<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Publicly Shame a Deadbeat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/</link>
	<description>A premier personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:01:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wylerassociate</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/comment-page-1/#comment-252112</link>
		<dc:creator>wylerassociate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 05:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4900#comment-252112</guid>
		<description>I also have issues with publicly shaming deadbeats because they deserve their say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also have issues with publicly shaming deadbeats because they deserve their say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/comment-page-1/#comment-186929</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 21:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4900#comment-186929</guid>
		<description>I can see how a site like this might be effective, but I have moral problems with the premise.  Damn you, morals!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see how a site like this might be effective, but I have moral problems with the premise.  Damn you, morals!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill M</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/comment-page-1/#comment-186857</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2008 03:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4900#comment-186857</guid>
		<description>I agree with mapgirl.  Sueing anonymous users will get you nothin, maybe another bill from your lawyer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with mapgirl.  Sueing anonymous users will get you nothin, maybe another bill from your lawyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mapgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/comment-page-1/#comment-186853</link>
		<dc:creator>mapgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 20:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4900#comment-186853</guid>
		<description>Instead of this, why not re-institute debtor&#039;s prison? Because suing someone for slander and libel on an anonymous website doesn&#039;t really get a debt paid does it? Just look all those deadbeat dads who don&#039;t pay child support. Their names go up on public websites, but does it really get all of them to pay? (I&#039;m sure some do, but certainly not all. Many go on  being deadbeats.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of this, why not re-institute debtor&#8217;s prison? Because suing someone for slander and libel on an anonymous website doesn&#8217;t really get a debt paid does it? Just look all those deadbeat dads who don&#8217;t pay child support. Their names go up on public websites, but does it really get all of them to pay? (I&#8217;m sure some do, but certainly not all. Many go on  being deadbeats.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Green Panda</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/comment-page-1/#comment-186852</link>
		<dc:creator>Green Panda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 18:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4900#comment-186852</guid>
		<description>I can see how this can be abused y some people. How can they prove the debt is real?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see how this can be abused y some people. How can they prove the debt is real?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amp</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/comment-page-1/#comment-186850</link>
		<dc:creator>Amp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:57:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4900#comment-186850</guid>
		<description>I hear the terms &quot;libel&quot;, &quot;slander&quot;, and &quot;defamation&quot; coming!

Even if the owner is not responsible, those who post there will be.  Plus, any complaintant who asks for their name to be removed from a public website not controlled by the government who is not granted that respect can call up a site&#039;s ISP, lodge a complaint, and have the site taken down.

This one won&#039;t last, boys ;) The owner will be inundated with lawsuits, and even if he&#039;s found to be &quot;innocent&quot; (how can one who facilitates be innocent?), the time and money he&#039;ll spend off work and with lawyers will kill him.

Sometimes, the suit is not won by the facts, but by the lack of energy on one party&#039;s part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear the terms &#8220;libel&#8221;, &#8220;slander&#8221;, and &#8220;defamation&#8221; coming!</p>
<p>Even if the owner is not responsible, those who post there will be.  Plus, any complaintant who asks for their name to be removed from a public website not controlled by the government who is not granted that respect can call up a site&#8217;s ISP, lodge a complaint, and have the site taken down.</p>
<p>This one won&#8217;t last, boys ;) The owner will be inundated with lawsuits, and even if he&#8217;s found to be &#8220;innocent&#8221; (how can one who facilitates be innocent?), the time and money he&#8217;ll spend off work and with lawyers will kill him.</p>
<p>Sometimes, the suit is not won by the facts, but by the lack of energy on one party&#8217;s part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flexo</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/comment-page-1/#comment-186848</link>
		<dc:creator>Flexo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 17:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4900#comment-186848</guid>
		<description>Chad: It&#039;s my understanding that there is a federal law that protects website operators from liability for content posted by visitors and users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chad: It&#8217;s my understanding that there is a federal law that protects website operators from liability for content posted by visitors and users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/comment-page-1/#comment-186847</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4900#comment-186847</guid>
		<description>I can not see anything good coming from this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can not see anything good coming from this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chad Bordeaux</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/publicly-shame-a-deadbeat/comment-page-1/#comment-186846</link>
		<dc:creator>Chad Bordeaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4900#comment-186846</guid>
		<description>I am not sure how this can be legal.  Sure, they can do it, but are there not fair credit reporting laws preventing many of the things that will be posted here?   Aren&#039;t they setting themselves up for a ton of lawsuits whenever false information is published?  It seems like they would be liable if false information were published.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure how this can be legal.  Sure, they can do it, but are there not fair credit reporting laws preventing many of the things that will be posted here?   Aren&#8217;t they setting themselves up for a ton of lawsuits whenever false information is published?  It seems like they would be liable if false information were published.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 9/23 queries in 0.095 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 619/625 objects using memcached
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d2r791h660ghva.cloudfront.net

Served from: www.consumerismcommentary.com @ 2012-02-12 18:57:12 -->
