<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pseudo-Savings Option: GE Interest Plus Account</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/06/pseudo-savings-option-ge-interest-plus-account/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/06/pseudo-savings-option-ge-interest-plus-account/</link>
	<description>A premiere personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:42:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tbrick</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/06/pseudo-savings-option-ge-interest-plus-account/#comment-122856</link>
		<dc:creator>tbrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 13:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/06/pseudo-savings-option-ge-interest-plus-account/#comment-122856</guid>
		<description>I have been with them since inception and find it to be a great place to invest.  Always higher rates than C.D&#039;s, and you can withdraw any amnt at any time.  Sure there is some risk, but I havent lost a dime in over 20 years with them......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been with them since inception and find it to be a great place to invest.  Always higher rates than C.D&#8217;s, and you can withdraw any amnt at any time.  Sure there is some risk, but I havent lost a dime in over 20 years with them&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dong</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/06/pseudo-savings-option-ge-interest-plus-account/#comment-116796</link>
		<dc:creator>dong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 14:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/06/pseudo-savings-option-ge-interest-plus-account/#comment-116796</guid>
		<description>Hmm, seems interesting, but I wonder how much of discount you might be getting in comparison to investing in GE Commercial Paper directly (not that most individuals would or should).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, seems interesting, but I wonder how much of discount you might be getting in comparison to investing in GE Commercial Paper directly (not that most individuals would or should).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/06/pseudo-savings-option-ge-interest-plus-account/#comment-116793</link>
		<dc:creator>kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/06/pseudo-savings-option-ge-interest-plus-account/#comment-116793</guid>
		<description>And I was right, they do pay more than an average money market (which is good -- you need to be compensated for credit concentration).

&quot;Rates will always be greater than the most recent sevenÃ¢â‚¬â€œday average yield (non-compounded) for taxable money market funds in the United States as published in Money Fund Report (TM) a service of iMoneyNet, Inc. (Formerly IBC&#039;s Money Fund Report).&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I was right, they do pay more than an average money market (which is good &#8212; you need to be compensated for credit concentration).</p>
<p>&#8220;Rates will always be greater than the most recent sevenÃ¢â‚¬â€œday average yield (non-compounded) for taxable money market funds in the United States as published in Money Fund Report (TM) a service of iMoneyNet, Inc. (Formerly IBC&#8217;s Money Fund Report).&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/06/pseudo-savings-option-ge-interest-plus-account/#comment-116792</link>
		<dc:creator>kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 13:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/06/pseudo-savings-option-ge-interest-plus-account/#comment-116792</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a fascinating way for a company to reduce their debt expense.  It&#039;s basically a money market account, complete with some  of the restrictions on check writing (I bet most MM accounts hold a lot of short term GE paper).  Accordingly, there is concentration risk here, so I would hope to make more from GE than from a standard money market account.  However, I still think that a tax free money market account is still the way to go for those in high income tax brackets.  For instance, the Vanguard Tax Exempt money market fund is currently yielding 3.64% after tax, or 5.43% pre-tax for those in the 33% tax bracket and 5.05% for those in the 28% tax bracket.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a fascinating way for a company to reduce their debt expense.  It&#8217;s basically a money market account, complete with some  of the restrictions on check writing (I bet most MM accounts hold a lot of short term GE paper).  Accordingly, there is concentration risk here, so I would hope to make more from GE than from a standard money market account.  However, I still think that a tax free money market account is still the way to go for those in high income tax brackets.  For instance, the Vanguard Tax Exempt money market fund is currently yielding 3.64% after tax, or 5.43% pre-tax for those in the 33% tax bracket and 5.05% for those in the 28% tax bracket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
