<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eco-Friendly Ball for New Year&#8217;s Eve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/eco-friendly-ball-for-new-years-eve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/eco-friendly-ball-for-new-years-eve/</link>
	<description>A premier personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:22:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/eco-friendly-ball-for-new-years-eve/comment-page-1/#comment-131124</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/01/eco-friendly-ball-for-new-years-eve/#comment-131124</guid>
		<description>My dad (an electrical engineer) and I joked about how little energy this really saved since the ball is turned on for about 2 minutes per year.  I&#039;m all for saving energy, but here they focused all their attention on the one device that probably accounts for the least energy consumption in the whole show.  I bet if you ran the numbers they would have saved a lot more by turning off one TV camera, or one of the huge signs in Times Square, or one of Hannah Montana&#039;s backup singers, or any number of things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My dad (an electrical engineer) and I joked about how little energy this really saved since the ball is turned on for about 2 minutes per year.  I&#8217;m all for saving energy, but here they focused all their attention on the one device that probably accounts for the least energy consumption in the whole show.  I bet if you ran the numbers they would have saved a lot more by turning off one TV camera, or one of the huge signs in Times Square, or one of Hannah Montana&#8217;s backup singers, or any number of things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/eco-friendly-ball-for-new-years-eve/comment-page-1/#comment-130879</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2008/01/01/eco-friendly-ball-for-new-years-eve/#comment-130879</guid>
		<description>I absolutely *loved* the 5 minute commercial break leading up to the ball dropping. The network brought the show back online exactly 2 minutes before the ball dropped.

Yes, it was 5 minutes, I timed it. Talk about maximizing revenue!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I absolutely *loved* the 5 minute commercial break leading up to the ball dropping. The network brought the show back online exactly 2 minutes before the ball dropped.</p>
<p>Yes, it was 5 minutes, I timed it. Talk about maximizing revenue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 9/16 queries in 0.024 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 500/506 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d2r791h660ghva.cloudfront.net

Served from: www.consumerismcommentary.com @ 2012-02-12 21:41:51 -->
