<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smart Women Marry for Money, and Here&#8217;s Why</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/</link>
	<description>A premiere personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:42:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MICHAEL</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-194243</link>
		<dc:creator>MICHAEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:04:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-194243</guid>
		<description>I HAVE TO STRONGLY DISSAGREE WITH THIS TYPE OF THINKING. I ADMIT A SMART WOMEN SHOULD WANT A MAN WHO CAN TAKE CARE OF HIMSELF AND HIS FINANCES, BUT THERE ARE SOME WHO CHOOSE TO REJECT MEN SOLELY ON THERE FINANCIAL STATUS. I HAVE RECENTLY HAD AN EXPERIENCE WHERE I GOT BACK TOGETHER WITH MY TRUE LOVE FROM COLLEGE, WE WERE MEANT TO BE TOGETHER. WE ARE PERFECT FOR EACH OTHER. HOWEVER WE ARE BOTH GOING THROUGH SOME TOUGH TIMES, HER DIVORCE AND MY EX ETC. WELL AT FIRST SHE WAS VERY EXCITED TO BE BACK WITH ME AND WE MADE PLANS TO START OUR FUTURE TOGETHER. UNFORTUNATELY MY CAREER IS NOT TAKING OFF AS WELL AS HERS AND SHE DECIDED TO LEAVE ME SOLELY ON THIS FACT. UNDERSTAND WE ARE CURRENTLY IN A LONG DISTANCE RELATIONSHIP WHICH IS ALSO HARD. WE TRUELY LOVE EACH OTHER BUT SINCE I COULD NOT IMPROVE MY CAREER FAST ENOUGH, WITHIN IN 3 MONTHS, SHE DUMPED ME. I AM NOT A BUM BY ANY STANDARD AND WORK A GOOD JOB 40 TO 60 HOURS A WEEK. SHE HAS HER HEART SET ON RETIRING EARLY AND BEING RICH. I THINK SHE IS MAKING A BIG MISSTAKE. SHE MAY BECOME RICH, WHO KNOWS, BUT SHE WILL NOT HAVE ANYONE TO ENJOY IT WITH THAT WILL TREAT HER THE WHY I DID. MONEY IS AN ILLUSION AND WILL NOT MAKE YOU HAPPY. IT WILL OF COURSE MAKE YOU HAPPIER TO HAVE NICE THINGS AND MAYBE A BETTER LIFESTYLE, BUT IF YOU BECOME SO OBSSESSED WITH IT AS SHE HAS BECOME YOU WILL LOSE IN THE END. SO IN CONCLUSION, I AGREE WHEN PICKING A DATE FOR A RELATIONSHIP IT IS GOOD TO HAVE SOMEONE WHO WORKS HARD AND CAN TAKE CARE OF THERE FINANCES, BUT I THINK IT IS UNFAIR TO REJECT SOMEONE YOU TRUELY HAVE A CONNECTION WITH BECAUSE OF THERE CURRENT MISFORTUNE. FURTHERMORE IF YOU ARE TRUELY IN LOVE WITH YOUR SIGNIFICANT OTHER IT DOESN&#039;T MATTER. THE MONEY WON&#039; T ALWAYS BE THERE FOR EITHER OF YOU. IF YOU MARRY SOMEONE WHO SEEMS TO BE A FINANCIAL GOD AND NOT FOR LOVE WHAT HAPPENS IF HE COLLAPSES, THEN YOU HAVE NEITHER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I HAVE TO STRONGLY DISSAGREE WITH THIS TYPE OF THINKING. I ADMIT A SMART WOMEN SHOULD WANT A MAN WHO CAN TAKE CARE OF HIMSELF AND HIS FINANCES, BUT THERE ARE SOME WHO CHOOSE TO REJECT MEN SOLELY ON THERE FINANCIAL STATUS. I HAVE RECENTLY HAD AN EXPERIENCE WHERE I GOT BACK TOGETHER WITH MY TRUE LOVE FROM COLLEGE, WE WERE MEANT TO BE TOGETHER. WE ARE PERFECT FOR EACH OTHER. HOWEVER WE ARE BOTH GOING THROUGH SOME TOUGH TIMES, HER DIVORCE AND MY EX ETC. WELL AT FIRST SHE WAS VERY EXCITED TO BE BACK WITH ME AND WE MADE PLANS TO START OUR FUTURE TOGETHER. UNFORTUNATELY MY CAREER IS NOT TAKING OFF AS WELL AS HERS AND SHE DECIDED TO LEAVE ME SOLELY ON THIS FACT. UNDERSTAND WE ARE CURRENTLY IN A LONG DISTANCE RELATIONSHIP WHICH IS ALSO HARD. WE TRUELY LOVE EACH OTHER BUT SINCE I COULD NOT IMPROVE MY CAREER FAST ENOUGH, WITHIN IN 3 MONTHS, SHE DUMPED ME. I AM NOT A BUM BY ANY STANDARD AND WORK A GOOD JOB 40 TO 60 HOURS A WEEK. SHE HAS HER HEART SET ON RETIRING EARLY AND BEING RICH. I THINK SHE IS MAKING A BIG MISSTAKE. SHE MAY BECOME RICH, WHO KNOWS, BUT SHE WILL NOT HAVE ANYONE TO ENJOY IT WITH THAT WILL TREAT HER THE WHY I DID. MONEY IS AN ILLUSION AND WILL NOT MAKE YOU HAPPY. IT WILL OF COURSE MAKE YOU HAPPIER TO HAVE NICE THINGS AND MAYBE A BETTER LIFESTYLE, BUT IF YOU BECOME SO OBSSESSED WITH IT AS SHE HAS BECOME YOU WILL LOSE IN THE END. SO IN CONCLUSION, I AGREE WHEN PICKING A DATE FOR A RELATIONSHIP IT IS GOOD TO HAVE SOMEONE WHO WORKS HARD AND CAN TAKE CARE OF THERE FINANCES, BUT I THINK IT IS UNFAIR TO REJECT SOMEONE YOU TRUELY HAVE A CONNECTION WITH BECAUSE OF THERE CURRENT MISFORTUNE. FURTHERMORE IF YOU ARE TRUELY IN LOVE WITH YOUR SIGNIFICANT OTHER IT DOESN&#8217;T MATTER. THE MONEY WON&#8217; T ALWAYS BE THERE FOR EITHER OF YOU. IF YOU MARRY SOMEONE WHO SEEMS TO BE A FINANCIAL GOD AND NOT FOR LOVE WHAT HAPPENS IF HE COLLAPSES, THEN YOU HAVE NEITHER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-193762</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 15:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-193762</guid>
		<description>I realize money is an issue when it comes to the longevity of a relationship. I think most men and women understand this notion. I also believe there are BOTH men and women who lack financial responsibility. What I don&#039;t understand is women feeling entitled to the hard earned money their husbands bring in. An ex-neighbor of mine was married to a wonderful man. Before they bought their dream home loaded with a housekeeper, gardener, full-time nanny and personal yoga instructor, she had a great job making equal to her husband. They decided to have a baby and she thought that was her que to stop working never to return. When their baby turned 2, times started getting tough in the economy. He had always done well, but now they needed more money to keep up their lifestyle. He encouraged her to go back to work, but she refused. Instead, she enjoyed the high-life and boozed all day. She turned angry in her drunken stupor calling him names and more. One day he woke up realizing he would be better off without her. So, he left. She forgot that it does indeed take two to tango. He is now doing very well and she struggles with hate and anger blaming him for her misfortune. If only they had been able to weather the storm, but unfortunately, women like that are entitled. These are the women who give us a bad name. Marry for love and work hard on your relationship, especially during the tough financial times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I realize money is an issue when it comes to the longevity of a relationship. I think most men and women understand this notion. I also believe there are BOTH men and women who lack financial responsibility. What I don&#8217;t understand is women feeling entitled to the hard earned money their husbands bring in. An ex-neighbor of mine was married to a wonderful man. Before they bought their dream home loaded with a housekeeper, gardener, full-time nanny and personal yoga instructor, she had a great job making equal to her husband. They decided to have a baby and she thought that was her que to stop working never to return. When their baby turned 2, times started getting tough in the economy. He had always done well, but now they needed more money to keep up their lifestyle. He encouraged her to go back to work, but she refused. Instead, she enjoyed the high-life and boozed all day. She turned angry in her drunken stupor calling him names and more. One day he woke up realizing he would be better off without her. So, he left. She forgot that it does indeed take two to tango. He is now doing very well and she struggles with hate and anger blaming him for her misfortune. If only they had been able to weather the storm, but unfortunately, women like that are entitled. These are the women who give us a bad name. Marry for love and work hard on your relationship, especially during the tough financial times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-192490</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-192490</guid>
		<description>As I read these comments, I wonder how many of you really don&#039;t realize that money is an issue when it comes to the longevity of relationship. I don&#039;t think men really understand this. I have met someone who I was attracted to by his personality (not his bank account) that I love a great deal but who has caused me many sleepless night because of is financial immaturity. He has $500 in overdraft charges, has let his car insurance laps and lives only for today.  All of this due to lack of financial responsibility. He is not credit worthy and does not pay his bills on time. He would rather go play golf, buy all the accessories that comes with the game then pay his bills. I&#039;ve tried time and time again to talk to him about the problems this is causing in our relationship and he says he understands and will cut his golf time down to twice a month. He lies about what he spends his money on and then expects me to pick up the slack.  When I refuse, guess what happens??  We fight and argue. NO! I don&#039;t want to be in my 50&#039;s married and miserable hoping that there will be social security to pay for my stay in the old folks home or rely on my children to take care of me. This person expects me to marry him and right now...there is absoluty NO WAY! So, my advise is not to look so much for a fat bank account but to look for someone who is mature and responsbile financially and who you can rely on that if you lose your job or become ill, they can provide for you/the family and put their selfish desires to the side.  It takes two to make a relationship work, which does include  financial maturity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I read these comments, I wonder how many of you really don&#8217;t realize that money is an issue when it comes to the longevity of relationship. I don&#8217;t think men really understand this. I have met someone who I was attracted to by his personality (not his bank account) that I love a great deal but who has caused me many sleepless night because of is financial immaturity. He has $500 in overdraft charges, has let his car insurance laps and lives only for today.  All of this due to lack of financial responsibility. He is not credit worthy and does not pay his bills on time. He would rather go play golf, buy all the accessories that comes with the game then pay his bills. I&#8217;ve tried time and time again to talk to him about the problems this is causing in our relationship and he says he understands and will cut his golf time down to twice a month. He lies about what he spends his money on and then expects me to pick up the slack.  When I refuse, guess what happens??  We fight and argue. NO! I don&#8217;t want to be in my 50&#8217;s married and miserable hoping that there will be social security to pay for my stay in the old folks home or rely on my children to take care of me. This person expects me to marry him and right now&#8230;there is absoluty NO WAY! So, my advise is not to look so much for a fat bank account but to look for someone who is mature and responsbile financially and who you can rely on that if you lose your job or become ill, they can provide for you/the family and put their selfish desires to the side.  It takes two to make a relationship work, which does include  financial maturity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: devski</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-190225</link>
		<dc:creator>devski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-190225</guid>
		<description>The number one mistake women (and men) make is thinking that talent is associated with personality. Very common mistake that everyone makes.

Knowing someone is wealthy or business savvy, or have a great talent in sports, or famous, or having any kind of high status, will not in anyway show what they are like as a person! Definitely and absolutely not! 

Doctor who turns out to be a killer, a business exec who embezzels money, a celebrity who is a drug addict, a congressman who is a pedophile, a mayor who solicits call girls. The list goes on, just read the news. Guess what these people have? Money, status and power. Guess what they dont have? Character. Who suffers? Their family and society.

My advice: Choose a persons personality/character over money, talent or status. It does take time to get to know someone, but its worth it. 

It is much easier for men to get money and gain status, than for them to be a good person. Rags to riches is not uncommon this days, but change in character from bad to good seldom happens. Being rich and famous, does not automatically change their personality (usually it gets worse). 

Smart women marry for character. Dumb women gets fooled by Money, Fame and Power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The number one mistake women (and men) make is thinking that talent is associated with personality. Very common mistake that everyone makes.</p>
<p>Knowing someone is wealthy or business savvy, or have a great talent in sports, or famous, or having any kind of high status, will not in anyway show what they are like as a person! Definitely and absolutely not! </p>
<p>Doctor who turns out to be a killer, a business exec who embezzels money, a celebrity who is a drug addict, a congressman who is a pedophile, a mayor who solicits call girls. The list goes on, just read the news. Guess what these people have? Money, status and power. Guess what they dont have? Character. Who suffers? Their family and society.</p>
<p>My advice: Choose a persons personality/character over money, talent or status. It does take time to get to know someone, but its worth it. </p>
<p>It is much easier for men to get money and gain status, than for them to be a good person. Rags to riches is not uncommon this days, but change in character from bad to good seldom happens. Being rich and famous, does not automatically change their personality (usually it gets worse). </p>
<p>Smart women marry for character. Dumb women gets fooled by Money, Fame and Power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg from FruWiki</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-189861</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg from FruWiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 01:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-189861</guid>
		<description>Helen, 

If you don&#039;t mind... How much do you spend on the accountant each year?  I&#039;m just curious because we&#039;ve never had one.  It sounds nice to have one, though fortunately we&#039;ve been able to get things under control ourselves.  

Actually, I think my husband and I enjoy some of our money talk (so long as we&#039;re making progress, that is, lol).  It&#039;s brought us closer together because we&#039;re talking about our common goals and working on problems together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Helen, </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t mind&#8230; How much do you spend on the accountant each year?  I&#8217;m just curious because we&#8217;ve never had one.  It sounds nice to have one, though fortunately we&#8217;ve been able to get things under control ourselves.  </p>
<p>Actually, I think my husband and I enjoy some of our money talk (so long as we&#8217;re making progress, that is, lol).  It&#8217;s brought us closer together because we&#8217;re talking about our common goals and working on problems together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-189849</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-189849</guid>
		<description>I read the article and it&#039;s a bit unnerving in some ways.  I don&#039;t need a busy partner nor do we need to stress over money.  That&#039;s what an accountant is for.  I have a man who works, is an excellent husband, and over the moon father any woman would die to have.  Money has never played a role in it.  We realize what we made/make, set goals, and let someone else put us on a budget and manage from there.  Namely, an accountant.  If you want to eliminate the stress of money in your marriage, consult a professional who will talk about goals, a realistic budget, and strategies to maximize your nest egg.  I would much rather have my husband in the Biblical sense in our spare time than worrying about money.  Colleges crank out accountants - try one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the article and it&#8217;s a bit unnerving in some ways.  I don&#8217;t need a busy partner nor do we need to stress over money.  That&#8217;s what an accountant is for.  I have a man who works, is an excellent husband, and over the moon father any woman would die to have.  Money has never played a role in it.  We realize what we made/make, set goals, and let someone else put us on a budget and manage from there.  Namely, an accountant.  If you want to eliminate the stress of money in your marriage, consult a professional who will talk about goals, a realistic budget, and strategies to maximize your nest egg.  I would much rather have my husband in the Biblical sense in our spare time than worrying about money.  Colleges crank out accountants &#8211; try one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atrox</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-188361</link>
		<dc:creator>Atrox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-188361</guid>
		<description>I think that this article makes some very good points. Just because a woman expects financial stability and responsibility out of her partner, that doesn&#039;t make her a gold digger. It doesn&#039;t mean she is looking to &quot;depend&quot; on a man. Sure, you have some that carry those intentions, but those are not the kind of women this article is talking about. 
Men have every right to be just as picky as women, and a lot of them are. It isn&#039;t wrong to look for a partner who is responsible and who plans for the future. You can learn a lot about a person by looking at how they manage their money.
And finally, one must take into consideration childbirth. Women are the ones who get pregnant, not men.  And it&#039;s women who were programmed to feed the children, nurture the children, and watch the children (there is a reason that only women lactate), especially in the earliest, most vulnerable stages of the child&#039;s life.  Would it be right to expect a woman to have the kids, AND be the one bringing in the majority of the money while she is doing it?  In this day and age, (most) men don&#039;t have to go out and risk their lives hunting massive game in order to feed their families. 
You also have to understand that financial stability is not the ONLY thing these women are looking for. It&#039;s just one of many standards. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s wrong to be a little picky - it&#039;s only sensible..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this article makes some very good points. Just because a woman expects financial stability and responsibility out of her partner, that doesn&#8217;t make her a gold digger. It doesn&#8217;t mean she is looking to &#8220;depend&#8221; on a man. Sure, you have some that carry those intentions, but those are not the kind of women this article is talking about.<br />
Men have every right to be just as picky as women, and a lot of them are. It isn&#8217;t wrong to look for a partner who is responsible and who plans for the future. You can learn a lot about a person by looking at how they manage their money.<br />
And finally, one must take into consideration childbirth. Women are the ones who get pregnant, not men.  And it&#8217;s women who were programmed to feed the children, nurture the children, and watch the children (there is a reason that only women lactate), especially in the earliest, most vulnerable stages of the child&#8217;s life.  Would it be right to expect a woman to have the kids, AND be the one bringing in the majority of the money while she is doing it?  In this day and age, (most) men don&#8217;t have to go out and risk their lives hunting massive game in order to feed their families.<br />
You also have to understand that financial stability is not the ONLY thing these women are looking for. It&#8217;s just one of many standards. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s wrong to be a little picky &#8211; it&#8217;s only sensible..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealityBites</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-187434</link>
		<dc:creator>RealityBites</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-187434</guid>
		<description>Everyone wants a wishy-washy &quot;sweep me away and lets forget about reality&quot; relationship. But smart women would keep their feet on the ground and also demand financial maturity from their partner. Especially when money remains the #1 reason for divorce rates that are exceeding 50% in some parts of the U.S.

Fact of the matter is, no marriage can be happy when income is in the bottom decile with 2 kids before your mid 20s, despite long work-weeks at minimum wage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone wants a wishy-washy &#8220;sweep me away and lets forget about reality&#8221; relationship. But smart women would keep their feet on the ground and also demand financial maturity from their partner. Especially when money remains the #1 reason for divorce rates that are exceeding 50% in some parts of the U.S.</p>
<p>Fact of the matter is, no marriage can be happy when income is in the bottom decile with 2 kids before your mid 20s, despite long work-weeks at minimum wage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eeeeeeyyuuuuuuu</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-186461</link>
		<dc:creator>Eeeeeeyyuuuuuuu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 05:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-186461</guid>
		<description>Why would anyone listen to this whore-monger?  It&#039;s true that to have a marriage you want someone who is functional enough to provide, but beyond that, this is all we are talking about.  Women who follow this advice &quot;PEOPLE ARE INVESTMENT ACCOUNTS&quot; almost always have a bad ending.    Psychologists have a word for it, malignant narcissism.  Down the road if he&#039;s an unsuspecting fellow and he figures her out and sees no reason to pretend he&#039;s obligated to her further.  I&#039;ve seen this realization break up countless marriages.  Or she has to put up with some lout and pretend she likes it for years and years and years.  Do you think Ivana Trump or Anna Nichole Smith had ideal lives?  If he is a jerk he probably knows what&#039;s she&#039;s up to from the get go, he probably wants her anyhow because she accessorizes him well and, when she gets a little long in the tooth, he has a younger replacement ready.  And she is getting exactly what&#039;s coming to her.  There are scads of these single middle-aged women sitting around resorts and talking about what bastards men are.  At the same time trying to sink their hooks into another one.

Marry someone who you are attracted to and love to be around.  It&#039;s okay to expect financial integrity, you don&#039;t want to marry some happy-go-lucky financial nightmare, but beyond that people are not things you acquire.  No, this advice is not any brave new world, it&#039;s just encouraging gold-digging with a new label.

You&#039;ll notice that the author realizes this on some level too, the trailer-trash seediness of it all, which is why (presumably) she doesn&#039;t state her name.  When she says &quot;Let me preface this by stating that I am not suggesting that women marry solely for money&quot; she is saying: &quot;women should marry primarily for money,&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would anyone listen to this whore-monger?  It&#8217;s true that to have a marriage you want someone who is functional enough to provide, but beyond that, this is all we are talking about.  Women who follow this advice &#8220;PEOPLE ARE INVESTMENT ACCOUNTS&#8221; almost always have a bad ending.    Psychologists have a word for it, malignant narcissism.  Down the road if he&#8217;s an unsuspecting fellow and he figures her out and sees no reason to pretend he&#8217;s obligated to her further.  I&#8217;ve seen this realization break up countless marriages.  Or she has to put up with some lout and pretend she likes it for years and years and years.  Do you think Ivana Trump or Anna Nichole Smith had ideal lives?  If he is a jerk he probably knows what&#8217;s she&#8217;s up to from the get go, he probably wants her anyhow because she accessorizes him well and, when she gets a little long in the tooth, he has a younger replacement ready.  And she is getting exactly what&#8217;s coming to her.  There are scads of these single middle-aged women sitting around resorts and talking about what bastards men are.  At the same time trying to sink their hooks into another one.</p>
<p>Marry someone who you are attracted to and love to be around.  It&#8217;s okay to expect financial integrity, you don&#8217;t want to marry some happy-go-lucky financial nightmare, but beyond that people are not things you acquire.  No, this advice is not any brave new world, it&#8217;s just encouraging gold-digging with a new label.</p>
<p>You&#8217;ll notice that the author realizes this on some level too, the trailer-trash seediness of it all, which is why (presumably) she doesn&#8217;t state her name.  When she says &#8220;Let me preface this by stating that I am not suggesting that women marry solely for money&#8221; she is saying: &#8220;women should marry primarily for money,&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluemax</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-186019</link>
		<dc:creator>bluemax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 11:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-186019</guid>
		<description>intresting article,very honest.the media bombard people with lifestye images of famous people with money,and women think why should&#039;t i have that?,but most ordinary men can&#039;t provide it.although women talk about love and romance,ie as long as we have each other,love will find a way,the stark reality is,for all this so called  equality,its equality when it suits them.when a women says i love you,shes actually saying i love what you can give me,materially.i think christine agularia,sorry if the spellings wrong,sung,what a girl wants,what a girl needs,whatever makes me happy,sets you free,ah yes,so true,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>intresting article,very honest.the media bombard people with lifestye images of famous people with money,and women think why should&#8217;t i have that?,but most ordinary men can&#8217;t provide it.although women talk about love and romance,ie as long as we have each other,love will find a way,the stark reality is,for all this so called  equality,its equality when it suits them.when a women says i love you,shes actually saying i love what you can give me,materially.i think christine agularia,sorry if the spellings wrong,sung,what a girl wants,what a girl needs,whatever makes me happy,sets you free,ah yes,so true,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginger</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-184850</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 13:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-184850</guid>
		<description>@ Veronica, Reading is fundamental and if you were able to read past the title then you would have seen the disclaimer: &quot;Let me preface this by stating that I am not suggesting that women marry solely for money, I am after all a believer in love and commitment as a solid foundation for marriage.&quot;

But commenters like you are too often committed to insulting over women because they have different views than you do.  I can almost bet that you&#039;re miserable wherever you happen to be in your life.   I have enough respect or myself and others not to stoop to your levels.  But, it just shows how low you are in your life right now.

Your problem isnt me, and my views because I promise you, my marriage is wonderful and it&#039;s based on the sweetest love, something you can&#039;t relate to.  I just happen to have a great package, a man who loves and respects me and is as financially savvy as I am, so yes, God has had mercy on my soul and blessed me with what has been the best thing to happen to me in the last 5 years.  I refuse to apologize for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Veronica, Reading is fundamental and if you were able to read past the title then you would have seen the disclaimer: &#8220;Let me preface this by stating that I am not suggesting that women marry solely for money, I am after all a believer in love and commitment as a solid foundation for marriage.&#8221;</p>
<p>But commenters like you are too often committed to insulting over women because they have different views than you do.  I can almost bet that you&#8217;re miserable wherever you happen to be in your life.   I have enough respect or myself and others not to stoop to your levels.  But, it just shows how low you are in your life right now.</p>
<p>Your problem isnt me, and my views because I promise you, my marriage is wonderful and it&#8217;s based on the sweetest love, something you can&#8217;t relate to.  I just happen to have a great package, a man who loves and respects me and is as financially savvy as I am, so yes, God has had mercy on my soul and blessed me with what has been the best thing to happen to me in the last 5 years.  I refuse to apologize for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veronica</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-184585</link>
		<dc:creator>Veronica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 05:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-184585</guid>
		<description>Author,

Women that marry for money are prostitutes, high-paid prostitutes. How can they be smarter than women who have actually worked their asses off their whole lives to be rich by themselves and give living proof to other women that they do not need to live under the hegemony of a man-controlled world? They are only selling their bodies for money, most likely because they have low self-esteem. You&#039;re a whore and an embarrassment to your gender. This is the worst form of rationality I&#039;ve ever seen. May God have mercy on your soul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author,</p>
<p>Women that marry for money are prostitutes, high-paid prostitutes. How can they be smarter than women who have actually worked their asses off their whole lives to be rich by themselves and give living proof to other women that they do not need to live under the hegemony of a man-controlled world? They are only selling their bodies for money, most likely because they have low self-esteem. You&#8217;re a whore and an embarrassment to your gender. This is the worst form of rationality I&#8217;ve ever seen. May God have mercy on your soul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JG</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-183087</link>
		<dc:creator>JG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 04:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-183087</guid>
		<description>Who says that women need to choose between looks and money?  If a good-looking women has a stupid,good-looking boyfriend, all she has to do is find a wealthy man to marry and then go back to her boyfriend after 5 or 7 years of a sham marriage.  This plan sure beats robbing a bank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who says that women need to choose between looks and money?  If a good-looking women has a stupid,good-looking boyfriend, all she has to do is find a wealthy man to marry and then go back to her boyfriend after 5 or 7 years of a sham marriage.  This plan sure beats robbing a bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damo</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-182778</link>
		<dc:creator>Damo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-182778</guid>
		<description>What about if things are the other way around?

I am a man who looks after his money, but my girlfriend spends money like water. 

I own three houses (inherited two and worked for one myself) and I have got money saved away in investments. 


I have two jobs, during the day I work as a cleaner and at night I drive Taxis. For cleaning I get paid $15 an hour for cleaning hotel rooms, driving Taxis I get about $120 a night. On Friday and Saturday I can get up to $200 a night. I drive four nights a week. 

In an average week I get about $1200. I also get money through renting out one of my houses. 

(Please note, I live in Australia. unskilled labour is much higher paid here than the USA.)  

I manage to save money because I do not spend very much- I know my city very well so I know where to get free stuff and where to eat for free. 



My girlfriend would not marry me simply because I do not have a &quot;good job&quot;, even though I am financially sound.

She said that she does not want to marry a cleaner because it is not a &quot;respectable job&quot;, and her family in Korea would be embarrassed. She does not even want to show me to her parents, she said that I would have to look for a &quot;better job&quot;. 

I have a university degree, a Bachelor of Arts in History and Sociology with second class honours, I also did a Graduate Diploma in Humanities, which involved the completion of a research thesis; therefore if I look hard enough I may be able to get a job in the public sector or something. 

In all honesty, I was too lazy to look for a more professional job after finishing university; and to be honesty I still am too lazy to look for a better job. But there is no real incentive for me to do so, as I am contented with my income, as my two jobs give me more than enough to do everything I want in life. 

Money is all that matters in the end of the day right? I clean toilets and hotel rooms for a living, but I have got cash and assets to live a good life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about if things are the other way around?</p>
<p>I am a man who looks after his money, but my girlfriend spends money like water. </p>
<p>I own three houses (inherited two and worked for one myself) and I have got money saved away in investments. </p>
<p>I have two jobs, during the day I work as a cleaner and at night I drive Taxis. For cleaning I get paid $15 an hour for cleaning hotel rooms, driving Taxis I get about $120 a night. On Friday and Saturday I can get up to $200 a night. I drive four nights a week. </p>
<p>In an average week I get about $1200. I also get money through renting out one of my houses. </p>
<p>(Please note, I live in Australia. unskilled labour is much higher paid here than the USA.)  </p>
<p>I manage to save money because I do not spend very much- I know my city very well so I know where to get free stuff and where to eat for free. </p>
<p>My girlfriend would not marry me simply because I do not have a &#8220;good job&#8221;, even though I am financially sound.</p>
<p>She said that she does not want to marry a cleaner because it is not a &#8220;respectable job&#8221;, and her family in Korea would be embarrassed. She does not even want to show me to her parents, she said that I would have to look for a &#8220;better job&#8221;. </p>
<p>I have a university degree, a Bachelor of Arts in History and Sociology with second class honours, I also did a Graduate Diploma in Humanities, which involved the completion of a research thesis; therefore if I look hard enough I may be able to get a job in the public sector or something. </p>
<p>In all honesty, I was too lazy to look for a more professional job after finishing university; and to be honesty I still am too lazy to look for a better job. But there is no real incentive for me to do so, as I am contented with my income, as my two jobs give me more than enough to do everything I want in life. </p>
<p>Money is all that matters in the end of the day right? I clean toilets and hotel rooms for a living, but I have got cash and assets to live a good life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andre</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-170991</link>
		<dc:creator>Andre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 02:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-170991</guid>
		<description>Well, I am 43, not exactly wealthy, but financially responsible, honest, spendthrift, living on my own, and accustomed to pay my bills on time. When we started dating, she asked me if I was married (no), if I had a girlfriend (no), and if I was faithful (yes). Then, after two weeks, she told me that, being 36 and wanting a family, she needed to get married and procreate soon. So, she told me, she hoped I did not mind if she dated people on the internet. For supposed lack of funds, I got booted for a hypothesis. I am trying to make more money, but I strongly hope I will enjoy it on my own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I am 43, not exactly wealthy, but financially responsible, honest, spendthrift, living on my own, and accustomed to pay my bills on time. When we started dating, she asked me if I was married (no), if I had a girlfriend (no), and if I was faithful (yes). Then, after two weeks, she told me that, being 36 and wanting a family, she needed to get married and procreate soon. So, she told me, she hoped I did not mind if she dated people on the internet. For supposed lack of funds, I got booted for a hypothesis. I am trying to make more money, but I strongly hope I will enjoy it on my own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frieda</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-150736</link>
		<dc:creator>Frieda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 13:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-150736</guid>
		<description>I read this into the article - if the guy is a financial loser then chances are he is a loser in other significant ways. If he cannot plan, pay bills on time, handle financial responsibilities, then he is not going to be a reliable person in other ways. These guys past age 25 lose their fly-by-the-seat-of-their-pants appeal and have a hard time finding partners. I think the relationship of money management and other big life issues is clear. It really isn&#039;t a matter of &quot;not being good with money&quot; - it isn&#039;t about being a financial investment whiz, rather it is about getting with the program in a very basic way. I most definately did not marry for money - but I did marry for love, which included being able to rely on and trust my husband to do the right thing financially with me. 

I saw the problems a financially irresponsible relative had in all aspects of life - challenges getting a job, forget about a partner...just kind of floating around hoping to find the pot of gold under the rainbow. It is incredibly sad to see in a nice guy heading into his 40s with...zilch. And I am not talking about money here, I am talking about steady employment and a family and all that boring old stuff, this dude still lives with his parents most of the year. He is a nice person, wouldn&#039;t hurt a fly but come on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this into the article &#8211; if the guy is a financial loser then chances are he is a loser in other significant ways. If he cannot plan, pay bills on time, handle financial responsibilities, then he is not going to be a reliable person in other ways. These guys past age 25 lose their fly-by-the-seat-of-their-pants appeal and have a hard time finding partners. I think the relationship of money management and other big life issues is clear. It really isn&#8217;t a matter of &#8220;not being good with money&#8221; &#8211; it isn&#8217;t about being a financial investment whiz, rather it is about getting with the program in a very basic way. I most definately did not marry for money &#8211; but I did marry for love, which included being able to rely on and trust my husband to do the right thing financially with me. </p>
<p>I saw the problems a financially irresponsible relative had in all aspects of life &#8211; challenges getting a job, forget about a partner&#8230;just kind of floating around hoping to find the pot of gold under the rainbow. It is incredibly sad to see in a nice guy heading into his 40s with&#8230;zilch. And I am not talking about money here, I am talking about steady employment and a family and all that boring old stuff, this dude still lives with his parents most of the year. He is a nice person, wouldn&#8217;t hurt a fly but come on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-150422</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 20:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-150422</guid>
		<description>Wait...wait... I think we just split a hair!  Anyway, great post!

I agree that, as a single male, financial habits are extremely important in chosing a mate. I think discussing finances should be a high priority because any lives that are built without a sure foundation with not survive. This is more important to me than what color the walls should be painted, or what kind of vacation destinations are compatible, because at the end of the day, if you don&#039;t have a strong financial position/skills your just renting anyway.

That&#039;s my .02 cents!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait&#8230;wait&#8230; I think we just split a hair!  Anyway, great post!</p>
<p>I agree that, as a single male, financial habits are extremely important in chosing a mate. I think discussing finances should be a high priority because any lives that are built without a sure foundation with not survive. This is more important to me than what color the walls should be painted, or what kind of vacation destinations are compatible, because at the end of the day, if you don&#8217;t have a strong financial position/skills your just renting anyway.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my .02 cents!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Serendipity</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-150358</link>
		<dc:creator>Serendipity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 21:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-150358</guid>
		<description>Okay, I&#039;m about a million years late to the party, but have to agree. How we spend our money is a clear indication of our values. I was thrilled when I learned that my future husband had scrimped to purchase a house at a very young age. It wasn&#039;t the prospect of marrying into the house I was excited about--it was the proof that our values aligned. I had found someone who also felt that planning for the long term was more important than a fancy lifestyle. 

Similarly, he was thrilled to find out that I was maxing out my 401k at the time. He wasn&#039;t excited because of the prospective gravy train (ha!), it just was proof that I wasn&#039;t looking for someone to take care of me financially. I already had it covered. 

How a person spends their money is a pretty decent gauge of their core life values, which should be in pretty close alignment for long-term happiness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;m about a million years late to the party, but have to agree. How we spend our money is a clear indication of our values. I was thrilled when I learned that my future husband had scrimped to purchase a house at a very young age. It wasn&#8217;t the prospect of marrying into the house I was excited about&#8211;it was the proof that our values aligned. I had found someone who also felt that planning for the long term was more important than a fancy lifestyle. </p>
<p>Similarly, he was thrilled to find out that I was maxing out my 401k at the time. He wasn&#8217;t excited because of the prospective gravy train (ha!), it just was proof that I wasn&#8217;t looking for someone to take care of me financially. I already had it covered. </p>
<p>How a person spends their money is a pretty decent gauge of their core life values, which should be in pretty close alignment for long-term happiness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric C</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-149397</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 10:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-149397</guid>
		<description>@ Ginger:

&quot;Anyhoo, just to address concerns about it seeming as though I am promoting ONLY thinking about men in terms of their wallet… that isnt the case and I made that clear, hopefully in the first few sentences. I really wanted to drive home the importance of selecting a mate with a healthy attitude towards personal finance.&quot;


However, all the work you did in the first few sentences was largely undone with your statements about stifling screams during sex with a shriveled up oil tycoon (not to mention several other head scratchers).

However, as I man I read your article and agreed whole-heartedly with it. However, I read it from the reverse point of view and placed women as the ones who must have their financial houses in order if they want any serious attention from me. Any woman I marry must pull her own weight: there will be no Drama Queen Fashionista Princesses in my life, thankyouverymuch. Looking for a Knight in Shining Armor to come sweep you off your feet, pay off all your debts, and set you up in some fancy McMansion with a Mercedes ML350 in the driveway? Keep looking sweetheart.

Maybe I can just find a shriveled up widow that survived her oil tycoon husband, that way I won&#039;t have to worry about it.  Hmmm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ginger:</p>
<p>&#8220;Anyhoo, just to address concerns about it seeming as though I am promoting ONLY thinking about men in terms of their wallet… that isnt the case and I made that clear, hopefully in the first few sentences. I really wanted to drive home the importance of selecting a mate with a healthy attitude towards personal finance.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, all the work you did in the first few sentences was largely undone with your statements about stifling screams during sex with a shriveled up oil tycoon (not to mention several other head scratchers).</p>
<p>However, as I man I read your article and agreed whole-heartedly with it. However, I read it from the reverse point of view and placed women as the ones who must have their financial houses in order if they want any serious attention from me. Any woman I marry must pull her own weight: there will be no Drama Queen Fashionista Princesses in my life, thankyouverymuch. Looking for a Knight in Shining Armor to come sweep you off your feet, pay off all your debts, and set you up in some fancy McMansion with a Mercedes ML350 in the driveway? Keep looking sweetheart.</p>
<p>Maybe I can just find a shriveled up widow that survived her oil tycoon husband, that way I won&#8217;t have to worry about it.  Hmmm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJC @ 7million7years</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-149097</link>
		<dc:creator>AJC @ 7million7years</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 04:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-149097</guid>
		<description>&quot;I have a big [bank account] and I know how to use it, baby&quot; ... it never worked for me then ... doubt it would work for me now ;)

Having been both poor and happy with my wife ... and rich and happy with my wife, I can safely say that money actually doesn&#039;t matter in a great relationship, but the communication around it does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I have a big [bank account] and I know how to use it, baby&#8221; &#8230; it never worked for me then &#8230; doubt it would work for me now ;)</p>
<p>Having been both poor and happy with my wife &#8230; and rich and happy with my wife, I can safely say that money actually doesn&#8217;t matter in a great relationship, but the communication around it does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ginger @ Girls Just Wanna Have Funds</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-138700</link>
		<dc:creator>Ginger @ Girls Just Wanna Have Funds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 15:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-138700</guid>
		<description>JDB,

You are right, this is a controversial article as I figured it would strike a nerve with most of the men reading, after all who wants to be viewed as a meal ticket.  However, as Ive said to others you&#039;re reading way tooo deeply into the story.  What I meant is what I wrote.

After receiving comments on my own site and emails about the article further discussing it Ive come to the conclusion that its easier for some men to evoke sentiments of love and communication rather than think about the very issues that drives so many divorces today.  The divorce rate in this country has skyrocketed in part due to issues around money.  Many arent willing to face this realization but love does NOT conquer all.

The point of my article is to encourage women to be savvy about the life partners they choose.  Too many of us fall for the same ole love and communication game.  Those are a given.  I should have stated that.  But to say that women should not focus on HOW financially savvy their partners are in favor of ONLY focusing on  given characteristics like communication, chemistry etc etc is equivalent to skipping across a major highway in oncoming traffic.  You&#039;re bound to get knocked on your face with the reality that you should have looked before crossing.  The same applies here: women should be looking at a man in ALL areas, not just chemistry, communication and the like.

No where did I say that men are a meal ticket or that the SIZE of their bank accounts should be taken into consideration.  The article simply aimed to discuss HOW these men manage their money.  I am happily married to a man who shares the same sentiments and felt the same way when we got together.  He wanted a woman who was financially savvy and who wouldnt spend us into the poor house.  I also have a husband who is budget conscious and thinks long term when it comes to our financial goals.  This was my point.  My husband makes great money but that wasn&#039;t the only reason that I chose him as my life partner.  His characteristics  far outweigh his financially savvy but make no mistake, his level of financial interest and savvy played a HUGE role.  I want no part of a man that spends recklessly because I do not plan to be broke and miserable in my old age because by choosing an irresponsible partner, we had to declare bankruptcy twice or foreclose on our home.  

No, not this woman.

A financially savvy woman may not be for you because it evokes other negative feelings but it doesn&#039;t negate the fact that women are beginning to take a closer look at HOW their partners manage money.  NOT how much money they make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JDB,</p>
<p>You are right, this is a controversial article as I figured it would strike a nerve with most of the men reading, after all who wants to be viewed as a meal ticket.  However, as Ive said to others you&#8217;re reading way tooo deeply into the story.  What I meant is what I wrote.</p>
<p>After receiving comments on my own site and emails about the article further discussing it Ive come to the conclusion that its easier for some men to evoke sentiments of love and communication rather than think about the very issues that drives so many divorces today.  The divorce rate in this country has skyrocketed in part due to issues around money.  Many arent willing to face this realization but love does NOT conquer all.</p>
<p>The point of my article is to encourage women to be savvy about the life partners they choose.  Too many of us fall for the same ole love and communication game.  Those are a given.  I should have stated that.  But to say that women should not focus on HOW financially savvy their partners are in favor of ONLY focusing on  given characteristics like communication, chemistry etc etc is equivalent to skipping across a major highway in oncoming traffic.  You&#8217;re bound to get knocked on your face with the reality that you should have looked before crossing.  The same applies here: women should be looking at a man in ALL areas, not just chemistry, communication and the like.</p>
<p>No where did I say that men are a meal ticket or that the SIZE of their bank accounts should be taken into consideration.  The article simply aimed to discuss HOW these men manage their money.  I am happily married to a man who shares the same sentiments and felt the same way when we got together.  He wanted a woman who was financially savvy and who wouldnt spend us into the poor house.  I also have a husband who is budget conscious and thinks long term when it comes to our financial goals.  This was my point.  My husband makes great money but that wasn&#8217;t the only reason that I chose him as my life partner.  His characteristics  far outweigh his financially savvy but make no mistake, his level of financial interest and savvy played a HUGE role.  I want no part of a man that spends recklessly because I do not plan to be broke and miserable in my old age because by choosing an irresponsible partner, we had to declare bankruptcy twice or foreclose on our home.  </p>
<p>No, not this woman.</p>
<p>A financially savvy woman may not be for you because it evokes other negative feelings but it doesn&#8217;t negate the fact that women are beginning to take a closer look at HOW their partners manage money.  NOT how much money they make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JDB</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-138686</link>
		<dc:creator>JDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 13:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-138686</guid>
		<description>This article is little more than an intellectually disinjenuous Victorian era justification for selfaggrandizement. Women shouldn&#039;t marry &quot;solely&quot; for money?  Its the whole little bit pregnant thing. And, men that are &quot;motovated by money&quot; are &quot;smarter&quot; than their counterparts that aren&#039;t.  Actually men who are driven by money are not only some of the most boring bumps on a log one could ever wish to be subjected to but they usually aren&#039;t around much to share their intellectual narrowness with you.  I don&#039;t know, maybe that&#039;s a plus.  The smartest people on earth often have the least financially to show for it-scientists, artists, writters, composers, etc.  But more troubling than the notion that American women should in 2008 be shopping for a husband is the deceptive nature of her advise.  Directness of communication and financial savvyness are laudible qualities for men and women.  Openness and honesty are indespensible.  But I&#039;d like to see the author put it into practice.  If my girlfriend were to intimate the kind of intentions the author promulgates in this article I could not take her seriously and would feel as HD mentions above.   Brava HD!  Savvyness is great but you have to be able to pull your own donkey, or agree on an arrangement based on who does what best and where each other is, independant from your love or feelings for one another (nearly 1/3 of married men is a SAHD).  Love and money don&#039;t mix.  Neither is a substitute for the other nor should it be an inducement in any way. I&#039;m sure that financial problems would not plague American relationships as much as they do if financial status were not as exalted as it is.  Couples have a mutual duty to be responsible, demonstrate their industry how ever they best do it and to not be a spendthrift.  Not to produce wealth or the promise of it. Looking for that suggests looking for love in all the wrong places.  Women should be &quot;in control of their financial destinys&quot;. But that&#039;s a far cry from assesing other men&#039;s potential financial destinys as a benchmark for who they will or will not love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is little more than an intellectually disinjenuous Victorian era justification for selfaggrandizement. Women shouldn&#8217;t marry &#8220;solely&#8221; for money?  Its the whole little bit pregnant thing. And, men that are &#8220;motovated by money&#8221; are &#8220;smarter&#8221; than their counterparts that aren&#8217;t.  Actually men who are driven by money are not only some of the most boring bumps on a log one could ever wish to be subjected to but they usually aren&#8217;t around much to share their intellectual narrowness with you.  I don&#8217;t know, maybe that&#8217;s a plus.  The smartest people on earth often have the least financially to show for it-scientists, artists, writters, composers, etc.  But more troubling than the notion that American women should in 2008 be shopping for a husband is the deceptive nature of her advise.  Directness of communication and financial savvyness are laudible qualities for men and women.  Openness and honesty are indespensible.  But I&#8217;d like to see the author put it into practice.  If my girlfriend were to intimate the kind of intentions the author promulgates in this article I could not take her seriously and would feel as HD mentions above.   Brava HD!  Savvyness is great but you have to be able to pull your own donkey, or agree on an arrangement based on who does what best and where each other is, independant from your love or feelings for one another (nearly 1/3 of married men is a SAHD).  Love and money don&#8217;t mix.  Neither is a substitute for the other nor should it be an inducement in any way. I&#8217;m sure that financial problems would not plague American relationships as much as they do if financial status were not as exalted as it is.  Couples have a mutual duty to be responsible, demonstrate their industry how ever they best do it and to not be a spendthrift.  Not to produce wealth or the promise of it. Looking for that suggests looking for love in all the wrong places.  Women should be &#8220;in control of their financial destinys&#8221;. But that&#8217;s a far cry from assesing other men&#8217;s potential financial destinys as a benchmark for who they will or will not love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg from All About Appearances</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-137594</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg from All About Appearances</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-137594</guid>
		<description>Well said, HD!  I think that&#039;s exactly what Ginger and I are trying to say!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, HD!  I think that&#8217;s exactly what Ginger and I are trying to say!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HD</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-137590</link>
		<dc:creator>HD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-137590</guid>
		<description>If I were a man, I would not want a partner who views me as a meal ticket.  I would respect a partner who considers fiscal responsibility a priority and shares the efforts toward maintaining that in the marriage.  I would cherish a partner that is more to me than either a parasite or a business partner - someone who I am compatible with whom I share much more than financial goals.  It&#039;s about so much more than money.  Who says that you win by acquiring the most toys?  But to be clear, I have no issue with the idea of avoiding irresponsible potential partners.  Fiscal irresponsibility, just like all other types of irresponsibility, is a fair weeding criteria.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I were a man, I would not want a partner who views me as a meal ticket.  I would respect a partner who considers fiscal responsibility a priority and shares the efforts toward maintaining that in the marriage.  I would cherish a partner that is more to me than either a parasite or a business partner &#8211; someone who I am compatible with whom I share much more than financial goals.  It&#8217;s about so much more than money.  Who says that you win by acquiring the most toys?  But to be clear, I have no issue with the idea of avoiding irresponsible potential partners.  Fiscal irresponsibility, just like all other types of irresponsibility, is a fair weeding criteria.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Meg</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-137533</link>
		<dc:creator>Meg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/19/smart-women-marry-for-money-and-heres-why/#comment-137533</guid>
		<description>Oops, forgot this was a guest post.  the above is not my first comment on CC - just on this post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, forgot this was a guest post.  the above is not my first comment on CC &#8211; just on this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
