Where Did the Federal Reserve Get $85 Billion for AIG?

When I heard the news that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York is making $85 billion available to American International Group in the form of loans, one of my first questions was about the source of the money. Does the Federal Reserve keep an emergency fund available to bail out companies during financial crises or does it just create the money out of thin air?

My question was answered on last night’s episode of Marketplace. Since the private sector refused to help AIG, the government stepped in to prevent financial meltdown. The $85 billion is taxpayers’ money, but it’s not funded by taxes we’ve paid. The U.S. Treasury Department sells securities to the public in order to raise the funds used for this bail-out. Yesterday, the Treasury Department auctioned short-term investments. The 35-Day Treasury Bill issued yesterday raised $40 billion in one day.

This auction process allows the investor to name their interest rates, and the Treasury picks the best offers. Many people were willing to lend the government money at a 0% interest rate. The median interest rate for all bids was 0.05%. The Federal Reserve, in turn, is lending money to AIG at a variable rate currently above 11%. If AIG is able to sell its assets and pay back the loans to the Federal Reserve over the next two years, the government stands to make a lot of money thanks to the wide spread in interest rates between the Federal Reserve’s borrowing and lending.

Even if AIG does not pay back the loan, the Treasury Department will still be able to pay back its investors. The government will use whatever means necessary in order to pay the investors as agreed, possibly printing money if necessary.

The fact that the government was able to raise a large amount of money at very low interest rates shows that investors are nervous. They’re willing to invest their money at a very low rate in return for a very safe investment.

Where does bailout money come from?, Marketplace, September 17, 2008
Treasury Auction Results (PDF), U.S. Treasury Department, September 17, 2008

Scroll down to read 10 comments on “Where Did the Federal Reserve Get $85 Billion for AIG?.”

Did you enjoy this article? If so, please share!
Add to: Tip'd | Facebook | Delicious | Reddit | Digg

Get the RSS feed or enter your email address:

Related Entries on Consumerism Commentary

10 Comments on “Where Did the Federal Reserve Get $85 Billion for AIG?.” To add your own comment, scroll down.

  1. #1: Tom
    Thursday, September 18, 2008
    9:21 am (reply)

    I guess those investors haven’t heard of FNBO 3.75% savings accounts!

  2. #2: AJ
    Thursday, September 18, 2008
    1:52 pm (reply)

    Banks like FNBO provide FDIC insurance only upto 100,000. So for any one wishing to get a insurance on their money this is the best way to protect their money. Think hedge funds or mutual funds.

  3. #3: John T. F.
    Thursday, September 18, 2008
    5:40 pm (reply)

    How is buying a bond with a 0% interest rate an investment? This sounds like a money laundering scheme.

  4. #4: Jim
    Thursday, September 18, 2008
    7:33 pm (reply)

    The article cited explains: “They were willing to lend the money to the Treasury for free, knowing that they wouldn’t lose it in the stock market or that they wouldn’t have it be held by another financial institution that could undergo some difficulties.” Its certainly odd but I guess there are some people out there that just want to make sure their money is SAFE for the next month. There may be more to the story than that and there could be other specific reasons it pays someone to have money safe for a month even at a 0% rate.

    Jim

  5. #5: lordbuddha
    Friday, September 19, 2008
    4:27 am (reply)

    who are the bidders and buyers? Who has a lot of green backs? Chinese? But investing at 0% is lunatic! Factor in inflation and it is a NEGATIVE investment! Does the Treasury say who are the buyers?

  6. #6: Flexo
    Friday, September 19, 2008
    9:52 am (reply)

    lordbuddha: I don’t think the Treasury releases that information, but this explains why investors bid 0% on T-bills. I wouldn’t be surprised if many are international investors.

  7. #7: lordbuddha
    Friday, September 19, 2008
    11:48 am (reply)

    So, our international friends are doing us a favor by giving us money. Remember, there is no free lunch (by Milton Friedman?).

  8. #8: Valerie
    Friday, September 19, 2008
    3:25 pm (reply)

    Hey guys…how about that “printing more money” as the Plan B to pay off investors? Did any of you ever read about the inflation in Germany post WWI, when people literally were hauling money around in wheel barrows to buy staples?

    You can’t keep devaluing the dollar forever and not pay for it eventually!

  9. #9: UH2L
    Sunday, September 21, 2008
    11:27 am (reply)

    Valerie is spot on. The money is there, but it will be of lesser value. I would start investing in precious metals, other currencies, or equities in other countries by way of mutual funds or stocks.

  10. #10: fathersez
    Wednesday, September 24, 2008
    1:34 am (reply)

    Still looks a little dodgy to me. There must be some effects of valuation as compared to foreign currencies. For international investors to put money in at 0%, and risk inflation and currency risks looks a lot risky.

    Even domestic investors would have to worry about inflation.

    Maybe some answers will come out in a few years.

Leave a Comment

Enter your comments below. Please note: Use of a non-personal web site or blog in the field below and/or comments that are off-topic, personal attacks, or support requests will likely be removed at my discretion.

Copyright of comments belongs to the comment author, but I reserve the right to edit comments for formatting or content.

Add a photo or icon to your comment by creating an account on Gravatar.

Welcome to Consumerism Commentary

Consumerism Commentary is a blog for men and women who wish to make the most of their financial lives. Read more about Consumerism Commentary.


Cash Loans
FNBO Direct
ShareBuilder - Welcome page

Advertise on Consumerism Commentary

Credit Card Offers

FNBO Direct

Recent Comments

Best of Consumerism Commentary

Recent Articles

Recent Topics on C3 Forums

Popular on pfblogs.org

Subscribe via E-mail

Tip'd
TradeKing.com

Contributors

Disclaimer

The authors of Consumerism Commentary are not professional financial advisers and no text within this website should be considered financial advice. Any individual who makes financial decisions based solely on the information contained within does so at his or her own risk. Always consult a financial professional.

About Advertising

This website contains advertisements, usually listed as “sponsors.” Some links are for products or services for which Consumerism Commentary is an "affiliate." No articles within the blog are advertisements disguised as blog entries. Consumerism Commentary is not compensated for any content, except for advertising sold. This site contains no Pay-Per-Post (or similar) articles.

Privacy Policy

Carnival of Personal Finance