<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: My 2007 401(k) Performance and Blog Roundup</title> <atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/</link> <description>A premiere personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:23:19 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Nick Adams</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-176562</link> <dc:creator>Nick Adams</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 21:08:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-176562</guid> <description>My question for everyone is, what&#039;s your return after fees and inflation?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question for everyone is, what&#8217;s your return after fees and inflation?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: H. Sumar</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-138752</link> <dc:creator>H. Sumar</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 05:32:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-138752</guid> <description>For comment #10, your choices are not &#039;limited&#039; If you rollover your 401k into a self-directed IRA, you can take advantage of tons of different investments that may not be available under your employer sponsored 401k plan... Investments such as commodities futures contracts, real estate, certain ETFs, etc.I would rollover to a Roth IRA right now and invest in commodities, gold, oil, soybean, copper, wheat &amp; sugar futures contracts.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For comment #10, your choices are not &#8216;limited&#8217; If you rollover your 401k into a self-directed IRA, you can take advantage of tons of different investments that may not be available under your employer sponsored 401k plan&#8230; Investments such as commodities futures contracts, real estate, certain ETFs, etc.</p><p>I would rollover to a Roth IRA right now and invest in commodities, gold, oil, soybean, copper, wheat &amp; sugar futures contracts.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ed</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-134159</link> <dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 02:17:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-134159</guid> <description>16.67% for 2007-6% for 2008 (so far)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>16.67% for 2007</p><p>-6% for 2008 (so far)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shana</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-133574</link> <dc:creator>Shana</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:44:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-133574</guid> <description>19%. ;-)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>19%. ;-)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nicole</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-133117</link> <dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 17:42:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-133117</guid> <description>8.0 for 200710.6 for 2006-10.4 year to date 2008Unfortunately, the choices are limited :(</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8.0 for 2007</p><p>10.6 for 2006</p><p>-10.4 year to date 2008</p><p>Unfortunately, the choices are limited :(</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: My Dollar Plan</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132929</link> <dc:creator>My Dollar Plan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:36:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132929</guid> <description>I don&#039;t look at the 401k in isolation because it only has one fund as part of our asset allocation strategy. I only look at our overall portfolio increase. 19.7%</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t look at the 401k in isolation because it only has one fund as part of our asset allocation strategy. I only look at our overall portfolio increase. 19.7%</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kick_push</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132927</link> <dc:creator>kick_push</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:21:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132927</guid> <description>9.8% for 2007.. i think i did okay considering that&#039;s higher than the s&amp;p average(13.9% return in 2006)portolio mix looks like this.. 89.5% stocks / 10.5% bonds (about to be 30 years young next month) =D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9.8% for 2007.. i think i did okay considering that&#8217;s higher than the s&amp;p average</p><p>(13.9% return in 2006)</p><p>portolio mix looks like this.. 89.5% stocks / 10.5% bonds (about to be 30 years young next month) =D</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132837</link> <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 02:19:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132837</guid> <description>-1.8%.  Apparently I&#039;m doing something completely wrong...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-1.8%.  Apparently I&#8217;m doing something completely wrong&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: SingleGuyMoney</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132829</link> <dc:creator>SingleGuyMoney</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:45:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132829</guid> <description>8.8% return for 2007. First part of 2008, down 7%.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8.8% return for 2007. First part of 2008, down 7%.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: That One Caveman</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132817</link> <dc:creator>That One Caveman</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:28:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132817</guid> <description>Strange...  I think you got my statement by mistake.  I just checked my performance online while doing some re-balancing and those are nearly my exact numbers for 2007.  I&#039;ve switched my portfolio to something a tad more aggressive, so I&#039;m sure it will be different next year.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strange&#8230;  I think you got my statement by mistake.  I just checked my performance online while doing some re-balancing and those are nearly my exact numbers for 2007.  I&#8217;ve switched my portfolio to something a tad more aggressive, so I&#8217;m sure it will be different next year.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mars</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132816</link> <dc:creator>Mars</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:24:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132816</guid> <description>6.7% with 70/30 stock/bond mix and with 20% International</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6.7% with 70/30 stock/bond mix and with 20% International</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: frank</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132814</link> <dc:creator>frank</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:02:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132814</guid> <description>9.8% for me</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>9.8% for me</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fred</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132802</link> <dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:45:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132802</guid> <description>Well, considering that the S&amp;P 500 did 5.49% for 2007, 7.09% doesn&#039;t look so bad. And 12.3% is phenomenal in comparison.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, considering that the S&#038;P 500 did 5.49% for 2007, 7.09% doesn&#8217;t look so bad. And 12.3% is phenomenal in comparison.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Rev</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132801</link> <dc:creator>Rev</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 19:41:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/15/my-2007-401k-performance-and-blog-roundup/#comment-132801</guid> <description>I did 12.3% on the year</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did 12.3% on the year</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/15 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cloud.consumerismcommentary.com

Served from: consumerismcommentary.com @ 2010-03-13 10:12:49 -->