As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

From the monthly archives:

October 2009

Peer-to-peer lending institution Prosper is offering a $50 bonus for new lenders who sign up for for the service and bid on two loans. Peer-to-peer lending is an interesting way for people to qualify for loans and to lend money to others. In an economy where savings account interest rates are under 3% or 2%, it’s tempting to put cash to better use through these direct loans. There is a possibility to earn much more than you would by putting cash in a savings account as long as loans are chosen carefully and you’re willing to accept risk.

There is something appealing about working outside the banking system. Peer-to-peer lending takes a specific power of the financial industry and puts in the hands of individuals.

I tried Prosper a few years ago. A friend of mine was looking to consolidate his credit card balances, but was looking for a better option that putting several thousand dollars onto one high-interest card. His plan was to apply for a loan on Prosper and use the funds to pay off his credit cards. He would then only need to worry about one payment each month with a lower total payment and a lower interest rate than what he would likely get with a credit card.

A Great New Investment OpportunityWhen he asked me about Propser, I offered to help him out by bidding to provide a portion of the funding for the loan. The idea of being an investor appealed to me, but unfortunately, the state of Texas prevented him from participating on Prosper at that time. It is my understanding that he would qualify only for an interest rate higher than allowed by the state.

My adventures with Prosper ended before they began. And I won’t be able to get started. As I began to research investing in a portfolio of loans at Prosper and bidding on individual loans, I was greeted by this message:

Unfortunately, at this time lenders in New Jersey are not able to bid or transfer money to Prosper. If you have portfolio plans, they have been paused. You may transfer money out of your Prosper account as they become available from loan payments.

If you reside in a state where Prosper is allowed to do business, consider signing up for an account and qualifying for the $50 bonus. What is your experience with Prosper?

{ 9 comments }

Through today, GMAC has received government bailout funds totaling $12.5 billion. The company is asking the Obama administration for $5.6 billion more. One might say that in a true democracy, GMAC would need to ask permission from each taxpayer whose funds would go towards shoring up the company’s balance sheet, a move that would make GMAC appear more stable on paper. But we have a representative democracy, where Congress makes decisions that occasionally reflect the will of the members’ constituents.

GMAC might receive their third bailout. Industry analysts agree that the failure of GMAC would have a devastating ripple effect throughout the rest of the economy. If GMAC fails, so would the companies who depend on GMAC to offer loans to customers, General Motors and Chrysler. The failure of these companies in turn would result in the failures of suppliers and dealers. The government has already pumped so much taxpayer money into these companies that their failure would signal a broader failure of the entire bailout process. Also, GMAC’s total bailout is still less than the financial injections Citigroup and Bank of America have received.

In personal finance, an additional bailout for a failing company would be similar to throwing good money after bad. For example, if one makes a poor purchasing decision while buying a car, costly repairs might be necessary. Rather than cutting the losses and getting rid of the car, one might continue putting money into the black hole, and after time, the money that you spent on the purchase and repairs could have purchased a nicer car that ran without problems.

There is no guarantee that another bailout will save GMAC in the long run.

GMAC is the parent company of Ally Bank, formerly known as GMAC Bank, an online bank that has drawn in more customers with a savvy advertising campaign and high interest rates. The American Bankers Association forced the FDIC to request Ally Bank to lower its rates because other banks couldn’t compete with Ally’s new strength acquired with the help of taxpayers.

If GMAC were to fail, Ally Bank depositors should be safe as long as they have stayed within FDIC’s coverage limits.

I think it may be time to start allowing companies like GMAC, those who require funding from taxpayers to improve their balance sheets and who have little prospect for paying taxpayers back, to fail. There are signs the economy is recovering. Maybe it is time to let the market and capitalism work itself out. Those companies who remained conservative will survive and those who chased bad loans and complex derivatives without sufficiently considering risk will step aside.

Do you think GMAC should receive another bailout?

Photo credit: jim.greenhill
3rd Rescue Considered for GMAC, Eric Dash, New York Times, October 28, 2009

{ 11 comments }

Here in the Untied States, ING Direct, a banking arm of the large financial company ING Group from the Netherlands, offers more than just high-yield online savings accounts. The bank also offers investments and mortgages, and some of the latter may have been too risky, like those sold and packaged into securities by domestic banks.

ING Group received a taxpayer bailout of €10 billion ($14.9 billion) and the European Commission is forcing the financial company to restructure in order to repay this loan. Part of this deal involves taking ING’s insurance companies public and selling the United States’ ING Direct by 2013.

The effect of this sale remains to be seen. Some time between today and the end of 2013, ING Direct will be owned by another company. This bank was one of the first to operate without any brick-and-mortar branches and the first to be an unmitigated success. When I first started paying attention to my finances at the start of this decade, the recommendations for ING Direct flowed from every information channel. With the highest interest rates in the savings account business, unusually capable customer service, and a slick and functional website, the bank was a favorite among the die-hard personal finance fans at the Motley Fool discussion boards.

More recently, ING Direct has moved from excellent to very good. I still recommend this bank to people who want a hassle-free experience, but their rates are no longer as competitive and their electronic checking account is not the best in class. For those with more money to put in savings, those who would benefit from a higher interest rate, I usually offer additional options.

ING Direct’s corporate message in response to those customers concerned about recent news of the impending sale is that your money is safe. I don’t think safety is the real concern. Accounts at the bank are insured by the FDIC, so even if the bank fails safety isn’t a problem. These are the questions you should have right now:

  • Who will purchase the bank and will ING Direct’s core values change?
  • If the core values change, will they be for the better (more competitive interest rates, for example) or for the worse (scaled back operations and customer service, for example)?
  • What new account fees will be introduced?
  • ING Direct employs about 1,200 in Delaware and another thousand more across the country. Will they have jobs and for how long?

These questions will not be answered for some time.

I do not see the announcement of this sale as a reason to move money out of ING Direct now. I will be watching developments closely, however. With the bulk of my savings in ING Direct, I am very sensitive to the fact that they do not offer the highest interest rate available. For years, the bank has counted on customers like me: those who first deposited when the interest rates were high and competitive and who have stayed around as other banks consistently offer higher rates. But I do not owe my loyalty to a company and will be quick to shop around if I am no longer getting a good deal considering cost, return, and service.

Photo credit: diaper
ING to sell Delaware-based bank in [sic] 2013, Eric Ruth, The News Journal, October 27, 2009
Post-Bailout Blues as Europe Orders ING Group to Sell 2 Units, Eric Dash, New York Times, October 26, 2009

{ 14 comments }

This is an editorial by Smithee and a plea for your help in shaping the future of entertainment.

At our house, we enjoy some Hulu programming on occasion. Even though during the recent DVR years I’ve become accustomed to skipping commercials, I don’t mind them on Hulu, for these reasons:

  1. I’ve only seen one per commercial break
  2. They haven’t been suddenly, obnoxiously loud
  3. Hulu is free, and so advertising makes sense

And so far, there’s no ability to skip them. I can deal with that, because in an episode of, say, “Defying Gravity” on Hulu, there are five commercial breaks, for a total of five minutes of Lipitor commercials (at first, every episode would play five of the same Lipitor commercial, it was almost funny). I can accept five minutes. That means about 9.6% of a 43-minute show is an ad. That’s fine, so long as the service is free.

But that is going to change sometime in 2010. Hulu is owned by NewsCorp (who owns roughly half of everything), and they have decided:

It’s time to start getting paid for broadcast content online. I think a free model is a very difficult way to capture the value of our content. I think what we need to do is deliver that content to consumers in a way where they will appreciate the value. Hulu concurs with that, it needs to evolve to have a meaningful subscription model as part of its business

Anything more specific than this decision is just speculation: subscriptions for what, everything? premium channels only? groups of channels? Nobody knows.

What I propose is unacceptable is this: a subscription fee for any user, for any content, so long as the advertising remains part of the experience. In other words: unskippable ads are no problem, subscription fees for any content are no problem, but both together would be a problem.

You and I have a chance right now to help influence and inform Hulu’s decision to go forward with a subscription model, before we let ourselves get duped.

Sadly, we’ve been letting ourselves get duped for a long time.

Newspapers, Cable TV, mobile phones

Newspapers are filled with advertisements, and they also expect you to pay for each copy. The same is true of magazines. In fact you could argue that any fashion magazine is just one huge multi-part advertisement. So, I don’t read them. Oh, I look at the news online all the time, but between my banner-blindness and various browser plugins, it’s not often I see an advertisement.

TV is a different story. TV used to be just like radio: the good parts were ad-supported, and you also had a station that relied on member subscriptions. Cable messed that all up, and we were too busy with the colorful new channels to notice. A cable company would set up shop in your town and tell you all about the dozens of extra options you’d get for $X / month. We were totally psyched to get MTV and Nickelodeon at our house, but it didn’t occur to me until later than since the cable company replaced our over-the-air channels, we were now paying for something that used to be free. Thirteen free somethings, in fact (UHF was admittedly pretty empty).

There’s an argument that in the case of OTA / broadcast channels, what you’re paying the cable company for is consistent quality of signal. I’d be happy to see some proof of that, in the form of a cable company’s accounting spreadsheet. I’m sure that NBC is charging the cable companies regional monopolies a fee to include their programming, and cable is passing that cost on to the customer.

The mobile phone business model just depresses me whenever I think of it. Here’s how a phone worked since the time it was invented: if you called someone, you were expected to pay for it, but if someone called you, it was free. This makes total sense: the phone call recipient didn’t intend to have that conversation, he or she isn’t really responsible. Besides that, this seemed to work very well for decades, and phone companies never changed it. That is, until we were tooling around town with phones in our pockets and cars. Since it was new and fancy, providers decided to invent a different business model: you’d be paying for calls now whether you started it or not.

As far as I know, mobile phone companies have never had to justify this to their customers en masse.

AOL vs. World of Warcraft

Remember those CDs of AOL software? They were everywhere. It seemed like you’d get a new version in your mailbox every three months, especially if you weren’t even a customer. They were free, because AOL’s business model was a monthly fee for access, content, and software upgrades. And AOL did fine for a long time.

Everquest came along and messed that all up, charging both a monthly fee and an upfront fee for the software, and now WoW players suffer the same fate. You’re paying the company twice for the same things they were going to be doing anyway. What is wrong with us? Why do we enable companies to use more than one business model at a time?

Advertising is a replacement for subscriptions

And vice versa: subscriptions are a replacement for advertising. Advertising is one business model, and subscriptions are another. Employing both for the same product is unacceptable.

I’d like to ask for your help now in spreading this message to the managers at Hulu, so they understand the intelligent way to move forward is to either saddle us with a recurring fee and remove the commercials, or leave the commercials in an otherwise free service.

On Hulu’s discussion forum, there are already many threads decrying the decision to start charging. You could try adding your own voice there, or e-mailing feedback@hulu.com. Another less elegant method would be to add an irrelevant comment on one of the entries at the official Hulu blog. In my experience, site owners are more likely to read blog comments than they are discussion forums, but your mileage may vary.

Hulu’s Free Glory Days Are Official Numbered, John Herrman, Gizmodo, Oct. 22 2009

{ 12 comments }

As of October 26, 2009, over 100 banks have failed this year. Most of these are smaller regional banks who, in order to compete with larger banks, offered risky loans and are now facing customer defaults. Larger banks were offered government bailouts to prevent failure, but these smaller banks whose failures are not seen as major risks to the economy are left without taxpayer assistance.

The FDIC covers savings accounts, checking accounts, and certificates of deposit to ensure that customers hardly notice when one of these smaller banks fail. As long as a bank is a member of FDIC, and most are, customers should be confident that even if a bank fails, they will be able to withdraw their deposits within the coverage limit. Predicting the increase of bank failures this year, the FDIC decided over a year ago to increase its insurance limits. In 2008, only 26 banks failed compared to 106 so far this year.

Although there is often worry in the press that FDIC is underfunded and might run out of money, that situation is highly unlikely. The FDIC is requiring banks to start paying their FDIC premiums which have largely been ignored for decades to increase its available funds. The FDIC also has an extensive line of credit with the Treasury, and because Congress will always vote to make sure the FDIC will be able to cover necessary expenses, it is in effect a limitless credit line.

Here is a full list of banks that have failed since 2000. I will update this list as necessary.

Bank Location Failed Date
Riverview Community Bank Otsego, MN October 23, 2009
Partners Bank Naples, FL October 23, 2009
Hillcrest Bank Florida Naples, FL October 23, 2009
Flagship National Bank Bradenton, FL October 23, 2009
First DuPage Bank Westmont, IL October 23, 2009
Bank of Elmwood Racine, WI October 23, 2009
American United Bank Lawrenceville, GA October 23, 2009
San Joaquin Bank Bakersfield, CA October 16, 2009
Warren Bank Warren, MI October 2, 2009
Southern Colorado National Bank Pueblo, CO October 2, 2009
Jennings State Bank Spring Grove, MN October 2, 2009
Georgian Bank Atlanta, GA September 25, 2009
Irwin Union Bank, F.S.B. Louisville, KY September 18, 2009
Irwin Union Bank and Trust Company Columbus, IN September 18, 2009
Venture Bank Lacey, WA September 11, 2009
Corus Bank, N.A. Chicago, IL September 11, 2009
Brickwell Community Bank Woodbury, MN September 11, 2009
Vantus Bank Sioux City, IA September 4, 2009
Platinum Community Bank Rolling Meadows, IL September 4, 2009
InBank Oak Forest, IL September 4, 2009
First State Bank Flagstaff, AZ September 4, 2009
First Bank of Kansas City Kansas City, MO September 4, 2009
Mainstreet Bank Forest Lake, MN August 28, 2009
Bradford Bank Baltimore, MD August 28, 2009
Affinity Bank Ventura, CA August 28, 2009
First Coweta Bank Newnan, GA August 21, 2009
CapitalSouth Bank Birmingham, AL August 21, 2009
Guaranty Bank Austin, TX August 21, 2009
ebank Atlanta, GA August 21, 2009
Colonial Bank Montgomery, AL August 14, 2009
Community Bank of Nevada Las Vegas, NV August 14, 2009
Union Bank, National Association Gilbert, AZ August 14, 2009
Dwelling House Savings and Loan Association Pittsburgh, PA August 14, 2009
Community Bank of Arizona Phoenix, AZ August 14, 2009
First State Bank Sarasota, FL August 7, 2009
Community National Bank of Sarasota County Venice, FL August 7, 2009
Community First Bank Prineville, OR August 7, 2009
Integrity Bank Jupiter, FL July 31, 2009
Peoples Community Bank West Chester, OH July 31, 2009
Mutual Bank Harvey, IL July 31, 2009
First State Bank of Altus Altus, OK July 31, 2009
First BankAmericano Elizabeth, NJ July 31, 2009
Waterford Village Bank Williamsville, NY July 24, 2009
Security Bank of North Metro Woodstock, GA July 24, 2009
Security Bank of North Fulton Alpharetta, GA July 24, 2009
Security Bank of Jones County Gray, GA July 24, 2009
Security Bank of Houston County Perry, GA July 24, 2009
Security Bank of Gwinnett County Suwanee, GA July 24, 2009
Security Bank of Bibb County Macon, GA July 24, 2009
Vineyard Bank Rancho Cucamonga, CA July 17, 2009
Temecula Valley Bank Temecula, CA July 17, 2009
First Piedmont Bank Winder, GA July 17, 2009
BankFirst Sioux Falls, SD July 17, 2009
Bank of Wyoming Thermopolis, WY July 10, 2009
Rock River Bank Oregon, IL July 2, 2009
Millennium State Bank of Texas Dallas, TX July 2, 2009
John Warner Bank Clinton, IL July 2, 2009
Founders Bank Worth, IL July 2, 2009
First State Bank of Winchester Winchester, IL July 2, 2009
First National Bank of Danville Danville, IL July 2, 2009
Elizabeth State Bank Elizabeth, IL July 2, 2009
Mirae Bank Los Angeles, CA June 26, 2009
Horizon Bank Pine City, MN June 26, 2009
Neighborhood Community Bank Newnan, GA June 26, 2009
MetroPacific Bank Irvine, CA June 26, 2009
Community Bank of West Georgia Villa Rica, GA June 26, 2009
Southern Community Bank Fayetteville, GA June 19, 2009
First National Bank of Anthony Anthony, KS June 19, 2009
Cooperative Bank Wilmington, NC June 19, 2009
Bank of Lincolnwood Lincolnwood, IL June 5, 2009
Strategic Capital Bank Champaign, IL May 22, 2009
Citizens National Bank Macomb, IL May 22, 2009
BankUnited, FSB Coral Gables, FL May 21, 2009
Westsound Bank Bremerton, WA May 8, 2009
America West Bank Layton, UT May 1, 2009
Silverton Bank, NA Atlanta, GA May 1, 2009
Citizens Community Bank Ridgewood, NJ May 1, 2009
American Southern Bank Kennesaw, GA April 24, 2009
Michigan Heritage Bank Farmington Hills, MI April 24, 2009
First Bank of Idaho Ketchum, ID April 24, 2009
First Bank of Beverly Hills Calabasas, CA April 24, 2009
Great Basin Bank of Nevada Elko, NV April 17, 2009
American Sterling Bank Sugar Creek, MO April 17, 2009
New Frontier Bank Greeley, CO April 10, 2009
Cape Fear Bank Wilmington, NC April 10, 2009
Omni National Bank Atlanta, GA March 27, 2009
FirstCity Bank Stockbridge, GA March 20, 2009
TeamBank, NA Paola, KS March 20, 2009
Colorado National Bank Colorado Springs, CO March 20, 2009
Freedom Bank of Georgia Commerce, GA March 6, 2009
Security Savings Bank Henderson, NV February 27, 2009
Heritage Community Bank Glenwood, IL February 27, 2009
Silver Falls Bank Silverton, OR February 20, 2009
Corn Belt Bank & Trust Co. Pittsfield, IL February 13, 2009
Sherman County Bank Loup City, NE February 13, 2009
Riverside Bank of the Gulf Coast Cape Coral, FL February 13, 2009
Pinnacle Bank of Oregon Beaverton, OR February 13, 2009
FirstBank Financial Services McDonough, GA February 6, 2009
County Bank Merced, CA February 6, 2009
Alliance Bank Culver City, CA February 6, 2009
Suburban FSB Crofton, MD January 30, 2009
Ocala National Bank Ocala, FL January 30, 2009
MagnetBank Salt Lake City, UT January 30, 2009
1st Centennial Bank Redlands, CA January 23, 2009
Bank of Clark County Vancouver, WA January 16, 2009
National Bank of Commerce Berkeley, IL January 16, 2009
Sanderson State Bank Sanderson, TX December 12, 2008
Haven Trust Bank Duluth, GA December 12, 2008
First Georgia Community Bank Jackson, GA December 5, 2008
PFF Bank & Trust Pomona, CA November 21, 2008
Downey Savings & Loan Newport Beach, CA November 21, 2008
Community Bank Loganville, GA November 21, 2008
Franklin Bank, SSB Houston, TX November 7, 2008
Security Pacific Bank Los Angeles, CA November 7, 2008
Freedom Bank Bradenton, FL October 31, 2008
Alpha Bank & Trust Alpharetta, GA October 24, 2008
Meridian Bank Eldred, IL October 10, 2008
Main Street Bank Northville, MI October 10, 2008
Washington Mutual Bank FSB Park City, UT September 25, 2008
Washington Mutual Bank Henderson, NV September 25, 2008
Ameribank Northfork, WV September 19, 2008
Silver State Bank Henderson, NV September 5, 2008
Integrity Bank Alpharetta, GA August 29, 2008
Columbian Bank & Trust Topeka, KS August 22, 2008
First Priority Bank Bradenton, FL August 1, 2008
First National Bank of Nevada Reno, NV July 25, 2008
First Heritage Bank, NA Newport Beach, CA July 25, 2008
IndyMac Bank Pasadena, CA July 11, 2008
First Integrity Bank, NA Staples, MN May 30, 2008
ANB Financial, NA Bentonville, AR May 9, 2008
Hume Bank Hume, MO March 7, 2008
Douglass National Bank Kansas City, MO January 25, 2008
Miami Valley Bank Lakeview, OH October 4, 2007
NetBank Alpharetta, GA September 28, 2007
Metropolitan Savings Bank Pittsburgh, PA February 2, 2007
Bank of Ephraim Ephraim, UT June 25, 2004
Reliance Bank White Plains, NY March 19, 2004
Guaranty National Bank of Tallahassee Tallahassee, FL March 12, 2004
Dollar Savings Bank Newark, NJ February 14, 2004
Pulaski Savings Bank Philadelphia, PA November 14, 2003
First National Bank of Blanchardville Blanchardville, WI May 9, 2003
Southern Pacific Bank Torrance, CA February 7, 2003
Farmers Bank of Cheneyville Cheneyville, LA December 17, 2002
Bank of Alamo Alamo, TN November 8, 2002
AmTrade International Bank Atlanta, GA September 30, 2002
Universal Federal Savings Bank Chicago, IL June 27, 2002
Connecticut Bank of Commerce Stamford, CT June 26, 2002
New Century Bank Shelby Township, MI March 28, 2002
Net 1st National Bank Boca Raton, FL March 1, 2002
NextBank, NA Phoenix, AZ February 7, 2002
Oakwood Deposit Bank Co. Oakwood, OH February 1, 2002
Bank of Sierra Blanca Sierra Blanca, TX January 18, 2002
Hamilton Bank, NA Miami, FL January 11, 2002
Sinclair National Bank Gravette, AR September 7, 2001
Superior Bank, FSB Hinsdale, IL July 27, 2001
Malta National Bank Malta, OH May 3, 2001
First Alliance Bank & Trust Co. Manchester, NH February 2, 2001
National State Bank of Metropolis Metropolis, IL December 14, 2000
Bank of Honolulu Honolulu, HI October 13, 2000

{ 5 comments }

A few years ago, I visited the Japanese Tea Garden in Golden Gate Park in San Francisco. Japanese gardens are designed precisely to appear natural, resulting in an interesting collision between nature and man. There is a set of principles or aesthetics that guide the creation of Japanese gardens, including the dry gardens commonly called “Zen gardens.”

The basis for these modern Japanese aesthetics has existed for thousands of years and is rooted in Buddhist writings and teachings. However, the full concept of aesthetics relating to these ancient ideas has been discussed only within the past two centuries, as the the traditional Japanese concepts have been infused with the Western idea of art and aesthetics.

These same Japanese aesthetics, the attributes that define a Japanese garden, can be further stretched by the Western mind to relate to other areas of thought. If you are particularly interested in personal finances, as we are here at Consumerism Commentary, you might attempt to apply these concepts to attitudes and behaviors surrounding interaction with money.

Here are seven aesthetics rooted in Japanese culture that can be drawn upon to make us think about the way we live with and deal with money, from personal expenses to investing.

kanso 簡素

Keep your finances simple. The extreme limit of necessity would be to have no other financial accounts but one checking account for paying your bills. Simplifying at this level may beyond the limit of practicality even if still possible. But there is no reason I should continue to have savings accounts at seven different banks, even if seven is an odd number, compliant with other aesthetics.

In addition to utilize as few banks as possible, simplify your investment accounts. Keep your investments in one account in one index fund or target retirement fund that matches your risk profile. This also makes it much easier to evaluate your asset allocation to ensure your investments on the whole match your tolerance for risk.

There is rarely a need to have more than one credit card for your personal matters. Zero is an even better number.

Simplicity in all financial matters is an attainable goal.

seijaku 静寂

Managers of actively managed mutual funds earn their pay by buying and selling investments frequently. Index funds take the opposite approach by matching a stock index, adding or removing stocks only when the index does, which is rarely. Index funds embody this concept of stillness. Unnecessary activity, like stock trading, makes the stock broker rich while you’re adding risk and decreasing your chance of beating an index fund’s performance.

Keeping your wealth still and motionless allows time to have a chance to cultivate it. The effect of compound interest increases when you let it work for decades.

If you’ve simplified your finances down to a small number of accounts, you can further keep your money motionless by removing the necessity of transferring funds from one place to another. The 0% balance transfer game or otherwise moving your credit card balances from one card to another is in direct conflict with this aesthetic.

datsuzoku 脱俗

Break free from your possessions. We buy things because they reflect who we are or who we want to be, but no thing can be a true reflection of a self. Not only do material possessions drain you of funds that could be spent on necessities, but you will have less money for sharing with others within and outside of your family.

Break free from conventional thought and following the bandwagon. You are free to be your own person and find your own path. You should never feel trapped in a job or a career. Even a steady bi-weekly paycheck is a pattern that could be broken without fear. With creativity, draw income to you through something unexpected.

Don’t confine yourself to your budget. The ultimate way to grow wealth is to spend less than you earn, so as long as that continues, you can break free from your budget and enjoy flexibility without too much worry.

koko 考古

Focus on the bare essentials. Add something to your life only if it has a functional purpose and fills a need. This concept is a nod to frugality and sparsity. For example, do you need three televisions, one for each large room in your house? Do you even need one television when you can find entertainment, including comedy, nature, and drama — possibly even crime-focused drama — for free, by sitting in a park and watching other people interact? Wouldn’t it be more fulfilling to visit a National Park than to sit on your couch and watch a documentary about it?

Decide what in your life is not essential and eliminate it. If something does not add value more than or equal to its expense, consider it a candidate for elimination. I think immediately of the interest that you pay on a credit card balance. Once you pay interest, you’ve paid more than the value of whatever you’ve purchased with the credit card. If you decide a $1,000 television brings $1,000 worth of value into your life, then it may be worthwhile. But if you put that on a credit card and pay the balance and interest over time, the new question is whether that $1,000 television added $2,000 worth of value into your life.

shizen 自然

You should represent yourself to the world truthfully and without pretense. There is no need to purchase expensive cars and houses when necessity allows for lesser purchases. Don’t concern yourself with “keeping up with the Joneses.” Without the need to show the world you have more money than you really have, you will lose the desire to buy more than you can afford. As a result, the chances of falling into the trap of debt from unnecessary spending will diminish.

My thoughts on this are drawn to people with public-facing careers. Real estate agents, for example, often want to project an aura of success. If clients believe that the agent is rich, the clients will then believe that they are successful agents. The natural conclusion is that these agents are successful because they represent clients fairly and offer quality houses. The same is true for lawyers whose business is representing clients in court trials. Lavish spending projects an image of wealth, which indicates to prospective customers a history of successful court appearances.

This is all show and all pretense. Anyone can look wealthy or successful thanks to the availability of credit. You can’t see what lurks beneath someone else’s surface.

Do not cover up all that is natural. Do not hide money or money-related problems from your partner or spouse. Finances should be part of a communication that is open and honest, not hidden beneath layers of creative stories.

fukinsei 不均整

Create a budget, a monthly spending plan that outlines your limits for expenses in a variety of categories that make sense for you. A budget by definition starts out the same each month but will look different by the month’s final day. Life’s asymmetry is natural, and your budget should reflect this asymmetry while maintaining balance. You spend more for gifts as the December holidays approach, so you might budget more for gifts in November and December than you might in June or July. In order for this asymmetry to be balanced, an increase in one category at one time should correspond with a decrease either in another category or at another time.

This flexibility is essential for creating a workable budget. A budget should free you, not trap you.

Balanced asymmetry appears elsewhere. “Work/life balance” is a relatively new concept that is based on this idea. When my employer talks about “work/life balance,” they are not trying to imply that we should spend an equal amount of hours in our life between our career and everything else we do. It is an asymmetrical approach to living a more fulfilled life.

yugen 幽玄

Whenever your personal financial issues are public rather than private, choose subtlety over directness. Do not brag about your successes. There is no need for you to have your latest business acquisition or marriage listed in your college’s alumni magazine. If you give charitably to an organization, you do not need to publicly list your name or the amount of money you donated.

In the business world, there is a movement towards personal branding. It is good for your career to find ways make yourself stand out among your colleagues or among a sea of job applicants. While I would agree that it’s important to protect your identity, particularly online, from anything that might damage your reputation, the best way to stand out is to be the best rather than to declare you are the best.

Let others declare it for you.

A guide, not a rule

While it would be great if all of the above could apply to our interactions with money all the time, I like to look at these aesthetic concepts as a guide. Just considering these ideas and allowing yourself to think about money in a different way can be enlightening. Perhaps you can strive to achieve several of these concepts in your own life, or perhaps you can appreciate this way of living even if you choose to relate with money in a different manner.

Simplifying my finances is one way I can start applying this approach to my life. As I mentioned above, I currently use seven accounts for my savings. Many of these I open so I can review them for Consumerism Commentary, but even the purely personal bank accounts number too many. Do you or would you apply any of these aesthetics to your finances?

Disclaimer: I am not an expert in Japanese philosophy or, for that matter, in personal finance. I drew the above concepts of Japanese aesthetics from a variety of sources.

Photo credits: semihundido, laRuth, DieselDemon, 田中十洋

{ 8 comments }

The Consumerism Commentary Podcast has now completed six months of broadcasts without missing one week. This is as good a place as any to declare the “First Season” of the podcast complete and begin the “Second Season.”

In the premiere of Season 2, Tom Dziubek and Flexo speak with Adam Baker, the creator of the website Man Vs. Debt. We discuss Baker’s war on debt and its origins. We also talk about a number of traveling tips collected throughout Baker’s experiences leaving Indiana and living in Australia and New Zealand.

Production Number: S02E01
Segment Number: 40

 

To listen, use the player above (Adobe Flash required), download the podcast here, subscribe to the podcast RSS feed, or use the iTunes link. Note: open links in a new window (Ctrl-click or Command-click) to avoid interrupting the podcast.

Adam Baker, Man Vs. Debt[00:00] Introduction from Flexo
[00:33] Interview with Adam Baker, Man vs. Debt
[00:58] Baker’s story
[07:30] Baker’s Declaration of War on debt
[09:21] Using only cash for variable monthly expenses
[10:14] Money with family and friends
[12:00] Investing in ourselves
[13:46] Baker’s move to Australia
[16:34] Couchsurfing
[19:16] WWOOFing
[20:50] Long-term vs. short-term travel
[21:50] Staying at hostels
[24:26] End

We always welcome feedback from listeners. If you have any comments for this episode or for any other, or if you have suggestions for future episodes, please leave us comments here or email us at podcast at this domain name.

{ 0 comments }