As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

From the category archives:

Personal Finance

Comments
Email this article Email this article
Print this article Print this article

I Will Teach You to Be Rich, a Six-Week Boot Camp With Ramit Sethi

by Flexo on November 3, 2009

in Personal Finance

While I was in California this past week, I spent a few days at my brother’s new apartment before his wedding this past Saturday. Among the piles of books not yet placed into a bookcase was something familiar: I Will Teach You to Be Rich by Ramit Sethi (review here). Ramit is a colleague of mine, a personal finance blogger who published a book that quickly became a favorite.

How Ramit saved my brother

My brother, who we’ll call Stewie for the sake of anonymity, is both a systems administrator and a musician; he earned good money from a day job which he then used to help fund his band’s national tour last year. But tours are expensive and money runs out. When I asked, he credits Consumerism Commentary and Ramit’s book with helping him get his finances in order and out of debt from the tour, and I think he mentioned Consumerism Commentary only to be nice. Stewie is an avid reader and has read a number of other books about basic money management and investing but I Will Teach You to Be Rich is the only one he feels provided concrete advice and suggestions for being smart about money.

I know Stewie was truthful because when he gave me a check to pay for the restaurant hosting his wedding ceremony and reception, the check was drawn from a Schwab Bank Investor Checking account, an account recommended several times throughout Ramit Sethi’s book.

The six-week “Boot Camp”

Today Ramit Sethi is releasing a new project. He has created a “Boot Camp,” a six-week program designed to empower participants to make better financial decisions. Through the Boot Camp, Ramit places participants with similar financial goals together and provides them with the tools, information, and most importantly, the motivation to get started and the group accountability to maintain action.

Here is how it works. At the start of each week, participants receive excerpts from I Will Teach You to Be Rich with additional content and worksheets. This is followed with a webcast, a video discussion on the week’s topic, downloadable so you can watch or listen on your iPod or computer when you have time. Each week will also feature special guest speakers including Andrew Jolls (ex-executive of FICO and founder of VideoCreditScore.com), Charlie Hoehn (author of Recession-Proof Graduate), and Chris Guillebeau (traveler and author of The Art of Non-Conformity). A complete curriculum including guest speakers is included below.

If Ramit had created the Boot Camp one year ago, I would have recommended the program to my brother. And this is coming from someone who was originally a skeptic of Ramit. When he first launched his blog in August 2004, I wondered how a pompous graduate student at Stanford could teach people to be rich without a long history of personal experience being rich. But his writing is captivating, he understands people, and provides the tools for getting things done.

How much does it cost?

At $199, the program might be a bit expensive for someone who is trying to figure out how they’re going to make their next rent payment. I’m confident this program will help a participant save at least $199, recovering the cost of the program, and the tools within will provide a lifetime of benefits. Ramit is offsetting the high price by offering a 30-day money-bank guarantee, so you can participate in most of the program and back out before the end if it is not working for you.

I’m generally a critic of seminars like Rich Dad Academy and Landmark Education, but with Ramit, I know the information will be sound, specific financial advice designed to inspire and motivate, not an up-sell scheme where you have to pay more for the “deluxe” package in order qualify for the useful information.

I expect the next time the Boot Camp is offered, the price will be significantly higher as he tweaks the service to include more materials and guest speakers.

Registration for the Boot Camp is only open through Friday, November 6.

Here is a taste of the Boot Camp, a twelve minute video of Ramit Sethi talking about automating your finances with specific tips for setting up accounts and directing your funds to the right places at the right times. (If you are reading through an RSS reader, you may need to click through to view the video.)

If you want to listen to more from Ramit before signing up, listen to my interview with Ramit from earlier this year. If you opt to join the Boot Camp, come back and let us know whether you like it.

Boot camp curriculum and guest speakers

Week 1: Optimizing your credit cards
Speaker: Andy Jolls: Thursday, November 12, 10:00 pm EST

Week 2: Beat the banks and negotiate for lower bills
Speaker: Charlie Hoehn: Thursday, November 19, 10:00 pm EST

Week 3: Open 401K and Roth IRA
Speaker: Chris Guillebeau: Tuesday, November 24, 10:00 pm EST

Week 4: Conscious Spending
Speaker: Penelope Trunk: Tuesday, December 1, 10:00 pm EST

Week 5: Automation
Speaker: Shannon Sofield: Thursday, December 10, 10:00 pm EST

Week 6: Investing – setting up portfolio
Speaker: Pam Slim: Thursday, December 17, 10:00 pm EST

{ 2 comments }



Comments
Email this article Email this article
Print this article Print this article

Seven Zen Principles to Guide Your Money and Your Life

by Flexo on October 26, 2009

in Best Of, Personal Finance

A few years ago, I visited the Japanese Tea Garden in Golden Gate Park in San Francisco. Japanese gardens are designed precisely to appear natural, resulting in an interesting collision between nature and man. There is a set of principles or aesthetics that guide the creation of Japanese gardens, including the dry gardens commonly called “Zen gardens.”

The basis for these modern Japanese aesthetics has existed for thousands of years and is rooted in Buddhist writings and teachings. However, the full concept of aesthetics relating to these ancient ideas has been discussed only within the past two centuries, as the the traditional Japanese concepts have been infused with the Western idea of art and aesthetics.

These same Japanese aesthetics, the attributes that define a Japanese garden, can be further stretched by the Western mind to relate to other areas of thought. If you are particularly interested in personal finances, as we are here at Consumerism Commentary, you might attempt to apply these concepts to attitudes and behaviors surrounding interaction with money.

Here are seven aesthetics rooted in Japanese culture that can be drawn upon to make us think about the way we live with and deal with money, from personal expenses to investing.

kanso 簡素

Keep your finances simple. The extreme limit of necessity would be to have no other financial accounts but one checking account for paying your bills. Simplifying at this level may beyond the limit of practicality even if still possible. But there is no reason I should continue to have savings accounts at seven different banks, even if seven is an odd number, compliant with other aesthetics.

In addition to utilize as few banks as possible, simplify your investment accounts. Keep your investments in one account in one index fund or target retirement fund that matches your risk profile. This also makes it much easier to evaluate your asset allocation to ensure your investments on the whole match your tolerance for risk.

There is rarely a need to have more than one credit card for your personal matters. Zero is an even better number.

Simplicity in all financial matters is an attainable goal.

seijaku 静寂

Managers of actively managed mutual funds earn their pay by buying and selling investments frequently. Index funds take the opposite approach by matching a stock index, adding or removing stocks only when the index does, which is rarely. Index funds embody this concept of stillness. Unnecessary activity, like stock trading, makes the stock broker rich while you’re adding risk and decreasing your chance of beating an index fund’s performance.

Keeping your wealth still and motionless allows time to have a chance to cultivate it. The effect of compound interest increases when you let it work for decades.

If you’ve simplified your finances down to a small number of accounts, you can further keep your money motionless by removing the necessity of transferring funds from one place to another. The 0% balance transfer game or otherwise moving your credit card balances from one card to another is in direct conflict with this aesthetic.

datsuzoku 脱俗

Break free from your possessions. We buy things because they reflect who we are or who we want to be, but no thing can be a true reflection of a self. Not only do material possessions drain you of funds that could be spent on necessities, but you will have less money for sharing with others within and outside of your family.

Break free from conventional thought and following the bandwagon. You are free to be your own person and find your own path. You should never feel trapped in a job or a career. Even a steady bi-weekly paycheck is a pattern that could be broken without fear. With creativity, draw income to you through something unexpected.

Don’t confine yourself to your budget. The ultimate way to grow wealth is to spend less than you earn, so as long as that continues, you can break free from your budget and enjoy flexibility without too much worry.

koko 考古

Focus on the bare essentials. Add something to your life only if it has a functional purpose and fills a need. This concept is a nod to frugality and sparsity. For example, do you need three televisions, one for each large room in your house? Do you even need one television when you can find entertainment, including comedy, nature, and drama — possibly even crime-focused drama — for free, by sitting in a park and watching other people interact? Wouldn’t it be more fulfilling to visit a National Park than to sit on your couch and watch a documentary about it?

Decide what in your life is not essential and eliminate it. If something does not add value more than or equal to its expense, consider it a candidate for elimination. I think immediately of the interest that you pay on a credit card balance. Once you pay interest, you’ve paid more than the value of whatever you’ve purchased with the credit card. If you decide a $1,000 television brings $1,000 worth of value into your life, then it may be worthwhile. But if you put that on a credit card and pay the balance and interest over time, the new question is whether that $1,000 television added $2,000 worth of value into your life.

shizen 自然

You should represent yourself to the world truthfully and without pretense. There is no need to purchase expensive cars and houses when necessity allows for lesser purchases. Don’t concern yourself with “keeping up with the Joneses.” Without the need to show the world you have more money than you really have, you will lose the desire to buy more than you can afford. As a result, the chances of falling into the trap of debt from unnecessary spending will diminish.

My thoughts on this are drawn to people with public-facing careers. Real estate agents, for example, often want to project an aura of success. If clients believe that the agent is rich, the clients will then believe that they are successful agents. The natural conclusion is that these agents are successful because they represent clients fairly and offer quality houses. The same is true for lawyers whose business is representing clients in court trials. Lavish spending projects an image of wealth, which indicates to prospective customers a history of successful court appearances.

This is all show and all pretense. Anyone can look wealthy or successful thanks to the availability of credit. You can’t see what lurks beneath someone else’s surface.

Do not cover up all that is natural. Do not hide money or money-related problems from your partner or spouse. Finances should be part of a communication that is open and honest, not hidden beneath layers of creative stories.

fukinsei 不均整

Create a budget, a monthly spending plan that outlines your limits for expenses in a variety of categories that make sense for you. A budget by definition starts out the same each month but will look different by the month’s final day. Life’s asymmetry is natural, and your budget should reflect this asymmetry while maintaining balance. You spend more for gifts as the December holidays approach, so you might budget more for gifts in November and December than you might in June or July. In order for this asymmetry to be balanced, an increase in one category at one time should correspond with a decrease either in another category or at another time.

This flexibility is essential for creating a workable budget. A budget should free you, not trap you.

Balanced asymmetry appears elsewhere. “Work/life balance” is a relatively new concept that is based on this idea. When my employer talks about “work/life balance,” they are not trying to imply that we should spend an equal amount of hours in our life between our career and everything else we do. It is an asymmetrical approach to living a more fulfilled life.

yugen 幽玄

Whenever your personal financial issues are public rather than private, choose subtlety over directness. Do not brag about your successes. There is no need for you to have your latest business acquisition or marriage listed in your college’s alumni magazine. If you give charitably to an organization, you do not need to publicly list your name or the amount of money you donated.

In the business world, there is a movement towards personal branding. It is good for your career to find ways make yourself stand out among your colleagues or among a sea of job applicants. While I would agree that it’s important to protect your identity, particularly online, from anything that might damage your reputation, the best way to stand out is to be the best rather than to declare you are the best.

Let others declare it for you.

A guide, not a rule

While it would be great if all of the above could apply to our interactions with money all the time, I like to look at these aesthetic concepts as a guide. Just considering these ideas and allowing yourself to think about money in a different way can be enlightening. Perhaps you can strive to achieve several of these concepts in your own life, or perhaps you can appreciate this way of living even if you choose to relate with money in a different manner.

Simplifying my finances is one way I can start applying this approach to my life. As I mentioned above, I currently use seven accounts for my savings. Many of these I open so I can review them for Consumerism Commentary, but even the purely personal bank accounts number too many. Do you or would you apply any of these aesthetics to your finances?

Disclaimer: I am not an expert in Japanese philosophy or, for that matter, in personal finance. I drew the above concepts of Japanese aesthetics from a variety of sources.

Photo credits: semihundido, laRuth, DieselDemon, 田中十洋

{ 6 comments }

Comments
Email this article Email this article
Print this article Print this article

Ten Things I Will Teach My Children About Money

by Flexo on September 28, 2009

in Personal Finance

I do not currently have children, but I have not ruled out starting a family some day. If and when I do have children, I hope I will be able to help them become smart and capable adults over time. I believe this is what my parents have done for me, and I’d like to believe I’m in a position to pass on good attitudes about money.

Here are a few concepts I’d like to teach these future children about money as they become old enough to understand them.

I intend to teach as much by example as by conversation with the understanding that no person is perfect.

1. Money is neither good nor evil. Money is simply a tool, with no quality that defines it as good or evil. It can, however, be used to do good things or evil things. Money does help reveal the nature of a person. There is nothing inherently bad about not having little wealth or having great wealth. The value of a person is not defined by how much money he or she has, so you cannot judge a person by looking at the bank account statements.

2. Money is not a goal. There is no point in wanting to have one million dollars, or any sum of wealth that might make a good milestone, if it servers no purpose other than to sit in a bank account or at the bottom of a balance sheet. Focus on real goals, not net worth. Don’t be the boy who, when asked what he wants to be when he grows up, answers, “Rich.” It’s not the number that counts, it’s what you do with it.

3. Money will not make you happy. Money is not correlated to happiness. Rich people aren’t necessarily happier than poor people. In fact, wealthy people are more stressed. The happiest people are those who are satisfied with what they have; if you always want more, you will always be struggling. Now, there will be people who will tell you that you must constantly strive for more in order to be successful, but these are people who equate success with things like job title, wealth, and seeing their name on seminar advertisement posters. They’re probably not happy. It’s okay not to settle, but only if your goals are worthwhile.

4. Don’t be jealous of other people’s money. There will always be people who have more money than you, but there will always be many more people who have less. If you learn to handle your money properly, you will find that you’re more financially secure than others who try hard to flaunt their wealth; those with fancy cars and houses may owe money to other people and to banks. Jealousy is a distracting emotion, so it’s better for your own sanity to worry about yourself than it is to look at other people, especially when you can only see what they are showing on the surface.

5. If you are in a position to help, you have an obligation to help. As I mentioned above, at any one time it is more likely you’ll be in a better financial position than most of the other people who live on this planet. You are lucky to be born in a rich country in a very prosperous time. Though it is no fault of your own, these circumstances present the responsibility of helping to make this world a better place in whatever way you see fit.

6. Companies want your money. Corporations spend lots of their own money trying to develop ways to get you to give your money to them. Don’t believe what you see in commercials, on television shows, in movies, on the internet, or even on the news. Everyone has an angle and that angle is often to try to get you to part with your money. It’s a cynical view of media and of the world, but turn off the commercials and think for yourself. Increase the signal-to-noise ratio.

7. Pay attention to your money. Once you start receiving an allowance, create a budget. Save part of the money and spend the rest as you see fit, but write out a budget and track everything you buy. This is a good habit to start early. If you’re paying attention, you’ll soon realize that the only situation that results in building your wealth is spending less than you have.

8. Don’t expect a free lunch. I will do everything in my power to ensure that lots of opportunities are available to you, but our culture within the “middle class” is defined by trading your time and effort for money. In other words, you get paid for working and you get paid better for working harder. You’re not a Bush, so you won’t get to be President of the United States because it runs in our family. There is no trust fund.

9. Save as much as you can for later. Even though Albert Einstein never really said that compound interest is the strongest force in the universe, he probably would suggest saving as much money as possible. It is true that the sooner you can control your actions to delay gratification, the better you can plan for the future. But it is also true that spending money shouldn’t always illicit a feeling of gratification. Feel good about saving, then you can feel gratified when you put money in the bank, not when you take it out.

10. Avoid borrowing money. Just like money is inherently neither good nor evil, owing money to other people is inherently neither good nor evil. Borrowing money has its drawbacks. Any purchase you finance with interest will end up costing more than it should. However, within the “middle class,” it will be difficult to avoid some borrowing. Not all debt has to be bad. You may need a loan for college and you almost definitely will need a mortgage to buy a house. Make smart choices about these purchases and you’ll be in a good position even if you do have debt.

11 (bonus). It’s not about the money. While money gives you flexibility and eventually independence, don’t spend too much of your time focusing on it. Realize that money should not be the sole driver for your decisions. Many smart people will tell you about “return on investment” (ROI), but sometimes you can’t measure the validity of a decision by how much money you receive. Think about all factors when making decisions. Some decisions, like those pertaining to investments, should be based on financial considerations as much as possible. But for other decisions pertaining to your life, money should be only one consideration of many.

Do you disagree with any of the above lessons? What do or will you teach your children about money? Is there anything else you wish your parents had taught you?

{ 20 comments }

Comments
Email this article Email this article
Print this article Print this article

Keep Emotions Separate From Financial Decisions

by Flexo on September 25, 2009

in Personal Finance

If you are reading this article, it is almost completely guaranteed that you are human. And if you are human and do not have a major cerebral deficit, you have emotions. Perhaps have is not a strong enough word; everything you do, and every decision you make, is controlled by your emotions. Even the strive to take a logical approach to life is an emotional desire. Despite this, and even with the knowledge that you can never fully leave your emotions behind, the best financial decisions are made when you are aware of your emotions, control them to a point, and compensate for the effect they might be having on your decision making.

Emotions in negotiations

In this Sunday’s Consumerism Commentary Podcast, one of our guests is Herb Cohen, a master negotiator who advised Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan on dealing with the Iranian Hostage Crisis. One of his suggestions, framed around negotiating a major purchase like a house, will be not to fall in love with the object.

If you want a good deal, you have to be willing to walk away. If you let your emotions control your decision, you are much more likely to pay more than you should. The salesperson — or anyone else with whom you negotiate — will know right away if your emotions are controlling your decisions and will use this fact to their advantage. Your emotions give your power away.

Emotions in debt

Many otherwise smart people find themselves in unmanageable debt as a result of their own decisions. Not everyone is in debt for this reason, but some who are have made decisions fueled by emotions, where “want” and “desire” were the operative words. When it comes to getting out of debt, you could take an emotional approach or try to put your emotions aside.

As humans are emotional creatures, I can see why some people would argue that an emotional approach to getting out of debt would be successful. And it just might be in the short term. But unless this example individual, in debt due to emotional spending and using emotional decisions to get out of debt, changes their mindset drastically once they are in better financial shape, there is a good chance their emotional decisions will lead them back to debt.

I like to tell people about the Debt Avalanche method of debt reduction because it takes a more mathematical approach to getting out of debt. This approach helps people get used to separating emotions from financial decisions as much as possible. On the other hand, the Debt Snowball method relies on emotions — the same emotions that might have allowed us to find ourselves in trouble and might cause us to falter again. The Debt Avalanche does have emotional components, but it does steer us away from using emotions to guide actions.

Emotions in investing

The only way to make money in investing is to “buy low, sell high,” but this is the exact opposite of what actual trading behavior looks like. Most investors decide to buy after a stock or other investment has shown a confidence-inspiring pattern of price increases. They also decide to sell when the price has declined; if everyone else is selling, causing the price to go down, they must know something that we don’t know. We lose confidence in the investment, and we sell. “Buy low, sell high” is a mantra that all investors know, so why do we ignore this in practice?

The answer is our emotions. Rather that making decisions based on an investment’s underlying value and expectations for the future, we are affected by the media and the stock market. News and price movement inspire fear or excitement, and it takes these emotions to encourage someone to resist inertia and decide to buy or sell.

We can’t fully separate emotions from our ability to make decisions. However, just by being aware of the effect they have can help mitigate the bad choices. How do you deal with your emotions when making financial decisions?

{ 2 comments }

Comments
Email this article Email this article
Print this article Print this article

A Report Card for Financial Rules of Thumb

by Flexo on September 23, 2009

in Personal Finance

I’m not a big fan of “rules of thumb.” These are bite-sized nuggets of wisdom masquerading as advice, designed to apply to a mass audience. At best, they cant point someone in the right direction, but at worst, rules of thumb can erroneously send people on the wrong path or can mistakenly instill a false sense of security. This is a good example of why the best financial advice is specifically tailored to an individual or a family.

Rules of thumb satisfy the human desire for knowledge on a stick, like fast food for the brain. They are easily repeatable and retweetable, and they invite a minimum of critical thinking. But it would be unfair to suggest ignoring all rules of thumb. Some are better — more accurate for a larger number of people — than others. But it’s important to determine which ones apply to your situation and which one’s are not relevant.

Here are some of the more popular rules of thumb targeting personal finances, often repeated by gurus and writers targeting a wide audience.

Rules of thumb

You should save 10 percent of your income. Grade: B-.

This rule of thumb is not specific. It is not clear whether 10 percent should be counted before or after taxes. Saving this percentage of your gross income, a larger sum than the same percentage of your “take-home” income, would be preferred. This rules of thumb also does not specify whether your 401(k) or other investments are included or if this only refers to savings not invested or spent.

I can’t say that saving 10 percent is a bad idea. This is a good starting point; in fact, putting this portion of your income away without touching it will put you far ahead of the “average” American. Many people, however, will need to save more, some significantly more, than 10 percent in order to meet their goals. This rule of thumb, ingrained in the minds of many people who have read books suggesting this amount, can convince someone than 10 percent is enough.

Your emergency fund should be large enough to replace 3 to 6 months of your income. Grade: D.

Again, this is a good starting point, but your income is not related to the size. Your emergency fund should be allow you to afford your non-discretionary expenses while you work to replace your income. Determining the right size for your emergency fund requires measuring your monthly expenses, judging the stability of your income, determining what you would be willing to do to replace that income, considering how much it might cost to relocate in an emergency, and seeking expenses to cut.

The economy and the job market — how long it might take you to find a new job — should be a consideration as well. A better rule of thumb might state that the size of your emergency fund should be enough to cover necessary expenses for the number of months equal to the unemployment rate. For example, if the unemployment rate in your state is 10 percent, your emergency fund should be large enough to cover 10 months’ worth of expenses.

You can withdraw 4 percent of your nest egg in retirement to provide yourself an income while keeping enough invested to last indefinitely. Grade: C.

The 4 percent “safe withdrawal rate” relies on a number of dangerous assumptions. First, the funds from which you take the 4 percent must be invested completely in a diversified selection of stocks, like the S&P 500. As we’ve seen recently, beginning retirement while completely invested in stocks in a year where the stock market is down can be disastrous to financial health. Secondly, in assumes the stock market will perform 5 percentage points higher than inflation. That’s a reasonably good estimate when you look at the stock market on average, but there is rarely an average year. The stock market performs significantly better in some years and significantly worse in others.

The rule of thumb is not detailed enough to explain, but 4 percent is the withdrawal rate for the first year only. The withdrawal in every subsequent year should increase by the rate of inflation. For example, if you withdraw $40,000 from your $1,000,000 in the first year, and in the second year your nest egg increases to $1,001,000 after a year where inflation was 3%, your withdrawal in the second year should be $41,200 (3% more than $40,000) rather than $40,040 (4% of your new balance).

To find the percentage of your portfolio that should be invested in stocks, subtract your age from 100. Grade: F.

According to this rule, once you are no longer a minor the most you’ll be invested in stocks or stock mutual funds is about 80 percent. Someone retiring at age 65 would have a portfolio only 35 percent invested in the stock market. This directly contradicts what would be necessary to make the 4 percent safe withdrawal rule of thumb a reality. And for most people, the calculation using 100 just simply won’t cut it in order to grow wealth over the long term.

There’s more to consider. Suze Orman has a massive net worth compared to most people, and can therefore afford to play it safe by investing almost all of it in bonds. Stocks are riskier, and she and other people with significant net worth do not have to take on as much risk as what is found in the stock market to provide more than enough income for the rest of their life. Not only that, but significant wealth in a less risky investment helps ensure there will be an estate to leave to family or charity at the end of life.

The rest of us must take on the risk of the stock market in order to provide the best chance of building wealth in the long term. And the amount of risk needed for us is a higher percentage than the result of subtracting your age from 100. Perhaps 130 or 140 would be a better figure to use.

To retire comfortably, you will need to have an income of 80 percent of your maximum pre-retirement income. Grade: C.

Although it’s common to believe your needs, and therefore expenses, will be less in retirement, reality shows that this is not always the case. It is safer to assume that your expenses will be 10 percent higher in retirement. Keep in mind that health care costs will most likely rise dramatically as you age. And with people living longer than ever, those expenses will last for many years.

Once size does not fit all. Rules of thumb are good starting points, but don’t fall into the trap of believing you are safe if you follow these rules. Do you know of any other rules of thumb deserving a thrashing?

Photo: John Leach

{ 21 comments }

Comments
Email this article Email this article
Print this article Print this article

America’s Total Net Worth is Up. Is Yours?

by Flexo on September 21, 2009

in Personal Finance

The total net worth among Americans has risen to $53 trillion, the highest this measure has been since the end of 2007. At that point, Americans were worth $65 trillion. The increase this past quarter of $2 trillion was the first increase in this measure since 2007.

I am taking this as a good sign for the economy. In addition to this increase, overall personal debt is not increasing. Even though some markets are still slow and unemployment is still high, when consumers start feeling better about the economy, these should improve. I’m still waiting for interest rates for savings accounts to start climbing again more than just a few hundredths of a percentage point like Ally Bank.

On the other hand, the stock market has been the primary driver behind the increase in net worth, and it’s quite possible that stocks have recovered too much too quickly. If the current recession is over, another might be around the corner. The stock market helped my net worth increase, in addition to income, over the past few years, but this might just be the result a temporary rally.

Has your net worth been increasing over the last few months, and if so, how are you increasing it?

{ 10 comments }

Comments
Email this article Email this article
Print this article Print this article

The Little Things and the Big Things: Which are More Important?

by Flexo on September 15, 2009

in Personal Finance

It’s easy to adopt one concept and use that concept to define your world. You commonly see this in religion, but I’m referring to personal finance concepts, as you might expect from Consumerism Commentary. One popular financial guru talks about The ECRD Factor. His followers — a guru can’t be a guru without a throng of fans who believe the guru’s words are gospel and question nothing — spread the word and this concept becomes well-known even if the name of the guru is not as widespread.

Outside of Consumerism Commentary, in what is usually referred to as “real life,” when the conversation turns to money for whatever reason, it is not uncommon for someone to share their advice. And often, someone will explain to me how wise and financially savvy they are because they’ve given up their daily morning coffee or doughnut or other expensive treat.

I will admit that saving four dollars a day is not entirely a bad idea. If this savings is repeated five days a week for fifty weeks a year, you’ve “earned” yourself $1,000 a year. Taking that concept to the next step, you could invest that $1,000 each year and grow your nest egg over time, doing much more for yourself your quality of life than a daily doughnut ever would. But the choice to forgo a daily treat does not exist in a vacuum.

In the cases of some of the people who have discovered their alleged personal financial freedom through their daily latte resistance, they’ve made this sacrifice only to lose ground on the larger, important financial decisions. They’ve taken daily baby steps forward but every so often, leap so far back that they’re worse off than they were when they started.

It’s very noble to have achieved the mindset that allows you to change your habit and break free from spending a few dollars each day. But if your real problem is buying clothes you can’t afford, or a car you can’t afford, or a house you can’t afford, any progress you’ve made by eschewing gourmet coffee or fattening doughy products can be rendered null and void. And the people I’ve spoken to who have been eager to flaunt their smart decision of going without a daily latte often fall victim to these other harmful behaviors.

If you pay $40,000 for a car when you only need one worth $16,000, you just undone twenty-four year’s worth of missing daily lattes. And that’s only if you pay cash. If you get a loan, the interest will harm you even further. If you pay $400,000 for a house when you should have spent for something smaller or in a different location $200,000, you can’t even live long enough to make that up in daily lattes. If you don’t manage your credit wisely, you could qualify only for a high-rate mortgage, costing you thousands of extra dollars — a thousand lattes or more — throughout the life of the loan.

The little things, like the daily small savings that accumulate over time, are helpful to your financial condition, but making wise decisions for the larger purchases can have a much larger bearing on your personal wealth. If an expensive coffee-related drink keeps you happy and sane, I say enjoy it, but make better decisions about the big things like cars, houses, the size of your family, and the location where you decide to live. The “mistake” of enjoying a daily treat doesn’t compare with the real financial decisions you make.

Keep in mind that I have no problem with people buying fancy cars or big houses, particularly if they can afford it. But someone opting to trim their expenses by skipping coffee is someone who wants to improve their financial condition, so it would be fair to assume that they should want to do so in the most effective manners. Everyone is free to set their own priorities, but life works better when those priorities actually match the goals.

{ 12 comments }

Comments
Email this article Email this article
Print this article Print this article

Measuring Financial Progress: Net Worth vs. Net Investable Assets

by Ray on September 3, 2009

in Personal Finance

This is a guest article by Ray, the owner and primary author of Financial Highway, where he discusses investing, saving and practical money management concepts. You can check subscribe to his RSS feed or follow him on Twitter.

I strongly believe that tracking your financial progress is crucial to reaching your financial goals. If you visit personal finance blogs on regular bases you have already noticed that measuring net worth is very common and many bloggers make it public like Flexo does here. There are a couple of metrics that can help you track your financial progress: Net worth and
Net Investable Assets are two most common and each provides different information. Let=92s take a look at each and determine which of the two measurement methods is better for tracking your financial progress.

Net worth

This is the most common metric you will see around and it’s simple to calculate. Net Worth illustrates how much you are worth after all your assets are sold and all debts have been paid off. The formula is simple:

Net worth = Assets – Liabilities

Debts include your consumer debt (credit cards and loans) as well as your mortgage. Assets include all your investments and savings (including emergency fund and retirement funds) as well as your home, cars and other personal property. You simply add up all your assets and subtract your debts from it and you have your net worth. Although this is often used in determining your financial strength, I do not consider it the best measurement. It assumes that you sell all your assets at the current value; this is not always a practical option.

Net investable assets

This term is often used in the investment industry; we would primarily track our clients’ net investable assets because this would be the amount we could work with. The net investable assets calculation is slightly different than the net worth calculation, and to me it’s somewhat more practical. In calculating your net investable assets you do not include your personal properties such as car, home and cottage. You simply add all your savings and investments and subtract your consumer debt (credit cards and loans). This leaves you with investable assets. This tells you how much money you have available without selling all your personal properties.

We do not subtract your mortgage because you need a place to live and if you do not have a mortgage than you would have rent to pay so it’s a regular expense. The net investable assets calculation gives you a more accurate measure of your financial independence.

Net worth or net investable assets?

How should you calculate your financial progress? Well it’s all up to you and what you feel comfortable with and makes sense to you. Recently Trent Hamm of The Simple Dollar announced that he is not including his home value in his net worth calculation, however he is still continuing to count the mortgage in the formula. Although this method makes sense to some I find it distorts things a little. If you do not count your home in your net worth than the mortgage that goes with it should not be added either, hence you would have your net investable assets.

No matter which way you go, or if you decide to make slight changes to things the important thing is to stay consistent and do what makes sense to you!

{ 4 comments }

Page 1 of 512345Earlier Articles »