<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quicken 2007?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/06/28/quicken-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/06/28/quicken-2007/</link>
	<description>A premiere personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:42:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Albert Einstein</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/06/28/quicken-2007/#comment-118863</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Einstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 05:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/06/28/quicken-2007/#comment-118863</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve loved my Quicken 2000 since 2000.
Would love to upgrade. Don&#039;t you think it&#039;s time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve loved my Quicken 2000 since 2000.<br />
Would love to upgrade. Don&#8217;t you think it&#8217;s time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda Heismann</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/06/28/quicken-2007/#comment-32618</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda Heismann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 13:38:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/06/28/quicken-2007/#comment-32618</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been looking at programs for macs, and I&#039;ve found that they tend to be more expensive and like Andy said, there&#039;s very little selection.  I know a lot of people who use only Macs, and in my experience most people who try macs (and I mean really try, not just move the mouse around once or twice) really like them.  It&#039;s the compatability and programs which smacks MacOS back down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking at programs for macs, and I&#8217;ve found that they tend to be more expensive and like Andy said, there&#8217;s very little selection.  I know a lot of people who use only Macs, and in my experience most people who try macs (and I mean really try, not just move the mouse around once or twice) really like them.  It&#8217;s the compatability and programs which smacks MacOS back down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Money Finance</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/06/28/quicken-2007/#comment-32456</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Money Finance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/06/28/quicken-2007/#comment-32456</guid>
		<description>Star Money Articles for the Week of June 26...

Here are interesting posts and news this week from the MoneyBlogNetwork members and beyond: Blueprint for Financial Prosperity notes that mutual funds are good for mutual funds. Consumerism Commentary announces Quicken 2007. AllFinancialMatters tells h...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Money Articles for the Week of June 26&#8230;</p>
<p>Here are interesting posts and news this week from the MoneyBlogNetwork members and beyond: Blueprint for Financial Prosperity notes that mutual funds are good for mutual funds. Consumerism Commentary announces Quicken 2007. AllFinancialMatters tells h&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/06/28/quicken-2007/#comment-31439</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 00:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2006/06/28/quicken-2007/#comment-31439</guid>
		<description>Upgrading Quicken annually really isn&#039;t worth the money, I&#039;ve found.  Not enough improvement (or even change) from one year to the next.  I&#039;ve been  just picking up the &quot;current&quot; version each time the one I&#039;m running at the time has been sunsetted - earlier this year I moved from 2003 to 2006 because 2003&#039;s online features were disabled, and I&#039;ll go up to 2008 when 2006 gets shut down by Intuit (if they keep the schedule the same).

I&#039;ve never heard good things about Quicken on the Mac.  Seems like Intuit is barely putting out any effort.  It&#039;s really the only application I use on my PC where I can&#039;t get a comparable product on MacOS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Upgrading Quicken annually really isn&#8217;t worth the money, I&#8217;ve found.  Not enough improvement (or even change) from one year to the next.  I&#8217;ve been  just picking up the &#8220;current&#8221; version each time the one I&#8217;m running at the time has been sunsetted &#8211; earlier this year I moved from 2003 to 2006 because 2003&#8217;s online features were disabled, and I&#8217;ll go up to 2008 when 2006 gets shut down by Intuit (if they keep the schedule the same).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never heard good things about Quicken on the Mac.  Seems like Intuit is barely putting out any effort.  It&#8217;s really the only application I use on my PC where I can&#8217;t get a comparable product on MacOS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
