New York Times Says It’s Better to Rent Than Buy

Yikes. Yesterday I was discussing my living options, and I’m thinking about buying a condominium when my lease is up. I’ve been in this apartment for longer than I had originally planned, and I can probably afford a modest condo.

Rent or Buy?According to a calculator offered by the New York Times, it makes more financial sense to keep renting. If you click the image, you can see the full results.

Assuming my rent at $901 increases 4% a year, a condo price of $215,000, a down payment of 20%, a mortgage rate of 6.25%, and property taxes of 4%, and a condo appreciation rate of 2%, it will never pay off to buy.

There are a bunch of assumptions, and it’s hard to say what the true scenario would be. By adjusting the sliders, changing the condo appreciation to 7%, it would be more profitable to buy after the 6th year of ownership. There are advanced settings, such as condo fees, deduction of fees, and annual renovation costs, but I didn’t adjust these in my short experiment.

What I would hope is that the general market will see the benefits of renting, so there is a possibility of keeping house prices down while I go through the process of buying.

Aside from the money, one thing holding me back from buying is the lack of the desire to stay in the area. Yet, I am still here.

Scroll down to read 19 comments on “New York Times Says It’s Better to Rent Than Buy.”

Add to: Facebook | Delicious | Reddit | Digg
Get the RSS feed or enter your email address:


Related Entries on Consumerism Commentary

19 Comments on “New York Times Says It’s Better to Rent Than Buy.” To add your own comment, scroll down.

  1. Comment #1 by Dan (reply)
    April 13th, 2007 at 11:25 am

    “Assuming my rent at $901 …it will never pay off to rent.”

    i think you meant it will never pay off to buy.

  2. Comment #2 by Flexo (reply)
    April 13th, 2007 at 11:31 am

    Thanks for catching that. :-)

  3. Comment #3 by brett (reply)
    April 13th, 2007 at 11:31 am

    You state “Assuming my rent at $901 increases 4% a year, a condo price of $215,000, a down payment of 20%, a mortgage rate of 6.25%, and property taxes of 4%, and a condo appreciation rate of 2%, it will never pay off to rent”

    So why is does your title state it is better to rent than to buy?

  4. Comment #4 by Nick (reply)
    April 13th, 2007 at 11:58 am

    Maybe it’s better to buy somewhere where the property taxes aren’t 4%!

  5. Comment #5 by MillionDollarJourney.com (reply)
    April 13th, 2007 at 12:23 pm

    Perhaps with the down turn in the US real estate market, you can pick up a deal sometime in the near future.

    FT

  6. Comment #6 by Matt (reply)
    April 13th, 2007 at 12:48 pm

    I’m not sure this factors in the income tax savings you can receive when you purchase a house.

  7. Comment #7 by Flexo (reply)
    April 13th, 2007 at 1:05 pm

    Matt: It does—check the advanced settings under “Buying” and the methodology page. It does assume that for the renting scenario, the amount you would drop as a down payment would be invested.

  8. Comment #8 by Flexo (reply)
    April 13th, 2007 at 2:38 pm

    In regards to the appreciation assumption, I wouldn’t be surprised if prices are somewhat flat around here the next few years.

    Robin: I agree with houses vs. condos. I’m not sure if it makes sense to wait and save up to buy a house in a few years rather than finding a condo this year.

  9. Comment #9 by corey (reply)
    April 13th, 2007 at 10:52 pm

    How depressing. I just hope they don’t turn my new apartment into condos like last time. I can’t believe people are actually buying converted units like that, and paying “homeowner association” dues on top.

  10. Comment #10 by Robin (reply)
    April 15th, 2007 at 3:28 pm

    Flexo: depends on your budget. What can you afford to spend on a house?

  11. Trackback #11 by Weekend Personal Finance Review (reply)
    April 15th, 2007 at 6:56 pm
  12. Trackback #12 by fivecentnickel.com (reply)
    April 15th, 2007 at 7:23 pm
  13. Trackback #13 by fivecentnickel.com (reply)
    April 15th, 2007 at 9:33 pm
  14. Comment #14 by Virginia (reply)
    April 16th, 2007 at 8:43 pm

    I know that I am a few days late to this conversation, but it IS on the “most popular links” bar.

    In my opinion, real estate will be flat to negative for the foreseeable future. The recent runups were only supported by temporarily low interest rates and the issuance of suicide loans by lenders who simply sold these loans, either to Fannie Mae or to Wall Street as “mortgage-backed securities”.

    Fannie Mae has stopped buying these loans and are forcing buy-backs of many. Wall Street is filing lawsuits over fraudulent applications and wants nothing to do with these toxic securities any longer. The currently sky-high prices are NOT supported by incomes and are, therefore, unsustainable. Your calculator was right, Flexo.

    For more information on the real estate market, go to http://www.patrick.net.

  15. Comment #15 by Willster (reply)
    April 24th, 2007 at 12:56 am

    Wow, this is very surprising! I always just assumed that I was paying a premium for my apartment renting, throwing my money away into a bottomless pit with no tangible return.

    But for me it’s more about the hassle. I don’t really anticipate staying in one location for more than a few years at a time, nor do I really like the idea of being tied down to a specific area.

  16. Comment #16 by Jonathan C (reply)
    April 26th, 2007 at 10:33 am

    Here are my two cents. I put together a little spreadsheet calculator, not totally unlike the billion that are out there. This one is specific to my income, and housing/renting market.

    For background, I am an electrical engineer in central Iowa. We were never fortunate enough to be swept away in a real estate run-up in the past 10-15 years here, and there appears to be less of a softening in the market as a result. We’ve just seen very steady 4-5% average annual appreciation per year, including 2006. The latest Story County assesor’s news release reported an average of 10% increase in assessed residential properties, but I think that is a bit high.

    The Iowa median home value is $76,346—well below the national level of $136,625. Median income is $38k. We have a lower-than average unemployment rate of 3.9%, versus the national average of 5.7%—so there are more per capita “potential” homeowners.

    Spreadsheet Setup: A month-to-month balance sheet showing total assets and liabilities.

    Constants: Our “effective” property tax rate is about 1.75% on a large 4-bedroom home for which we paid
    $185,000. We have two children and a 3rd on the way, so this size makes sense. We have a 15-year fixed-rate loan at 5% for 80% of the value of the home, we pitched in the 20% down payment. We also budget $41/month per month in home insurance and $50/month for miscellaneous maintenance costs that do not add value to the home. It is a new construction, so this is a pretty reasonable assumption. We don’t factor in any income tax benefit from mortgage interest. For the rental scenario, which requires less month-to-month cash outflow, any additional cash up to the total outflow from the mortgage scenario is assumed to accrue 5% interest. Conservative, but safe.

    Variables: The only variables are the rent payment and home appreciation rate.

    My “Personal” Break-Even Point Results: I thought a table would best consolidate the data for each scenario. These results, if nothing more, emphasize that homeownership should be for the longer-term.

    Break-Even Year Rent Apprec. Rate
    2 $1500 4%
    5 $1350 4%
    10 $1200 4%
    2 $1750 2%
    5 $1650 2%
    10 $1500 2%
    2 $1150 6%
    5 $1025 6%
    10 $825 6%

  17. Comment #17 by Jonathan C (reply)
    April 26th, 2007 at 10:40 am

    I thought I’d also throw in what typical rents are in my area. Singles can get by really easily for $300-$600 per month for a room according to the Ames Tribune classifieds. But for a family, renting a home or 4-bedroom apartment ranges from $850-$1500.

  18. Comment #18 by Jonathan C (reply)
    April 26th, 2007 at 10:43 am

    Argh. In my first post, that should be read

    Break-Even Year/Rent/Apprec. Rate
    2/%1500/4%
    etc.

  19. Trackback #19 by » Weekly Blog Roundup, Quick Edition on Consumerism Commentary: A Personal Finance Blog (reply)
    July 6th, 2007 at 2:14 pm

Leave a Comment

Enter your comments below. Please note: Use of a non-personal web site or blog in the field below and/or comments that are off-topic, personal attacks, or support requests will likely be removed at my discretion.

Copyright of comments belongs to the comment author, but I reserve the right to edit comments for formatting or content.

Add a photo or icon to your comment by creating an account on Gravatar.

Welcome to Consumerism Commentary

Consumerism Commentary is a blog for men and women who wish to make the most of their financial lives. Read more about Consumerism Commentary.


Cash Loans
SmartyPig. The Social Side of Savings

Advertise on Consumerism Commentary

Credit Card Offers

FNBO Direct

Recent Comments

Best of Consumerism Commentary

Recent Articles

Popular on pfblogs.org

Subscribe via E-mail

TradeKing.com

Contributors

Disclaimer

The authors of Consumerism Commentary are not professional financial advisers and no text within this website should be considered financial advice. Any individual who makes financial decisions based solely on the information contained within does so at his or her own risk. Always consult a financial professional.

About Advertising

This website contains advertisements, usually listed as “sponsors.” Some links are for products or services for which Consumerism Commentary is an "affiliate." No articles within the blog are advertisements disguised as blog entries. Consumerism Commentary is not compensated for any content, except for advertising sold. This site contains no Pay-Per-Post (or similar) articles.

Privacy Policy

Carnival of Personal Finance