If you perceived a painful sting each time you opened a wallet in a grocery store or at a gas station last year, it wasn’t just you. The Bureau of Labor Statistics has informed the public that the Consumer Price Index for 2007 is 4.1%, the highest inflation rate since 1990. The increase is due to higher costs of energy (up 17.4%) and food (up 4.9%). Without energy and food, the core inflation rate is 2.4%. [BLS: Consumer Price Index Summary]

Scroll down to read 5 comments.

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share!
Add to: Tip'd | Facebook | Delicious | Reddit | Digg

Get the RSS feed or enter your email address:

Related Entries on Consumerism Commentary

5 Comments on “Inflation Watch: Consumer Prices Rose 4.1% in 2007.” To add your own comment, scroll down.

  1. #1: Aryn
    Wednesday, January 16, 2008
    1:30 pm (reply)

    I heard this on NPR this morning. In the same report, they said salaries today are actually lower than they were in 2000 when adjusted for inflation. Now that’s even more alarming.

  2. #2: Brian
    Wednesday, January 16, 2008
    1:46 pm (reply)

    I used this to my advantage…by foregoing food and energy, I was able to save 1.7% more than the average American!

  3. #3: Smart Spending
    Wednesday, January 16, 2008
    6:52 pm (reply)
  4. #4: Kirk
    Thursday, January 17, 2008
    1:47 pm (reply)

    Core inflation is a sham. It uses hedonics to keep that number low. A good example of hedonics in use is computers. Let’s say you bought a computer five years ago for $1,000. That computer certainly had less computing power than the $1,000 computer today. The BLS uses the five year old computer in its inflation calculations. Now that five year old computer would only cost a fraction of the initial $1,000 you paid (if you could even find it on the market). So the BLS claims that the cost of computers has dropped. The reality is the cost hasn’t dropped. You still have to go out and buy a computer today for $1,000.

    During the Clinton administration, the BLS altered the way it calculated inflation. If they used the same formula as they did in the 70s, 80s, and early 90s, inflation would be more like 7%. Ouch!

  5. #5: Jacob
    Thursday, January 24, 2008
    8:25 am (reply)

    Just a heads up for those of you who receive measly “annual raises.” These companies, including my own, screw you out of any sort of actual increase by giving you between 1 and 5% annually.

    When raise time comes up, march into your bosses office with a printout of the last year’s CPI report. Let him or her know that, in order for you to make the SAME amount of money you made last year, you’ll need between 2 and 4%. So, if they come back at you with 2.5%, let them know they are, in effect, giving you a -1.5% decrease in pay when adjusting for buying power.

Leave a Comment

Enter your comments below. Please note: Use of a non-personal web site or blog in the field below and/or comments that are off-topic, personal attacks, or support requests will likely be removed at my discretion.

Copyright of comments belongs to the comment author, but I reserve the right to edit comments for formatting or content.

Add a photo or icon to your comment by creating an account on Gravatar.

Welcome to Consumerism Commentary

Consumerism Commentary is a blog for men and women who wish to make the most of their financial lives. Read more about Consumerism Commentary.


Cash Loans
FNBO Direct
ShareBuilder - Welcome page

Credit Card Offers

Recent Comments

FNBO Direct

Best of Consumerism Commentary

Recent Articles

Recent Topics on C3 Forums

Popular on pfblogs.org

Subscribe via E-mail

Tip'd
Click here to start saving with ING DIRECT!

Contributors

Disclaimer

The authors of Consumerism Commentary are not professional financial advisers and no text within this website should be considered financial advice. Any individual who makes financial decisions based solely on the information contained within does so at his or her own risk. Always consult a financial professional.

About Advertising

This website contains advertisements, usually listed as “sponsors.” Some links are for products or services for which Consumerism Commentary is an "affiliate." No articles within the blog are advertisements disguised as blog entries. Consumerism Commentary is not compensated for any content, except for advertising sold. This site contains no Pay-Per-Post (or similar) articles.

Privacy Policy

Carnival of Personal Finance