<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2007 Charitable Donations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/31/2007-charitable-donations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/31/2007-charitable-donations/</link>
	<description>A premiere personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:42:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chosha</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/31/2007-charitable-donations/#comment-130857</link>
		<dc:creator>chosha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 07:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/31/2007-charitable-donations/#comment-130857</guid>
		<description>Happy New Year!

My favourite charity is the Fred Hollows Foundation. They cure cataract blindness in places where people can&#039;t afford to have it done (even though it&#039;s totally treatable). I think I like it because it&#039;s so direct: $25 (AUD) and someone gets there sight back, just like that. And of course with their sight back they can function, find work, etc. I also really like helping the Salvation Army, because I&#039;ve seen the work they do for the poor and homeless here in Australia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year!</p>
<p>My favourite charity is the Fred Hollows Foundation. They cure cataract blindness in places where people can&#8217;t afford to have it done (even though it&#8217;s totally treatable). I think I like it because it&#8217;s so direct: $25 (AUD) and someone gets there sight back, just like that. And of course with their sight back they can function, find work, etc. I also really like helping the Salvation Army, because I&#8217;ve seen the work they do for the poor and homeless here in Australia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasha</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/31/2007-charitable-donations/#comment-130776</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/31/2007-charitable-donations/#comment-130776</guid>
		<description>Greg,  

I agree with your comment, and feel that larger donations are the way to go. My general minimum for a cash donation would be $100, because of the point you make.  I tried to pick the top 5 charities--there were a few more I wanted to donate to, but decided to save them to next year so I could concentrate on my top 5.  

I am a bit dismayed that I gave to UNICEF last year, but this year have been bombarded by mailings from them.  They even enclosed a coin in one of the mailings, and I wish they would have kept it.  Charities should allow you to select an option not to receive any mailings to help optimize your donation.  I do all of my donations online despite the envelopes I&#039;m sent. 

I&#039;ve not yet had a problem with my address being compromised or sold, but perhaps I&#039;m just lucky.  Then again, I donate to somewhat smaller or more eco-conscious charities who might be less inclined to such things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,  </p>
<p>I agree with your comment, and feel that larger donations are the way to go. My general minimum for a cash donation would be $100, because of the point you make.  I tried to pick the top 5 charities&#8211;there were a few more I wanted to donate to, but decided to save them to next year so I could concentrate on my top 5.  </p>
<p>I am a bit dismayed that I gave to UNICEF last year, but this year have been bombarded by mailings from them.  They even enclosed a coin in one of the mailings, and I wish they would have kept it.  Charities should allow you to select an option not to receive any mailings to help optimize your donation.  I do all of my donations online despite the envelopes I&#8217;m sent. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve not yet had a problem with my address being compromised or sold, but perhaps I&#8217;m just lucky.  Then again, I donate to somewhat smaller or more eco-conscious charities who might be less inclined to such things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/31/2007-charitable-donations/#comment-130757</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/31/2007-charitable-donations/#comment-130757</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always read -- and I&#039;ve written in articles -- that you should concentrate donations to a small number of charities, rather than giving a little money to many.

Apparently, a big portion of small donations -- $25, for example -- gets devoured with administrative costs and the fundraising expense of cultivating you as a donor. Giving bigger checks to fewer charities will mean more of your money will go to the cause you&#039;re trying to support. 

Also, charities are likely to sell small donors&#039; names and addresses to databases instead of keeping you to themselves.

Regardless, it&#039;s commendable you have a such a generous heart. Makes me want to rethink my own giving.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always read &#8212; and I&#8217;ve written in articles &#8212; that you should concentrate donations to a small number of charities, rather than giving a little money to many.</p>
<p>Apparently, a big portion of small donations &#8212; $25, for example &#8212; gets devoured with administrative costs and the fundraising expense of cultivating you as a donor. Giving bigger checks to fewer charities will mean more of your money will go to the cause you&#8217;re trying to support. </p>
<p>Also, charities are likely to sell small donors&#8217; names and addresses to databases instead of keeping you to themselves.</p>
<p>Regardless, it&#8217;s commendable you have a such a generous heart. Makes me want to rethink my own giving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
