<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: 2007 Charitable Donations</title> <atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/31/2007-charitable-donations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/31/2007-charitable-donations/</link> <description>A premiere personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 05:34:43 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: chosha</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/31/2007-charitable-donations/#comment-130857</link> <dc:creator>chosha</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 07:32:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/31/2007-charitable-donations/#comment-130857</guid> <description>Happy New Year!My favourite charity is the Fred Hollows Foundation. They cure cataract blindness in places where people can&#039;t afford to have it done (even though it&#039;s totally treatable). I think I like it because it&#039;s so direct: $25 (AUD) and someone gets there sight back, just like that. And of course with their sight back they can function, find work, etc. I also really like helping the Salvation Army, because I&#039;ve seen the work they do for the poor and homeless here in Australia.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Happy New Year!</p><p>My favourite charity is the Fred Hollows Foundation. They cure cataract blindness in places where people can&#8217;t afford to have it done (even though it&#8217;s totally treatable). I think I like it because it&#8217;s so direct: $25 (AUD) and someone gets there sight back, just like that. And of course with their sight back they can function, find work, etc. I also really like helping the Salvation Army, because I&#8217;ve seen the work they do for the poor and homeless here in Australia.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sasha</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/31/2007-charitable-donations/#comment-130776</link> <dc:creator>Sasha</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:47:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/31/2007-charitable-donations/#comment-130776</guid> <description>Greg,I agree with your comment, and feel that larger donations are the way to go. My general minimum for a cash donation would be $100, because of the point you make.  I tried to pick the top 5 charities--there were a few more I wanted to donate to, but decided to save them to next year so I could concentrate on my top 5.I am a bit dismayed that I gave to UNICEF last year, but this year have been bombarded by mailings from them.  They even enclosed a coin in one of the mailings, and I wish they would have kept it.  Charities should allow you to select an option not to receive any mailings to help optimize your donation.  I do all of my donations online despite the envelopes I&#039;m sent.I&#039;ve not yet had a problem with my address being compromised or sold, but perhaps I&#039;m just lucky.  Then again, I donate to somewhat smaller or more eco-conscious charities who might be less inclined to such things.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,</p><p>I agree with your comment, and feel that larger donations are the way to go. My general minimum for a cash donation would be $100, because of the point you make.  I tried to pick the top 5 charities&#8211;there were a few more I wanted to donate to, but decided to save them to next year so I could concentrate on my top 5.</p><p>I am a bit dismayed that I gave to UNICEF last year, but this year have been bombarded by mailings from them.  They even enclosed a coin in one of the mailings, and I wish they would have kept it.  Charities should allow you to select an option not to receive any mailings to help optimize your donation.  I do all of my donations online despite the envelopes I&#8217;m sent.</p><p>I&#8217;ve not yet had a problem with my address being compromised or sold, but perhaps I&#8217;m just lucky.  Then again, I donate to somewhat smaller or more eco-conscious charities who might be less inclined to such things.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Greg</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/31/2007-charitable-donations/#comment-130757</link> <dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 18:54:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/31/2007-charitable-donations/#comment-130757</guid> <description>I&#039;ve always read -- and I&#039;ve written in articles -- that you should concentrate donations to a small number of charities, rather than giving a little money to many.Apparently, a big portion of small donations -- $25, for example -- gets devoured with administrative costs and the fundraising expense of cultivating you as a donor. Giving bigger checks to fewer charities will mean more of your money will go to the cause you&#039;re trying to support.Also, charities are likely to sell small donors&#039; names and addresses to databases instead of keeping you to themselves.Regardless, it&#039;s commendable you have a such a generous heart. Makes me want to rethink my own giving.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always read &#8212; and I&#8217;ve written in articles &#8212; that you should concentrate donations to a small number of charities, rather than giving a little money to many.</p><p>Apparently, a big portion of small donations &#8212; $25, for example &#8212; gets devoured with administrative costs and the fundraising expense of cultivating you as a donor. Giving bigger checks to fewer charities will mean more of your money will go to the cause you&#8217;re trying to support.</p><p>Also, charities are likely to sell small donors&#8217; names and addresses to databases instead of keeping you to themselves.</p><p>Regardless, it&#8217;s commendable you have a such a generous heart. Makes me want to rethink my own giving.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/15 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cloud.consumerismcommentary.com

Served from: consumerismcommentary.com @ 2010-03-22 05:36:40 -->