<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Living Paycheck to Paycheck (On Purpose)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/</link>
	<description>A premiere personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:42:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Westcoast girl</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-138133</link>
		<dc:creator>Westcoast girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-138133</guid>
		<description>Great post! I completely understand where you&#039;re going with the &quot;paycheque to paycheque&quot; mentality. I too spend a large chunk of my paycheque before I even get it with contributions to retirement, health &amp; insurance benefits, 3 additional forced savings accounts (one for a new car in a few years, vacation/home fund, and the emergency fund) as well as my mortgage.

Then I live off the remainder while still saving some money at the end of every 2 weeks to leave in my chequing account for a weekend getaway, shopping expedition, or a non-recurring expense. 

For example, my property taxes are due in a couple of months and I&#039;m trying to cut back on my non-necessities in order to pay them, rather than dipping into my home fund. 

I don&#039;t mind missing a lunch or dinner out, or going to a cheaper salon occasionally. It&#039;s a strategy that works for me as a type of forced savings. Sometimes my friends bug me when I say &quot;I&#039;m broke&quot; - of course I&#039;m not - I just try to make more careful choices about how to spend the money I take home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! I completely understand where you&#8217;re going with the &#8220;paycheque to paycheque&#8221; mentality. I too spend a large chunk of my paycheque before I even get it with contributions to retirement, health &amp; insurance benefits, 3 additional forced savings accounts (one for a new car in a few years, vacation/home fund, and the emergency fund) as well as my mortgage.</p>
<p>Then I live off the remainder while still saving some money at the end of every 2 weeks to leave in my chequing account for a weekend getaway, shopping expedition, or a non-recurring expense. </p>
<p>For example, my property taxes are due in a couple of months and I&#8217;m trying to cut back on my non-necessities in order to pay them, rather than dipping into my home fund. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t mind missing a lunch or dinner out, or going to a cheaper salon occasionally. It&#8217;s a strategy that works for me as a type of forced savings. Sometimes my friends bug me when I say &#8220;I&#8217;m broke&#8221; &#8211; of course I&#8217;m not &#8211; I just try to make more careful choices about how to spend the money I take home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MsJayy</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137824</link>
		<dc:creator>MsJayy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 16:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137824</guid>
		<description>Great post Ma! Those of us who *know* you know that you being &quot;BROKE&quot; ain&#039;t EVEN literal cause &quot;you keeps money&quot;! Keep illustrating the power, truth &amp; beauty of PERSONAL finance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Ma! Those of us who *know* you know that you being &#8220;BROKE&#8221; ain&#8217;t EVEN literal cause &#8220;you keeps money&#8221;! Keep illustrating the power, truth &amp; beauty of PERSONAL finance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moneyandpf</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137700</link>
		<dc:creator>moneyandpf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137700</guid>
		<description>Great job as you balance between financial and personal goals!  It&#039;s great that you automatically have your money moved out to appropriate places.  Good luck I&#039;m sure your well on your way to reaching your goals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great job as you balance between financial and personal goals!  It&#8217;s great that you automatically have your money moved out to appropriate places.  Good luck I&#8217;m sure your well on your way to reaching your goals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moneymonk</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137615</link>
		<dc:creator>Moneymonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137615</guid>
		<description>&quot;We can never have it all&quot;  Yes we can , max out your credit cards to the limit !!! LOL

just kidding. Fabulous Post, Single Ma. Living paycheck to paycheck can be good when you have all of your priorities in order</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We can never have it all&#8221;  Yes we can , max out your credit cards to the limit !!! LOL</p>
<p>just kidding. Fabulous Post, Single Ma. Living paycheck to paycheck can be good when you have all of your priorities in order</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Savings</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137586</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Savings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137586</guid>
		<description>Ahmen Single Ma!  Your confidence definitely shows, and helps others realize that this method does indeed work for people.

Happy weekend :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahmen Single Ma!  Your confidence definitely shows, and helps others realize that this method does indeed work for people.</p>
<p>Happy weekend :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137513</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137513</guid>
		<description>This is a great post and similar to how I do my finances. I also &#039;spend&#039; my paycheck on paper before I&#039;ve gotten it and it keeps me from overspending on things. 

I&#039;ve tried other methods but treating savings like any other bill is the only one that&#039;s really worked for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great post and similar to how I do my finances. I also &#8217;spend&#8217; my paycheck on paper before I&#8217;ve gotten it and it keeps me from overspending on things. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried other methods but treating savings like any other bill is the only one that&#8217;s really worked for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gina72100</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137508</link>
		<dc:creator>gina72100</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137508</guid>
		<description>Wow! whats with the hateration? I personally loved this post and it has me looking at my budget differently. I need to start tracking what percentage of my income is actually spent on what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! whats with the hateration? I personally loved this post and it has me looking at my budget differently. I need to start tracking what percentage of my income is actually spent on what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: far out</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137479</link>
		<dc:creator>far out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:10:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137479</guid>
		<description>Single Ma -

I tried to post that in Firefox as MW and instead of posting, I got redirected to Google.  (WTF?)

So I thought maybe MW was being filtered out (why else would it redirect?), and I tried again in IE using a different handle.

Yes, you don&#039;t see 400-sq ft houses, probably because of zoning regs.  I&#039;d like to see 400-sf houses on 2,000-sf lots, but zoning regs usually require 10,000-sf minimum lot sizes.

I live in a 400-sf house but it&#039;s like a guest house behind a &quot;normal&quot; house, and the lot cannot be split, so I can&#039;t buy just this house by itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Single Ma -</p>
<p>I tried to post that in Firefox as MW and instead of posting, I got redirected to Google.  (WTF?)</p>
<p>So I thought maybe MW was being filtered out (why else would it redirect?), and I tried again in IE using a different handle.</p>
<p>Yes, you don&#8217;t see 400-sq ft houses, probably because of zoning regs.  I&#8217;d like to see 400-sf houses on 2,000-sf lots, but zoning regs usually require 10,000-sf minimum lot sizes.</p>
<p>I live in a 400-sf house but it&#8217;s like a guest house behind a &#8220;normal&#8221; house, and the lot cannot be split, so I can&#8217;t buy just this house by itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: far out</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137477</link>
		<dc:creator>far out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137477</guid>
		<description>p.s in my state, landlords can serve notices by ordinary first class mail, so you don&#039;t need a process server or a filing fee or anything.  the only thing that costs money is filing for eviction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.s in my state, landlords can serve notices by ordinary first class mail, so you don&#8217;t need a process server or a filing fee or anything.  the only thing that costs money is filing for eviction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: far out</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137476</link>
		<dc:creator>far out</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137476</guid>
		<description>Brian -

It depends a LOT on your state laws and the speed of your court system.  Where I live, an eviction can usually be completed in about a month from the time of a missed payment.

On the 5th day past due, you can serve (I think) a 7-day Notice to Quit, then you can file for eviction and get a trial date scheduled in 2-3 weeks.  If the tenant loses in court, he has 24 hours to vacate or have his possessions moved out to the curb.

Because screening, credit, and background checks are widespread today, formal eviction (which shows up in record checks) is something people try to avoid.

I attended a morning of eviction trials for a property management course, and of a few dozen scheduled trials, half were settled ahead of time and most of the others were settled informally pre-trial the same morning.  Only two or three actually went to (a very brief) trial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian -</p>
<p>It depends a LOT on your state laws and the speed of your court system.  Where I live, an eviction can usually be completed in about a month from the time of a missed payment.</p>
<p>On the 5th day past due, you can serve (I think) a 7-day Notice to Quit, then you can file for eviction and get a trial date scheduled in 2-3 weeks.  If the tenant loses in court, he has 24 hours to vacate or have his possessions moved out to the curb.</p>
<p>Because screening, credit, and background checks are widespread today, formal eviction (which shows up in record checks) is something people try to avoid.</p>
<p>I attended a morning of eviction trials for a property management course, and of a few dozen scheduled trials, half were settled ahead of time and most of the others were settled informally pre-trial the same morning.  Only two or three actually went to (a very brief) trial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newy</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137473</link>
		<dc:creator>Newy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137473</guid>
		<description>Great Post!  I am forcing myself into that mentality as well.  I want to eliminate all non-mortgage debt by December 2009 and I am well on my way by living paycheck - to -Paycheck on purpose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post!  I am forcing myself into that mentality as well.  I want to eliminate all non-mortgage debt by December 2009 and I am well on my way by living paycheck &#8211; to -Paycheck on purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bleesed Mom 2 Sweet Boys</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137472</link>
		<dc:creator>Bleesed Mom 2 Sweet Boys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137472</guid>
		<description>I am a faithful reader of Single Ma&#039;s and I found this to be another great article, FABULOUS as always Single Ma! Although this seems to be a interesting read here at Consumerism Commentary it is ashame they have such negative, holier than thou commenters who instead of looking beyond the words to get the deeper meaning of the article feel the need to pick it apart as if she has no idea what she is talking about. I mean come on did you really get that she was &quot;BROKE&quot; out of the piece and had no back up reserve? Do you think that this blog would have her as guest author if they thought she was not together? Get off your high horses and quit being so cynical! Instead have a look around her blog and give Single Ma her props for doing what most only dream of doing with 2 incomes and she has done it by her self raising her &quot;Baby Girl&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a faithful reader of Single Ma&#8217;s and I found this to be another great article, FABULOUS as always Single Ma! Although this seems to be a interesting read here at Consumerism Commentary it is ashame they have such negative, holier than thou commenters who instead of looking beyond the words to get the deeper meaning of the article feel the need to pick it apart as if she has no idea what she is talking about. I mean come on did you really get that she was &#8220;BROKE&#8221; out of the piece and had no back up reserve? Do you think that this blog would have her as guest author if they thought she was not together? Get off your high horses and quit being so cynical! Instead have a look around her blog and give Single Ma her props for doing what most only dream of doing with 2 incomes and she has done it by her self raising her &#8220;Baby Girl&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Future Millionaire</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137463</link>
		<dc:creator>Future Millionaire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137463</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with you there Single Ma on living artificially paycheck to paycheck.  By choice I only take home about 43% of my income and force myself to live on that.  But I do &quot;pay a bill&quot; each month which is into my savings account for occasional expenses like when I have to do my 60k mile check up (which I have to do some time in the coming weeks since I&#039;m already over the 60k mark).  This way my artificial paycheck only have to cover my typical monthly living expenses and I don&#039;t have to take these expenses out of my already very limited income.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you there Single Ma on living artificially paycheck to paycheck.  By choice I only take home about 43% of my income and force myself to live on that.  But I do &#8220;pay a bill&#8221; each month which is into my savings account for occasional expenses like when I have to do my 60k mile check up (which I have to do some time in the coming weeks since I&#8217;m already over the 60k mark).  This way my artificial paycheck only have to cover my typical monthly living expenses and I don&#8217;t have to take these expenses out of my already very limited income.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJean</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137434</link>
		<dc:creator>SJean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 03:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137434</guid>
		<description>Great single ma!  I am creating my own new budget right now, and am trying to eliminate the &quot;cushion&quot; in it so I force myself to live on less.  :)

This is reassurance that I&quot;m not the only one who wants to feel as though they are living paycheck to paycheck (well, without the stress of actually doing it!(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great single ma!  I am creating my own new budget right now, and am trying to eliminate the &#8220;cushion&#8221; in it so I force myself to live on less.  :)</p>
<p>This is reassurance that I&#8221;m not the only one who wants to feel as though they are living paycheck to paycheck (well, without the stress of actually doing it!(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nofearingthemoney</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137433</link>
		<dc:creator>nofearingthemoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137433</guid>
		<description>I often live exactly like this.  Frankly, because so much of my financial life is automated, (investments, savings, certain payments, etc.), it is not unusal for me to have less than $100 cash to get me to the next paycheck.  Out of that money, I pay for my daily living expenses for the two weeks.  It feels like I am living paycheck to paycheck, even though, like Single Ma, I am not technically doing so.

I also understand &quot;feeling broke.&quot;  I had to spend $1K unexpectedly on my car recently, (go in for an oil and filter change, come out with new brakes and tires).  Was the money there?  Yes?  Did I feel broke?  Yes...because I am used to a certain level of savings. Therefore, I have enforced some personal &quot;economies&quot; until my account is back to where I want it to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often live exactly like this.  Frankly, because so much of my financial life is automated, (investments, savings, certain payments, etc.), it is not unusal for me to have less than $100 cash to get me to the next paycheck.  Out of that money, I pay for my daily living expenses for the two weeks.  It feels like I am living paycheck to paycheck, even though, like Single Ma, I am not technically doing so.</p>
<p>I also understand &#8220;feeling broke.&#8221;  I had to spend $1K unexpectedly on my car recently, (go in for an oil and filter change, come out with new brakes and tires).  Was the money there?  Yes?  Did I feel broke?  Yes&#8230;because I am used to a certain level of savings. Therefore, I have enforced some personal &#8220;economies&#8221; until my account is back to where I want it to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ~Dawn</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137432</link>
		<dc:creator>~Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 01:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137432</guid>
		<description>Single Ma~
I liked your post... forcing yourself to live on less now so that you have more later is inspirational

To each their own when it comes to budgeting, I say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Single Ma~<br />
I liked your post&#8230; forcing yourself to live on less now so that you have more later is inspirational</p>
<p>To each their own when it comes to budgeting, I say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Single Ma</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137427</link>
		<dc:creator>Single Ma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137427</guid>
		<description>@ Adfecto - You&#039;re right!  When the debt is gone, throwing large sums at your savings or investment acct is great feeling!

@ Brian - Yes, I think it&#039;s a matter of semantics.  Based on the amount of discretionary $$ I&#039;m used to having, when it&#039;s significantly reduced, I consider myself &quot;broke&quot; but I certainly don&#039;t mean it literally.  And I agree, personal finance is personal.  As long as my financial goals are being met and my necessities are covered, everything else is gravy.  If I have to do without something that I &quot;want&quot; because something more important came up, I don&#039;t mind.

@ Card Master - Why are my exact contributions to employer benefits important in the context of this post?  I don&#039;t know the amount right off hand, but if there is some value to knowing that information, I may consider looking it up for you.  Perhaps, there&#039;s something specific you&#039;re trying to figure out.  If so, just ask.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Adfecto &#8211; You&#8217;re right!  When the debt is gone, throwing large sums at your savings or investment acct is great feeling!</p>
<p>@ Brian &#8211; Yes, I think it&#8217;s a matter of semantics.  Based on the amount of discretionary $$ I&#8217;m used to having, when it&#8217;s significantly reduced, I consider myself &#8220;broke&#8221; but I certainly don&#8217;t mean it literally.  And I agree, personal finance is personal.  As long as my financial goals are being met and my necessities are covered, everything else is gravy.  If I have to do without something that I &#8220;want&#8221; because something more important came up, I don&#8217;t mind.</p>
<p>@ Card Master &#8211; Why are my exact contributions to employer benefits important in the context of this post?  I don&#8217;t know the amount right off hand, but if there is some value to knowing that information, I may consider looking it up for you.  Perhaps, there&#8217;s something specific you&#8217;re trying to figure out.  If so, just ask.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The CardMaster</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137419</link>
		<dc:creator>The CardMaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137419</guid>
		<description>I must admit, there is something quite exhilarating about living paycheck to paycheck, but it&#039;s certainly not for everyone.

You mentioned that a &#039;big chunk&#039; goes to employer benefits - could you be a little more specific?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must admit, there is something quite exhilarating about living paycheck to paycheck, but it&#8217;s certainly not for everyone.</p>
<p>You mentioned that a &#8216;big chunk&#8217; goes to employer benefits &#8211; could you be a little more specific?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137416</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137416</guid>
		<description>Single Ma - This is your quote:

&quot;So if something out of the ordinary happens, such this month when I need new tires, I find myself strapped for cashâ€”or dare I say BROKEâ€”before the month is over.&quot;

You said broke...  now you say it won&#039;t break the bank.  Based on the info given, I can only comment on what I read.  I consider BROKE as breaking the bank, maybe it&#039;s just semantics.  

ANY non-recurring expense you don&#039;t pay every month is a pretty inclusive statement, and certainly not one I imagine could be covered on a consistent basis by simply &quot;cutting back on non-necessities.&quot;  It means you are either going to have to dip into your emergency fund more often, or constantly be juggling.

*I* would not be very comfortable in my financial plan if putting tires on my car meant I couldn&#039;t get a haircut that week, or grab a sandwich for lunch.  That was the old me, I remember him well, and I don&#039;t ever want to be him again.  I like knowing the money is ready when I need tires, and that I don&#039;t have to rearrange all of my other spending just to cover.  It keeps things running smooth, and it doesn&#039;t trigger emotions that cause poor decisions.

Personal Finance is just that - personal.  If your plan is (truly) working for you, then that&#039;s what you need to be doing.  My plan works for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Single Ma &#8211; This is your quote:</p>
<p>&#8220;So if something out of the ordinary happens, such this month when I need new tires, I find myself strapped for cashâ€”or dare I say BROKEâ€”before the month is over.&#8221;</p>
<p>You said broke&#8230;  now you say it won&#8217;t break the bank.  Based on the info given, I can only comment on what I read.  I consider BROKE as breaking the bank, maybe it&#8217;s just semantics.  </p>
<p>ANY non-recurring expense you don&#8217;t pay every month is a pretty inclusive statement, and certainly not one I imagine could be covered on a consistent basis by simply &#8220;cutting back on non-necessities.&#8221;  It means you are either going to have to dip into your emergency fund more often, or constantly be juggling.</p>
<p>*I* would not be very comfortable in my financial plan if putting tires on my car meant I couldn&#8217;t get a haircut that week, or grab a sandwich for lunch.  That was the old me, I remember him well, and I don&#8217;t ever want to be him again.  I like knowing the money is ready when I need tires, and that I don&#8217;t have to rearrange all of my other spending just to cover.  It keeps things running smooth, and it doesn&#8217;t trigger emotions that cause poor decisions.</p>
<p>Personal Finance is just that &#8211; personal.  If your plan is (truly) working for you, then that&#8217;s what you need to be doing.  My plan works for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adfecto</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137408</link>
		<dc:creator>Adfecto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137408</guid>
		<description>Wow.  This post speaks directly to how I live.  I bring home 62% of my pay rather than 45% as this author does, but it works out exactly the same in the end.  I had a bad habit for a while of whipping out the credit card at the end of the month when the money was down to nearly zero.  I still [slowly] built wealth because so much cash was pulled out off the top but I also ran up a couple thousand in debt in the process.  So now, after I pay all of my debt (including mortgage) I&#039;m down to 24.9% of my gross to pay utilities, food, transportation, and fun.  That means my debt payment and mortgage comes to 37% of my gross.  I feel like I am living paycheck to paycheck (but I am managing to save).  What motivates me to get better and pay off debt is to think of what my life would be like if that 37% were spent half on living and half on savings rather than on debt!  That would be the life!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  This post speaks directly to how I live.  I bring home 62% of my pay rather than 45% as this author does, but it works out exactly the same in the end.  I had a bad habit for a while of whipping out the credit card at the end of the month when the money was down to nearly zero.  I still [slowly] built wealth because so much cash was pulled out off the top but I also ran up a couple thousand in debt in the process.  So now, after I pay all of my debt (including mortgage) I&#8217;m down to 24.9% of my gross to pay utilities, food, transportation, and fun.  That means my debt payment and mortgage comes to 37% of my gross.  I feel like I am living paycheck to paycheck (but I am managing to save).  What motivates me to get better and pay off debt is to think of what my life would be like if that 37% were spent half on living and half on savings rather than on debt!  That would be the life!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Single Ma</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137405</link>
		<dc:creator>Single Ma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137405</guid>
		<description>@ brian - To me, &quot;out of the ordinary&quot; is ANY non-recurring expense that I don&#039;t have to pay every month. Cutting back on non-necessities to cover those expenses is a sufficient financial plan that works for me.  It doesn&#039;t require debt and it won&#039;t break the bank.  

re: mortgage question, I have an emergency fund that will cover 9-12 months of basic necessities and I also keep a separate reserve if my tenants don&#039;t pay.  I&#039;m well prepared for a &quot;worst case&quot; scenario.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ brian &#8211; To me, &#8220;out of the ordinary&#8221; is ANY non-recurring expense that I don&#8217;t have to pay every month. Cutting back on non-necessities to cover those expenses is a sufficient financial plan that works for me.  It doesn&#8217;t require debt and it won&#8217;t break the bank.  </p>
<p>re: mortgage question, I have an emergency fund that will cover 9-12 months of basic necessities and I also keep a separate reserve if my tenants don&#8217;t pay.  I&#8217;m well prepared for a &#8220;worst case&#8221; scenario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Single Ma</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137403</link>
		<dc:creator>Single Ma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137403</guid>
		<description>@ far out - Or is it minimum wage?  Whatever name you choose to go by today. LOL  I simply asked &quot;did he really say 400 sq ft?&quot;  I don&#039;t consider that mocking at all.  There&#039;s nothing &quot;wrong&quot; with owning a 400 sq ft home but I&#039;ve never seen one before.  Good luck on your quest to homeownership.

@ chicago - Buying new tires isn&#039;t a big deal to me at all, nor is it an annoyance.  My car needs tires, like I need shoes.  It&#039;s a simple necessity that affects my finances like everything a consumer must buy.

@ savvy - I think my past experience has prepared me to live on so little.  Now I&#039;ve become accustomed to it.  As long as my needs are met, I consider the rest as &quot;extra.&quot;  Being debt free makes it easier too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ far out &#8211; Or is it minimum wage?  Whatever name you choose to go by today. LOL  I simply asked &#8220;did he really say 400 sq ft?&#8221;  I don&#8217;t consider that mocking at all.  There&#8217;s nothing &#8220;wrong&#8221; with owning a 400 sq ft home but I&#8217;ve never seen one before.  Good luck on your quest to homeownership.</p>
<p>@ chicago &#8211; Buying new tires isn&#8217;t a big deal to me at all, nor is it an annoyance.  My car needs tires, like I need shoes.  It&#8217;s a simple necessity that affects my finances like everything a consumer must buy.</p>
<p>@ savvy &#8211; I think my past experience has prepared me to live on so little.  Now I&#8217;ve become accustomed to it.  As long as my needs are met, I consider the rest as &#8220;extra.&#8221;  Being debt free makes it easier too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137400</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137400</guid>
		<description>The author doesn&#039;t give a lot of detail really, but new tires should not be an &quot;out of the ordinary&quot; expense.  Vehicles require maintenance, it should be a budgeted expense.  I realize not everyone &quot;budgets&quot; by the penny on paper, but even a mental or rough budget has to factor in these basic needs, of which if you need a vehicle, maintenance is a basic need.

&quot;Out of the ordinary&quot; expenses, which in my mind are usually high-dollar issues - say the engine blew in the car and cost $3,000 - should be handled by the emergency fund, that&#039;s why it&#039;s there.

I guess what I&#039;m saying is - in a good financial plan, the structure should protect against pretty much anything causing your monthly cash flow to be so impacted.

I&#039;m also not clear on the mortgage payment - is it a monthly expense that you pay yourself even through the tenant is also, or do you just pay the $1600 in anticipation of the tenant&#039;s rent?  I hope you&#039;ve got about 6 months of that mortgage in the emergency fund, otherwise that&#039;s a BIG black cloud if your tenant turns into a deadbeat.  

It can easily take 6 months from a first missed payment, to recognizing a big problem, to force an eviction, to rent a property again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The author doesn&#8217;t give a lot of detail really, but new tires should not be an &#8220;out of the ordinary&#8221; expense.  Vehicles require maintenance, it should be a budgeted expense.  I realize not everyone &#8220;budgets&#8221; by the penny on paper, but even a mental or rough budget has to factor in these basic needs, of which if you need a vehicle, maintenance is a basic need.</p>
<p>&#8220;Out of the ordinary&#8221; expenses, which in my mind are usually high-dollar issues &#8211; say the engine blew in the car and cost $3,000 &#8211; should be handled by the emergency fund, that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s there.</p>
<p>I guess what I&#8217;m saying is &#8211; in a good financial plan, the structure should protect against pretty much anything causing your monthly cash flow to be so impacted.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also not clear on the mortgage payment &#8211; is it a monthly expense that you pay yourself even through the tenant is also, or do you just pay the $1600 in anticipation of the tenant&#8217;s rent?  I hope you&#8217;ve got about 6 months of that mortgage in the emergency fund, otherwise that&#8217;s a BIG black cloud if your tenant turns into a deadbeat.  </p>
<p>It can easily take 6 months from a first missed payment, to recognizing a big problem, to force an eviction, to rent a property again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: savvy</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137377</link>
		<dc:creator>savvy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137377</guid>
		<description>Great post.  I do pretty much the same thing.  I find that creating &#039;articial scarcity&#039; keeps me on the right path and keeps my spending in check.  Sure I work hard and &#039;deserve&#039; nice stuff but I&#039;d rather retire early than accumulate trinkets.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post.  I do pretty much the same thing.  I find that creating &#8216;articial scarcity&#8217; keeps me on the right path and keeps my spending in check.  Sure I work hard and &#8216;deserve&#8217; nice stuff but I&#8217;d rather retire early than accumulate trinkets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137361</link>
		<dc:creator>chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/02/20/living-paycheck-to-paycheck-on-purpose/#comment-137361</guid>
		<description>Needing new tires shouldn&#039;t be a huge suprise, tires wear out, it should be something you plan for just like you do with other &quot;big&quot; expenses, so when it happens it&#039;s just a minor annoyance and not a huge deal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Needing new tires shouldn&#8217;t be a huge suprise, tires wear out, it should be something you plan for just like you do with other &#8220;big&#8221; expenses, so when it happens it&#8217;s just a minor annoyance and not a huge deal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
