As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

SmartyPig Savings Account Opening Review

After two years of waiting, I opened an account at SmartyPig. Read this review before you open an account.

SmartyPig Savings Account Opening Review SmartyPig Savings Account Opening Review

Use Less Soap and Detergent in the Washing Machine

How I realized even a half-cup was too much detergent and what I'm doing about it.

Use Less Soap and Detergent in the Washing Machine Use Less Soap and Detergent in the Washing Machine

When Your Friends Become Social Sellers and Multi-Level Marketers

Here are suggestions for overcoming guilt and saying no to your friends and co-workers.

When Your Friends Become Social Sellers and Multi-Level Marketers When Your Friends Become Social Sellers and Multi-Level Marketers

Consumer Reports’ Best Cars of 2010

There are a couple of surprises on Consumer Reports' latest list of the best cars.

Consumer Reports’ Best Cars of 2010 Consumer Reports’ Best Cars of 2010

Take a New Inventory of Your Credit Cards or Pay New Fees

Issuers are establishing new fees for inactive cards. Know whether you're affected.

Take a New Inventory of Your Credit Cards or Pay New Fees Take a New Inventory of Your Credit Cards or Pay New Fees

The first time I shopped for car insurance I didn’t know much about what I would be buying. I should have taken the time to learn more about the various types of coverage before shopping. As a result of my lack of preparation, I did a poor job comparing rates. I was slightly better armed after I purchased a new car six years ago. By then I knew a little more about car insurance. I worked with AAA to find the best rates offered to me in New Jersey and received rates from a variety of other companies for similar coverage.

Yet I am still not a car insurance expert. A quick conversation with my co-workers reminded me that I should re-evaluate my coverage. I am currently covered for much more than necessary considering the reduced value of my car and the savings I have available. I plan to change my coverage this week.

An easy-to-read guide to the various types of auto insurance coverage would have been helpful when I first received a driver’s license. Here is the information I had familiarized myself with when I first assumed the responsibility of a driver.

Liability coverage

Liability coverage pays other people when you are at fault — the cause of an accident. Liability coverage is usually mandatory. If you do not have liability coverage and you cause an accident (and the other individual involved does not have uninsured motorist coverage) you would be responsible for paying their medical bills and car repair bills out of your own pocket. You could be sued if you don’t have insurance, or enough insurance, to cover the expenses paid by the victim resulting from your accident.

Liability coverage is separated between bodily injury and property. Your bodily injury liability coverage will pay for the other individual’s medical expenses and there are coverage levels per person and per accident. For example, my maximum coverage is currently $50,000 each person and $100,000 each accident. That means I will be liable for any excess expenses above those amounts. Property liability insurance covers repairs. My maximum coverage is currently $50,000 each accident. The insurance industry refers to these numbers in shorthand: 50/100/50.

Collision coverage

Collision coverage pays you or pays directly to a repair shop for damage to your car regardless of which driver is at fault. A deductible must be met first. Currently, my deductible is $500. This is low considering a portion of my Emergency Fund is ready to handle incidents. This type of insurance is not required unless you are financing the vehicle and the bank requires it or you are leasing the vehicle. I will eliminate this coverage when I call to adjust my policy.

Insurance will only cover the actual cash value of your car minus the deductible. Assuming my car is now worth $6,000, insurance will cover at most $5,500 for collision, and I am paying $537 a year for that benefit.

Comprehensive coverage

Comprehensive coverage pays you or pays directly to a repair shop for any damage to your car that occurs at any time other than a collision. If your car is stolen, comprehensive coverage would pay you. We experienced a violent storm the past few days, and trees everywhere were uprooted. I didn’t personally notice any cars damaged by falling trees, only fences, buildings, utility poles, and roads. However, it’s likely quite a few people in the area experienced damage to their card. Comprehensive car insurance coverage would help them.

Like collision, comprehensive coverage is not required unless you have a car loan or a lease. I am currently covered with a $500 deductible. I will most likely raise the deductible on this coverage. I considered eliminating comprehensive coverage, but two issues are steering me towards keeping, First, I do not park in a garage, and while my neighborhood is usually quiet, I can’t control other people or nature. Second, I drive to New York City often and my car has already been broken into once.

Uninsured motorists coverage

Uninsured motorists coverage pays you if damage to your car cannot be reimbursed by the driver at fault because they fail to have adequate insurance. Although liability insurance is required for all legal drivers, not all drivers are operating a vehicle legally. There is some, but not complete, overlap with collision coverage. Uninsured motorists coverage might pay your collision deductible. Uninsured motorists coverage will also pay for bodily injury costs not reimbursed by the other driver’s insurance.

I currently have uninsured motorists coverage at the same levels as my liability coverage, 50/100/50.

Personal injury protection

Personal injury protection (PIP) pays you or a service provider for your medical, hospital, and funeral expenses. They may also pay for other family/household members and pedestrians involved in an accident. It’s a good idea to compare the personal injury protection benefits with those offered by your health insurance. If some of the benefits are duplicated, you may be able to justify lower PIP coverage.

If you drive passengers often, consider increasing your PIP coverage. I almost always drive alone, and I’m considering dropping PIP from my policy. Currently, I am covered for a maximum of $250,000 after a deductible of $250.

Other coverage

When my car was being repaired after the break-in I mentioned above, the rental car coverage was helpful. My insurance policy offers reimbursement for transportation expenses up to $30 per day or $900 per accident. This coverage costs me $35 a year. I will likely keep this insurance because its cost is low and I currently have no other convenient means of transportation.

Gap insurance usually is not associated directly with the other aspects of car insurance. It provides one specific benefit. For a driver whose vehicle is leased or finances, gap insurance will pay the driver the difference between the actual cash value of the car minus a deductible and the remaining balance due on the loan or lease.

For example, if you are upside-down, owing $20,000 on a car whose value is only $15,000, and the vehicle is totaled in an accident, your collision insurance will only cover $15,000. Without gap insurance, you would still need to pay what you owe without a car to show for it, and you’ll usually need to buy a new car as well. The gap insurance would cover the $5,000 difference.

Later this week, I’ll reduce my insurance coverage with my provider, Liberty Mutual, and soon after begin shopping around for better rates.

Photo: iboy_daniel, Eduardo Deboni, L. Marie, jeffwilcox, visualpanic, adrian8_8

{ 8 comments }



The Consumerism Commentary Podcast is featuring Lou Scatigna, author of the book The Financial Physician: How to Cure Your Money Problems and Boost Your Financial Health. Lou also hosts the Financial Physician Radio Show on WOBM and XM Radio.

Among the topics discussed, Lou talks about his approach to giving financial advice, his take on the housing market and why both husbands and wives need to be involved in financial decisions.

If you enjoy this podcast, please vote for us in the First Annual Plutus Awards for “Best Personal Finance Podcast.” Voting ends on Tuesday, March 16. Thanks!

Consumerism Commentary Podcast #47
Financial Physician, Lou Scatigna
Production/Segment: S02E21 / 59

Adobe Flash required
DownloadRSSiTunes

Table of contents

[00:00] Introduction from Flexo
[00:30] Interview with Lou Scatigna
[00:40] Lou’s tough-love approach to financial advice
[02:37] Lou’s financial background
[05:09] Buying used cars
[07:15] The housing market in 2010
[08:44] Income tax tips
[09:43] The Financial Physician
[13:50] Getting on the same page as your partner
[18:08] End

We always welcome feedback from listeners. If you have any comments for this episode or for any other, or if you have suggestions for future episodes, please leave us comments here or email us at podcast at this domain name.

{ 1 comment }



The giveaway has ended. Thanks to everyone who has participated. The winners will be notified shortly.

This week I will be giving away five “extreme finance packages” containing Quicken, TurboTax, and QuickBooks. Each winner will be able to choose their flavor of each piece of software.

Today is the last day to enter to win this giveaway. Response has been much slower than I expected, so your chances of winning are currently very good.

In order to put your name in the hat, read these instructions. There are many ways to increase your chances, as well, from participating with Consumerism Commentary on Twitter and Facebook.

The giveaway ends at 11:59 PM Eastern Time tonight, so make sure you enter today.

The giveaway has ended. Thanks to everyone who has participated. The winners will be notified shortly.

{ 0 comments }



Bank of America is controlling the news cycle lately. First, the bank eliminated overdraft fees for debit card purchases. Now, the bank has apologized to a woman for seizing her parrot.

Back in October, Bank of America believed Angela Iannelli was defaulting on her mortgage and she had abandoned her house. The bank ordered a contractor to visit the house to install a new lock and otherwise secure the location. The contractor saw Luke, a blue macaw, and took the pet, believed to be abandoned, away for its supposed safety.

When Iannelli called to rectify the situation with the bank, here is how the conversation progressed, from the Wall Street Journal, where the story was originally reported:

Ms. Iannelli, who owns a diner and works part-time as a bartender, said Bank of America representatives weren’t helpful when she called in to protest. They first denied knowing where the parrot was, and later told her she could go to the offices of the contractor, about 80 miles away, to retrieve the bird herself. Ms. Iannelli said bank representatives also told her they were “tired” of hearing from her, hung up on her and advised her to seek help from the police.

This incident occurred after the owner missed only one mortgage payment. She is now suing for $50,000 for the emotional distress of the event and the week she spent without Luke, in addition to the other actions taken by the contractor. Before the contractors walked off with the parrot, they cut water lines and electrical wiring and poured antifreeze into various drains.

Even if the bank had the correct information and were stepping in to secure a house that was truly in trouble, these actions seem drastic.

Bank Sorry for Taking Parrot, James R. Hagerty, Wall Street Journal, March 11, 2010

{ 8 comments }

ING Direct’s recent survey results about retirement are scary. I don’t know what the world is going to be like in thirty years, the time I’ll be approaching “retirement age.” I do know that if my pattern of increasing expenses doesn’t change until then, and if I’m still earning primary income by trading my time and effort, a comfortable retirement is going to require a lot of saved and invested money.

If you believe the 4% safe withdrawal estimate, in order to live off the equivalent of today’s $50,000 a year, I’m going to need the equivalent of today’s $1,250,000 invested. Assume a modest 3% rate of inflation and I’ll need more than $3,000,000 in 2040 dollars. Unless I make major reductive changes to my lifestyle or move somewhere in the world where the cost of living is low, I’d prefer to live on more than today’s $50,000 a year. I’m going to need a bigger nest egg.

Although it sounds sophisticated, this is speculation based on assumptions that could be very wrong. I’m doing exactly what 53% of working Americans are doing according to the ING Direct survey: guessing the amount of money I’ll need to save for retirement. Even if I were to use an online retirement calculator sponsored or designed by banks, investment companies, or bloggers, my results would still be guesses, though most likely slightly more accurate.

ING Direct is offering a planning tool that takes into account the lifestyle you’d like in retirement, your investment style, and your assets and planned contributions, and presents a savings plan. According to my results, I am surprisingly on target for over $3,000,000 in 2040. This includes a number of significant assumptions about my future income and rate of return on stocks.

According to the ING Direct survey, one third of Americans age 55 and over think their number is $250,000 or less. There is a subtle implication that this won’t be enough for many retirees.

In reality, I don’t know what my retirement will look like in 30 years. I may never be able to stop working in order to afford expenses for my future family. The best we can do is set a target that makes sense for what we know and understand of the world today, and make choices based on the assumption that the nature of money and finance won’t change too much between now and then.

What is your retirement number?

{ 28 comments }

Last year, Smithee reported that Bank of America was the first major bank to allow customers to opt out of overdraft protection and the associated fees. Those customers who opted out of overdraft protection would have their card rejected when attempting to make a purchase without the funds available.

Thanks to these changes as well as the limitation of four overdraft fees charged per day rather than ten, the bank lost out on $160 million in income in the last three months of 2009. Nevertheless, the bank will continue to make changes to comply with federal regulations.

Bank of American announced additional changes coming this summer, and I expect other banks will follow suit. On June 19 for new customers and in early August for existing customers, Bank of America will cease all overdraft protection on debit card purchases. After the policy change, no customer will be able to spend more than they have available in their account while using their debit card. The transaction will be declined.

Bank of AmericaThe type of overdraft protection being eliminated is the type where the bank covers the funds in the short term and your checking account balance will head into negative territory. Customers will still be able to link their checking accounts to credit cards or savings accounts, so overdraft coverage in the form of a transfer from their own account will be available for a fee $10.

The bank-covered overdraft protection will continue to be available for checks and automated payments. Banks still see this as a convenience to the customers; no one wants their mortgage payment to bounce or be denied. At the ATM, if a customer attempts to withdraw more than the amount available, the machine will warn the user than a $35 fee will be charged if the withdrawal continues.

Bank of America is making it clear that it is looking to win points with customers with this move to eliminate certain overdraft fees. I have no concern about Bank of America’s ability — as well as the ability of any other big bank — to continue to find ways to charge unexpected and excessive fees. It’s a great reason to track your finances and keep your finances simple.

Photo: taberandrew

{ 3 comments }

When I post my financial reports each month, they reflect only a small piece of who I am as a person. My bank account balances are only a small part of my life although they are center stage on Consumerism Commentary. I try to avoid labels for this reason; when I reach a net worth of a million dollars, I will be hesitant to call myself a “millionaire,” a label that would describe only a small part of me.

Even when looking at my finances in whole, net worth is a small piece. You cannot forget about your net income, a number which will tell you more about your financial well being than your net worth. That is, if your net income is positive every month and your net worth is negative, you’re in better financial shape than if your net worth is positive and your net income is negative.

You can take your net worth, income, and cash flow and still have an incomplete picture of your financial wellbeing. That’s because these figures all neglect to include human capital, your ability to earn income in the future, and focus solely on financial capital, your assets.

The New York Times recently shared an article about using human capital to hedge your financial capital. If you have strong human capital, you can afford to take fewer risks with your financial capital, but if your human capital is weaker, you may need to take more financial risks to get to the same place.

The strength of human capital can be judged by the stability of your job and your ability to find work regardless of the economy. Can your skills be marketed across a variety of industries? If you are a mortgage broker, your immediate job security is tied to the real estate industry. That could be a dangerous sign for your human capital. But if you are a financial analyst, you might be able to find a job in any economy in any industry (not just finance).

If you are close to retirement, your human capital will be low. You may not be willing to spend several years training for a new job or career. Young people have a human capital advantage; time is on their side.

This measurement of human capital may be even more important and tell a more complete story about your ability to thrive financially than your financial capital. How would you characterize your human capital?

{ 5 comments }