As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!
     

Rich Homeowners More Likely to Walk Away From Mortgages

This article was written by in Real Estate and Home. 2 comments.


When it comes to walking away from a house and mortgage, wealthy homeowners are doing their part. Not only are those with a $1 million net worth or above more likely to stop payments, but they are also more likely to see their home as an investment and cut their losses.

Of homeowners with a high net worth, more than 1 out of 7 are delinquent with their mortgage payments. Only 1 out of 12 homeowners with a lower net worth are late. These statistics are the result of a survey by CoreLogic. Here is some analysis from the New York Times:

The CoreLogic data suggest that the rich do not seem to have concerns about the civic good uppermost in their mind, especially when it comes to investment and second homes. Nor do they appear to be particularly worried about being sued by their lender or frozen out of future loans by Fannie Mae, possible consequences of default…

“Those with high net worth have other resources to lean on if they get in trouble,” said Mr. Khater, the analyst. “If they’re going delinquent faster than anyone else, that tells me they are doing so willingly.”

For most people, a house isn’t a good investment, but these rules don’t apply to the rich who own multiple properties and expect their own personal brand adds to the value of the house in a way that increases property value at a rate higher than the rest of the real estate market. Some people benefit from viewing their homes as an investment, particularly with today’s low mortgage interest rates.

In addition, many among the super-rich purchase properties through trusts, so their personal wealth is further protected if they decide to abandon their mortgages. For a typical individual, abandoning a mortgage could have drastic repercussions on his or her ability to buy a house in the future.

Biggest Defaulters on Mortgages Are the Rich, David Streitfeld, New York Times, July 8, 2010

Published or updated July 9, 2010. If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to the RSS feed or receive daily emails. Follow @ConsumerismComm on Twitter and visit our Facebook page for more updates.

Email Email Print Print
avatar
Points: ♦127,500
Rank: Platinum
About the author

Luke Landes is the founder of Consumerism Commentary. He has been blogging and writing for the internet since 1995 and has been building online communities since 1991. Find out more about Luke Landes and follow him on Twitter. View all articles by .

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

avatar Jenna

What about buying foreclosed homes and houses in a short sale? Seems like you would be able to make a bunch of money on those homes. Plus you are still doing good to community by buying a home and making general improvements.

Reply to this comment

avatar Financial Samurai

Flexo, I know you aren’t a homeowner, but do you know if someone can just let one property go into foreclosure by stop paying the mortgage, and be protected while still having tons of cash in the bank that could actually pay off the entire loan?

I think a state such as TExas, you can foreclose and the state can’t go after your assets. Donno about elsewhere.

Perhaps one solution is to send your cash off shore?

Reply to this comment

Leave a Comment

Connect with Facebook

Note: Use your name or a unique handle, not the name of a website or business. No deep links or business URLs are allowed. Spam, including promotional linking to a company website, will be deleted. By submitting your comment you are agreeing to these terms and conditions.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.

Previous post:

Next post: