Bipolar Landlords: Revoking Credit Card Rent Payments

For the second time since moving into this apartment several years ago, the landlord (a national corporation, not an individual or a family) has decided to stop accepting credit cards for rent payments.

While I suppose this is good for tenants who don’t pay their full credit card balance every month, but I’ll no longer be able to accrue cash back rewards on my rent payment.

When I came home this evening, a note was attached to my doorknob. This is the method of communication the apartment manager prefers. The note reads:

Just a reminder the effective April 1st we will no longer be able to process credit/debit cards for rent. If you had an auto-pay set up it will no longer charge to your account.

Please stop by the office to setup Express Rent Debit or you may use check or certified funds for payments.

Thanking you again for your assistance with the above.

Besides the embarrassing grammar, this is not a reminder. This is the first I’ve heard about it. Nevertheless, I’ll just have them automatically debit my ING Direct savings account. The last time they revoked the credit card method of rent payment, they reinstated it without alerting me. I’m not much concerned about what they do in the future this time around, as with any luck I’ll be moving out in a few months.

Scroll down to read 9 comments on “Bipolar Landlords: Revoking Credit Card Rent Payments.”

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share!
Add to: Tip'd | Facebook | Delicious | Reddit | Digg

Get the RSS feed or enter your email address:

Related Entries on Consumerism Commentary

9 Comments on “Bipolar Landlords: Revoking Credit Card Rent Payments.” To add your own comment, scroll down.

  1. #1: Jeremy Bettis
    Tuesday, March 27, 2007
    9:03 pm (reply)

    I am not really surprised, it is rather expensive to process credit card payments. Perhaps at first the losses due to credit card fees were not as much as the bounced checks and late payments that were prevented, but probably too many of their good tenants signed up for the credit card payment option, and now it is loosing money for them.

  2. #2: limeade
    Tuesday, March 27, 2007
    9:22 pm (reply)

    I can’t understand why they wouldn’t allow a payment from a credit card. As long as they get there money I don’t see why they’d care if it were a check or from Visa. I guess they must have some reason.

  3. #3: dakboy
    Tuesday, March 27, 2007
    10:35 pm (reply)

    Yep, processing credit cards adds up. That company owns approx. 240,000 units (per their website). To make the math easy, let’s say you’re paying a processing fee of 2% on each transaction, if each unit rents for $1000/month, you’re losing $400,000 per year to processing fees.

    I work for a similar company (but much smaller) and just cutting our check-processing time by a single day means over $100,000 per year in extra interest earned, from what I heard in one meeting. So your apartment’s management company is looking at a huge savings by dropping credit card payments.

  4. #4: Flexo
    Tuesday, March 27, 2007
    10:49 pm (reply)

    That’s assuming they aren’t paying massive bank fees for bounced checks from tenants. When they made the decision to reinstate credit card payments last year, they must have done that for a financial reason as well.

    Dealing with the receipt of checks is also much more of an administrative hassle than credit cards. So, while I’m sure they made the decision from a purely financial standpoint (ie., not customer service), there are other financial aspects to consider other than just the credit card processing fee.

  5. #5: KMC
    Wednesday, March 28, 2007
    10:27 am (reply)

    Typical of most large companies, someone in the finance department of your landlord’s company came up with the brilliant idea to just get rid of those pesky fees to Visa. When companies do this, they typically neglect to look at the other side of the equation where doing something adds costs elsewhere.
    My guess is costs will rise because of these other factors people have mentioned and they’ll go back to accepting credit cards. But not until the genius who made this decision is given a nice fat bonus for “saving the company hundreds of thousands of dollars a year.”

  6. #6: Free Money Finance
    Friday, March 30, 2007
    6:20 am (reply)
  7. #7: Barb
    Friday, March 30, 2007
    4:13 pm (reply)

    My landlord actually accepts PayPal, which kind of blows me away. Very convenient for me, though.

  8. #8: » Personal Balance Sheet, March 2007 ($87,999, +13.81%) on Consumerism Commentary: A Personal Finance Blog
    Sunday, April 1, 2007
    10:36 pm (reply)
  9. #9: » I Got Hit With a $4 Bank Fee From Wachovia on Consumerism Commentary: A Personal Finance Blog
    Tuesday, April 17, 2007
    7:40 pm (reply)

Leave a Comment

Enter your comments below. Please note: Use of a non-personal web site or blog in the field below and/or comments that are off-topic, personal attacks, or support requests will likely be removed at my discretion.

Copyright of comments belongs to the comment author, but I reserve the right to edit comments for formatting or content.

Add a photo or icon to your comment by creating an account on Gravatar.

Welcome to Consumerism Commentary

Consumerism Commentary is a blog for men and women who wish to make the most of their financial lives. Read more about Consumerism Commentary.


FNBO Direct
Cash Loans

Credit Card Offers

Recent Comments

FNBO Direct

Best of Consumerism Commentary

Recent Articles

Recent Topics on C3 Forums

Popular on pfblogs.org

Subscribe via E-mail

Tip'd
TradeKing.com

Contributors

Disclaimer

The authors of Consumerism Commentary are not professional financial advisers and no text within this website should be considered financial advice. Any individual who makes financial decisions based solely on the information contained within does so at his or her own risk. Always consult a financial professional.

About Advertising

This website contains advertisements, usually listed as “sponsors.” Some links are for products or services for which Consumerism Commentary is an "affiliate." No articles within the blog are advertisements disguised as blog entries. Consumerism Commentary is not compensated for any content, except for advertising sold. This site contains no Pay-Per-Post (or similar) articles.

Privacy Policy

Carnival of Personal Finance