<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Overdraft Fees Becoming More Popular</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/overdraft-fees-becoming-more-popular/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/overdraft-fees-becoming-more-popular/</link>
	<description>A premier personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:22:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telemill</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/overdraft-fees-becoming-more-popular/comment-page-1/#comment-117092</link>
		<dc:creator>Telemill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 02:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/12/overdraft-fees-becoming-more-popular/#comment-117092</guid>
		<description>Hey, some of these banks are playing around with these accounts -- I feel -- just to charge some of these fees.

I won&#039;t name names but a bank I had used for over 8 years began playing around with my account.  

We all know about the &quot;instant&quot; withdrawal of funds from our account the minute we write a check and the bank&#039;s lax &quot;three-day&quot; float period on money deposited. Now, seriously, if you can take my money out of my account 5 minutes after I write a check . . . surely, you can credit my account in a 24 hour period, right?  Their answer: nope.

So, here is the deal.  Had a credit card balance of over $10K.  Worked by BUTT of to acquire the money to pay it off.  Had $13K in the bank (for several weeks).  Wrote a check to pay off the entire $10K on the credit card.  The credit card company calls to say that my payment didn&#039;t go through. What the . . .

I call the bank.  Their response:  Oh! Didn&#039;t you know, we changed the terms recently where you have to &quot;notify&quot; us five days before you make a large payment like that.  What the . . .

My response:  You mean I have to actually notify you to take MY money out of MY account and pay MY bills?  Needless to say, I paid the bill . . . had the bank paid my insufficient fund fees (because, damn it that wasn&#039;t my fault, I had the got-damn money) and closed the account two weeks later.

They (the banks)are playing around with us and our money, guys.  And they are making grand-theft dough on us.  Dang-it, I gotta get me some bank stock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, some of these banks are playing around with these accounts &#8212; I feel &#8212; just to charge some of these fees.</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t name names but a bank I had used for over 8 years began playing around with my account.  </p>
<p>We all know about the &#8220;instant&#8221; withdrawal of funds from our account the minute we write a check and the bank&#8217;s lax &#8220;three-day&#8221; float period on money deposited. Now, seriously, if you can take my money out of my account 5 minutes after I write a check . . . surely, you can credit my account in a 24 hour period, right?  Their answer: nope.</p>
<p>So, here is the deal.  Had a credit card balance of over $10K.  Worked by BUTT of to acquire the money to pay it off.  Had $13K in the bank (for several weeks).  Wrote a check to pay off the entire $10K on the credit card.  The credit card company calls to say that my payment didn&#8217;t go through. What the . . .</p>
<p>I call the bank.  Their response:  Oh! Didn&#8217;t you know, we changed the terms recently where you have to &#8220;notify&#8221; us five days before you make a large payment like that.  What the . . .</p>
<p>My response:  You mean I have to actually notify you to take MY money out of MY account and pay MY bills?  Needless to say, I paid the bill . . . had the bank paid my insufficient fund fees (because, damn it that wasn&#8217;t my fault, I had the got-damn money) and closed the account two weeks later.</p>
<p>They (the banks)are playing around with us and our money, guys.  And they are making grand-theft dough on us.  Dang-it, I gotta get me some bank stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flexo</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/overdraft-fees-becoming-more-popular/comment-page-1/#comment-116982</link>
		<dc:creator>Flexo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/12/overdraft-fees-becoming-more-popular/#comment-116982</guid>
		<description>Jason: If you&#039;ve had an account for many years, then the account terms presented when you opened the account most likely no longer apply.  Banks often change their terms on their accounts.  One must read all the notices the bank sends in order to catch these changes... many people don&#039;t.

I don&#039;t think this is a case of a news organization giving large companies a &quot;black eye,&quot; but it could have been a slow news day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason: If you&#8217;ve had an account for many years, then the account terms presented when you opened the account most likely no longer apply.  Banks often change their terms on their accounts.  One must read all the notices the bank sends in order to catch these changes&#8230; many people don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think this is a case of a news organization giving large companies a &#8220;black eye,&#8221; but it could have been a slow news day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/overdraft-fees-becoming-more-popular/comment-page-1/#comment-116981</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/07/12/overdraft-fees-becoming-more-popular/#comment-116981</guid>
		<description>Why are people suddenly &quot;discovering&quot; this and reacting to it?  In all honesty it&#039;s likely because it was a slow news day and a large news organization thought it would be a good day to try to give large companies another black eye.

That being said, if this comes as a suprise to you then you apparently didn&#039;t find the time to read your account agreement when you opened your account.  If you don&#039;t want the fees you can request that your financial institution not process overdrafts and then you can pay the bounced check charge to the retailer (in some cases that is a $50 charge).  Of course balancing your checkbook might take care of the issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are people suddenly &#8220;discovering&#8221; this and reacting to it?  In all honesty it&#8217;s likely because it was a slow news day and a large news organization thought it would be a good day to try to give large companies another black eye.</p>
<p>That being said, if this comes as a suprise to you then you apparently didn&#8217;t find the time to read your account agreement when you opened your account.  If you don&#8217;t want the fees you can request that your financial institution not process overdrafts and then you can pay the bounced check charge to the retailer (in some cases that is a $50 charge).  Of course balancing your checkbook might take care of the issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 9/17 queries in 0.027 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 517/523 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d2r791h660ghva.cloudfront.net

Served from: www.consumerismcommentary.com @ 2012-02-12 21:45:10 -->
