As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!
     

Ask The Expert: Company Match

This article was written by in Saving. 9 comments.


Walter Updegrave is the staff expert at CNN Money, and he fields questions from those who write in to his column called, as one might guess, Ask The Expert. The latest question comes from a twenty-four year old:

My 401(k) plan will actually give me the 50 percent match on as much as 15 percent of my salary, but I’m unsure whether I should put less in my emergency account and increase my 401(k) contribution or stick with my current plan. What do you think I should do?

Walter offers great advice — take advantage of the full company match. You can’t turn free money down. Fill up the emergency cash fund next, then fill up a Roth IRA with any available savings left over.

I’m only saving 4% of my income in my 401(k) currently, but that takes advantage of the full company match. My Roth IRA comes next, and that’s being funded to the $4,000 maximum. My emergency fund is stagnant, but with all my cash accounts, it should be sufficient to cover my expenses for several months if necessary.

Updated February 6, 2012 and originally published October 24, 2005. If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to the RSS feed or receive daily emails. Follow @ConsumerismComm on Twitter and visit our Facebook page for more updates.

Email Email Print Print
avatar
Points: ♦127,475
Rank: Platinum
About the author

Luke Landes, also known as Flexo, is the founder of Consumerism Commentary. He has been blogging and writing for the internet since 1995 and has been building online communities since 1991. Find out more about him and follow Luke Landes on Twitter. View all articles by .

{ 3 comments }

avatar thc

It’s acutally pretty irresponsible for Updegrave to be dispensing such advice on such little information about the investor. Besides, I don’t think Updegrave has any real credetials anyway.

avatar Luke Landes ♦127,475 (Platinum)

Well, I think the case with any advice column, whether financial in nature or otherwise, is that the advice given is intended to be general in nature, in order to apply loosely to the majority of readers. If the writer wanted personalized financial advice, she should have asked a financial advisor, not a columnist.

The problem with financial advice is that if one tells an other to do one thing and then market conditions make that a bad choice in hindsight, people want to hold the advice-giver accountable.

avatar thc

You make a valid point except that publications like Money Magazine have convinced less sophisticated investors that they don’t need personalized financial advice, all they need do is read their magazine. (Isn’t Updegrave on the staff at Money?)

To your second point, providers of financial advice *should* be held accountable. That’s why it’s important that they are experienced and hold credentials. It takes more than just a journalism degree.

Previous post:

Next post: