<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FDIC Might Be Underfunded: Should You Withdraw Your Money From Banks?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/</link>
	<description>A premier personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 May 2012 07:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NJ Housefrau</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190264</link>
		<dc:creator>NJ Housefrau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 14:55:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190264</guid>
		<description>Reply to Jim (14) from NJ Hausfrau:  Thank you for your comments.  I should have realized there were a few more zeroes involved!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reply to Jim (14) from NJ Hausfrau:  Thank you for your comments.  I should have realized there were a few more zeroes involved!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190247</link>
		<dc:creator>thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 05:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190247</guid>
		<description>Absolutely no way that the gov&#039;t will allow FDIC to fail in this regard. I couldn&#039;t think of a bigger nightmare situation as far as the total demise of our financial system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely no way that the gov&#8217;t will allow FDIC to fail in this regard. I couldn&#8217;t think of a bigger nightmare situation as far as the total demise of our financial system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flexo</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190243</link>
		<dc:creator>Flexo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190243</guid>
		<description>In theory this is right. Unfortunately, banks stopped funding the insurance system. They didn&#039;t want to pay the insurance fees to the FDIC, and the Congress let them do it, because at the time, FDIC believed their funds were sufficient. At the end of 2008, the reserve funded by the banks held only $19 billion, thanks to no banks paying in.  The FDIC feels they need a credit line of $500 billion to protect against the failure of a major bank.

I&#039;m not saying that the FDIC will have problems, but from 1996 to 2006, banks did not pay any money to fund FDIC insurance, so a major failure could extend beyond the reach of the FDIC reserves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In theory this is right. Unfortunately, banks stopped funding the insurance system. They didn&#8217;t want to pay the insurance fees to the FDIC, and the Congress let them do it, because at the time, FDIC believed their funds were sufficient. At the end of 2008, the reserve funded by the banks held only $19 billion, thanks to no banks paying in.  The FDIC feels they need a credit line of $500 billion to protect against the failure of a major bank.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that the FDIC will have problems, but from 1996 to 2006, banks did not pay any money to fund FDIC insurance, so a major failure could extend beyond the reach of the FDIC reserves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190242</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190242</guid>
		<description>Also for reference, there are over 8000 banks in the USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also for reference, there are over 8000 banks in the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190241</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 23:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190241</guid>
		<description>There really haven&#039;t been that many bank failures lately.   Less than 50 banks have failed so far in 2008 &amp; 2009 combined.

By comparison during the S&amp;L crisis in the 1980&#039;s &amp; early 1990&#039;s we had over 200 banks for sever years in a row and it peaked with 900-1000 banks failing in a 2 year period of 1988 &amp; 1989.


Also, it should be made clear that while the FDIC is backed by the US Treasury, the money to support bank failures is not tax dollars.   THe FDIC insurance is funded by fees paid by the banks themselves.   Its an insurance system funded by the banks.   Its not a taxpayer handout.   THe credit line from the US government is backup money so they have quick/short term capital if or when they might need it.  They normally have $30B line of credit with the US Treasury.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There really haven&#8217;t been that many bank failures lately.   Less than 50 banks have failed so far in 2008 &amp; 2009 combined.</p>
<p>By comparison during the S&amp;L crisis in the 1980&#8242;s &amp; early 1990&#8242;s we had over 200 banks for sever years in a row and it peaked with 900-1000 banks failing in a 2 year period of 1988 &amp; 1989.</p>
<p>Also, it should be made clear that while the FDIC is backed by the US Treasury, the money to support bank failures is not tax dollars.   THe FDIC insurance is funded by fees paid by the banks themselves.   Its an insurance system funded by the banks.   Its not a taxpayer handout.   THe credit line from the US government is backup money so they have quick/short term capital if or when they might need it.  They normally have $30B line of credit with the US Treasury.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190238</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 22:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190238</guid>
		<description>Your math is off.

Giving $250,000 to everyone in the USA would be $75 Trillion dollars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your math is off.</p>
<p>Giving $250,000 to everyone in the USA would be $75 Trillion dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NJ Housefrau</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190196</link>
		<dc:creator>NJ Housefrau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 00:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190196</guid>
		<description>Why not bail US out!  Many of you have already thought of this; I&#039;m sure it&#039;s not original, but:  let&#039;s say there are about 305,000,000 people in the USA, and let&#039;s say four people make up the average family--that&#039;s 25% of that 305 million--about 76,250,000.  Let&#039;s  say that is also the number of joint tax returns filed.  And let&#039;s say the remaining approximately 228,750,000 are single filers.  And let&#039;s say the joint filers are &quot;bailed out&quot; to the tune of $500,000.00  and the singles to the tune of $250,000.00.  According to this computer&#039;s calculations, the cost to the government would be about $38,125,000.00 for the &quot;joints and $57,187,500.00 for the &quot;singles--just slightly over $95,000,000.00 total.  Isn&#039;t that  9.5% of one (that&#039;s right, one (1) ) billion $$$; and how many hundreds of billions have already been thrown down the crapper?  &quot;They&quot; say we need to spend to help the economy get going!  I don&#039;t know about you, but I could do a commendable job with $500,000.00, even AFTER taxes!  bk  
                 
P. S.  If my calculations are incorrect, please let me know.  I apologize in advance for my ADD if that is that case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not bail US out!  Many of you have already thought of this; I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s not original, but:  let&#8217;s say there are about 305,000,000 people in the USA, and let&#8217;s say four people make up the average family&#8211;that&#8217;s 25% of that 305 million&#8211;about 76,250,000.  Let&#8217;s  say that is also the number of joint tax returns filed.  And let&#8217;s say the remaining approximately 228,750,000 are single filers.  And let&#8217;s say the joint filers are &#8220;bailed out&#8221; to the tune of $500,000.00  and the singles to the tune of $250,000.00.  According to this computer&#8217;s calculations, the cost to the government would be about $38,125,000.00 for the &#8220;joints and $57,187,500.00 for the &#8220;singles&#8211;just slightly over $95,000,000.00 total.  Isn&#8217;t that  9.5% of one (that&#8217;s right, one (1) ) billion $$$; and how many hundreds of billions have already been thrown down the crapper?  &#8220;They&#8221; say we need to spend to help the economy get going!  I don&#8217;t know about you, but I could do a commendable job with $500,000.00, even AFTER taxes!  bk  </p>
<p>P. S.  If my calculations are incorrect, please let me know.  I apologize in advance for my ADD if that is that case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190193</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 21:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190193</guid>
		<description>FDIC will always be able to meet its obligations since it&#039;s backed by the full faith and credit of the US government (official party line).  As our politicians have demonstrated, it&#039;s easy to just keep issuing more debt to burden future generations.  However, in order to avoid more taxpayer pain, FDIC has already and can continue to - increase the amount existing banks must pay into the FDIC fund.  

I saw the 60 minutes interview with Bair - they already have some pretty dire/conservative projections of how many banks are going to fail (she wouldn&#039;t give the quantitative estimate) and to what degree.  In many cases, they actually find a private buyer and the FDIC doesn&#039;t even lose much money (relatively speaking).

If you think banks are tumbling, there are triple short ETFs; if recovering, triple long.  I tweeted and posted on some trades to accomodate both - hedging with long FAZ with call options on FAS.  Up 27% today. Playing out ok over past few days.  Interesting to see what happens following upcoming meetings on mark to market and uptick rules, etc.  May see huge volatility in shares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FDIC will always be able to meet its obligations since it&#8217;s backed by the full faith and credit of the US government (official party line).  As our politicians have demonstrated, it&#8217;s easy to just keep issuing more debt to burden future generations.  However, in order to avoid more taxpayer pain, FDIC has already and can continue to &#8211; increase the amount existing banks must pay into the FDIC fund.  </p>
<p>I saw the 60 minutes interview with Bair &#8211; they already have some pretty dire/conservative projections of how many banks are going to fail (she wouldn&#8217;t give the quantitative estimate) and to what degree.  In many cases, they actually find a private buyer and the FDIC doesn&#8217;t even lose much money (relatively speaking).</p>
<p>If you think banks are tumbling, there are triple short ETFs; if recovering, triple long.  I tweeted and posted on some trades to accomodate both &#8211; hedging with long FAZ with call options on FAS.  Up 27% today. Playing out ok over past few days.  Interesting to see what happens following upcoming meetings on mark to market and uptick rules, etc.  May see huge volatility in shares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anca</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190190</link>
		<dc:creator>Anca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190190</guid>
		<description>Seems like consumers are getting a mixed message from the banking community: don&#039;t make a run on your bank because you&#039;ll cause it to collapse, but we&#039;re not going to give you enough interest to make it worth your while to keep your money in our banks. Seems like just another industry that doesn&#039;t give a care about customer satisfaction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like consumers are getting a mixed message from the banking community: don&#8217;t make a run on your bank because you&#8217;ll cause it to collapse, but we&#8217;re not going to give you enough interest to make it worth your while to keep your money in our banks. Seems like just another industry that doesn&#8217;t give a care about customer satisfaction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flexo</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190184</link>
		<dc:creator>Flexo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190184</guid>
		<description>The primary source is the letter sent from FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair to Senator Christopher Dodd. It&#039;s pretty clear what they are asking for.  You can read the letter here: 

http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/fdic030509.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The primary source is the letter sent from FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair to Senator Christopher Dodd. It&#8217;s pretty clear what they are asking for.  You can read the letter here: </p>
<p><a href="http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/fdic030509.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://s.wsj.net/public/resources/documents/fdic030509.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flexo</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190183</link>
		<dc:creator>Flexo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:53:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190183</guid>
		<description>That was the message aired on Sunday to the public, but it&#039;s not the same message the FDIC told Congress last week. The FDIC asked Congress for a $500 billion credit limit because they claim the $19 billion they had in reserves at the end of 2008 is not enough. &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123630125365247061.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s the story from the Wall Street Journal.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was the message aired on Sunday to the public, but it&#8217;s not the same message the FDIC told Congress last week. The FDIC asked Congress for a $500 billion credit limit because they claim the $19 billion they had in reserves at the end of 2008 is not enough. <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123630125365247061.html" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s the story from the Wall Street Journal.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rrgg</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190182</link>
		<dc:creator>rrgg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190182</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t matter if the FDIC is underfunded because they are backed by the US government and will be funded further as needed in an emergency.

As evident from previous failures, so many people are already unaware of FDIC insurance.  This kind of talk just worsens it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t matter if the FDIC is underfunded because they are backed by the US government and will be funded further as needed in an emergency.</p>
<p>As evident from previous failures, so many people are already unaware of FDIC insurance.  This kind of talk just worsens it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RW</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190181</link>
		<dc:creator>RW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190181</guid>
		<description>Please share your source of information.  If this is just speculation please label it as such as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please share your source of information.  If this is just speculation please label it as such as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UH2L</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190179</link>
		<dc:creator>UH2L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190179</guid>
		<description>With investments giving negative returns, banks not giving much interest and possibly failing, it seems to me like the most concrete thing to do, (if you can afford and want/need), is to buy stuff.  Stuff has utility.  The dollar has a long way to go down in value/utility based on all of our deficits and low interest rates.  

In keeping with this philosophy, I put a deposit on a car yesterday because the deal was too good to pass up and it was the optimal time to trade in my car before the warranty expired.  I&#039;m using cash to get the highest rebate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With investments giving negative returns, banks not giving much interest and possibly failing, it seems to me like the most concrete thing to do, (if you can afford and want/need), is to buy stuff.  Stuff has utility.  The dollar has a long way to go down in value/utility based on all of our deficits and low interest rates.  </p>
<p>In keeping with this philosophy, I put a deposit on a car yesterday because the deal was too good to pass up and it was the optimal time to trade in my car before the warranty expired.  I&#8217;m using cash to get the highest rebate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190178</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190178</guid>
		<description>Sheila Bair was on 60 Minutes Sunday evening and repeatedly stated that they are in no danger of running out of funds because they are backed by the U.S. Treasury.

She also mentions the source of the funds they use:
&quot;No. it is money from our reserves which, and we are funded by insurance premiums that are assessed on banks. So, no it&#039;s not taxpayer money,&quot;

You can read the textual version of the story or watch the video here:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/06/60minutes/main4848047.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheila Bair was on 60 Minutes Sunday evening and repeatedly stated that they are in no danger of running out of funds because they are backed by the U.S. Treasury.</p>
<p>She also mentions the source of the funds they use:<br />
&#8220;No. it is money from our reserves which, and we are funded by insurance premiums that are assessed on banks. So, no it&#8217;s not taxpayer money,&#8221;</p>
<p>You can read the textual version of the story or watch the video here:<br />
<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/06/60minutes/main4848047.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/03/06/60minutes/main4848047.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flexo</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190177</link>
		<dc:creator>Flexo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190177</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I read somewhere, or heard someone interviewed, but can&#039;t remember where, from an FDIC spokesperson that they had plenty of money to cover all anticipated bank closures with money left over in their budget.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You&#039;re exactly right. This is precisely what the FDIC had been claiming until the other day when they announced they&#039;d be asking the government for the $500 billion credit line. Amazing how things suddenly &quot;change&quot; from one day to the next. It seems as if the FDIC was overstating their position to ensure there wouldn&#039;t be a run on banks...

You&#039;re also right about how banks fail under normal circumstances; an acquiring bank is immediately able to fulfill the obligations, but this system can break down if acquiring banks don&#039;t step in quickly, and we might not be in normal circumstances.

That being said, like &quot;Common Sense&quot; above, I find it highly unlikely that there will be a problem. The FDIC will get the money it needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I read somewhere, or heard someone interviewed, but can&#8217;t remember where, from an FDIC spokesperson that they had plenty of money to cover all anticipated bank closures with money left over in their budget.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re exactly right. This is precisely what the FDIC had been claiming until the other day when they announced they&#8217;d be asking the government for the $500 billion credit line. Amazing how things suddenly &#8220;change&#8221; from one day to the next. It seems as if the FDIC was overstating their position to ensure there wouldn&#8217;t be a run on banks&#8230;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re also right about how banks fail under normal circumstances; an acquiring bank is immediately able to fulfill the obligations, but this system can break down if acquiring banks don&#8217;t step in quickly, and we might not be in normal circumstances.</p>
<p>That being said, like &#8220;Common Sense&#8221; above, I find it highly unlikely that there will be a problem. The FDIC will get the money it needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megscole64</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190175</link>
		<dc:creator>megscole64</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190175</guid>
		<description>I read somewhere, or heard someone interviewed, but can&#039;t remember where, from an FDIC spokesperson that they had plenty of money to cover all anticipated bank closures with money left over in their budget. 

Plus...not all banks that close end up forfeiting the savings right? I mean...if a local bank &quot;fails&quot; and is acquired then your savings are just under that bank now. 

I&#039;m with a credit union ... and ING. I&#039;m not sure how the credit union insurance applies...but we have nowhere nearly 100k anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read somewhere, or heard someone interviewed, but can&#8217;t remember where, from an FDIC spokesperson that they had plenty of money to cover all anticipated bank closures with money left over in their budget. </p>
<p>Plus&#8230;not all banks that close end up forfeiting the savings right? I mean&#8230;if a local bank &#8220;fails&#8221; and is acquired then your savings are just under that bank now. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m with a credit union &#8230; and ING. I&#8217;m not sure how the credit union insurance applies&#8230;but we have nowhere nearly 100k anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190171</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190171</guid>
		<description>This kind of discussion only fuels the crisis. The majority of community banks are in no danger of failing and never have been. The FDIC will not &quot;run out of money&quot; because they are a part of the US Treasury Department. They will just get more if they need it. 

When banks fail they are most often acquired by another, stronger bank. The FDIC works hard to insure that there is no gap between the closure of one bank and the re-opening under the new bank&#039;s name. Information about the financial strength of all banks is readily avaialble on the FDIC&#039;s web-site. You can compare actual dollars and ratios for the most recent quarter and previous quarters to see how your bank&#039;s current performance compares to its past performance. 

Fear and uncertainity fuel the crisis. Knowledge is power. There is no cause for concern with any account below the insurance threshold and very little cause for concern in financially healthy banks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of discussion only fuels the crisis. The majority of community banks are in no danger of failing and never have been. The FDIC will not &#8220;run out of money&#8221; because they are a part of the US Treasury Department. They will just get more if they need it. </p>
<p>When banks fail they are most often acquired by another, stronger bank. The FDIC works hard to insure that there is no gap between the closure of one bank and the re-opening under the new bank&#8217;s name. Information about the financial strength of all banks is readily avaialble on the FDIC&#8217;s web-site. You can compare actual dollars and ratios for the most recent quarter and previous quarters to see how your bank&#8217;s current performance compares to its past performance. </p>
<p>Fear and uncertainity fuel the crisis. Knowledge is power. There is no cause for concern with any account below the insurance threshold and very little cause for concern in financially healthy banks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Weakonomist</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/fdic-might-be-underfunded-should-you-withdraw-your-money-from-banks/comment-page-1/#comment-190169</link>
		<dc:creator>The Weakonomist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=5581#comment-190169</guid>
		<description>Good advice to diversify across many many banks. This would imply you have a bunch of cash. I&#039;ve always felt there isn&#039;t much point in having more than $100k in cash at any given time. My opinion might change someday when I actually have that much money to worry about. 

As for the FDIC, if they run out of money the govt will give them more, that doesn&#039;t worry me at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good advice to diversify across many many banks. This would imply you have a bunch of cash. I&#8217;ve always felt there isn&#8217;t much point in having more than $100k in cash at any given time. My opinion might change someday when I actually have that much money to worry about. </p>
<p>As for the FDIC, if they run out of money the govt will give them more, that doesn&#8217;t worry me at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

