As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

October 2010

Today on the Consumerism Commentary Podcast, Tom Dziubek talks to Farnoosh Torabi, author of the book Psych Yourself Rich: Get the Mindset and Discipline You Need to Build Your Financial Life and Money Coach on the SOAPnet reality TV show Bank of Mom and Dad. Tom and Farnoosh discuss many of the topics in her book such the definition of being “rich”, the things you need to feel rich and also how people can apply Google’s “20% rule” to their own lives. Finally, Farnoosh talks about “Bank of Mom and Dad”.

Consumerism Commentary Podcast #80
Psych Yourself Rich, Farnoosh Torabi: S04E2 / 102

Adobe Flash required
DownloadRSSiTunes

Table of contents


[00:00] Introduction from Tom
[00:36] Interview with Farnoosh Torabi
[00:51] Farnoosh’s background
[04:02] Being “rich”
[07:30] Financial responsibilities in a relationship
[08:55] Money that works
[10:00] The concept of retiring with millions of dollars
[12:27] Goal ambivalence
[16:32] Google’s 20% rule
[19:56] Getting yourself on the path to psyching yourself rich
[23:46] Bank of Mom and Dad
[30:21] End

We always welcome feedback from listeners. If you have any comments for this episode or for any other, or if you have suggestions for future episodes, please leave us comments here or email us at podcast at this domain name.

{ 1 comment }

This is a guest article by Stella Louise, editor of Blog & Save from Savings.com.

I was my neighborhood T.J. Maxx recently debating between two pairs of boots: Both were low heel, knee-high black boots, but one was a more trendy version with black stretch panel inserts by a reputable brand name, while the other pair were basic, classic and unadorned and by a more premium shoe maker. The second pair was also twice the price of the more trendy boots.

I bought the more expensive pair.

I would have saved $50 if I had based my decision solely on price, but I decided to “think outside the shoebox” as it were and factor something else into my decision. It wasn’t the fact that the more expensive boots were manufactured by a more prestigious designer and that they were actually worth 2-3 times the T.J. Maxx price, it was the fact that I’d most likely get more use out of the basic, classic style vs. the trendier pair of boots.

Here’s the thing: I already own three pairs of black boots. The first pair is a short style to be worn under pants. After purchasing them, I knew I still “needed” a pair of knee high boots to wear with dresses and skirts, so when I found a pair of faux suede boots with a pointy toe and killer stiletto heels for only $18, I thought I had it made. Unfortunately, “killer” doesn’t only apply to the look of the boots, but what they do to my feet as well.

The third pair of black boots I bought are knee high with a more moderate heel, as well as being cuffed at the top and having strap-detailing across the front of the ankle. They are easier to wear than the stiletto boots, but are not exactly wearable. They don’t zip up, which means if I want wear them over jeans I have the impossible task of trying to shove pant legs inside the boot without them getting all bunched up. And the detailing which makes them unique and stylish, also limits what they can be worn with.

The reasons I bought them: they were black, they were knee-high, they were more comfortable than the stiletto boots and, most importantly, they were cheap.

Except, when all is said and done, they weren’t because I haven’t gotten much use out of them at all. Since I had already sunk a bit of money into several pairs of boots to begin with, I let cost, rather than functionality, be the deciding factor in my decision. So I settled for a pair that weren’t very versatile because at the time they seemed to be a good buy.

Penny-wise and pound foolish,” as my Dad might say–for when you base a purchasing decision solely on price, you can end up paying much more in the long run.

Whether it’s the winter coat that falls apart after only one season, or the iPhone knock-off that doesn’t have the essential features you actually need or the gym with the lower membership fee that doesn’t have the equipment or classes that make it worth actually getting yourself to go there to work out, settling for “close enough” can have some serious financial ramifications. In the case of the cheap coat, you’d end up shelling out for a new one next season when it would have been more cost effective to spend the extra cash up front for a better-made version that would last several years. The cheap gym could cause you to eat a hefty initiation fee when you finally move to one that’s more suitable–not to mention the months of paying dues and never using the facilities. And if you’re really jonesing for an iPhone, chances are that the knock-off you settled for will end up gathering dust in favor of you splurging to get the coveted gadget.

In fact more often than not, “settling” only leads to costing you extra money in the long run. Everything being equal, it makes sense to choose the lower price–but, as I’ve written before, there are a number of situations where cheaper isn’t better. So before making a purchasing decision, make sure you take into account factors other than just price–including quality, value, functionality, usefulness, longevity, etc. Because whether it’s a lifemate or a laptop, settling can have costly consequences.

{ 10 comments }

In April, I noted that General Motors repaid taxpayers for the company’s government-initiated bailout loans in full. There has been quite a discussion about this repayment, but the main points are that the loans accounted only for a small portion of the bailout, and one could consider that the loan repayment was possible only due to more government money inflows.

Though the loan portion has been repaid, the U.S. Treasury still controls the company through its ownership of 61% of outstanding shares of common stock and $2.1 billion in preferred stock.

Whatever your perspective, GM is continuing its plans to move away from the Treasury’s controlling stake. They will buy the preferred stock back from the government, which has been earning taxpayers a 9% dividend. GM plans to re-introduce common stock to the public later this year and the Treasury will sell its shares on the open market. The company will pay its union debt and will soon open a significant credit line it doesn’t plan to use.

So here are the questions: Will you buy GM stock? Will you buy GM cars? And what do you think of GM’s bailout? Is GM even a relevant manufacturer today?

I have nothing against GM cars. I have no major experience driving one. My current car is a Honda Civic, the second Honda Civic I’ve owned. My first car was a very used Toyota Celica.

CNN Money, Chris Isidore, October 28, 2010

{ 25 comments }

The trend of financial over-sharing continues, and I’m glad to have been on the leading edge. I’ve been sharing the details of my finances, including spending habits, since I created Consumerism Commentary in 2003. The idea of social net worth continued with sites like NetWorthIQ, which allowed the public to post family net worth and compare numbers with others.

Mint has since become the most popular way for tracking finances online, and this website has been collecting spending data for some time, analyzing and categorizing each transaction.

Once Mint crossed the million user mark, the data was collected in aggregate to get a better look at the country’s economic condition. Now, with a user base expanded even further, Mint has opened its data vaults to the public with the ability to drill down to the city level. You can now see, for example, the most popular restaurants in New York City (based on number of transactions) or the most expensive clothing shops in San Francisco (based on average purchase price).

The city-based data is interesting for drawing conclusions (or making assumptions) about the most populous areas of the country. Unfortunately, there is only enough data to compare three cities in my state. In New Jersey, the only cities available are Jersey City, Newark, and Trenton. Don’t expect to find data for suburbs like Ewing or Princeton within the Trenton data; it appears to include the city proper only, defined presumably either by zip code of merchant or zip code of Mint user.

Mint Data fulfills a certain financial voyeuristic intention. There is some value in determining whether the amount you spend at McDonald’s every month is more or less than the average New Yorker, but these type of comparisons are generally unsatisfying past the surface. The type of comparison that is more worthwhile is a look at the change over time for an individual or a location, and Mint Data offers this option.

The services produces attractive charts that can be embedded in websites. Here is how spending at Bubba Gump New York, a restaurant apparently inspired by Forrest Gump, has changed over the past few months and how it compares with overall spending on restaurants in the city.

The key to improving your finances is to forget about these comparisons. What does it mean if you spend $200 a month in clothing stores while the average spending in your city is $100? It doesn’t necessarily mean anything other than that. Different people have different financial situations and different needs. None of this is apparent in aggregate comparisons. Without drilling down on the demographics to a very fine level of detail, the only relevant analysis is a comparison with the earlier you.

Check out Mint Data or sign up to track your finances on Mint for free.

{ 5 comments }

Recent Changes in My Personal Finance Plan

by Luke Landes

It’s easy to fall into financial habits. Even people who consider themselves inflexible can grow accustomed to a financial change after time. That’s the beauty of automation — an automatic 10 percent transfer to a high-yield savings account every time you receive a paycheck eventually becomes painless. Habits aren’t always perfect; just as you adjust […]

15 comments Read the full article →

Podcast 79: Potential Income Tax Changes, Bob Meighan

by Luke Landes

Today on the Consumerism Commentary Podcast, Tom Dziubek talks to Bob Meighan, CPA and Vice President of Consumer Advocacy TurboTax, Intuit about potential income tax changes for the new year. Bob and Tom talk about the potential sunsetting of the “Bush Tax Cuts” and how it will impact more than just those making $250,000 a […]

0 comments Read the full article →

Your Opinion: Is Debt Slavery?

by Luke Landes
739027758_ac83c599f4_o[1]

I’ve written several times on Consumerism Commentary, and other people have written and said many times as well, that debt is slavery. In fact, there is a popular book on the topic aptly titled, Debt is Slavery. It’s a convenient metaphor; if slavery is working without the benefit of enjoying the fruits of your labor, […]

43 comments Read the full article →

Where Your Federal Tax Money Goes

by Luke Landes

Thanks to an organization called Third Way, American taxpayers can get a good, detailed look at how much of a typical tax bill is destined for any particular government program. Third Way is a progressive think-tank, and they studied the federal budget to provide an itemized tax receipt for the typical taxpayer. Here is their […]

16 comments Read the full article →

Guide to CitiBank Credit Cards

by Luke Landes

The offer you are interested in has expired. Read our review of other Citi cards.

1 comment Read the full article →

Brokers Are Salespeople, Share Your Story

by Luke Landes

Everyone has a responsibility to oneself and one’s family, first and foremost. It’s hard to blame brokers or anyone else who sells financial products to investors. The choices they make are designed to ensure their well-being, so when they convince an investor to direct money into a product, anyone who is interested in building his […]

21 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 41234