As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!
     

Mark Cuban to Government: Show Us How the $700 Billion Will Be Spent

This article was written by in Economy. 5 comments.


I swear I’m trying to write about topics other than the massive national bailout of the financial industry, but there always seems to be something interesting to say. Yesterday, it was Mark Cuban, owner of the Dallas Mavericks and chairman of HDNet who offered interesting insight. He suggested that the United States Treasury Department list every asset they buy within the $700 billion bailout plan and the price they intend to offer.

When the government sells the assets, perhaps for a profit, it should also list the price received.

In addition, by posting the assets in an eBay like auction/sales environment, it would enable independent buyers to come in and buy the assets using private money rather than government money… By adding liquidity to the process, the government could be responsible for less and sellers could get more. This is the only way I can think of to get true transparency. Without it, I promise you that it will be impossible to account for how much money was spent on the assets and how much cash was generated from the sales process and what the net cost or benefit to taxpayers is.

Without transparency, we wont have any idea how this all played out. None. Which creates the real problem of allowing it to happen again, but with the government needing the bailout.

This suggestion sounds excellent to me. Transparency might stop the Treasury Department from playing favorites, offering more to buy assets than what they are worth or playing favorites.

Mark also mentioned that CEOs of the companies being bailed out should be required to forfeit their severance pay and bonuses that they might otherwise receive. I also agree with this point. It is egregious for the individuals who require help from the government — that is, from the taxpayers — to save their company and industry to be shown the door with parting gifts. There could be a case for any company having the possibility of being worse off if the outgoing CEO had not been there, but that would be a tough case to prove.

$700 Billion Bailout? eBay It!, Blog Maverick, September 22, 2008

Updated January 16, 2010 and originally published September 23, 2008. If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to the RSS feed or receive daily emails. Follow @ConsumerismComm on Twitter and visit our Facebook page for more updates.

Email Email Print Print
avatar
Points: ♦127,475
Rank: Platinum
About the author

Luke Landes, also known as Flexo, is the founder of Consumerism Commentary. He has been blogging and writing for the internet since 1995 and has been building online communities since 1991. Find out more about him and follow Luke Landes on Twitter. View all articles by .

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

avatar Todd

Mark is full of good ideas. I really like this approach as well. Shoot for full transparency and open market. Let the open market (independent buyers) drive the prices. great idea!

Reply to this comment

avatar Mr. ToughMoneyLove

I am not a big fan of Mark Cuban and his antics but in this case he is spot on. Transparency is key, particularly now that we have the FAS 150 “mark to market” rule.

Reply to this comment

avatar David

How about we let Cuban invest it in a sports team? Will be worth more in a few years than this mess will, and I don’t mind my tax money going towards sports instead of failed companies. ;-)

Reply to this comment

avatar Harold

The government is going to pay more for the assets than what the market will be willing to pay. According to Paulson, these assets will come from many different companies both american and foreign. What the government seems to be doing is creating a market for these assets.

Reply to this comment

avatar kitty

Harold, this is true, but these assets may be undervalued now – as everything on the market is.

At least according to some analysts I heard – and obviously it’s just an opinion – these assets are valued as if 50-60% of loans will fail and there’ll be no recovery. In reality, only about 25% of subprime loans fail, and when the house is sold, it’s usually for more than $0.

Having said that – while I believe the bailout is necessary, I do think Mark’s ideas are excellent.

Reply to this comment

Leave a Comment

Connect with Facebook

Note: Use your name or a unique handle, not the name of a website or business. No deep links or business URLs are allowed. Spam, including promotional linking to a company website, will be deleted. By submitting your comment you are agreeing to these terms and conditions.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Previous post:

Next post: