<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Who Are These Strangers on Twitter?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2009/06/05/who-are-these-strangers-on-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2009/06/05/who-are-these-strangers-on-twitter/</link> <description>A premiere personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 14:31:20 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Stephanie</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2009/06/05/who-are-these-strangers-on-twitter/#comment-194695</link> <dc:creator>Stephanie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:06:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=6736#comment-194695</guid> <description>I agree, let&#039;s also add SEO experts to the list.  I realize they have semi-legitimate goals of boosting their profile, but it just seems very slimy.  Kind of like the people who hand out their business card to everyone they meet and schmooze/compliment and stick around long enough to see what they can get from you.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, let&#8217;s also add SEO experts to the list.  I realize they have semi-legitimate goals of boosting their profile, but it just seems very slimy.  Kind of like the people who hand out their business card to everyone they meet and schmooze/compliment and stick around long enough to see what they can get from you.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard Townsend</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2009/06/05/who-are-these-strangers-on-twitter/#comment-194486</link> <dc:creator>Richard Townsend</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 11:56:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=6736#comment-194486</guid> <description>Hi Smithee,Nice blog and I see your point however, the beauty of twitter is that we can choose to follow or not and even block if we wish. Actually I read another writers comment and he said that linking the words spamming (or I guess no-spam) and twitter together was an oxymoron. To me pretty much the total twitter experience is probably all not much more than &#039;legitimized&#039; spam with a few scattered gems. I have about 8,500 followers that I have built up over a couple of months and I don&#039;t mind who follows as I am not particularly selling anything just ideas. (I do have ads on my website however if I tried to live off that income I would probably starve to death).The real value in twitter (for me anyway) is that like you I&#039;m a blogger and it presents me with a great way to promote my blog. As I blog on career issues, management, leadership and teamwork the bigger my audience from my point of view the better. For years I blogged, sat writing articles had a few visitors and every now and then a comment or two. Twitter gives me instant feedback because often now someone will RT my tweet (that leads to my blog) and you know that there are people out there that are getting something from your sometimes hard to find words and efforts. I also link people to other&#039;s well written articles so there is a balance of my stuff and things I find as I research for management information on the web. Then of course every now and then you get another compliment, the coveted #followfriday.I was discussing twitter today with someone who just didn&#039;t get it at all until I explained that you can have locked tweets to talk about private things with your friends, if thats your thing. Emails tend not to get written so twitter is a good substitute for many. I find that a boring approach myself and actually state on my profile and &quot;thanks for following&quot; message &quot;no boring personal tweets&quot;.I have noticed over time that I, even amongst the clutter, eventually link up with people that provide good quality information in my areas of interest and on &quot;tweetdeck&quot; I just add them to my favorites list and they are the core of my quality group. If I did not endure the overall &#039;spam&#039; I would (perhaps maybe) not have connected with the cream. Its a bit like milking a cow I guess, you have to get all the milk and separate the cream later.Finally, many people are rejecting twitter as a fad however, whether you&#039;re selling ideas (in a hope to influence) or real world products I think it is a case of &quot;ignore it at your peril&quot;. Additionally you wouldn&#039;t stand at the front door of your real world supermarket and vet who was coming in and turn away the ones you didn&#039;t like the look of, well I wouldn&#039;t anyway.Ric ( I tweet as http://twitter.com/rictownsend and my website is www.orglearn.org (or is telling you that a bit spammy :) You can edit it out if you think it is.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Smithee,</p><p>Nice blog and I see your point however, the beauty of twitter is that we can choose to follow or not and even block if we wish. Actually I read another writers comment and he said that linking the words spamming (or I guess no-spam) and twitter together was an oxymoron. To me pretty much the total twitter experience is probably all not much more than &#8216;legitimized&#8217; spam with a few scattered gems. I have about 8,500 followers that I have built up over a couple of months and I don&#8217;t mind who follows as I am not particularly selling anything just ideas. (I do have ads on my website however if I tried to live off that income I would probably starve to death).</p><p>The real value in twitter (for me anyway) is that like you I&#8217;m a blogger and it presents me with a great way to promote my blog. As I blog on career issues, management, leadership and teamwork the bigger my audience from my point of view the better. For years I blogged, sat writing articles had a few visitors and every now and then a comment or two. Twitter gives me instant feedback because often now someone will RT my tweet (that leads to my blog) and you know that there are people out there that are getting something from your sometimes hard to find words and efforts. I also link people to other&#8217;s well written articles so there is a balance of my stuff and things I find as I research for management information on the web. Then of course every now and then you get another compliment, the coveted #followfriday.</p><p>I was discussing twitter today with someone who just didn&#8217;t get it at all until I explained that you can have locked tweets to talk about private things with your friends, if thats your thing. Emails tend not to get written so twitter is a good substitute for many. I find that a boring approach myself and actually state on my profile and &#8220;thanks for following&#8221; message &#8220;no boring personal tweets&#8221;.</p><p>I have noticed over time that I, even amongst the clutter, eventually link up with people that provide good quality information in my areas of interest and on &#8220;tweetdeck&#8221; I just add them to my favorites list and they are the core of my quality group. If I did not endure the overall &#8217;spam&#8217; I would (perhaps maybe) not have connected with the cream. Its a bit like milking a cow I guess, you have to get all the milk and separate the cream later.</p><p>Finally, many people are rejecting twitter as a fad however, whether you&#8217;re selling ideas (in a hope to influence) or real world products I think it is a case of &#8220;ignore it at your peril&#8221;. Additionally you wouldn&#8217;t stand at the front door of your real world supermarket and vet who was coming in and turn away the ones you didn&#8217;t like the look of, well I wouldn&#8217;t anyway.</p><p>Ric ( I tweet as <a
href="http://twitter.com/rictownsend" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/rictownsend</a> and my website is <a
href="http://www.orglearn.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.orglearn.org</a> (or is telling you that a bit spammy :) You can edit it out if you think it is.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Erica</title><link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2009/06/05/who-are-these-strangers-on-twitter/#comment-194448</link> <dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:46:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=6736#comment-194448</guid> <description>I wouldn&#039;t mind getting rid of the following Twitter users as well: &quot;social media gurus,&quot; &quot;online-marketing aficionados,&quot; and the self-proclaimed &quot;internet entrepreneurs.&quot;They may not technically be spammers but I would like them to find someone else to bother.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t mind getting rid of the following Twitter users as well: &#8220;social media gurus,&#8221; &#8220;online-marketing aficionados,&#8221; and the self-proclaimed &#8220;internet entrepreneurs.&#8221;</p><p>They may not technically be spammers but I would like them to find someone else to bother.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/15 queries in 0.016 seconds using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cloud.consumerismcommentary.com

Served from: consumerismcommentary.com @ 2010-03-19 11:10:36 -->