Top Ten Used Cars Under $10,000

If you have $10,000 available to spend on a car, cars.com has suggestions for you with a recent top ten list. Here’s their methodology:

[W]e crunched retail values for late-model used cars and factored in reliability ratings, safety equipment and crash-test scores. Using those criteria, what began as a list of 215 contenders from 2002 onward shrank to 40 finalists. To pare things down further, we solicited our experts for opinions on each car—things like gas mileage, cabin comfort and driving refinement. Finally, we took a hard look at how many of these used cars had key safety features like side-impact airbags and antilock brakes installed.

It seems to me that the list was designed to include the latest model available around $10,000 for each of the brands. Otherwise, we might have seen two different years of the Honda Accord (or, for that matter, of the Ford Focus). Here is the list.

  1. 2005 Ford Focus
  2. 2005 Ford Taurus
  3. 2003 Mazda Protegé
  4. 2003 Mercury Sable
  5. 2002 Buick LeSabre
  6. 2002 Chevrolet Impala
  7. 2002 Ford Windstar
  8. 2002 Honda Accord
  9. 2002 Honda Civic
  1. 2002 Oldsmobile Aurora

    Before you go and buy a car based on this list, check Consumer Reports which may provide more information on the quality of these vehicles.

Scroll down to read 15 comments on “Top Ten Used Cars Under $10,000.”

Related Entries on Consumerism Commentary

15 Comments on “Top Ten Used Cars Under $10,000.” To add your own comment, scroll down.

  1. Comment #1 by The Happy Rock (reply)
    August 7th, 2007 at 12:31 pm

    I had some many problems with my two year old ford focus, it made me quickly run back to Japanese cars.

    I would have a hard time not buying a used honda, toyota or nissan when I go to buy a car for around 4k -5k when mine 1994 Nissan finally goes.

  2. Comment #2 by Pinyo (reply)
    August 7th, 2007 at 2:00 pm

    I think used American cars are the best value. I have a 98 Ford Contour that still runs just fine. Had to fix it a few times, but nothing expensive.

    If I buy new, I like Japanese. Generally, I don’t spend more than $25k on a car. I may be lowering that limit soon.

  3. Comment #3 by beth (reply)
    August 7th, 2007 at 4:51 pm

    I’d like to be a witness for a car maker that didn’t make the list: Hyundai. Consumer Reports quite likes them from about 2004 on. I hear the crash results aren’t stellar (good thing I have a short commute and try to do it by car only a couple times per week!).

    However I got my 2005 car in 2006, with 15,000 miles on it, for $6k. And it runs great, and gets good gas mileage.

  4. Comment #4 by Jon (reply)
    August 7th, 2007 at 9:50 pm

    I agree with the Mazda Protege. I have had mine for over six years and it is a wonderful car. They are a good bargain used, are fun to drive and reliable. Pretty good gas mileage too.

  5. Comment #5 by James (reply)
    August 7th, 2007 at 10:50 pm

    Given Ford’s recent number of recalls, loss of market share and other issues. The fact that Ford products take the top two spots is surprising to me.

    It would be terrific if they were making a comeback, but I’m still skeptical.

    Best,

    James

  6. Comment #6 by Brad (reply)
    August 8th, 2007 at 3:56 pm

    I’m also skeptical about the Fords in the top 2 spots. If Ford was making great cars in 2005, their market share wouldn’t be suffering the way it is today.

  7. Comment #7 by xshanex (reply)
    August 9th, 2007 at 2:02 am

    I cannot believe that the ford focus is on the list at #1. My girlfriends well maintained 3 year old focus with 60k miles was falling apart when she traded it in ($14k new and $3.5k trade-in). She tried to keep it going to get more mileage out of it but when the transmission was on its way out and the car had a tendency to stall out every once in a while while on the freeway or on off-ramps. 60k miles in a for focus equals CV joints going out, window quit working, bad tranny, stalling, poor dealer support, broken off interior pieces, and 2 sets of rotors

    The ford windstar is also a bad idea as I have had several acquaintances who had them and they were very trouble prone

  8. Comment #8 by The Happy Rock (reply)
    August 9th, 2007 at 10:44 am

    I didn’t have as many problems as your girlfriend, but I had dumped at almost 2k into a 3 year old car. I bought it for 9k and traded for 6k a year later. I got a deal on the trade in(above blue book), be cause Car Sense in PA is a nice company. Even as I traded it in, the engine light was on as the door handles failed to open the doors sometimes.

    The whole year cost me almost 5k, although it did allow me to pay cash for that car and the Nissan we got after the Focus. Which was the whole point. I bought the Focus, because lists like this one continually give the Focus good rating even in reliability.

  9. Trackback #9 by » Weekly Reads: Bonds Hits 756, Mets Fan Catches Payday » Blueprint for Financial Prosperity (reply)
    August 11th, 2007 at 3:13 am
  10. Comment #10 by Anitra (reply)
    August 13th, 2007 at 1:55 pm

    I have a 2002 Ford Focus that I’ve had for three years. I haven’t had any problems with it (other than replacing a side mirror that some college kid knocked off). My husband has a Ford Ranger. Both of them are still in pretty good shape; I think a deciding factor in the longevity of U.S. cars (Ford, GM, Chrysler) is whether you get an automatic transmission or a manual. All the automatics my family has owned had problems. All the manuals we were able to run into the ground; most of them lasted until their 10th “birthday”, if not longer.

  11. Comment #11 by The Happy Rock (reply)
    August 13th, 2007 at 2:15 pm

    Anitra,

    That is an interesting point about manual vs automatic. My 94 sentra is manual and my junker 2002 focus was automatic, so your theory holds! I will have to take notice of this in the future.

  12. Comment #12 by NIck Post (reply)
    August 28th, 2007 at 11:52 am

    Hey, my 2000 Focus is in the shop right now. The dealer is looking into whether I get to have the recalled fuel pump replaced or if they will wait until I’m more stranded than we have been lately.

    Sticking to Japanese from now on. Oh, and maybe a Saab for me. I dunno.

    Fun car reading: beaterreview dot com

  13. Comment #13 by Chairman Kaga (reply)
    January 14th, 2008 at 4:47 pm

    I had an ‘02 Focus SVT for all of six months. In that time the brakes needed replacing after a few months(expected wear and tear, but the replacements were far more expensive than they should have been, and this comes from a former Integra Type-R driver), the transmission would regularly stick in second and fourth gear (no mechanic could ever sort out the linkage), the dual-stage intake assembly broke ($900 with labor) and the ECU was “failing”, requiring an almost $4000 full replacement. At that time I bit the bullet and traded it in at a loss (rolled in $3k) for an ‘05 Saab 9-2X Aero, which is actually just a rebadged Subaru WRX wagon and reliable as an old boot, to boot. The SVT was a blast to drive and wonderfully practical – when it was running. Otherwise it was the biggest POS I’ve ever owned.
    My suggestion – find an unmolested Civic EX or a Protege, or if you’re feeling a little quirky an Impreza or Legacy. Plenty of those for under $10K!

  14. Comment #14 by RUNGO (reply)
    February 23rd, 2008 at 7:24 pm

    PLEASE NEVER NEVER NEVER BUY A CADILLAC CATERA THATS TRASH!!!!!!!!

  15. Comment #15 by swiftjustice44 (reply)
    April 25th, 2008 at 7:50 pm

    Oh please…the Mazda is a maintainence nightmare, the Focus is a disposable car. Buying a used car is a crap shoot and the longevity depends on how the vehicle was driven AND maintained BEFORE you bought it. FWD cars will seldom hold up the way a rear wheel drive car will. Transverse engines, trans-axles and CV joints just don’t take the same abuse that traditional drive trains can. Add to that, the majority of Americans don’t do the most rudimentary routine checks of oil, tire pressure, a/t filters and the result is a bunch of cars that don’t make it long.

Leave a Comment

Enter your comments below. Please note: Use of a non-personal web site or blog in the field below and/or comments that are off-topic, personal attacks, or support requests will likely be removed at my discretion.

Copyright of comments belongs to the comment author, but I reserve the right to edit comments for formatting or content.

Add a photo or icon to your comment by creating an account on Gravatar.

Welcome to Consumerism Commentary

Consumerism Commentary is a blog for men and women who wish to make the most of their financial lives. Read more about Consumerism Commentary.

Contributors

Subscribe via E-mail

Recent Comments

Best of Consumerism Commentary

Recent Articles

Popular on pfblogs.org

Disclaimer

The authors of Consumerism Commentary are not professional financial advisers and no text within this website should be considered financial advice. Any individual who makes financial decisions based solely on the information contained within does so at his or her own risk. Always consult a financial professional.

About Advertising

This website contains advertisements, usually listed as “sponsors.” Some links are for products or services for which Consumerism Commentary is an "affiliate." No articles within the blog are advertisements disguised as blog entries. Consumerism Commentary is not compensated for any content, except for advertising sold. This site contains no Pay-Per-Post (or similar) articles.

Privacy Policy

Carnival of Personal Finance