As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Tim Middleton’s Bad Mutual Funds

by Flexo on May 9, 2006

in Investing

Over on MSN Money, Timothy Middleton warns the public about seven “bad” (poor-performing, actually) mutual funds. Luckilly, I don’t own any of them. I own various types of broad index funds except for a few more specific funds offered by my 401(k) — I don’t have a choice. Anyway, Middleton has specific advice for holders of these underperforming mutual funds:
* American Funds Washington Mutual A (AWSHX): Buy
* Fidelity Growth & Income (FGRIX): Weak hold
* Templeton Foreign A (TEMFX): Buy
* Putnam Fund For Growth & Income A (PGRWX): Sell
* Janus Fund (JANSX): Hold
* Putnam Voyager A (PVOYX): Weak hold
* Fidelity Asset Manager (FASMX): Buy

As I said above, I believe in index funds. Timothy doesn’t, and is empahtically:

The efficient-markets theory asserts that nobody can beat the market because information is too freely available to give any one participant an advantage over another. That theory is bunk. Much of the information that’s available is dangerous, because it’s incomplete or otherwise flawed. And some investors never do any homework. Thank goodness for an inefficient market. A little knowledge in investing is a powerful thing.

So now that we have knowledge from the MSN Money columnist, we should expect to gain some money in the short term if we follow his advice. I don’t have the money to test him, but perhaps someone does.

VN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


About the Author

Flexo, the owner and creator of Consumerism Commentary, has been blogging and writing for the internet since 1995 and has been building online communities since 1991. Find out more about him and follow him on Twitter.

If you enjoyed this article, get the free RSS feed or get daily emails.

Join the free Consumerism Commentary newsletter. Enter your email address here to receive weekly emails with behind-the-scenes information, exclusive giveaways, and money tips.



Related Entries on Consumerism Commentary

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Doobie May 9, 2006 at 12:51 pm

Hmmmm…he lists the seven “worst” but recommends selling only one of them (Putnam Growth & Income).

UN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Reply to this comment

2 Flexo May 9, 2006 at 12:58 pm

“Worst” is in terms of recent performance relative to benchmarks. So they’ve beed bad lately, but perhaps not in the future.

UA:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Reply to this comment

3 Doobie May 9, 2006 at 4:16 pm

I know, but it’s misleading. They present it to the reader as the “worst” mutual fund(s) (implying past and future value) when it should have been presented more along the “poorest performers” line.

UN:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Reply to this comment

4 Flexo May 9, 2006 at 10:38 pm

It threw me off at first, as well.

UA:F [1.7.5_995]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Reply to this comment

Leave a Comment

Note: By submitting your comment you are agreeing to these terms and conditions. If you attempt to post spam, including promotional linking to a company website, your comment will be deleted.

Previous post: Bad Loans In China

Next post: Ten Tips For Cutting Car Expenses