers and no text within this website should be considered financial advice. Any individual who makes financial decisions based solely on the information contained within does so at his or her own risk. Always consult a financial professional.

About Advertising

This website contains advertisements, usually listed as “sponsors.” Some links are for products or services for which Consumerism Commentary is an "affiliate." No articles within the blog are advertisements disguised as blog entries. Consumerism Commentary is not compensated for any content, except for advertising sold. This site contains no Pay-Per-Post (or similar) articles.

Privacy Policy

Carnival of Personal Finance