As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!
     

The Poverty Rate Remained Flat Last Year

This article was written by in Wealth and Affluence. 3 comments.


In 2011, the percentage of Americans living in poverty declined from 15.1 percent to 15.0 percent according to the census figures released within the last few days. According to the Census Bureau, this is not a statistically significant change, meaning the number of Americans in poverty, 46.2 million, is roughly the same as in 2010.

Whether you consider the 10 basis point decrease in the rate of poverty over one year an actual decrease or not significant enough to make a headline, the news that the poverty rate didn’t increase is a positive development. Poverty had been increasing each year until these latest results. Keep in mind, though, that the poverty threshold increased. A family of four including two children earning $22,800 in 2010 would not have been considered living in poverty, while in 2011 the same family with the same income would. Inflation plays a role, and in the middle class, wages might follow inflation, but in or close to poverty, they don’t.

So taking inflation into account, the rate of poverty should have increased, with a higher threshold to overcome and stagnant wages in the lowest working class, but the rate didn’t.

I wouldn’t get too excited about the potential eradication of poverty in the United States, however. We have a long way to go. Dr. Cornel West and Tavis Smiley, crusaders for the impoverished, want society to focus on 150 million people in the United States, the poor, new poor, or near poor. Those living middle-class-like lives, paycheck-to-paycheck, where one medical emergency or job loss could send them into financial despair are included in this larger number.

Even if you don’t accept the idea that poverty should be the major economic issue deserving policy attention moving forward, there is little doubt that middle-income jobs are disappearing, being replaced by low-income jobs, forcing a good portion of Americans who aren’t ignoring their situation to re-think their long-term plans for financial independence. The new report from the census shows the Gini index, designed to measure income inequality, showed a significant annual increase for the first time since 1993, but overall since 1993, the Gini index has increased 5.2 percent. This puts numbers behind the idea that the middle class is shrinking and the poor and the wealthy are further separated.

With this kind of separation, the rich and the poor might as well live on different planets. Neither rich presidential candidate can personally relate to the difficulties many in this country face every day, but modern American democracy is designed in such a way that the only way to reach the highest government office is to have a significant amount of wealth.

Comparing these statistics to other countries around the world, the United States is not the worst in terms of income equality, but it isn’t very good. The opposite of income inequality is not necessarily a lack of capitalistic opportunity; a country can have a strong entrepreneurial class without ignoring its impoverished.

How important is poverty and income inequality to you for this election and the next century?

United States Department of Commerce and Census Bureau [pdf]

Published or updated September 13, 2012. If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to the RSS feed or receive daily emails. Follow @ConsumerismComm on Twitter and visit our Facebook page for more updates.

Email Email Print Print
avatar
Points: ♦127,475
Rank: Platinum
About the author

Luke Landes, also known as Flexo, is the founder of Consumerism Commentary. He has been blogging and writing for the internet since 1995 and has been building online communities since 1991. Find out more about him and follow Luke Landes on Twitter. View all articles by .

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

avatar qixx ♦1,890 (Half-Dollar)

Having just finished The Rich and the Rest of Us earlier this week poverty has been on my mind. I don’t see any actual difference in the two main candidates this election in regard to what effect they would have on poverty. I find their jobs platforms are very similar and both lacking. Neither seems to have a plan for helping underemployed or emboldening “fundamental fairness”. I’d like to see both make it a bigger part of their platform.

Reply to this comment

avatar wylerassociate ♦162 (Cent)

income inequality is clearly one of the major issues in this election for me & many others but I don’t see either party really tackling the issue other than giving sound bites.

Reply to this comment

avatar Jenna, Adaptu Community Manager

This sounds like a #FinCon12 topic. I think poverty by any definition needs to be addressed more in the news, be it local, national or international. The fact that Americans (more importantly children) don’t have access to food and clothing is just unacceptable.

Reply to this comment

Leave a Comment

Connect with Facebook

Note: Use your name or a unique handle, not the name of a website or business. No deep links or business URLs are allowed. Spam, including promotional linking to a company website, will be deleted. By submitting your comment you are agreeing to these terms and conditions.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Previous post:

Next post: