As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Banking


Thanks to heavy marketing campaigns, including endorsements and partnerships with everyone from Russell Simmons to Kim Kardashian to Suze Orman (it’s hip! it’s popular! it’s financially smart!), use of prepaid debit cards has surged.

Prepaid debit cards were once a fringe financial product. They were intended to be used by people who have a communal distrust of banks, which could be understandable, as the financial industry has done little to gain the public’s trust throughout the recession and after receiving a massive bailout from taxpayers.

If not by those who distrust the industry, prepaid debit cards would be used by those who believe they can’t afford to keep minimum balances deposited in a bank to avoid costly monthly fees.

The fees for using prepaid debit cards often end up higher, but seem less of a burden day-to-day. This is the fast food effect. When you can’t put together $70 to buy groceries for the week for your family on any particular day, you buy $15 in fast food for the family, which lasts a meal. It costs more in the long-run, but the $15 is manageable on any particular day while the $70 is not. Prepaid debit cards operate on the same principal. Despite the availability of free checking accounts as well as free interest-bearing savings accounts, customers are often subjected to unexpected fees and minimum required balances that make the accounts and their potentiality for a lack of costs seemingly out of reach.

When you deposit money into a checking or savings account at a bank, including legitimate online banks, you can be sure of several things:

  • Your account will never lose value. As long as the bank is insured by the FDIC, and all legitimate national, regional, local banks are, when you have $100 at the bank, that money will always be yours. You will always be able to get to it when you need it. Credit unions, like banks, have insurance as well.
  • You will automatically get your money if your bank fails. Banks go under. As we saw throughout the recession, many banks, regardless of size, go under. But thanks to FDIC protection, customers get their deposited money back easily or a new bank takes over the account.

According to an article by the former chairperson of the FDIC, Sheila Bair, many prepaid debit card accounts have no such protection. Issuers of prepaid debit cards can choose whether they want to protect their customers using FDIC insurance — the more expensive choice — or through a patchwork of protections that differ by state. Many choose the least expensive option.

When you add money to your debit card account, often called “loading” or “reloading,” not “depositing,” you are giving the company issuing the card free reign to do whatever it likes with your money. Bank offering “deposit” accounts (checking accounts and savings accounts insured by the FDIC) have certain restrictions these card companies do not. Banks must not use deposited funds to invest in anything riskier than money market funds, nut prepaid debit card issuers can use customers’ money to invest in anything they like, even risky investments that might lose money.

If a prepaid debt card issuer fails and the customers’ accounts are not covered by FDIC, you might have to take legal action to get your money back. With FDIC, this is an automatic process and doesn’t cost a cent to customers. There is no such easy process for prepaid debit card holders, who might have to pay for legal representation of experience delays before seeing the money they loaded onto the debit card of a failing company.

Bair points out that state protections are not as comprehensive as FDIC insurance:

If the prepaid card company has invested its customers’ funds in securities, which have lost their value, the only protection those customers will have is the surety bond. In Alabama, for example, customers are collectively protected up to $50,000. In Florida, they are collectively protected up to $2 million. These amounts do not represent the compensation given to each customer. They represent the upper limit for the entire class no matter how many prepaid cards have been issued or how much money has been loaded on them. Three states — Montana, New Mexico, and South Carolina — do not guarantee any repayment.

Customers can have up to $250,000 in one bank (or $500,000 if half is within a joint account) with full FDIC insurance coverage. You can deposit as much as $250,000 without any concern about whether your money will survive a financial meltdown. In some states, if the company issuing your prepaid debit card goes under, you could get nothing back, and it’s legal.

To be fair, Sheila Bair is, as mentioned above, the former chairperson of the FDIC, so there is adequate reason to suspect she would be in favor of FDIC insurance. Nevertheless, this could be an important point to consider before signing up for a prepaid debit card. Although average prepaid debit card balances are less than savings and checking account balances, you don’t want to be stuck fighting for your money back in the event of another financial crisis.

Prepaid debit cards have several strikes going against them:

  • Prepaid debit cards are more expensive in the long-run.
  • Prepaid debit cards are riskier than checking and savings accounts.

Despite their rising popularity, these reasons are enough for me to not recommend them. Some might offer cash back rewards, but they are hardly worth the variety of fees almost always associated with using the card. Free checking accounts with free debit cards are available from reputable financial institutions. You can find some that have low or no minimum balance requirements. Those are almost always better options.

{ 4 comments }

This week should have been a vacation.

It has been, for the most part, but not entirely. While I’ve traveled occasionally over the past few years, and even chosen destinations meant for relaxation and time alone with loved ones, I haven’t had one of those fabled true vacations. My cell phone was still near by. I still took business-related calls. I still wrote for Consumerism Commentary every day, participated in discussions, and replied to emails, every day while not home.

Perhaps working for myself is a benefit and a curse — I make my own schedule but I feel compelled to take care of my responsibilities, at least some of them, even when I should b allowing myself to forget about work.

I had planned to change that this week. After visiting my family in southern California, a week-long detour to San Francisco with my girlfriend should be something to keep me away from working. We’re having a great time, but without enough planning in advance and with other business-related responsibilities requiring my attention, it hasn’t been the complete escape from reality I had in mind.

While my own vacation may not be a true escape, my financial attentiveness has seemed to have been more successful at leaving the world behind. In the past two days I discovered I made some annoying errors with the management of my accounts.

1. I didn’t verify Wells Fargo closed my old business accounts.

A year after I sold most of my business, I finished up accounting and began the process of closing my business bank accounts. At least, I thought I did. I visited my local Wells Fargo branch in January to close my old accounts and open new accounts for my new business. The banking representative at the branch transferred the residual balances out of the accounts, and I thought I had taken care of everything.

When I checked my account online this month, I noticed the old, supposedly-closed accounts were still listed, and I had been charged a monthly maintenance fee. By transferring my balances out, I was left with an account with a zero balance, below the minimum balance required to avoid monthly fees. Because the accounts were still in existence, for whatever reason, I was charged this small fee, and my account balance had dipped below zero.

I called the bank’s customer service department for business accounts late one night recently. They were able to see that the accounts should have been closed in January. The bank kindly reversed the monthly fee that should never had been charged, and we both verified that the accounts were now closed.

At the same time, I forfeited the six cents of interest that had accumulated in my business savings account during the month of January. Had I wanted to transfer that remaining balance to my personal account, it would have taken another day and another phone call. I quickly decided it wasn’t worth the effort.

I wasn’t able to avoid all fees. After I took care of the above problem, I realized that I had been charged a small monthly maintenance fee in my new business account. When I created the new accounts for the business, I discussed with the representative in the branch the requirements for avoiding monthly service charges. The account I chose requires either a $150 recurring automatic transfer or a minimum average daily balance of $500. This is where my memory becomes hazy: I thought the representative set up the recurring transfer for me.

My mistake was mot verifying this after the fact. When I noticed my mistake, I transferred cash into the business account to cover the minimum average daily balance requirement, but not without incurring one monthly service charge.

2. I didn’t have a large enough balance in my Capital One 360 checking account to cover my credit card payment!

My finances used to be simple: my income was deposited from various sources into a business checking account, an amount was transferred to a personal account to represent my paycheck, and this amount would cover my expenses each month, most of which are paid on a credit card that earns miles.

My financial situation has changed, and I use different accounts now. That means I have to remember to fund my personal checking account with the right amount each month. And I’ve allowed myself to keep my finances automated for so long that I might forget these tasks. Chase, as one would expect as the credit issuer, makes things difficult.

  • My automatic credit card payment bounced, which I knew before Chase “knew.” It took a day or two for Chase to recognize that the automated payment would not go through.
  • In that interim period, I wanted to make the full payment from a different account — a checking account held at Chase, which had already been linked to my credit card for use as a payment method. Chase would not permit me to make the full payment because if the first, automated payment had gone through, the remaining balance on my credit card would only include charges since the last bill, and Chase doesn’t let credit card users “overpay” their bills. In my case, it wouldn’t be an overpayment because I knew the automated payment would not go through, but Chase didn’t “know” that yet.
  • Once Chase recognized the response from Capital One 360 rejecting the automated payment request, I was able to schedule a new payment. I had already scheduled a smaller payment to cover the charges since the last bill, but I wanted to make sure my card balance was paid in full as soon as possible. Chase, for an unknown reason, does not allow two payments within three days of each other. I say the reason is unknown, but I know there is a purpose — to ensure that situations like these don’t happen without Chase earning some money in interest or late fees.

While these recent events haven’t cost me much money in the long run, it has been a wake-up call. In my attempts to simplify my finances, and due to the reduction of my need to look at my accounts on a daily basis, I’ve let certain things slip. I’ve taken too much of a vacation from managing my finances in a responsible manner.

Years ago I warned about the dangers of automating your finances. I set up a good system, and it worked for me well until my circumstances changed and I began throwing wrenches into the works without making sure everything was still working properly, like a well-oiled machine. The damage wasn’t excessive, but it was annoying, so now it’s time to re-evaluate my financial system, make changes and enhancements to make sure nothing falls through the cracks, and begin, once again, monitoring my money a little more closely.

Mistakes happen to everyone. It could be worse; a small-time writer like myself who pays a few extra fees is nothing compared to a financial planner, popular author, and columnist for The New York Times who lost a his house. At the risk of seeping into alliterative reductionism, the best approach to take when facing unfavorable outcomes is to accept, analyze, and adjust.

With these financial fires extinguished, I can get back to enjoying my vacation in San Francisco despite the occasional turn to a focus on business while everyone else is asleep.

{ 5 comments }

Barclays has enjoyed a long and storied history as a financial industry leader in the United Kingdom. While those of us in the United States often consider a financial company to be historied once it passes its centennial, Barclays was founded in 1690. As an organization, the bank is older than our country.

The brand made its entrance in the United States recently. During the collapse of the financial industry, Barclays acquired the remnants of the failed Lehman Brothers. The bank also primarily backed store-branded credit cards, like the Best Western Credit Card, until last year. The BarclayCard division of the company developed its own credit card products, such as the Barclaycard Ring MasterCard, which featured crowdsourced rewards. By using questionnaires and online voting, the cardholders can determine the card’s features.

Barclays, like many financial services companies, has been under scrutiny. Last year, the company was fined $450 million for its involvement in the Libor scandal, allegedly manipulating how intrabank lending rates were determined, either to make a profit or to appear more financially secure than the company might have been.

Increasing its presence in the United States, Barclays is now focusing on its retail banking division, offering online savings and certificates of deposit. I opened a Barclays Online Savings account to see if the bank would be competitive with some of the best online savings accounts, like Capital One 360 (formerly ING Direct) and Ally Bank.

Applying for the account

The Barclays Online Savings account application requires the same type of information all banks in the United States require. The application conveniently asks up front whether you would like to create the account as a Payable on Death account, where you can designate a beneficiary. This will come in handy as it the option might be difficult to change later or you might forget.

The bank requires a Social Security Number and a street address in the United States. You will need to choose one security question from among three standard choices. If you ever need to call the bank for customer service, the representative will challenge you, asking you to answer your chosen security question with the answer you provide on the application.

As with all online banks, creating a new account requires an electronic link with an existing checking or savings account. Barclays ask for your external bank’s routing number and your account number. Within a few days, Barclays will initiate a test deposit. New customers must verify the amount of the test deposit in order to successfully use the external bank for depositing and withdrawing money to and from the Barclay’s account. The application notes that the bank will hold new customers’ initial deposits up to five business days.

The next step in the application is to agree to Barclay’s terms and conditions. The terms make it clear that for the first thirty days, Barclays will hold all deposits will be held for five business days before making the funds available for withdrawal. After that, ACH transfers will be available immediately (but keep in mind ACH transfers are usually processed overnight) while all other deposits are subject to a hold for five days.

In the terms, Barclays makes it clear that it is under no obligation to reduce fees for insufficient funds:

If we receive a withdrawal, transfer, electronic transaction, or other item drawn on your Account, and there are insufficient funds in your Account to pay the item, we will return the item unpaid and you may be charged an Non-Sufficient Funds (NSF) fee. We will process withdrawals, transfers or related requests received on the same day in the order we choose. You understand that we have no obligation to minimize the NSF fees charged as a result of having insufficient funds in the Account, and that the processing order we select may result in your incurring more fees than you would if we were to process the withdrawals, transfers or related requests in a different order.

This has been a significant problem with banks; Bank of America and several other banks recently settled a lawsuit that alleged they ordered withdrawals in such a way that the bank could maximize insufficient funds fees. The bank expects that including this clause in the terms would prevent customers from being able to successfully take action against the bank for the same shady practice. The good news is that the NSF fee is only $5 per item.

I discovered that actually taking the time to read the terms and conditions creates an online delay long enough for the application to time out, requiring the applicant to start from the beginning.

The final step is to verify your identity using questions taken from information on your credit report. This is a common method of identity verification used by the financial industry at large. If everything is as the bank expects, you’ll immediately be granted an account number and Barclays will begin processing your initial deposit from your funding bank.

Using the Barclays Online Savings account

Logging in to your account for the first time, the website will ask you to create a SafeKeys phrase. The bank will display this phrase and a selected image each time you access your account online. Also, you will need to provide answers to five security questions. These are different from the security question and answer created during the application process. Normally, you would need to answer one of these five questions every time you access your account online, but you can register your computer (or other device) to skip this part of the log-in process. That’s not recommended for security reasons.

The website interface won’t win any awards for innovation, but it gets the job done. All the necessary features are present. You can view a list of recent transactions in your account, transfer funds to and from your linked accounts, and sign up for remote deposit. You can read your statements online; Barclays does not send any statements via the mail.

Once my account is fully funded, I intend to test the speed of withdrawals. All other things being relatively equal, this is what I frequently see as the most annoying aspect of online bank accounts. For savings, you expect the money to be accessible when you need it; if it takes an unexpected long time for your linked bank to receive a withdrawal from the online bank, the funds held there are useless for small emergencies. (This is a good reason to consider a tiered emergency fund.

Interest rates and fees

Initially, Barclays is offering one of the top interest rates among online banks. This is a normal tactic for a bank that’s currently in a stage where it wants to generate deposits and new customers. Some banks offer competitive rates for a short time, enticing new customers, only to later lower the rates to be more like brick and mortar banks, while others hold onto their position among their competitors. Barclays is currently advertising that its rate are ten times the national average, and it will be interesting to see if that continues to be an enforced marketing message.

Online banks tend to be a commodity. Prospective customers generally shop on price, not on customer experience. Brick and mortar banks usually attract customers through customer service and location, but without a face, online banks are generally similar enough that customers may not always care about the identity of the company behind the account. Since price is an important factor, interest rates and fees tend to be important points for comparison.

I’ve already mentioned that the Barclays Online Savings account has a low insufficient funds fee of $5. There are no minimum balance requirements, and no monthly account fees just for the benefit of owning an account. You may be charged a small fee if you make over six withdrawals during a calendar month, but this comes from a government regulation for all savings accounts. There are no other fees with Barclays to speak of.

If you choose to open an account, or if you have had previous experiences with Barclays, please share your thoughts here. Continuing a conversation about the bank will help other readers decide whether the Barclays Online Savings account could be a great choice for a primary high-yield savings account.

{ 5 comments }

Capital One’s decision to acquire ING Direct was a great strategic move, but the deal had a few problems. Because ING Direct’s parent company, as part of a European bail-out agreement, was required to sell ING Direct in the United States and in other global locations, and to cease using the ING Direct name, Capital One was forced to change its branding and marketing.

What was once ING Direct, by far a favorite online savings bank among more internet-savvy and financially aware customers for many years, is now known as Capital One 360.

As I’ve discovered from many conversations, online and offline, Capital One is still struggling to rid itself of its reputation for catering to customers with poor credit — and not catering to them well. Although Capital One’s products have matured, and some of the company’s credit cards are matched well against today’s best credit cards, the impression of a company that deals with sub-prime customers lingers.

Today, Capital One is more than just a credit card issuer. The company began acquiring retail banks, redirecting itself towards depository institutions, following a trend through the recession where depository institutions had some regulatory advantages. For example, American Express, a company focused on its own credit cards as well as its travel business, branched into retail banking around the same time.

The question remains as to whether it’s fair to apply the lingering reputation of Capital One to its bank branches, online and offline, which offering savings and checking accounts to retail customers. Should former ING Direct customers expect the types of problems that Capital One’s credit card customers have experienced in the past?

Website improvements

With the rebranding required to occur by February, Capital One 360 took the opportunity to make some changes to the website, arguably the most important aspect for customers interacting with their financial institution when there are no branches.

Most of the changes to the website are purely cosmetic, but a new account overview page provides a simple way to see how much interest you’ve earned and to change basic information, like registering the account in the name of a Revocable Living Trust and applying for an increase in the overdraft line of credit for the checking account.

Money access improvements

If you had an ING Direct “Electric Orange” checking account or you decide to open a Capital One 360 Checking account, you now have additional ATMs available free of charge. ING Direct partnered with the AllPoint network to offer free ATM access at 38,000 locations, and with Capital One’s acquisition, this availability will continue. It is supplemented by free access at all Capital One ATMs, for a new total of 40,000 fee-free locations.

After Capital One announced the acquisition of ING Direct but before the rebranding, Capital One introduced a mobile application allowing easier check deposits. This has become an essential feature for any online banking experience; if your bank does not offer mobile remote check deposits, find a bank that does. Here’s a review of the “CheckMate” check deposit service, which hasn’t changed since the review other than in name from ING Direct to Capital One 360.

Capital One does not charge a foreign transaction fee when customers use a debit card overseas. The lack of foreign transaction fees is a hallmark of some of Capital One’s credit cards.

Interest rates

A primary concern for the savviest savers is the interest rates. A number of banks, traditional and new, are following the early online pioneers like ING Direct, VirtualBank, and NetBank, none of which continue to exist in their pioneering form. These banks without brick-and-mortar locations were able to curtail expenses related to the operation of storefronts. Just like in Being John Malkovich, “Low overhead, my boy; we pass the savings on to you!” High-yield, internet-based, savings accounts can offer interest rates more competitively, putting the typical 0.25% APY or less you might receive with your big national bank to shame, but those big banks are now competing with their own online-only or online-focused divisions.

When a bank that has consistently offered one of the highest — but usually not the highest — interest rates available in the country is acquired by a larger corporation, one of the first thoughts among customers is that the best benefits are likely to change.

The Capital One 360 acquisition came at a time when banks were already lowing their interest rates. With the Federal Reserve Bank offering depository institutions money almost for free, banks have no incentive to attract depositors other than to meet capital requirements. Why would a business pay depositors 1% APY or more when it can raise the same funds at 0.25% or less from the Federal Reserve?

The acquisition does not seem to have hastened the bank’s drive to decrease customers’ interest rates — at least, not yet. Over the past year, ING Direct has decreased its savings account interest rate only once, from 0.8% APY to 0.75% APY. It’s not the highest available among the best savings accounts, but a good customer experience can occasionally make up for a less-than-stellar interest rate deal.

Customer service

For better or worse, there haven’t been any changes to customer service availability. Capital One retained ING Direct employees in their customer service centers and haven’t scaled back hours of operation. I have not had any problems in dealing with customer service since the acquisition. My one call to customer service was to close my business savings accounts — a decision I made because the business was closing, not because of the change in ownership.

The call was easy, and I was connected with the customer service representative right away without being required to navigate a maze in an automated response system. The customer service agent was friendly, respectful, and knowledgeable, and he completed my request immediately.

For years, Consumerism Commentary readers have shared customer service stories with other readers, so if you have any experiences to share with the new Capital One 360, please be sure to offer your impressions for the benefit of other visitors to this website by leaving your comments below.

Referral program

ING Direct was popular not only for its higher interest rates but for its referral program. This program has continued and expanded under Capital One. Customers can earn up to $500 using the “Refer a Friend” program. I used 25 of my 25 referrals back in 2008, but I was interested to see that I now have 25 more referrals available, for a total of 50. For each new customer you refer who opens an account with a deposit of at least $250, you receive a $10 bounty. The new customer receives a bonus as well: $50 for opening a checking account or $25 for opening a savings account.

Improvements to the Refer a Friend program make it easier for customers to share their referral link using social sites like Facebook and Twitter.

The bounty you receive as an existing customer and the bonus you receive as a new customer are considered interest income. If you open a new checking account using a referral link with a $250 deposit and leave it for a year and earn a $50 bonus above your normal interest, you’ve effectively raised your interest rate beyond 20% APY. Refer your friends and you could, in theory with a $250 deposit, earn $550 plus your regular interest, for an incredible APY of 220%. That’s just playing with the numbers, though, because these are one-time bonuses that cannot be repeated over the long-term.

What do you think

Open your own account today and see for yourself.

Thus far, Consumerism Commentary readers are split. Some indicated they intended to close their ING Direct accounts because they weren’t interested in an account owned by Capital One, while others were planning to “wait and see” if Capital One would make any detrimental changes to the banking operations for former ING Direct customers. Normally, I’ve been able to talk with ING Direct executives candidly about their bank’s services and policies — and I’ve never had any problems getting in touch with the right people at other banks — but after the acquisition was announced, Capital One executives refused to talk to me about their plans for ING Direct customers.

A lack of candid communication certainly worried me, but I kept my funds in the Capital One 360 account, and I don’t feel like I’ve suffered for it — so far.

{ 21 comments }

What Happens If Your Bank Account Is Hacked?

by Luke Landes
Robbery

McAfee Labs, a company that deals with internet security from malware and hackers, has announced that a ring of criminals intend to steal money from customers with accounts at major American banks. The operation even has a codename, “Project Blitzkreig,” and is rumored to go into effect this coming spring. The fact that this plan ... Continue reading this article…

7 comments Read the full article →

Citigroup Laying Off 11,000 Employees

by Luke Landes
citi-building

As part of a measure to cut ongoing expenses for the benefit of major shareholders, Citigroup has announced a massive reduction of employment, affecting over four percent of the company’s workforce across the world. The new CEO, Michael Corbat, has determined the best course of action to increase the value of the company for investors ... Continue reading this article…

12 comments Read the full article →

Bank of America Settlement Postcard Checks

by Luke Landes

Bank of America’s journey with its overdraft fee class-action lawsuit is coming to an end. Earlier this month, the bank began processing its “refunds” to customers who were affected by a debit processing priority policy that greatly benefited the bank at the expense of its customers. In short, a customer with $500 in the bank ... Continue reading this article…

46 comments Read the full article →

ING Direct Becoming Capital One 360

by Luke Landes

Earlier this year, Capital One’s acquisition of ING Direct was approved and finalized. Consumerism Commentary readers responded, for the most part, by stating they plan on closing their ING Direct accounts in protest. I preferred to wait and see. The conflict and attitude arises from ING Direct’s history of being consumer friendly and on the ... Continue reading this article…

27 comments Read the full article →

Are Consumers Really Concerned About Savings?

by Luke Landes
Savings piggy bank

A survey released by Chase today concluded that 74 percent of Americans are concerned about having enough money in savings, but only 34 percent have increased their savings since the economic downturn. There’s more to the survey, but this fact alone raises more than enough questions to consider for an entire day. What does it ... Continue reading this article…

12 comments Read the full article →

Banks Raise Interest Rates, Savers Give Up Hope

by Luke Landes
Savings

This week, several banks raised interest rates for diligent savers taking advantage of so-called high-yield savings accounts. American Express Bank, a cousin of a credit card company you’ve probably heard of that reorganized as a bank holding company to better position itself for government protection and balance sheet building, raised its interest rate. Ally Bank, ... Continue reading this article…

11 comments Read the full article →

Simple Debit Card and Mint.com Debit Card: What’s the Fuss?

by Luke Landes
Piggy bank

I suppose I don’t understand Silicon Valley hype. I do, however, understand frustrations with the traditional banking system, and one techie start-up and one former start-up engulfed by one of the largest companies in personal finance management are taking the opportunity to see if they can replace some aspects of the financial industry. SmartyPig started ... Continue reading this article…

7 comments Read the full article →

HSBC Direct Confuses Account Holders With Fee Notice

by Luke Landes
HSBC

Millions of HSBC Direct customers received a strange email yesterday or the day before indicating a few changes to the bank’s fee structure. (HSBC’s former name for its Online Savings Account service is HSBC Direct; the new name will be HSBC Advance.) The statement seemed to indicate HSBC would be instituting a new, high fee ... Continue reading this article…

6 comments Read the full article →

The Poor Are Priced Out of Checking Accounts

by Luke Landes

Reminder: This is the last week to vote for Consumerism Commentary and your favorite financial blogs in this year’s Plutus Awards. Take a moment — after reading this article, naturally — to show your appreciation for the best writing about money management and personal finance outside of mainstream media. It’s no surprise that low income ... Continue reading this article…

19 comments Read the full article →

ING to Consider Selling ING Direct Canada and ING Direct UK

by Luke Landes
ING Direct

To satisfy European regulators, ING Group, the Dutch former parent company of popular online bank ING Direct in the United States, is “reviewing strategic options” for its other online banking divisions, ING Direct Canada and ING Direct UK. Those “strategic options” could include a sale of those branches. Earlier this year, Capital One completed its ... Continue reading this article…

2 comments Read the full article →

How Many Savings Accounts Do You Need?

by Luke Landes
Money

Over the past year, I’ve been simplifying my finances. I’ve collected a number of savings accounts and checking accounts, mostly as a way of auditioning and reviewing various banks for the benefit of Consumerism Commentary readers. There’s little sense in me holding onto so many accounts across dozens of banks, so I’ve been taking some ... Continue reading this article…

11 comments Read the full article →

Banks Could Make It Easier to Close Accounts

by Luke Landes
Dollar bill

Closing a bank account in the twenty-first century, when a good portion of your banking is handled electronically, can be a cumbersome task. I created a bank switch kit earlier this year to help consumers organize their actions and take the correct steps to move your money from one bank to another without encountering any ... Continue reading this article…

15 comments Read the full article →

Young Americans Likely to Be Unbanked Regardless of Income Level

by Luke Landes
Check Cashing

In discussing unbanked and underbanked American consumers, we tend to focus on low socioeconomic status communities. The mainstream opinion is that building wealth and long-term financial stability relies on the use of traditional banking and investing products and the knowledge to use these products effectively. The financial industry tends to avoid low socioeconomic status communities ... Continue reading this article…

16 comments Read the full article →

New York Community Bank Adding Fees For Former Aurora Customers

by Luke Landes
Central Park New York

Last month, I received the news that Aurora Bank deposits would be assumed by New York Community Bank. Aurora Bank is yet another online bank that increased its marketing efforts leading up to a sale. For a while, Aurora Bank was a branch of Lehman Brothers, and part of that company’s bankruptcy proceedings required the ... Continue reading this article…

3 comments Read the full article →

Citizens Bank Settles Overdraft Fee Class Action Lawsuit

by Luke Landes

Banks are still struggling with the decisions executives made to maximize profit from overdrafts by rearranging the order of withdrawals to customers’ detriment. By December last year, Bank of America settled a class-action lawsuit related to overdrafts and was expected to pay $410 million. That decision is being appealed by a plaintiff, so it will ... Continue reading this article…

14 comments Read the full article →

Review of Capital One 360′s Remote Deposit

by Luke Landes
ING Direct

Several readers contacted me yesterday with this piece of good news. After months of promising its customers to launch the new feature soon, Capital One 360, formerly ING Direct, now offers remote check deposit. The delay was likely caused by the efforts that resulted in Capital One purchasing ING Direct USA. Previously, in order to ... Continue reading this article…

24 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 1612345···Last »