As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

From the category archives:

Personal Finance

Help a Reader Who Inherited $10,000

by Flexo on January 21, 2010. Filed under Personal Finance.

Does anyone have advice for Sibyl? She commented on an article reviewing Jane Bryant Quinn’s latest book with a question pertaining to her own finances. Sibyl was kind enough to include many details about her family’s finances.

I have some suggestions, but this is always a good opportunity to have readers provide theirs as well.

Here is her story:

I just inherited $10,000. What do I do with it so that it earns rather than loses value? I currently have it in a checking account earning 3.25%.

I’m female, age 61, and married. Our income comes from my husband’s retirement ($1,700 a month), two annuities ($1,040 per month and $2,000 per year), and a part-time job ($20,000 per year). I do not work outside the home.

We can collect Social Security in January 2011 as we will both be 62 in October. My husband expects about $1,700 a month from Social Security and I expect about $700 a month. He hopes to retire after we receive Social Security. Is this a good idea or should he keep working?

We have no expenses except the household (our cars and house is house are paid for). Our current credit card debt totals $3,000 at 0% and we have about $8,000 in savings earning 3.48%.

After my mother’s estate is settled in January 2012, I may receive as much as $100,000. Should I ask again at that time?

My opinions: It sounds like Sibyl is in a solid financial situation. Her main question is what to do with the $10,000 inheritance. First, a 3.25% is a great interest rate for a checking account right now. At this time, cash flow doesn’t seem to be a problem, although I’m confused about the $1,700 a month they are drawing from his retirement right now. Debt is not a problem either. Since cash flow is covered, I think Sibyl should consider investing the $10,000 in a mix of tax-advantaged bonds and stocks with a time horizon of twenty years or so.

Sibyl’s next question is whether her husband should retire or keep working. Although she has provided her annuity income, but I’m not sure about the terms of the annuities. Annuities have a tendency to be too expensive for the benefits they provide, but they can offer some stability in income along with growth. The biggest danger with annuities would be the penalties you have to pay in order to access your money if needed.

If Sibyl’s plans for retirement are modest, they should be in a good position for her husband to stop working when he would like to do so.

An additional inheritance of $100,000 will be a nice shot in the arm. Sibyl didn’t mention children, so I’m not sure if she has pans to pass her estate down to another generation, give all her funds away to organizations, or spend all that is left on her “bucket list.” $100,000 will help boost any of these goals.

Keep in mind I’m not a financial adviser. These are only my opinions and I can’t be held liable for the results of any actions made based on information posted on Consumerism Commentary.

What advice would you give Sibyl and her husband?

{ 18 comments }



People Farm Casting, a casting agency that focuses on finding non-actors for reality television shows and commercials, contacted Consumerism Commentary to let us know about a new project. The agency, whose team has experience casting shows like Pimp My Ride and commercials like that Dos Equis ad with the “most interesting man in the world,” has been hired by a large consumer financial institution to cast a new reality show.

I spoke briefly with People Farm Casting yesterday to get a feel for the project. The show will feature several different individuals and families in need of specific financial help. A financial expert will work with each individual for several weeks, and every interaction will be filmed for the series. This could be an interesting opportunity to receive financial help, appear in a reality series, and get paid. If that sounds interesting to you, read the information below and contact People Farm Casting as soon as possible.

A large consumer financial institution is seeking individuals and families that NEED some help planning for their future to star in a brand new series that will take the confusion out of finance! We will be casting across the country. Casting has started so read below and then shoot us an email at: investorcasting@gmail.com

Make sure to include your:

  • Name
  • Location
  • Contact information
  • and a recent photo of you/you and your family.

(Must be over 18)

We are looking for all types of stories, financial situations, both good and bad. Here are just a few examples of the stories we’d like to showcase:

  • Early Retirement Planner
  • First-time Home Buyer / Seller
  • Newlyweds / Couple Getting Married
  • Parents Planning for Child’s Future
  • Divorced Singles
  • Laid-off Professionals
  • Cross Cultural Investors
  • Job Change / Pay cut
  • Pre-retirement Couple (Person in late 40s)
  • Non-savvy Investor
  • Savvy Investor
  • Late Retirement Planning

It would be great to see a Consumerism Commentary reader cast in this new series. Good luck!

{ 0 comments }



Can You Ever Have Enough Money?

by Outlaw on December 24, 2009. Filed under Personal Finance.

This is a guest article by Outlaw, who lives and works in New York’s financial district and writes on the blog Credit Card Outlaw.

When I first became fascinated with personal finance strategy, I was in serious credit card debt. I couldn’t find full-time work. I felt like an idiot.

Every month, a new credit card statement. Every month, deeper in debt. No rich parents to fall back on, no income, and yet I still had to buy food and pay my rent. Even thinking about money made me sick to my stomach.

I was too smart for this. That’s what I kept telling myself.

Fed up, I began reading everything I could get my hands on. Every blog, including Consumerism Commentary, and every book in the personal finance aisle. I landed a full-time job and started a small business. I drastically slashed my living expenses. Within about three months, something miraculous happened: I was able to pay off the last of my credit cards. I wrote about this experience and how it felt on my blog, and about how getting out of debt shifted my goals.

My goal went from $0.00 (debt free) to around $50,000. I wanted to have $50,000 because I felt that seeing an amount like that in my bank account would give me a tangible level of comfort.

It doesn’t. Sorry to burst your bubble. When you hit $50,000, you simply associate with new people. Or maybe when you hit $100,000. But it’s pretty much a universal law that as you become a bigger fish, you find yourself in a bigger pond — with much bigger fish. If anything, I was happier when I was worth nothing at all.

But building wealth isn’t about happiness. It’s about overcoming the odds. It’s about attaining a level of accomplishment that no person or thing can ever take away from you, save for the grim reaper. Beyond covering your basic needs (food, water, shelter), money has very little correlation to happiness. Not what you wanted to hear, but completely true nonetheless.

Asking about the relationship between money and happiness is like asking whether winning a chess game leads to long-term happiness. You don’t play chess to become happy. You play chess to play chess.

It is a fool’s argument to suggest otherwise. Wealth building is just a game. Once you eliminate the years of negative beliefs about money that others have forced upon you (shame, guilt, fear, envy — our culture does an impressively crap job of preparing us for wealth acquisition), you can start the game in earnest.

Lose all attachment. Look only at the returns, the profit or loss, the overhead. Nothing else matters. Forget vanity projects, forget becoming rich overnight, and forget impressing others. I love personal finance because everything is spelled out. You are either in the black or in the red, wealthy or debtor. There is no ambiguity.

And please, forget about building wealth for your distant future. Until recently, I had been contributing the maximum amount to my 401k at work. What a waste!

Now I contribute nothing.

I’m in great shape, but I have bad genetics: the odds are excellent I will die young from diabetes or heart disease. When you get good with your money, you become good at understanding statistics. And that means looking at things exactly as they are, not as you want them to be or as you wish they were.

For this reason, saving up for some magical fantasy time in my sixties when I can play golf and suck on Werther’s Originals… that doesn’t make sense to me. And what if, against all genetic odds, I survive into my sixties or seventies? I don’t want to be wealthy, with a Life Alert hanging around my neck and a spare pair of dentures in my back pocket. I want to enjoy my prosperity now, while I’m alive and healthy. I would rather be poor at seventy than poor at thirty. That’s just me.

Plus, I don’t like any of the options my employer’s 401k plan offers. I chose the most “aggressive” fund at first, because I’m relatively young and fearless, but then I did my research. I don’t like, don’t understand, or simply don’t trust many of the companies held in the most aggressive fund. Some of them are sloppy organizations, others are in debt, and the rest are just boring dinosaurs with zero growth potential. There is a difference between aggressive and stupid.

So I switched my money into my plan’s most “conservative” fund, which is based primarily on corporate bond offerings. I don’t like how insanely low the returns are, and again, I don’t trust some of the underlying companies: they are debt-ridden dinosaurs. I don’t like the high expense ratio. I don’t like the almost certain possibility that taxes will be higher in the future than they are now — Uncle Sam needs to pay off its debts in some way, eventually.

I would rather take all of my money, less applicable taxes, and put it toward self-improvement, enjoyment, and my small business. Those all yield better proven returns than some obscure aggressive growth fund or fixed-income investment managed by people in skyscrapers whom I have never met or shook hands with. Also, I should not be charged money for the “privilege” of investing in your fund. Sorry, that’s just not how it works.

Those who defend 401k plans say that if you don’t contribute now, you are robbing your future self. Maybe I am. But I would prefer that to the alternative: robbing my present self for a future self that very well may not exist.

You’re alive today. Enjoy your wealth, and invest it yourself, or in yourself. Nobody cares more about your portfolio than you do.

Stop worrying and start playing the game. Wealth won’t buy you a good relationship or better friends. It won’t buy you happiness. But it can buy you more money. And more money buys more money.

Whoever first coined the term “the first million is always the hardest” was a genius. Invest your money now, while it is still worth something, before inflation eats it up or your health deteriorates. Don’t give it to a 401k plan to do with as they please.

And don’t share your plans with other people, unless they are on the same path. Some of my friends resent me when I talk about my wealth building goals, or my small successes so far. So I don’t talk to them about it any more. Let people live in ignorance. There are enough smart people online and in personal finance forums; you don’t need to be getting any financial advice from your friends or family members.

If you diversify, invest in what you know, spend less than you earn, enjoy the present and lose all emotional attachment to money you will succeed. There is no other option.

The rest is just small talk.

{ 15 comments }

This decade flew by. Ten years ago, I had recently graduated college and had been working for a non-profit arts organization. At this point in my life, I didn’t know it, but I was setting myself up for financial problems. Despite working 80 or more hours a week during the summer and fall, despite living an hour and a half away from the office, despite major personality and philosophical conflicts among the ten employees in the tiny office space, and despite a salary which didn’t cover modest living expense when added to commuting expenses, I enjoyed the work I was doing.

Looking back, it’s probably a good thing the only money I had in the stock market was a few thousand dollars remaining in what had once been a Uniform Transfer to Minors Act (UTMA) account. Although airplanes didn’t mysteriously crash, falling from the sky when the clock struck midnight ushering in the year 2000, the stock market soon plummeted. At this time I was only marginally aware of my finances, but I quickly became a fan of The Motley Fool’s discussion boards, ING Direct, and taking control of my financial future.

The start of the decade was turbulent personally and professionally, but for me, everything that has transpired since the turn of the century has allowed me to grow in all aspects of my life. There is no question that I am in a better spot financially now than I was in December 1999, with a net worth somewhere below zero but not explicitly defined because I remained blissfully ignorant of my negative cash flow. Professionally, most of my income now comes from what I do outside my day job, and barring signs that my future plans will not be profitable, I plan on leaving that day job within the next few months.

For those who were just graduating college ten years ago or so, as I was, chances are life is better now than it was in 1999. I have to wonder if any other age groups feel the same way, however. Someone close to retirement today might have seen barely any financial growth overall over the past ten years, and some might even have a loss. The unemployment rate is still high, so there are likely many people who have been out of work for over a year or who have accepted jobs paying a fraction of the salary they once commanded.

How has this decade been for you? Are you better off at the end of 2009 than you were at the end of 1999?

{ 21 comments }

      4 comments 4

Triage Your Finances

by Kelly Whalen on November 25, 2009. Filed under Personal Finance.

Over the past couple of weeks, six finalists have been auditioning for the opening of “staff writer” at Consumerism Commentary. Each is providing two guest articles to share with readers. After the six writers have shared their guest articles, readers will have an opportunity to provide feedback before we select the staff writer.

This article is presented by Kelly Whalen, a mostly stay-at-home mom who writes about personal finance at The Centsible Life.

When I was 16 I participated in a mock emergency drill. The drills are staged for members of the emergency services (police, ambulance companies, hospitals, firefighters, etc.) to help prepare them in case of a large scale emergency. As a volunteer “injured” person I got a card stating my injuries. My job was to act as if I was injured. We had about 10 minutes to choose a place to hide, and then the emergency workers come on the scene and start sorting the injured. They used a system called triage to help classify the injured. There are 4 levels for triage in most systems.

  • 0: The deceased or mortally wounded who are beyond help
  • 1: The injured who can be helped by immediate transportation
  • 2: The injured whose transport can be delayed
  • 3: Those with minor injuries, who need help less urgently

Surprisingly triage translates to managing your money. Here’s how you can use the triage system to better manage your money.

0 / Beyond Help: Some financial decisions are a done deal. No use in spending energy and effort on past decisions that you can’t change. For instance you may have a home that has depreciated in value with the housing market crash, and you’re stuck in an underwater mortgage. You may be able to negotiate with your lender, but then you move on. Come up with a plan to do what you can. For me, this means not worrying about our too expensive car payment since it makes sense for us to pay it off over the next 2 years instead.

Examples of #0:

  • Mistakes that you’ve already made.
  • Issues with credit
  • Debt

1 / In need of immediate attention: Focusing on things that need immediate attention comes first. Bills need to be paid on time. You should be saving a percentage of your income automatically. At this time of year my level 1 issues are continuing to pre-pay our bills (we pay everything 2 weeks to a month ahead), staying in budget for holiday gift giving, and using up our HSA before December 31st.

Examples of #1:

  • Funding retirement accounts, emergency fund, and savings for larger purchases
  • Past due or current bills
  • Future purchases/expenses for the next month
  • Major life changes that are upcoming in the next 12 months

2 / Attention can be delayed: These are issues that are important, but should not be put off for long. Life insurance may not be a priority if you are single with no dependents, but it’s something that should be on your radar. Another example: if you are paying off high interest debt you might be delaying maxing out your retirement savings while still taking advantage of any match from your employer. This is fine in the short term, and you should keep in mind that the goal is to fully pay off debt so you can focus more on saving. For my family we are delaying saving for college. Paying off debt, funding our emergency fund, and maxing out our retirement savings comes first.

Examples of #2:

  • Bills that are more than a month or more away
  • Major life changes that are 1+ years away (they should be on your radar, you should be planning for them, but only after your #1s are taken care of)
  • Organizing paperwork, setting up an online account manager, or switching credit card companies are examples of things that may be on your list. These are items to tackle once a month, and they shouldn’t be at the forefront of your money management.

3 / Minor issues, that can need attention, but are not life threatening: Things that need minor attention are things that can be ignored 90% of the time. These are small things that can save you some cash, or some time but aren’t going to have a huge impact on your finances. Often people focus on the small things instead of first trying to tackle the bigger wins. If you have tackled all the big wins, and want to spend time finding the cheapest toilet paper per square, go for it. For instance if you have 3 high interest credit cards, coupon clipping shouldn’t be your first priority.

Examples of #3:

  • Extreme frugality: Do it if you love it, but don’t do it as your first step to getting your finances in shape.
  • Rate chasing: Not worth your time in most cases.
  • Credit card rewards: Most people who love credit cards talk about everything they do to earn their 1% maximum. If it’s easy to do, then by all means go for it, but obsessing over getting every last reward dollar isn’t always worth it.
  • Other: I’m sure you have many things that fall into this category. I’d love to hear what you think are 3s in your life.

By using triage, you can tackle your biggest personal finance issues first, and work your way from critical condition to minor issues. By categorizing what are the most important financial issues to you, you can focus on the things that will have the biggest impact on your finances and ignore anything that’s not important.

This is a guest article by Kelly Whalen, one of six finalists interested in being Consumerism Commentary’s staff writer.

Photo credit: Steve Mann

{ 4 comments }

My Honda Civic has an option for cruise control. Unfortunately, most of my driving currently takes place on the New Jersey Turnpike and local highways during rush hour and construction, so I rarely have an opportunity to activate this feature. In the slim occasion I find myself driving on a deserted country road, I activate the cruise control and sit back, letting the car’s computer maintain my speed. I like to imagine cruise control is an auto-pilot device, so I can relax, close my eyes, and wake upon arrival.

If you’ve ever driven with cruise control, you’ll know it is not the same as auto-pilot. You have to be vigilant and aware of your surroundings, even if you’re not keeping your foot on the accelerator pedal. I have the same concerns with the topic of automating finances.

cruise controlMaking your finances automatic is a great way to put your savings into overdrive. I take advantage of technology’s ability to automate in a number of ways:

  • My paycheck is directly deposited into my bank account every pay period.
  • Several of my bills, as many as possible, are paid automatically and in full every month with the appropriate credit card.
  • My credit cards are paid in full every month without me writing one check or clicking one button.
  • A number of savings transfers and investments are programmed to occur at the same time every month, again with no intervention.

I would like to say that these features of automation have effectively put my finances on auto-pilot. It is true that I am now free to use the time I would have otherwise spent paying bills and depositing paychecks for other, possibly more worthwhile tasks. I am hesitant to call this system an “auto-pilot,” however. Like driving, I am still in charge and my brain needs to be engaged. If I stop paying attention, the likelihood of a crash increases.

I primarily use three credit cards, two for personal use and one for business use. Despite the cards’ close proximity in my wallet, their cycles have not converged. The payments are due at different times of the month. My checking accounts are debited automatically, so I need to ensure I have enough money in the appropriate accounts at the appropriate times to avoid an overdraft fee. The automation doesn’t permit me to to “set it and forget it.”

The same is true with my bills. I mentioned I drive on the New Jersey Turnpike every day. That’s an expensive commute. I use the E-ZPass system to make the drive go quicker and receive a discount on tolls, but this kind of automation lowers my sensitivity to increasing tolls. Since I’m not stopping at the booth and handing out cash, I don’t see that money leaving my wallet. I look at my quarterly statements from E-ZPass, but with 65 weekdays of toll charges, plus some on weekends, it’s easy to let the increases stay buried in my mind.

I’ve begun to offset the toll increases by opting non-toll roads occasionally but with more traffic lights on these alternate routes, I would have to wonder whether the extra fuel expense negates the savings in tolls.

Even though my utility bills like electricity, cable and telephone, as well as my credit cards, are paid automatically each month, I am sure to review the statement or transactions. It’s tempting to let cruise control handle everything. I mentioned that it’s important to ensure money is in the accounts prior to the automated withdrawals, but more attention is necessary. Reviewing statements and transactions is necessary to catch mistakes.

Mistakes can be on the company’s part or on the consumer’s; at least once I’ve forgotten to cancel a “free for the first month” service and was rewarded with a charge on my credit card. I would have remained ignorant of the charge if I didn’t review the statements and download my transactions into Quicken. And I have also experienced a number of mistakes, such as the cable company charging me for a service they didn’t provide.

Companies are quick to encourage automation because they know a certain percentage of consumers will let “mistakes” slip. That’s a statistic I don’t want to be.

What part of your finances is tackled automatically, and are you on auto-pilot or cruise control? Have you ever encountered mistakes you would have missed if you weren’t paying attention?

Photo credit: mhalon

{ 10 comments }

Over the next couple of weeks, six finalists will be auditioning for the opening of “staff writer” at Consumerism Commentary. Each will be providing two guest articles to share with readers. After the six writers have shared their guest articles, readers will have an opportunity to provide feedback before we select the staff writer.

This article is presented by Ray, the owner and primary author of Financial Highway, where he discusses investing, saving and practical money management concepts.

I hate going through bills and statements every month, but the Mrs. on the other hand is very particular about it, she goes through all of the bills and checks items off “what a waste of time” I used to think until I recently. The few minutes it takes to check your bills can save you a lot of headache in the future.

Fraudulent charges

The most obvious reason you should take the time to check your statements is to check for unauthorized charges. This happens more frequent than you would think, if there is a large fraudulent charge it would be easy to detect but it’s the small amounts that can go unnoticed for a long time. This could also be charges that are not necessarily unauthorized but certain fees that you are unaware of, often you have between 60-90 days to dispute these charges so it is important to check regularly and report such charges immediately.

Mistakes

Yes mistakes happen, sometimes you are charged for things you are not suppose to be charged for, maybe a promotion ended or maybe a new fee was placed on certain things and you may miss them. By checking your bills regularly you will be aware of any extra fees or mistakes on your accounts, again taking early action will help you rectify these issues.

Accounting

Although I am a big fan of putting your finances on autopilot, you still need to keep track of your spending and budgeting. Going through your bills and statements will enable you to keep track of your expenditures and see if you are staying within your budget. It will also help you keep track of who you owe and how much, doing this on monthly bases will save you a lot of time at the end of the year and during tax filling.

Promotions and changes

Every now and then I notice some promotional offer being available from the company, for example recently I noticed that we can get a free upgrade on our TV package for six months, I love free! Checking the bills you may be able to find a few good promotions, which can go a long way. Companies also notify their customers of any changes in their terms and conditions when they send out the bills, you may miss important changes if you do not go through them which can end up costing you in the end.

I used to hate going through bills, but now I realize that those few minutes can save me a great deal of headache and run around later on. Not to mention the potential of saving money.

Do you go through your bills? Any other reasons why one should go through their bills on regular bases?

This is a guest article by Ray, one of six finalists interested in being Consumerism Commentary’s staff writer.

{ 10 comments }

One of my favorite bloggers, and likely one of yours, is J.D. Roth. He has been writing about personal finance at Get Rich Slowly for some time now, and I was a fan of his writing at foldedspace when “blog” was still a new word. He is working on a book now, which I can’t wait to get my hands on (and read), and at the same time, he has been working on a blog series condensing his thoughts about personal finance into thirteen core tenets.

This is one of J.D.’s favorite mantras when offering financial advice or support: Do what works for you.

I think this is a great philosophy, and I can see how it is appealing to intelligent people who are capable of thinking independently, performing objective analysis, and making decisions based on empirical data and other established facts. It cuts directly to the core of personal finance: that money is personal and not every solution is universal. Different people require different answers, and what works for one person might not necessarily work for another.

The spirit of “What Works For You” is the important aspect: there are many paths to success and one should find the path that fits personally, using experimentation and consideration as a guide.

There are many open questions in personal finance but few concrete answers. What is a good investment? What will the stock market do tomorrow? Will I be able to afford college for my children in ten years? health care for myself next year? Uncertainty can lead to frustration, and when people don’t know what to do, they want to stick with something that feels comfortable.

I think it’s easy for the spirit of the “What Works For you” philosophy to be lost as one spreads the message, because the philosophy implies a search for comfort and is therefore subject to a number of psychological traps.

“What Works for You” grants a license to ignore criticism

itsatrapOne thing I remember about the time I was required to listen to a day-long Landmark Education seminar is the leader’s ability to silence anyone who didn’t accept their philosophy. If you disagreed with one aspect of their nonsense, a Landmark follower simply claimed you had a “racket” and you were immediately dismissed. The “What Works for You” argument does the same thing.

If you are focused on doing “What Works For You,” there is no room for opposing viewpoints. We are given the opportunity to selectively ignore facts that don’t fit our world view. Consider credit cards that offer rewards when you use them. I use a cash back credit card and never pay interest or late fees. That sounds like a great deal, and I often suggest this as a good way to make the credit card companies work for you. But according to consumer studies, on average, people like me spend more using credit cards than they would with cash. Even the rewards earned, particularly as credit card companies find ways to keep reducing these rewards, don’t make up the difference due to increased spending.

But many like me continue to use credit cards because it works for us. We say that we are spending less than we earn and we’re winning the battle with credit cards. But unless we have conducted our own experiments to determine how our own behavior, as an individual or family, is affected differently through using credit or cash, we have silenced criticism from cash-only advocates with a nothing more than a wave of the hand and the contentment that since we don’t see any surface damage on our finances, our behavior works for us.

“What Works For You” invites analysis that could be far too simple

Notice that the philosophy is not “What Works Best For You.” Whether something works is a binary state: either something works or something does not work. The only answers are yes or no. There is no gray area, no sliding scale, no room for judgment.

The Debt Snowball is often touted as the best method to pay off debt. There is no doubt this method, which calls for paying off your credit card debt from the card with the lowest balance to the highest, works for many people. And its popularity leads people to believe that it’s not worth considering another choice.

But many people who have succeeded paying off debt with the Debt Snowball would have succeeded with the Debt Avalanche, which offers similar psychological benefits but saves money and time. It’s important for someone embarking on the journey to pay off debt to be presented with options and be allowed to make their own decision. If you look only for “What Works For You,” you could be missing something that works better.

“What Works for You” accepts mediocrity as a way of life

I have been around enough high-achievers to be jaded with the constant strive for excellence and the endless desire to be the best in whatever activity happens to be involved. Determination to be the best is how some teams win world championships but others live in misery with failure. Thankfully we don’t all have to be the best in the world at what we do.

But that’s not an excuse for refusing to seek improvement. Since the 1970s, there has been a new focus on self-esteem, which after many years of filtering from psychologists through to popular culture, has resulted in an environment where “everybody is a winner.” Everyone in Little League gets trophies, even the team with the worst record. Consideration of self-esteem is important to a point, and the placement of that point is debatable; before too long, people should be rewarded for something more than just participation, something beyond just the minimum.

“What Works” is just the minimum. Do more than that. Do what works and look for something that works better. Don’t just stop buying daily $5 lattes, stop leasing expensive cars every three years. Don’t just start putting 5% of your salary into a savings account, put 10% into a great savings account, contribute the maximum to your Roth IRA, and get at least the maximum employer match in your 401(k).

It’s important, in dealing with personal finance, to just start somewhere but that’s not an excuse to stop doing or to stop thinking.

The spirit of “What Works For You” is a good philosophy. Personal finance is personal. You should be free to make your own choices based on the best information and experiences and find the path that works best for you. I will submit that it is also important that while searching for your personalized version of a financial plan that you don’t fall into the above traps.

{ 16 comments }