<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: List of New Jersey Gas Stations in Violation, Part 2</title> <atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/06/25/list-of-new-jersey-gas-stations-in-violation-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/06/25/list-of-new-jersey-gas-stations-in-violation-part-2/</link> <description>A premiere personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:51:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Tee</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/06/25/list-of-new-jersey-gas-stations-in-violation-part-2/#comment-165899</link> <dc:creator>Tee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:14:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=3379#comment-165899</guid> <description>Regarding the Hess Station in East Windsor on Rt 33, there prices have been the same as the shell station across the street for quite some time, what there violation is -- I dont know.  They usually are comparable as far as gas pricing.  The exxon station on 33 -- now there is the rip off --always significantly more money for gas and also the valero on 571 westbound side in west windsor.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the Hess Station in East Windsor on Rt 33, there prices have been the same as the shell station across the street for quite some time, what there violation is &#8212; I dont know.  They usually are comparable as far as gas pricing.  The exxon station on 33 &#8212; now there is the rip off &#8211;always significantly more money for gas and also the valero on 571 westbound side in west windsor.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Flexo</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/06/25/list-of-new-jersey-gas-stations-in-violation-part-2/#comment-160802</link> <dc:creator>Flexo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:46:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=3379#comment-160802</guid> <description>It&#039;s quite apparent that some violations are worse than others. But if there&#039;s an official source that says that 50% of the violation notices given by the state were due to &quot;pumping too much gas&quot; I&#039;d like to see it.  I&#039;m sure some were, but certainly not 50% of all violations. In fact, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/06/25/getting-ripped-off-for-new-jersey-gasoline-inaccurately-calibrated-pumps/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&#039;s an interactive map&lt;/a&gt; of all the violation details for each station.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s quite apparent that some violations are worse than others. But if there&#8217;s an official source that says that 50% of the violation notices given by the state were due to &#8220;pumping too much gas&#8221; I&#8217;d like to see it.  I&#8217;m sure some were, but certainly not 50% of all violations. In fact, <a
href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/06/25/getting-ripped-off-for-new-jersey-gasoline-inaccurately-calibrated-pumps/" rel="nofollow">here&#8217;s an interactive map</a> of all the violation details for each station.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Getty</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/06/25/list-of-new-jersey-gas-stations-in-violation-part-2/#comment-160799</link> <dc:creator>Getty</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:26:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=3379#comment-160799</guid> <description>Just so you people know, the Getty #56250 Was found to be in such a small violation, the station and the Getty company were only fined $100.00 Dollars total. And as well, the Only one plus (89 octane) pump was dispensing an ounce less then stated, which turns out they were ripping you off by less than a half of  a cent per gallon. So stop being asssholes, and so you know 50% of the other stations in violation, were pumping too much gas into peoples tanks. (Which to the DW&amp;M Department of Weights and Measures is still a violation).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so you people know, the Getty #56250 Was found to be in such a small violation, the station and the Getty company were only fined $100.00 Dollars total. And as well, the Only one plus (89 octane) pump was dispensing an ounce less then stated, which turns out they were ripping you off by less than a half of  a cent per gallon. So stop being asssholes, and so you know 50% of the other stations in violation, were pumping too much gas into peoples tanks. (Which to the DW&amp;M Department of Weights and Measures is still a violation).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/15 queries in 0.015 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cloud.consumerismcommentary.com

Served from: consumerismcommentary.com @ 2010-03-20 13:22:04 -->