As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Historically Inaccurate Numbers

by Flexo on March 6, 2006

in Economy

I generally like the articles Bill Fleckenstein writes for his “Contrarian Chronicles” column at MSN Money. Today he published an article about the way the government manipulates the rules of arithmetic to maintain an happy economic outlook.

Here’s the first example: unemployment. If unemployment data are calculated using the same methods that were used during the Great Depression, we would be seeing numbers more like 12%. Real (not inflation-adjusted) consumer price index is at 8%.

The information Bill is quoting is coming from an interview with economist, not composer, John Williams. That article is not yet available online, but it will be interesting to read once it is published on March 11. Until then, I’ll have to live vicariously through Bill’s interpretation of the interview.

Williams differentiates between two data-manipulation practices. One is “systemic manipulations, where methodologies are changed.” That’s done in order to align the government’s view of the world with the world, i.e., make things look better than they are. The second practice is out-and-out fudging of the data to produce whatever result is desired.

Why would the government manipulate data? What is the benefit of making the economy seem “better” than it is? Here’s one idea: Social Security is tied to the CPI. If CPI was calculated the same way it was 30 years ago, Social Security checks would be 70% higher.

Paired with Ben Stein’s article, a grim view of the future, Bill gives us a grim view of the present. Why do I always misplace my bottle of soma when it is needed?

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


About the Author

Flexo, the owner and creator of Consumerism Commentary, has been blogging and writing for the internet since 1995 and has been building online communities since 1991. Find out more about him and follow him on Twitter.

If you enjoyed this article, get the free RSS feed or get daily emails.

Join the free Consumerism Commentary newsletter. Enter your email address here to receive weekly emails with behind-the-scenes information, exclusive giveaways, and money tips.



Related Entries on Consumerism Commentary

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

1 JLP at AllThingsFinancial March 6, 2006 at 11:25 pm

I don’t care for Fleckstein. I think maybe it’s his hair.

UN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Reply to this comment

2 Herb March 7, 2006 at 4:32 pm

Why would the govt manipulate data? Oh, I don’t know… is it because very few people get re-elected when unemployment is running at 12%? Additionally, one of the big FOMC ideas with inflation is to kill the expectation of inflation. ie. if people don’t expect inflation then it’s not a problem even if there is inflation. So, you take out of the calcs all of the stuff that rises in value and voila, no inflation!

UN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Reply to this comment

Leave a Comment

Note: By submitting your comment you are agreeing to these terms and conditions. If you attempt to post spam, including promotional linking to a company website, your comment will be deleted.

Previous post: The Future Is Grim: Ben Stein

Next post: Administrative Note – I’m Fed Up