<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google, or: Why I&#8217;ll Never Be Good at Stock Predictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/</link>
	<description>A premiere personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:42:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roundup for week of 7 October 2007: Back in the Saddle Edition at Mighty Bargain Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119462</link>
		<dc:creator>Roundup for week of 7 October 2007: Back in the Saddle Edition at Mighty Bargain Hunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 06:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119462</guid>
		<description>[...] Commentary underestimated how high GOOG would go.&#160; (So did I &#8212; my target was even lower than [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Commentary underestimated how high GOOG would go.&nbsp; (So did I &#8212; my target was even lower than [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Free Money Finance</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119427</link>
		<dc:creator>Free Money Finance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119427</guid>
		<description>Star Money Articles for the Week of October 8...

Here are some recent interesting posts from the MoneyBlogNetwork and beyond: MightyBargainHunter is alive! Five Cent Nickel got called by a collection agency. Blueprint for Financial Prosperity tells how to calculate the taxable equivalent yield. No Cr...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Star Money Articles for the Week of October 8&#8230;</p>
<p>Here are some recent interesting posts from the MoneyBlogNetwork and beyond: MightyBargainHunter is alive! Five Cent Nickel got called by a collection agency. Blueprint for Financial Prosperity tells how to calculate the taxable equivalent yield. No Cr&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbhunter</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119422</link>
		<dc:creator>mbhunter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 01:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119422</guid>
		<description>Shoot, I thought its start at $90 was too high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shoot, I thought its start at $90 was too high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lazy Man</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119391</link>
		<dc:creator>Lazy Man</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119391</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s never about the flat price of the stock, it&#039;s about price/earnings and market capitalization.  Warren Buffet has a company with a high stock number, and it just keeps getting higher :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s never about the flat price of the stock, it&#8217;s about price/earnings and market capitalization.  Warren Buffet has a company with a high stock number, and it just keeps getting higher :-).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franco</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119369</link>
		<dc:creator>franco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 05:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119369</guid>
		<description>Wow, short GOOG.....???? I need to start a trading 101 class. Obviously, at some point it will go down and everyone will say I told you so after the stock runs from 400 to 700+ before the end of the year. But look at the great trading opportunity you all are missing. To short GOOG the smart way would be through options, which at this point does not support an extended downturn. A little pullback possible soon, then earnings release next week, which should be blown away. $700 here we come. Shorts will get squeezed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, short GOOG&#8230;..???? I need to start a trading 101 class. Obviously, at some point it will go down and everyone will say I told you so after the stock runs from 400 to 700+ before the end of the year. But look at the great trading opportunity you all are missing. To short GOOG the smart way would be through options, which at this point does not support an extended downturn. A little pullback possible soon, then earnings release next week, which should be blown away. $700 here we come. Shorts will get squeezed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creative Investor</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119355</link>
		<dc:creator>Creative Investor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119355</guid>
		<description>I guess I&#039;ll my 2 cents in here and agree with what everybody else had said, I definitely had and still have the same sentiment about Google: a phenomenal company that huge growth prospects, but will it keep growing at the same rate? At what point investors will lose confidence in it and it will crash (not necessarily through the fault of its own, just the hype that investors built around it)? I just hope than when it does crash I&#039;ll have the guts to get in at that point.

Even though I&#039;m still afraid to buy it now, I definitely would short it. Betting against the company that promises to &quot;do no evil&quot;? Come on now. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I&#8217;ll my 2 cents in here and agree with what everybody else had said, I definitely had and still have the same sentiment about Google: a phenomenal company that huge growth prospects, but will it keep growing at the same rate? At what point investors will lose confidence in it and it will crash (not necessarily through the fault of its own, just the hype that investors built around it)? I just hope than when it does crash I&#8217;ll have the guts to get in at that point.</p>
<p>Even though I&#8217;m still afraid to buy it now, I definitely would short it. Betting against the company that promises to &#8220;do no evil&#8221;? Come on now. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hank</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119352</link>
		<dc:creator>hank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 22:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119352</guid>
		<description>Boy howdy - Have you seen &quot;Frequency&quot; with Dennis Quaid?  Same thing, a quote in there about Yahoo during his time travel experience...  20/20, it will ALWAYS be 20/20.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy howdy &#8211; Have you seen &#8220;Frequency&#8221; with Dennis Quaid?  Same thing, a quote in there about Yahoo during his time travel experience&#8230;  20/20, it will ALWAYS be 20/20.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FinanceAndFat</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119335</link>
		<dc:creator>FinanceAndFat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 03:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119335</guid>
		<description>Yep, I had the exact opinion. Until it was in the 400s and I started to understand why. I think most people just didn&#039;t get how successful GOOG could be with those silly little text ads, I know I didn&#039;t understand it when I should have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, I had the exact opinion. Until it was in the 400s and I started to understand why. I think most people just didn&#8217;t get how successful GOOG could be with those silly little text ads, I know I didn&#8217;t understand it when I should have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SingleGuyMoney</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119333</link>
		<dc:creator>SingleGuyMoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119333</guid>
		<description>I almost bought at $400 but I thought it would not go much higher. You are right, hindsight is 20/20.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I almost bought at $400 but I thought it would not go much higher. You are right, hindsight is 20/20.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119331</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119331</guid>
		<description>Hey that&#039;s better than this one guy I know.  A good family friend of ours, who is actually a pretty savvy investor and a VERY wealthy individual, thought that the Google IPO was a joke and obscenely overpriced.  He shorted the stock and lost (presumably) hundreds of thousands if not more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey that&#8217;s better than this one guy I know.  A good family friend of ours, who is actually a pretty savvy investor and a VERY wealthy individual, thought that the Google IPO was a joke and obscenely overpriced.  He shorted the stock and lost (presumably) hundreds of thousands if not more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retro</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119330</link>
		<dc:creator>retro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119330</guid>
		<description>...there&#039;s only one google, hundreds of dot-bombs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;there&#8217;s only one google, hundreds of dot-bombs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119327</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119327</guid>
		<description>oh GOOG, how you mock thee! It&#039;s been an ongoing joke since the IPO with my friend about the growth of this stock. We are both in the search business, and were extremely high on it being successful, however just out of college we didn&#039;t have money. I played with the notion of getting a Credit Card Loan to buy some stock, but never went through. &quot;Glad I didn&#039;t buy when it was $150&quot; is how we greet each other on days like this. 

GOOG is a giant, and it is entirely reasonable that this stock moves even closer to (dare I say) 1k. However, there will be a fall as the numbers just don&#039;t add up. There is a GOOG bubble, it&#039;s just a matter of how long you want to ride and if you know when to get off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh GOOG, how you mock thee! It&#8217;s been an ongoing joke since the IPO with my friend about the growth of this stock. We are both in the search business, and were extremely high on it being successful, however just out of college we didn&#8217;t have money. I played with the notion of getting a Credit Card Loan to buy some stock, but never went through. &#8220;Glad I didn&#8217;t buy when it was $150&#8243; is how we greet each other on days like this. </p>
<p>GOOG is a giant, and it is entirely reasonable that this stock moves even closer to (dare I say) 1k. However, there will be a fall as the numbers just don&#8217;t add up. There is a GOOG bubble, it&#8217;s just a matter of how long you want to ride and if you know when to get off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119325</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119325</guid>
		<description>I kick myself when I think about Google stock. I was VERY close to pulling the trigger on the first day of trading, but something kept telling me that it was more hype than anything, and it wouldn&#039;t sustain the high price. 

Then a few months go by, a year, and longer... and I wish I would have bought even 10 shares. Oh well, that is the way the cookie crumbles. I&#039;ll have to settle for owning some of it in a few of my mutual funds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kick myself when I think about Google stock. I was VERY close to pulling the trigger on the first day of trading, but something kept telling me that it was more hype than anything, and it wouldn&#8217;t sustain the high price. </p>
<p>Then a few months go by, a year, and longer&#8230; and I wish I would have bought even 10 shares. Oh well, that is the way the cookie crumbles. I&#8217;ll have to settle for owning some of it in a few of my mutual funds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: franco</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119324</link>
		<dc:creator>franco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119324</guid>
		<description>In the case of GOOG. The stock has always been inexpensive in valuation comnpared to their peers. I have been hopping in and out of the stock at various price points for sometime. My final position was bought at $454 since it&#039;s P/E was lower than say Amazon.com, but the forward growth rate was relatively high. So come on $700, I am waiting!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the case of GOOG. The stock has always been inexpensive in valuation comnpared to their peers. I have been hopping in and out of the stock at various price points for sometime. My final position was bought at $454 since it&#8217;s P/E was lower than say Amazon.com, but the forward growth rate was relatively high. So come on $700, I am waiting!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: klerg</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119322</link>
		<dc:creator>klerg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 13:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/10/09/google-or-why-ill-never-be-good-at-stock-predictions/#comment-119322</guid>
		<description>While I was a nay-sayer on Google&#039;s stock, I still believe that will go down someday and go down hard.  I have a tech mutual fund that has 4.08% of it&#039;s dough invested in Google and I myself am comfortable own that much of the company&#039;s stock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I was a nay-sayer on Google&#8217;s stock, I still believe that will go down someday and go down hard.  I have a tech mutual fund that has 4.08% of it&#8217;s dough invested in Google and I myself am comfortable own that much of the company&#8217;s stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
