As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!


The U.S. Postal Service could offer basic banking services to customers, many of whom do not have reliable and affordable access to mainstream banking products like savings accounts and forms of credit.

From the moment I heard this, it sounded like a bad idea. Not long ago, discussions about the U.S. Postal Service focused on the question of ending delivery on Saturdays, the closing of 700 retail locations, and the elimination of the U.S. Postal service entirely. And now, there’s a proposal with studies claiming legitimate benefits across the board for expanding the services offered by this semi-private, semi-government entity.

The U.S. Postal Service has a weird existence. It is an independent government agency that operates like an independent corporation, but it is subject to congressional interference, oversight, and direction. USPS is not funded by tax revenue, yet the government still directs how the organization’s revenue is spent.

Providing the U.S. Postal Service with another profit center, like the ability to profit from basic banking services, might help the organization grow in strength.

The domestic precedent for banking at the post office.

In 1907, the United States suffered an economic recession, and this crisis was followed by a “panic” in 1910. The American public reacted by losing trust and faith in the banking industry, and in a bid to get money moving through the economy again, the Post Office began offering savings accounts in 1911. This made basic banking services available to working class people, who felt either abused or ignored by the financial industry. The savings account earned depositors 2% interest, while the post office earned 2.5% interest on the deposits by investing them with the mainstream financial industry.

The Postal Service continued offering deposit accounts through 1967, but still continues offering money orders, which allow customers to send money in cash form relatively securely from one location to another.

The social environment that spurred to government to allow the USPS to start offering banking services exists today. According to Elizabeth Warren, a senator who is in favor of expanding the Postal Service’s relationship with retail money-handling, “… [T]he average underserved household spends roughly 10 percent of its annual income on interest and fees — about the same amount they spend on food.”

The poor is spending too much money on non-bank financial services like check-cashing and payday loans. Poor communities turn to predatory, high-cost financial services because they don’t have many choices. Banks — and even credit unions, which are thought to better support local communities — do not set up retail locations in economically-stressed neighborhoods because it’s not profitable. There’s little trust in either direction between the banking industry and poor communities. Even if convenient retail locations did exist in high-poverty locations, customers would not walk through the doors.

But everyone goes to the Post Office or receives deliveries from a letter carrier. While the USPS reach in rural locations isn’t great, delivery services touch almost every household in the country, regardless of socio-economic status. If the U.S. Postal Service is able to offer check-cashing and small loans, and perhaps limited deposits again, and able to offer such services at a lower cost than what is currently available, it could mean a better lifestyle for those living in tough financial situations.

The foreign precedent for banking at the post office.

Other countries have successfully implemented similar models.

  • In Australia, you can bank at the post office. Australia Post works in partnership with the financial industry to accept deposits and make withdrawals and pay credit card bills.
  • In the United Kingdom, the Post Office offers banking services that compete with retail banking, and has recently expanded their selection of banking products. The Post Office in the UK is structured differently, with a different service that handles delivery and collection of mail (the Royal Mail), and both are now private companies than they are government agencies.
  • La Poste in France has its own banking subsidiary, La Banque postale, and post offices in that country offer banking services.
  • Poste italiene in Italy, which was once a government-owned monopoly but is now a public company under government control, offers financial products such as savings accounts and prepaid cards.
  • The postal service in Japan, again a former government agency that has gone through privatization, offers a variety of financial services including savings accounts, government bonds, investments, and loans.

The banking industry isn’t a fan of the idea.

Banks don’t want competition from outside their industry. Competition of this kind is a threat to the reputation of the industry, especially when an organization as unhealthy as the U.S. Postal Service can come in and undercut their pricing. A recent article in American Banker, the trade publication of the American Bankers Association poked fun at the idea that the USPS could serve poor communities better than the financial industry with “15 reasons why the post office should stay out of banking.” Each “reason” was a Tweet in which a Postal Service customer complained on Twitter about an interaction with the mail or an employee of the post office. The 15 reasons were in fact just one: poor customer service.

Customer service is a legitimate complaint. It seems far-fetched to take a work force that already seems displeased with the responsibilities they have and introduce more services. They will need training. They will need more staff to handle larger volumes of customers. The proposal could take a generally bad customer experience and make it much worse.

But the postal service does not hold a monopoly on bad customer service; in fact, the post office and the financial industry are roughly tied in the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI). When it comes to pointing out customer service issues, the banking industry can sit back down.

Some in the U.S. Postal Service approve of the idea.

The U.S. Postal Service Office of the Inspector General released a white paper with research about and support for the idea. The Postal Service considers itself to be one of the most trusted companies in America (citing the Ponemon Institute’s survey which named the USPS the fourth most trusted company in the United States), but the organization isn’t usually included in surveys of the most trusted private companies because the USPS isn’t fully private. If the Post Office is trusted much more than companies in the banking industry, it is well-positioned to handle consumers’ financial responsibilities much better than banks.

The Postal Service is well positioned to provide non-bank financial services to those whose needs are not being met by the traditional financial sector. It could accomplish this largely by partnering with banks, who also could lend expertise as the Postal Service structures new offerings. The Office of Inspector General is not suggesting that the Postal Service become a bank or openly compete with banks. To the contrary, we are suggesting that the Postal Service could greatly complement banks’ offerings. The Postal Service could help financial institutions fill the gaps in their efforts to reach the underserved. While banks are closing branches all over the country, mostly in low-income areas like rural communities and inner cities, the physical postal network is ubiquitous.

Here’s the bottom line. The banking industry has no interest in expanding services to cover poverty-stricken communities and households and those households have no interest in dealing with the banking industry. At the same time, the poverty needs financial services, and they are restricted to their only, expensive options like payday loans and check-cashing storefronts. These products exist because there is a need for them — or for something. So far, this has been the only profitable, and thus sustainable, way to bring financial services to certain communities.

If we can leverage an existing infrastructure to reduce the cost of financial service for the poor, and reduce their financial burden at the same time, it’s worth looking into. The U.S. Postal Service is not always the example of a perfect organization, but it is not any worse than your average bank. Despite closures, the Postal Service has the infrastructure in place to better reach communities underserved by the financial industry. Any other method of expand financial services would require a much bigger investment in infrastructure and would not be financially viable.

The U.S. Postal Service should begin to offer basic banking services, like savings accounts and prepaid debit cards. The financial industry doesn’t need to see this as competition, because the primary target customer isn’t interested in working with a bank, anyway. The Postal Service could partner with the industry behind the scenes to take advantage of the financial infrastructure that already exists. A relationship is possible, and rather than fight society’s attempts to better serve the underserved, the financial industry should welcome any kind of innovation that would help bring banking to lower classes.

Eventually, as households in poverty become better acquainted with financial products, they will become better customers for banks, even if it takes a generation for that to take hold.

Photo: Flickr


An article on The Atlantic brought new research on the growth of income inequality to my attention. The article explains that the cause of today’s income disparity between the wealthy and the rest of the country is explained by the plot of the film When Harry Met Sally — or the increasingly common occurrence of marriages containing individuals well-matched on two specific factors: socio-economic status and education level.

The paper with the new research is available from the National Bureau of Economic Research.

Over the past five decades, men and women are more likely to wed partners who are in the same socio-economic status group. As more couples fall into this kind of homogeneity, a feedback effect takes place. In fact, society today is more like it has been throughout most of history, where classes determine socialization and procreation, building generational wealth. The culture in twentieth century United States stands out as a contrast to most of Western history because the equal rights movement and other social causes temporarily shifted the country’s consciousness, and disenfranchised communities sought ways to improve their chances of becoming a part of the middle class machine from a societal perspective.

Europeans came to America before this country’s founding for a variety of reasons, but one of these was economic freedom. Although many European countries had made inroads towards economic mobility, Europeans with wealthy parents but no inheritance would get the opportunity to thrive in a new country. And for the most part, this worked out well for them. Many of the descendants of early settlers have held onto generational wealth obtained primarily by being the first Europeans to occupy land on this continent.

This particular American Dream hasn’t worked out as well for the subsequent immigrants to this country, which things getting progressively worse for each successive wave of immigration, but the earlier a family arrived in the United States, the better chance they have of being part of the wealthy class today.

Until this point, the availability of economically-compatible spouses were somewhat limited. People married their neighbors. Parents and community leaders arranged marriages (or just made suggestions) for their children based on compatibility factors that made sense for those families or communities. It was common in this country for a man with a good, upper middle-class job to marry a woman from a poorer family. Or his secretary.

Over the last fifty years, four specific societal changes affected the choices people had in a mate.

1. Socio-economic situations have become more complex.

Upward economic mobility became more of a reality not just for white European male immigrants, but for women and other non-white men. Men and women began working at the same companies, at the same levels. Today’s result of this advancement for women is that we have corporate Vice Presidents who marry other corporate Vice Presidents. We have managers marrying other managers.

And why not? People with similar roles have much in common, making a marriage more social than perhaps has been the traditional case. People with similar roles also have similar independent incomes.

2. Travel is easier and more affordable.

While historically, familial relationships were limited to the confines of a community, distant communities are now closer together. Cars are prevalent, so it doesn’t take long to get from one city to another. Travel by airplane, despite what seems to be an non-stop rise in airfares, is more affordable, and long-distance relationships are possible.

Also aiding long-distance relationships are advancements in communication technologies. While nothing is better than being with your loved one in person, a couple can now stay in virtual constant communication regardless of where in the world they might be.

3. Social acceptance of non-traditional unions is more common.

American society still has a long way to go before racism is no longer a major concern, but there used to be a time in many states during which racial intermarriages were illegal. The Supreme Court rules that no state could instate such a discriminatory law, and this, the eventual social acceptance of such relationships, and other changes in the workforce that gave more opportunities for non-white workers to succeed, increased the pool of potential mates.

And the eventual acceptance of same-sex marriage continues on that path; more and more, people will be able to (legally, with all the benefits thereto, and with societal acceptance) choose to spend their lives with partners with very similar backgrounds, instilling homogeneity for future generations.

4. Everyone has an opportunity to go to college.

For the most part of the last century, society in the United States has been promoting college. Through the GI Bill, easy access to loans for tuition, and employers who value a college degree, more and more citizens of the United States have been attending college. And an increasing proportion of these university students are women.

While it has always been the case that college graduates tend to marry other college graduates, these used to comprise just a small percentage of all relationships. Again, social trends over the past fifty years have changed the landscape. College degrees are much more common and men and women have an easier time finding compatible partners who are also college educated.

These four changes to society in the United States have widened the pool of available partners who are compatible in education and socio-economic status. This compatibility is not a bad thing. If I’m going to share my life with a partner, I would be expect to be able to communicate about issues that are important to me, and for her to be able to express her ideas intelligently — my hope is that she would challenge me intellectually.

Add this into the new American Dream, which seems to be to pursue individual wealth regardless of others, and you have people who seek out partners along compatibility dimensions such as wealth and education. Because of equal opportunity across sex lines, those types of relationships are more available than they were during the period of this country’s history with the most economic mobility, 1960 through 1980.

The promise of equal opportunity in the workforce for women started in the 1960s, but wasn’t realized or culturally significant until the 1980s. The evidence may be in popular films from the 1980s, depicting more women in traditionally male working roles and with higher education, and of course, in When Harry Met Sally.

If you’re born to a poor family today, the biggest likelihood for your future is that you will stay poor. That’s more like most of Western history than it is like the United States that became the major world power in the twentieth century. Working hard, going to college, and entering the middle class is one way to escape the cycle of poverty or near-poverty, but most will fail. The biggest traditional chance of giving your future children a chance for success is to marry someone wealthy, but more and more, the wealthy are finding their own kind.

Do you and your partner have similar education and socieo-economic backgrounds?

If you’re not married and you are looking for a partner, is this part of your considerations?


Anyone who likes getting a look at their future tax expenses might be interested in seeing what next year’s tax brackets and tax rates will be. The IRS has now announced the official rates and brackets for 2014, although the numbers have been predicted for months because the IRS uses a simple process of inflation and somewhat round numbers to determine the brackets. Congress isn’t expected to make any changes to the tax laws this year, unlike the last several years when the question to continue Bush-era tax breaks needed to be addressed every year.

Keep in mind that the 2014 federal income tax brackets don’t matter to most people until they file their 2014 income tax returns in early 2015. That’s a long way off. But for those who pay estimated taxes for 2014 income throughout the year, the information doesn’t hurt. Chances are you’re getting ready to settle your 2013 income taxes, which will be due April 15, 2014. In that case, the rates and brackets you want to review are the 2013 rates and brackets. If you want to see how your income earned in 2015 is being taxed, view these tax brackets and marginal rates for 2015.

Before getting to the numbers, keep in mind what marginal rates are. Your marginal rate is what you pay on your last dollar of income earned. If, for example, you will earn $50,000 in 2014, your marginal rate will be 25%. That does not mean you pay 25% on all of your income.

In fact, there is a strongly-held belief that the tax code penalizes people for earning more. I’ve heard people expressing disappointment with receiving a bonus because it might push them into the next tax bracket. Yes, as you earn more money, you’ll owe more income tax (in general), but when you’re in a higher tax bracket, it doesn’t affect the tax you owe on income below that new bracket’s threshold. There’s no big jump — the higher tax rate applies only to the income you earn above the top bracket’s baseline.

(Employers have a funny way of withholding taxes on your bonus payment, but to the IRS, and in the end when you finally settle your tax bill, a dollar is a dollar whether it was earned as salary or bonus.)

There’s one instance when it does make sense to be concerned about receiving more income — when that income comes in the form of an asset that’s not very liquid. Here’s an example: In the rare circumstance you win a new car in a contest or sweepstakes, the value of that car must be treated as income. If you win a $60,000 car, you’re going to have to come up with more cash to pay taxes on that $60,000. This is one of the reasons many who end up winning these kinds of contests end up selling the prize.

The 2014 federal income tax brackets and marginal rates.

The federal income tax brackets and marginal rates have now been officially announced by the IRS. These were the rates predicted by Wolters Kluwer, CCH several months ago, based on the rate of inflation the IRS announced it would use in September. The Tax Foundation, a non-partisan tax research group based in Washington, D.C., has also shared the official information.

Rate Single Filers Married Joint Filers Head of Household Filers
10% $0 to $9,075 $0 to $18,150 $0 to $12,950
15% $9,075 to $36,900 $18,150 to $73,800 $12,950 to $49,400
25% $36,900 to $89,350 $73,800 to $148,850 $49,400 to $127,550
28% $89,350 to $186,350 $148,850 to $226,850 $127,550 to $206,600
33% $186,350 to $405,100 $226,850 to $405,100 $206,600 to $405,100
35% $405,100 to $406,750 $405,100 to $457,600 $405,100 to $432,200
39.6% $406,750 and up $457,600 and up $432,200 and up

Determining your effective tax rate.

The table above lists marginal tax rates. What might be more interesting to calculate is your effective tax rate. For example, if you’re single, you earn $100,000 in taxable income in 2014, your effective tax rate — how much tax you end up paying as a percentage of your income — will likely be much lower than the marginal tax rate of 28%. It could be half of that. After taking out the standard deduction for your income, which in 2014 will be $6,200, leaves you with $93,800 in taxable income, although there might be other deductions that apply to you.

With $93,800 in income after the standard deduction, you would owe 10% of $9,075, 15% of $27,825 (the total income covered in the second tax bracket), 25% of $52,450, and 28% of $4,450 (the fourth tax bracket up to your taxable income). That calculation results in $19,439 in federal income tax — an effective tax rate of 19.4% based on the total income of $100,000. That amount could be further reduced by any tax credits for which you might qualify. Your effective tax rate would be considered lower if you’ve had other reductions to your gross income, like 401(k) contributions.

The new standard deductions and personal exemption.

As inflation effects the tax brackets, it also affects the standard deduction amounts. I mentioned above that the standard deduction for single files will be $6,200 in 2014, an increase of $100. For married taxpayers filing jointly, the standard deduction will be $12,400, an increase of $200. For heads of household, the amount of the standard deduction will increase $150 to $9,100.

The personal exemption for 2014 will be $3,950.

What is the possibility of Congress changing the tax rates?

Congress could make a new law at any time that changes tax rates. Last year, there was a big debate that centered around the extension of certain tax cuts. The government made the decision to break the cycle in which the tax rates required a vote every year, so for once, we might be able to get through the next few months without a debate about tax rates. Given Congress’s recent proclivity for negotiating like terrorists with hostages rather than sensible adults who were elected as representatives of the citizens of this country, there’s no perfect prediction of what might occur over the next few months.


In just a few days, one of the major provisions of the Affordable Care Act will go into effect. The health insurance marketplace will open. The public discussion about this marketplace and about Obamacare overall is full of partisan politics, so it’s difficult to see beyond the rhetoric and get an idea of what this new marketplace really means.

The health insurance marketplace is a way for American citizens, who may not be able to get or afford health insurance through the traditional channels, to select a plan for health coverage. Those traditional channels include insurance through an employer, which is usually subsidized by that employer, or directly from an insurance company, such as through individual health insurance.

The law calls for states to set up their own insurance marketplaces, but the federal government is providing a marketplace for residents in states whose governments choose not to organize their own marketplace. The state in which I live, New Jersey, is one of these states in which citizens will use the federal marketplace.

If you have health insurance through your work, the marketplaces (or exchanges) won’t affect you, but other portions of the Affordable Care Act might as I’ll explain. Getting subsidized health insurance through an employer is still going to be the best option for the majority of middle-class or above, full-time employees.

I don’t have health insurance from an employer. I have coverage through COBRA, and I would qualify for continuing that coverage through January 2014, but I may not want to, now that I have more options. With COBRA, I have the same plan I had while I was an employee, but my premiums are no longer subsidized by my employer. In fact, I’m sure my premium includes a fee that gives the third-party COBRA administration company a reason to exist when this layer may not provide any additional benefit to anyone.

Until October 1, my only option than COBRA would be to buy individual insurance directly from an insurance company. After October 1, I can begin shopping on the federal health insurance marketplace, to choose a plan with the coverage that I want, and the monthly premium may be a better deal. The prices and plan details won’t be publicly available until October 1. If there’s a more affordable option than COBRA that meets my coverage needs, I’ll take it.

Why employees may have to select a new plan

Aside from the new marketplaces, the Affordable Care Act requires that all health insurance plans comply with new rules for coverage. The way some insurance companies seem to be handling the requirement is by informing policyholders they must choose a new health care plan for next year. You may have received a letter from your insurance company informing of the need to select a new plan, particularly if you have health insurance through your employer. If you haven’t received this notification, chances are good you know someone who has.

The new plans offered for next year will include at the least the baseline provisions called for by the Affordable Care Act. Policyholders with plans who do not meet that standard will need to select or confirm new coverage for 2014. Some of those baseline provisions include:

  • Outpatient and emergency services
  • Hospitalization
  • Maternity and newborn care
  • Mental health disorders
  • Preventative care without co-payment
  • Screenings and immunizations for children

Qualifying for discounts

Many people in the United States will qualify for a discount if they choose a health insurance plan through the marketplace. With household income below a certain level, some Americans will qualify for lower monthly premiums, lower copayments, lower coinsurance, and lower deductibles. This income limit for discounted premiums starts at $28,725 for an individual and increases to $99,075 for a family of eight.

Plan categories: bronze, silver, gold, and platinum

The new plans will be categorized as bronze, silver, gold, and platinum. Each level indicates a different balance between premium costs — the monthly fee for coverage — and out-of-pocket costs. In general, if you expect to visit the doctor less, you can choose a plan with lower premiums and higher out-of-pocket costs, but your future medical needs can be difficult to predict sometimes. The marketplace also includes “catastrophic” plans, which have very low premiums. These are often the same decisions employees have made for years when choosing health insurance plans; these new categories can help organize and compare the options.

Medicaid and CHIP

Medicaid is still an available option for health insurance, as is the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). If you can’t afford coverage from the health insurance marketplace, you or your family may qualify for Medicaid, or your children might qualify for CHIP. If you can afford health insurance but choose not to be covered, a new line on income tax forms will calculate a fee that starts at 1 percent of income, and that fee will be added to the tax you owe, but those who cannot afford health insurance will not be charged this fee, up to $695. That’s less than the cost of health insurance, but opting for health insurance if you can afford it is always a better choice.

In many states, Medicaid is expanding, so more people will be covered under this provision, and for those who do, it will cost less money than buying an insurance plan from the exchanges.

Estimated costs

The Kaiser Family Foundation offers a calculator that helps you determine how much you might pay for a Silver health insurance plan from the exchange in your state (or the federal exchange). According to the calculator here, my premium will be $3,668, or $306 a month. That’s less than half of what I pay for COBRA for good coverage, and about half of what I used to pay for a bare-boned health insurance plan I selected directly from an insurance company as individual insurance.

If you don’t have a health insurance plan through your employer and believe you might be interested in buying health insurance from the exchange, take a look at the calculator and estimate your monthly premium. If you do have health insurance through your employer, you probably won’t need to look at health insurance through the exchange.

Signing up for new health insurance

If you are an employee, you might have some new choices during your open enrollment period this year as insurance companies reformulate their plans to comply with the new law. But for those without with employer-subsidized health insurance options, the marketplaces will open online on October 1. (Owners of small businesses who are shopping for health insurance for their companies can start shopping offline on October 1 but the online shopping won’t be enabled until November 1.) This will give shoppers almost three months to select a plan before they go into effect on January 1, 2014, though open enrollment will continue for three months into 2014.

States have not been very forthcoming with information for their citizens about how to enroll in these health insurance plans. In some cases, it seems like government agencies at the state level are deliberately confusing residents in an effort to make this process more difficult. The process is really easy, though, particularly for those with access to the Internet.

  • Visit HealthCare.gov, the federal government’s health care website.
  • Answer a few questions about your residence and status.
  • The website will tell you where to browse to next to see your health insurance options. For example, since New Jersey doesn’t have a state marketplace, I shop right on HealthCare.gov.

The chance of Obamacare failing

The Republicans in Congress are looking to block the provisions of the Affordable Care Act, and seem to be willing to shut down the government in order to make their case. These tactics historically don’t work. Obamacare will go into effect. This is the plan that insurance companies wanted. Unlike a single-payer health care system, the system created by the Affordable Care Act keeps the insurance companies in business and not only keeps industry jobs in place but presents an opportunity for more jobs in insurance as well as health care.

One threat to Obamacare is defunding. The political tactic involved comes from the desire to see ideas put forth by the other party fail, and one way to do that is to put a system into effect while removing the government funding that is necessary for the system to succeed. The result is that one side gets to say, “I told you so,” even if the failure is due to defunding and not due to a systemic problem.

Regardless, with a group as powerful as health insurance companies behind Obamacare, defunding probably isn’t a major concern in the long run, and the health insurance marketplaces will likely live on in some form in perpetuity. Defunding will have an effect on lower-income families that qualify for and rely on the discounted insurance plans.

What are your expectations for the new health insurance marketplaces?


How to Save Money Without Worrying About Coupons

by Luke Landes

The retail industry has everyone fooled. While millions of people spend their time scouring for deals, clipping coupons from the newspaper if they’re old-fashioned, plugging into the latest mobile deal applications if they are somewhat more technologically inclined, sharing their finds on Facebook to recruit friends for group deals, the companies on the other side ... Continue reading this article…

14 comments Read the full article →

8 Reasons to Sell Your Business

by Luke Landes
Handshake in suits

I was an entrepreneur by accident. When I started blogging in 1994, I didn’t expect to earn money; I wasn’t even trying. But almost ten years after building my first website, I created Consumerism Commentary to learn about personal finance and to improve my own money situation. Within about a year, much to my initial ... Continue reading this article…

11 comments Read the full article →

Many Low-Income Families Can’t Use Mainstream Banking Even If They Wanted

by Luke Landes

I’ve written previously about many different reasons households, particularly those in locations where families typically have low incomes and those in areas where certain minorities constitute a majority of households, are more likely to take advantage of the high-cost alternative banking system including payday loans and check-cashing storefronts. For example, traditional banks find it difficult ... Continue reading this article…

13 comments Read the full article →

Don’t Take Budgeting Advice From McDonald’s

by Luke Landes
McDonald's ridiculous budget worksheet

I had planned to write about McDonald’s ridiculous budgeting tips for employees when I first saw the news circulating through social media. I’m so far behind with my editorial plan that every last Consumerism Commentary reader has probably heard about this latest manifestation of corporate ignorance of reality by now. Writers of all stripes and ... Continue reading this article…

23 comments Read the full article →

4 Types of Retirement: Which Will You Choose?

by Luke Landes
Which retirement will you choose?

While every situation is different, there are only a few types of retirement for those of us in the working class. Before I get to the retirement concept, here’s what I mean by “working class.” The working class includes those who need to survive by trading their time and effort for an income. They could ... Continue reading this article…

19 comments Read the full article →

Can Tipping Change a Waiter’s Behavior?

by Luke Landes
Can tipping change a waitress's behavior?

A friend of mine once lamented publicly: “When did the standard restaurant tip change from 15 percent to 20?” Sure, I remember paying typically 15 percent for a tip when I first started dining out with my friends. That was when I gained my first sense of independence from my parents twenty years ago, as ... Continue reading this article…

37 comments Read the full article →

Working From Home: A Benefit or a Distraction?

by Luke Landes

Marissa Mayer, the CEO of Yahoo, is looking to improve her company’s performance. In a memo from the company’s human resources department to all employees, Mayer made her intentions clear. In order to build a more cohesive company of employees, all work from home arrangements are canceled. The confidential memo was made public by Kara ... Continue reading this article…

23 comments Read the full article →

The Wrong Reason To Become An Entrepreneur

by Luke Landes

I don’t have the statistics pertaining to this, but I have a strong impression that many people dream about starting their own business, and many who do have this particular daydream are inspired to consider what this life would be like because they don’t like their boss. Or maybe they don’t like working for someone ... Continue reading this article…

11 comments Read the full article →

Credit Card Checkout Fees Are Here

by Luke Landes
Credit Card Surchage

I’m currently in California, visiting my mother, who as I mentioned in a previous article is in the hospital. While articles this week will likely be slow on Consumerism Commentary, one thing I won’t have to deal with while visiting family is the relaxed regulation on merchants who accept credit cards. Starting this week, retailers ... Continue reading this article…

18 comments Read the full article →

A New #Cut4Bieber: Justin Bieber’s Prepaid Debit Card

by Luke Landes
Justin Bieber

There’s apparently a celebrity of some sort called Justin Bieber. I don’t know much about him, but I might have heard a song of his one time. He might have been a baby only a few years ago, but today he’s following in the footsteps of some of my favorite gurus, in a love-to-hate sense, ... Continue reading this article…

7 comments Read the full article →

Plan for the Payroll Tax Cut Expiring in 2013

by Luke Landes
Tax rates

Missing from discussions about the so-called fiscal cliff is the option to continue the payroll tax cut. To boost the economy, President Obama and Congress introduced a stimulus bill in 2010 that reduced the payroll tax, money collected at the time of each paycheck from employers and employees (workers with W2 forms). The employee’s share ... Continue reading this article…

20 comments Read the full article →

Your Credit Score Affects Your Love Life

by Luke Landes

A few years ago, credit scores were taboo. The idea that a credit score could be used for more than just determining qualification for a loan was at best unfair and at worst discriminatory. Employers in some circumstances can use credit scores or credit reports to determine whether to offer jobs to applicants. If you ... Continue reading this article…

3 comments Read the full article →

Aftermath of Sandy: Check Your Insurance Coverage Before the Storm

by Luke Landes
Hurricane Sandy

I hope all Consumerism Commentary readers affected by Hurricane slash Extra-Tropical Storm slash Low-Pressure System Sandy are alive and safe and have avoided damage. I lost power for sixteen to eighteen hours, and although I live near a canal, flood waters didn’t reach me. Many of my local friends are still without power, and my ... Continue reading this article…

6 comments Read the full article →

Go to College for Free

by Luke Landes
West Point Academy cadet

Welcome new readers. Be sure to subscribe to Consumerism Commentary via RSS. New readers should start here. I enjoyed my experience as an undergraduate at a “state-assisted, privately governed” university. As I did not live in that university’s state prior to attending, my tuition fees were higher than many of my classmates’ fees. To attend ... Continue reading this article…

18 comments Read the full article →

Why I Don’t Make Your Financial Decisions For You

by Luke Landes

Some feedback over the nine years of writing about money on Consumerism Commentary indicates that there are some readers — not necessarily daily readers and fans of a website, but those who are searching online about some finance-related topic and are at best passing by any particular website — are looking for quick answers. People ... Continue reading this article…

9 comments Read the full article →

5 Tips for Dealing With the Job Shift Away From the Middle Class

by Luke Landes

The middle class fared the worst in terms of job losses throughout the recession. The National Employment Law Project has consolidated findings from its studies and found that while there has been some economic recovery in the employment sector following the recession, the recovery changed the nature of the job market. Jobs with a mid-tier ... Continue reading this article…

9 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 612345···Last »