As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

From the category archives:

Credit

The Federal Trade Commission wants consumers to know that the only website offering the three federally mandated free credit reports each year — one from each credit reporting bureau — is AnnualCreditReport.com. While they don’t name the “other” website specifically, this campaign is a direct response to freecreditreport.com, a service from the reporting bureau Experian that requires users to sign up for a credit monitoring service in order to receive a “free” credit report.

Experian reportedly makes it difficult for customers to cancel this monitoring service during its trial period. The impostor website previously used more misleading language to convince visitors that they were visiting the federally-mandated website for receiving free credit reports, but in the last few years, they’ve improved some of their marketing copy. But they haven’t improved service for customers who wish only to receive a free credit report. They have released a series of catchy commercials, and the FTC is now fighting back with their own public service announcements.

Here is one of the PSAs:

{ 9 comments }



Is it ironic that Citi, a bank on the brink of disaster, is now marketing a credit card that “rewards” card holders for good financial behavior? This new credit card marketed toward Generation Y and teenagers, Citi Forward (and Citi Forward for College Students), offers benefits such as 100 points for paying on time and staying within your credit limit each month, 5 points for each $1 spent in “responsible” categories such as books, movies, music, and restaurants, 1 point per $1 for all other purchases, and 5,000 bonus points for signing up for paperless statements.

The most attractive feature is a quarterly reduction of APR by 0.25 percentage points after 3 months of making a purchase and staying within your credit limit and paying on time. This reduction is limited to eight in total and will only be applied if you continue to make purchases using the card.

Why is Citi taking this approach? The company surveyed 1,000 consumers and found:

76% of [survey respondents] said they would rather learn by being rewarded for the right things they do, rather than learning from their mistakes.

I seem to remember a college professor explaining that positive reinforcement is more effective over punishment when your goal is to change someone’s behavior. But don’t get the wrong idea, Citi card holders will certainly be punished if they make a mistake. The default interest rate — immediately charged if the card holder misses a payment — is 29.99%.

The points rewarded must be redeemed through Citi’s ThankYou network, which does not have a one-to-one relationship between points and cents, as the previous credit cards offering cash back rewards had. You would need to accumulate 16,000 points to qualify for a $100 cash reward. If you want a better “exchange rate,” you need to spend or donate your points.

It’s clear that the “responsible” categories for which Citi would like to “reward” its customers are not those that encourage good behavior. If Citi wanted to encourage financial responsibility, they would be promoting the use of libraries rather than purchasing books and buying groceries and cooking implements rather than dining at restaurants. I happen to be a fan of movies and music, but these are two categories where strapped consumers may wish to cut back spending in this recessionary economy. Furthermore, Citi claims that rewarding customers for choosing paperless statements is based on the idea that saving the environment is good, but I think even the targeted teenagers understand that it costs Citi a significant sum to send paper statements in the mail.

The 0.25 percentage point reduction in APR is a good start, but if Citi wanted to encourage true financial competence, they would reward customers for paying bills in full each month.

What do you think about Citibank’s latest credit card?

{ 9 comments }



Thank you to all the taxpayers who are footing the bill for this. As Citibank continues to receive money from the government of the United States, funded by investors in Treasury bills and citizens of the future who will be paying more to the government to support the interest payments on that debt, Citibank continues to reward me. Rather than making new loans to businesses or individuals in needs, Citi simply raises credit card limits.

The concept is somewhat sound; raise credit limits and people will spend more, helping Citi with interest fees and helping the economy through more consumer activity. But if they’re raising the limit for people like me, there is no effect other than using bailout money to prop up their balance sheet.

I have never spent anywhere close to my credit limit in any one month. Yet, they targeted me as a candidate for an increase. I won’t decline the increase; a higher limit results in a lower utilization ratio, which will most likely lead to a higher credit score.

Here is their personal announcement to me:

YOUR ACCOUNT: CREDIT LINE INCREASE

Congratulations on Your Recent Credit Line Increase.

Dear (Flexo),

Because you are one of our loyal customers, we wanted to give your Citi® Card even more value. So reward yourself with the spending power and flexibility that comes with a higher line of credit.

You’ve earned it. Now enjoy it.

Use your new line of credit to transfer balances: You may qualify for a great rate on a balance transfer. To see what offers may be available to you, visit balancetransfer.citicards.com.

Wow, I feel so special. I earned it!

Clearly, Citi is hoping I will transfer a balance from another card, taking advantage of a 3.99% APR and 3% balance transfer fee. Even if I had a balance to transfer, I would pass. This credit limit increase would have been better spent by Citigroup elsewhere.

{ 10 comments }

The number that credit reporting bureau Experian supplies to lenders when you apply for a loan, used to evaluate whether the company should extend credit to you, will soon be unavailable to customers. At midnight tonight, customers will no longer be able to visit MyFICO to buy their own credit scores from Experian.

After today, the only way you will be able to access the score that represents your creditworthiness is to apply for a loan and ask for it. Even if you do this, it’s not guaranteed that the lender will comply.

Credit bureaus are now required to supply a free credit report three times a year (one from each bureau) through AnnualCreditReport.com. This is helpful to ensure that there are no mistakes on your report, but the only way to come close to fully understanding what lenders see about you when you apply for a loan is to know your FICO credit score.

This information should be free and available anytime. Right now, you have to pay if you want your real FICO scores from the three bureaus. Any score you find offered for free is an estimation, even if it is based on formulas similar to the ones used by the bureaus for the official score. And with Experian pulling out of their agreement with MyFICO, the company is saying that customers do not deserve to know the same personal information that lenders, employers, and landlords see.

I am not happy with this change. Part of me thinks that the executives at Experian will “change their mind” tomorrow and decide to continue offering the score for purchase. If they do, it will probably be an extremely successful hoax meant to encourage customers to panic and buy their scores tonight. Either way, this is a step in the wrong direction for consumers.

{ 7 comments }

Updated March 31, 2009: Chase has been ordered by NY Attorney General to refund the money gathered from the process described below.

I’ve always thought that credit cards with annual fees were a ridiculous notion. Other than having a credit history which requires you to get a secured card (been there), it’s usually no problem to find a card with no annual fee. But even if you do pick a card with a fee, it’s supposed to be something you decide to do to yourself.

JPMorgan Chase has started adding an annual fee to credit accounts for its customers who fit the following criteria:

  • the credit card has a low promotional rate
  • the card owner has carried a “large” balance for more than two years
  • the card owner has made “little” progress paying off the balance

I couldn’t tell from the news reports how Chase is defining “large” and “little.”

In addition to the $120 annual fee (which is added to the account in $10 monthly chunks and which accrues interest itself), the bank is also raising minimum payments from 2% to 5%.

When we wrote recently about Citigroup raising its rates in spite of a pledge not to do so, we got some very helpful and encouraging comments on the article from people who’d managed to talk to the right customer service reps and get their original terms reinstated.

Let us know if you’re affected, and what you plan to do. There’s already a class-action lawsuit you can join.

{ 16 comments }

Fair Isaac, the company that is responsible for the formula behind your FICO score, has been planning an update for a long time, and it’s now being put into practice, but not without a few wrinkles.

Called “FICO 08″, the new re-tooling should provide a more accurate risk assessment for anybody with a credit history. The most alarming thing right now is that while Fair Isaac is ready to roll out the new formula, according to the Chicago Tribune only one of the three credit reporting agencies, TransUnion, is making use of the new rules. Equifax is going ahead with plans to use FICO 08, but Experian may take quite a bit of time due to pending litigation with Fair Isaac. Suffice it to say that this won’t have an overnight impact on your ability to borrow.

Eventually, though, here’s what it means:

No more piggybacking

Not too long ago companies started offering to add someone with poor credit as an authorized user on an account belonging to someone with better credit. After a while, the credit rating for the less fortunate person would improve. Under the new formula, this sort of—let’s be frank—trickery will not be rewarded. Spouses and children, however, will not be penalized in the same way.

Bad accounts under $100 are no problem

Even if it goes to a collection agency, if you foul up on an account with a balance of less than $100, it won’t heavily affect your score.

A single serious flaw won’t ruin everything

With the older system, one big problem, such as a vehicle repossession, could torpedo your entire credit score. Now, if all other accounts are in good shape, one serious issue will not matter as much. – NewsChannel5

Available credit means more

This may be a case of unfortunate timing, with Americans’ credit lines shrinking as a result of fearful banks, but your future FICO score will depend more heavily on how much available credit you have. In short: keep your accounts open, even if you’re not using them.

You’ll want multiple types of credit in your name

In order to have a high score in the future, it won’t be enough to have a department store card or three, you’ll be rewarded more for having a loan or two in the mix, as well.

{ 8 comments }

Last month, a representative from Visa offered to answer a few questions for Consumerism Commentary readers about debit cards. It many ways, I find debit cards to be inferior to credit cards, but Visa claims the cards linked directly to bank accounts have some redeeming qualities. Here are three additional questions I asked Visa and the company’s responses.

What are your thoughts regarding Visa’s “defense” of debit cards?

Question 4: When using debit cards, do consumers generally spend more than they would
with cash?

Response: Debit cards offer a convenient, secure way to access funds that are already available in your checking account – which means you’re spending the money you have. You also get a record of all purchases so you know where the money went.

Paying with a debit card can actually a great way to manage your spending. Just last year we conducted a consumer survey and found that cash expenditures can be harder to keep track of than those on cards. We asked more than 2,000 U.S. adults about their cash spending habits and almost half of respondents admitted they suffered from “mystery spending” or cash they spend but have no idea where it went.

The results also showed that 48 percent of Americans surveyed who use cash say they can’t account for almost one-third of it, spending an average of $120 in a typical week, but losing track of $45. In fact, more than half (59 percent) of respondents who say their mystery spending is out of control feel it would be worse without using a debit card. Among debit cardholders we surveyed, the majority (64 percent) believe their debit card helps keep mystery spending to a minimum and four out of five say a debit card helps them track their spending. This feedback supports that debit cards can definitely be used as a money saving tool.

My comments: Keep in mind that this research cited by Visa compares using debit cards with using cash for payments. Also note that the survey asks about what consumers believe about their spending patterns, were they to opt with cash rather than debit cards, but doesn’t measure actual behavior. Many studies have shown that people spend more with plastic than they do with cash, even if cash expenses are often “mystery.” The company did a good job of not really addressing the issue raised in the question.

In November, I conducted a experiment to compare my spending with a credit card with my cash-only spending. Even though some of my cash transactions were not tracked to the cent, I spent a significant amount less than I did when I was using a credit card. I continued the experiment into December, and although I now I’ve ended the experiment and use my credit card, I am much more conscientious about my excess spending.

Question 5: One popular feature of credit cards is the availability of rewards, such as cash back bonuses, airline miles, etc. I have seen very few similar offers for debit cards. Are issuers interested in offering rewards to debit card customers?

Response: About 85 percent of U.S. households participate in at least one rewards program. Increasingly, consumers are looking for rewards and value for the transactions they make every day, like paying bills, buying groceries, or filling up their gas tank. As consumers turn to debit cards for these types of purchases, instead of cash and checks, more financial institutions are introducing debit rewards programs.

Often, issuers will pair up with a partner like an airline or hotel to give you the ability to earn points on a debit card toward rewards you care about. Some financial institutions also offer the ability to earn points for qualified purchases that can be redeemed through an online catalog, for items like gift cards, airline vouchers and hotel accommodations.

Many financial institutions also reward their debit cardholders for other relationships they have with the institution like a car loan, savings account, mortgage, etc., giving those customers the ability to earn additional points or other benefits.

It’s important to understand how you can earn points toward rewards: what purchases qualify, whether you earn points when you enter a PIN or sign for your purchases, etc. Make sure you ask these questions of your financial
institution, as policies may vary.

My comments: Reward programs are becoming more rare among credit cards, and even more so among debit cards. This is due to the state of the banking industry. I expect that once we definite signs of an economic recovery, and banks are concerned with making huge profits rather than avoiding bankruptcy, we’ll start to see more debit card reward programs. Until then, consider yourself lucky if you have a rewards program that you use to its fullest extent. Remember, banks that offer rewards programs do so to foster loyalty and above average use.

Question 6: To what type of consumer would you recommend debit cards over cash?

Response: Really, debit cards are a great tool for every one with a bank account. Some
of the benefits of debit over cash include:

  • Money Management and Control. Debit transactions are deducted directly from a checking account and recorded in one place on a monthly statement. This allows cardholders to easily track where every penny is going and better spend within their means.
  • Security. Debit cards offer better protections than cash or checks, and Zero Liability means consumers pay nothing for fraudulent purchases.
  • Acceptance. Debit cards can be used at millions of locations worldwide, and can be used over the phone and on the Internet.
  • Convenience. Debit card transactions are quick and simple, getting you out of the store faster; automatic bill pay via debit eliminates worries about missed payments.
  • Rewards. More debit cards are also offering rewards so purchases earn points toward travel, merchandise or even cash.

My comments: Visa is clearly focusing on the benefits of debit cards over cash, but the true showdown for those who use plastic is between debit cards and credit cards. The set of above reasons for choosing debit cards is a subset of the reasons for choosing credit cards over cash — and credit cards offer more protection, tougher security, broader acceptance, and more attractive rewards.

“Zero Liability” is a good policy, but if your debit card is stolen and used, your bank account can be overdrawn at a moment when you most need your balance to be there, like when your mortgage or rent check is cashed. Then you’re dealing with overdraft fees or bounced check fees and possibly other penalties. This is a deal breaker for me. I use debit cards occasionally, but I will avoid using a debit card as my main payment method.

I appreciate the representative from Visa taking the time to answer these questions. Are you convinced? What do you think about debit cards?

Photo credit: DeclanTM

{ 14 comments }

We reported earlier on some new regulations that attempt to curb “predatory” practices by credit card issuers, like an end to Universal Default and more accurate credit offers.

One of the interesting things about these new rules is that Congress didn’t vote on them, they were approved by a Federal Reserve committee, and they were set to go into effect in July 2010, or sooner, if a given individual company gets around to it.

The Dallas Examiner has a report out stating our incoming President’s support for such reforms, and saying that a similar bill might still go through Congress, which means the rules would have to be enacted within 90 days of the bill being signed into law.

One thing that didn’t make it through the recent Federal Reserve regulations was the idea of a Credit Card rating system, a proposal for which has been on Obama’s campaign Web site since the beginning, or at least since the first time I looked at it. Here’s the summary of the idea:

Obama and Biden will create a credit card rating system, modeled on five-star systems used for other consumer products, to provide consumers an easily identifiable ranking of credit cards, based on the card’s features. Credit card companies will be required to display the rating on all application and contract materials, enabling consumers to quickly understand all of the major provisions of a credit card without having to rely exclusively on fine print in lengthy documents.

We’ll keep you updated on future developments to this idea. In the meantime, welcome to the First 100 Days.

{ 5 comments }