<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Take Control of Your Finances Part 1-C: Make Accurate Predictions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/11/12/take-control-of-your-finances-part-1-c-make-accurate-predictions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/11/12/take-control-of-your-finances-part-1-c-make-accurate-predictions/</link>
	<description>A premiere personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 07:50:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flexo</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/11/12/take-control-of-your-finances-part-1-c-make-accurate-predictions/#comment-185949</link>
		<dc:creator>Flexo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4535#comment-185949</guid>
		<description>Dan: In the example above, there is no room for savings or investing after discretionary expenses.  That, as you can imagine, is a big problem.  The example here might be typical of someone living paycheck-to-paycheck.  I would include a category below discretionary expenses and net income for transfers to savings/investments.  In fact, in the example above, the individual would have to &lt;em&gt;draw&lt;/em&gt; $175 &lt;em&gt;from&lt;/em&gt; savings just to pay all expenses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan: In the example above, there is no room for savings or investing after discretionary expenses.  That, as you can imagine, is a big problem.  The example here might be typical of someone living paycheck-to-paycheck.  I would include a category below discretionary expenses and net income for transfers to savings/investments.  In fact, in the example above, the individual would have to <em>draw</em> $175 <em>from</em> savings just to pay all expenses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/11/12/take-control-of-your-finances-part-1-c-make-accurate-predictions/#comment-185946</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 01:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4535#comment-185946</guid>
		<description>I noticed that the non-discretionary and discrentionary data is the same that use in your monthly reporting.  It&#039;s nice to understand how you arrive at that data.  But the one area that I don&#039;t see is for a persons IRA, 401K, or ESPP.  When is that money taken out or where/how is it assigned?  

It isn&#039;t like you can say that you had a net income so you placed the net income in these funds because those IRA, 401K, or ESPP plans are taken out as if it was money flowing out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed that the non-discretionary and discrentionary data is the same that use in your monthly reporting.  It&#8217;s nice to understand how you arrive at that data.  But the one area that I don&#8217;t see is for a persons IRA, 401K, or ESPP.  When is that money taken out or where/how is it assigned?  </p>
<p>It isn&#8217;t like you can say that you had a net income so you placed the net income in these funds because those IRA, 401K, or ESPP plans are taken out as if it was money flowing out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
