As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

A Case of Really Bad Timing

This article was written by in Charity. 5 comments.

At the end of 2007, I contributed $5,000 to a Fidelity Charitable Gift Fund that I created for myself to distribute to non-profit organizations later, once I selected a cause to support. This was a case of really bad timing; since then my account’s value has dropped 6%. Suddenly, I have $300 less to donate to charity. While I am receiving the tax deduction for the full $5,000, unless my account increases at least 6.4%, organizations won’t benefit from the full amount I donated.

I think I need to examine my allocation strategy in the Charitable Gift Fund. Perhaps I should keep the amount I intend to distribute in the coming year in a money market fund within the account, while everything else should be invested for the longer term in a broad stock index fund.

Published or updated January 17, 2008. If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to the RSS feed or receive daily emails. Follow @ConsumerismComm on Twitter and visit our Facebook page for more updates.

Email Email Print Print
About the author

Luke Landes is the founder of Consumerism Commentary. He has been blogging and writing for the internet since 1995 and has been building online communities since 1991. Find out more about Luke Landes and follow him on Twitter. View all articles by .

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

avatar jim

I think you should treat it like any investment account except that instead of selling you will donate it, so perhaps this 5000 should what you plan to donate in 2009? That way you don’t let these swings affect you.

Reply to this comment

avatar Eric Toya

Was this a one time, this year only contribution? If you distribute the funds now, you have missed out on a potential tax loss, and the charity that will still benefit from you contribution benefits a bit less.

I agree with Jim. Don’t be in a hurry to distribute the funds. Let it build a bit. Make another contribution next year. See where it is then.

Reply to this comment

avatar Luke Landes

It was a last year contribution, actually. It’s a contribution to an intermediary fund I set up at Fidelity, so I got the deduction for the full $5,000, even though it hasn’t been “granted” to an organization yet. When I made the contribution, I had the option of a money market fund or a variety of mutual funds. I chose the S&P 500 fund. Knowing that I intended on distributing the full $5,000 within the year, I should have invested that amount in a money market, more friendly to short-term holding.

I believe I have a solution that makes sense. I’ll just leave this $5,000 in the account to grow over the long term, but I’ll contribute more to the fund this year, with the intent of distributing that contribution instead.

Reply to this comment

avatar jim

I think that solution makes sense, let the $5k go perhaps until next year or even farther down the road. Ultimately you want the funds to appreciate (otherwise you would’ve contributed directly to the charity!) so give them some time.

You might want to forgo contributing to the fund in the first place for short term contributions.

Reply to this comment

avatar Eric Toya

Right, if the plan is to distribute the funds with the year, there is no benefit to using the Fidelity intermediary. Do you intend to make the donation anonymous? That would be one benefit. Otherwise, just send a check off to your charity of choice.

Reply to this comment

Leave a Comment

Note: Use your name or a unique handle, not the name of a website or business. No deep links or business URLs are allowed. Spam, including promotional linking to a company website, will be deleted. By submitting your comment you are agreeing to these terms and conditions.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.