<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ING Direct Lowered Commissions for ShareBuilder Accounts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/ing-direct-lowered-commissions-for-sharebuilder-accounts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/ing-direct-lowered-commissions-for-sharebuilder-accounts/</link>
	<description>A premier personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 03:52:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Llama Money</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/ing-direct-lowered-commissions-for-sharebuilder-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-128860</link>
		<dc:creator>Llama Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 15:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/18/ing-direct-lowered-commissions-for-sharebuilder-accounts/#comment-128860</guid>
		<description>Even at $9.95 it&#039;s tough to swallow unless you&#039;re placing large orders.  Like Eden said - investing $100 or $200 at a time doesn&#039;t make any sense if 5-10% of your money is instantly eaten by commissions.  And of course you get to pay again when it&#039;s time to sell - making it even tougher to swallow.  

no-load Mutual funds are the way to go for small investors, I think.  At least until you have enough to buy larger amounts of individual stock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even at $9.95 it&#8217;s tough to swallow unless you&#8217;re placing large orders.  Like Eden said &#8211; investing $100 or $200 at a time doesn&#8217;t make any sense if 5-10% of your money is instantly eaten by commissions.  And of course you get to pay again when it&#8217;s time to sell &#8211; making it even tougher to swallow.  </p>
<p>no-load Mutual funds are the way to go for small investors, I think.  At least until you have enough to buy larger amounts of individual stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eden</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/ing-direct-lowered-commissions-for-sharebuilder-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-128812</link>
		<dc:creator>Eden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 03:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/18/ing-direct-lowered-commissions-for-sharebuilder-accounts/#comment-128812</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a good move. My only problem with Sharebuilder has been that they encourage small investments and a $4 charge on $100 or less is quite large.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good move. My only problem with Sharebuilder has been that they encourage small investments and a $4 charge on $100 or less is quite large.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SingleGuyMoney</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/ing-direct-lowered-commissions-for-sharebuilder-accounts/comment-page-1/#comment-128804</link>
		<dc:creator>SingleGuyMoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 23:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/18/ing-direct-lowered-commissions-for-sharebuilder-accounts/#comment-128804</guid>
		<description>I may actually start using my Sharebuilder account again since they&#039;ve lowered commissions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may actually start using my Sharebuilder account again since they&#8217;ve lowered commissions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 9/17 queries in 0.053 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 517/523 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d2r791h660ghva.cloudfront.net

Served from: www.consumerismcommentary.com @ 2012-02-12 23:39:22 -->
