<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Think You Pay High Fees?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/16/think-you-pay-high-fees/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/16/think-you-pay-high-fees/</link>
	<description>A premiere personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:42:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dnn</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/16/think-you-pay-high-fees/#comment-117150</link>
		<dc:creator>dnn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/16/think-you-pay-high-fees/#comment-117150</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think i could go through 90+ :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think i could go through 90+ :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flexo</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/16/think-you-pay-high-fees/#comment-117139</link>
		<dc:creator>Flexo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 01:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/16/think-you-pay-high-fees/#comment-117139</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s understood that the &quot;cost per trade&quot; in accounts is not really a transaction fee for each trade, but a way of breaking down the total fees by a measurement that makes sense to most people -- the same way a car&#039;s expenses can be broken down as a car&#039;s &quot;cost per mile,&quot; which takes all expenses into account and then breaks them down in a way in which the costs can be compared across cars.  Also, a piece of clothing&#039;s &quot;cost per wear&quot; doesn&#039;t mean you have to pay that amount each time you wear it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s understood that the &#8220;cost per trade&#8221; in accounts is not really a transaction fee for each trade, but a way of breaking down the total fees by a measurement that makes sense to most people &#8212; the same way a car&#8217;s expenses can be broken down as a car&#8217;s &#8220;cost per mile,&#8221; which takes all expenses into account and then breaks them down in a way in which the costs can be compared across cars.  Also, a piece of clothing&#8217;s &#8220;cost per wear&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean you have to pay that amount each time you wear it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dong</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/16/think-you-pay-high-fees/#comment-117138</link>
		<dc:creator>dong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 00:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/16/think-you-pay-high-fees/#comment-117138</guid>
		<description>I think the article is a little misleading about the cost per trade.  I imagine UBS accounts mentioned were in Wrap account where they charge a fixed percentage of assets.  So dividing that cost by the number of trades is inaccurate.  Clearly the company has incentive to sell clients the most expensive product just as a car dealership tries to sell a car with options the client doesn&#039;t need.  In itself this not a problem, however often times clients are misled by unscrupulous agents to buy things that they don&#039;t understand.   The article here doesn&#039;t give enough to detail to know what really happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the article is a little misleading about the cost per trade.  I imagine UBS accounts mentioned were in Wrap account where they charge a fixed percentage of assets.  So dividing that cost by the number of trades is inaccurate.  Clearly the company has incentive to sell clients the most expensive product just as a car dealership tries to sell a car with options the client doesn&#8217;t need.  In itself this not a problem, however often times clients are misled by unscrupulous agents to buy things that they don&#8217;t understand.   The article here doesn&#8217;t give enough to detail to know what really happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
