<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rich People are More Likely to Cheat on Income Tax Returns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/rich-people-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-income-tax-returns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/rich-people-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-income-tax-returns/</link>
	<description>A premier personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 20:33:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fathersez</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/rich-people-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-income-tax-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-186116</link>
		<dc:creator>fathersez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 08:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4274#comment-186116</guid>
		<description>I agree with Mark. 

I think that we should also look at the aspect of allowing expenses. Businesses have a wider scope for allowing expenses as tax deductibles as opposed to the salaried guy who has so little room.

It might not be just an issue of integrity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mark. </p>
<p>I think that we should also look at the aspect of allowing expenses. Businesses have a wider scope for allowing expenses as tax deductibles as opposed to the salaried guy who has so little room.</p>
<p>It might not be just an issue of integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/rich-people-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-income-tax-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-184935</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4274#comment-184935</guid>
		<description>Mike (um, the other Mike) says &quot;I thought income tax is unconstitutional, because it’s an unapportioned tax which the constitution forbids.&quot;

Ah, but in point of fact, the constitution reads: &quot;The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.&quot;

That is the 16th Amendment which is, by definition, part of the constitution.

Of course, I suppose there are those who would argue that the constitution is unconstitutional.  But if we assume the constitution is in fact constitutional, then the income tax is, alas, constitutional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike (um, the other Mike) says &#8220;I thought income tax is unconstitutional, because it’s an unapportioned tax which the constitution forbids.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ah, but in point of fact, the constitution reads: &#8220;The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.&#8221;</p>
<p>That is the 16th Amendment which is, by definition, part of the constitution.</p>
<p>Of course, I suppose there are those who would argue that the constitution is unconstitutional.  But if we assume the constitution is in fact constitutional, then the income tax is, alas, constitutional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/rich-people-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-income-tax-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-184906</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4274#comment-184906</guid>
		<description>I thought income tax is unconstitutional, because it&#039;s an unapportioned tax which the constitution forbids. Even with that, I also thought that not all the required number of States approved that amendment. Meaning, they passed it even though it&#039;s not technically written as law. And the government is thus illegally collecting/forcing income tax from people and then jail them if they don&#039;t pay? Quite the &quot;democracy&quot; I&#039;d say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought income tax is unconstitutional, because it&#8217;s an unapportioned tax which the constitution forbids. Even with that, I also thought that not all the required number of States approved that amendment. Meaning, they passed it even though it&#8217;s not technically written as law. And the government is thus illegally collecting/forcing income tax from people and then jail them if they don&#8217;t pay? Quite the &#8220;democracy&#8221; I&#8217;d say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/rich-people-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-income-tax-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-184899</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 15:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4274#comment-184899</guid>
		<description>I wonder what will happen when the Feds increase taxes on all these rich people? That will increase compliance I&#039;m sure ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what will happen when the Feds increase taxes on all these rich people? That will increase compliance I&#8217;m sure &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Writer's Coin</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/rich-people-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-income-tax-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-184895</link>
		<dc:creator>Writer's Coin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 11:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4274#comment-184895</guid>
		<description>The more is at stake, the higher the probability of trying to do something about it. I&#039;m not surprised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The more is at stake, the higher the probability of trying to do something about it. I&#8217;m not surprised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flexo</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/rich-people-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-income-tax-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-184877</link>
		<dc:creator>Flexo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4274#comment-184877</guid>
		<description>Mark: &quot;Poor&quot; people weren&#039;t really the focus of the study.  The premise does seem obvious but the study puts numbers behind the theory to &quot;prove&quot; it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: &#8220;Poor&#8221; people weren&#8217;t really the focus of the study.  The premise does seem obvious but the study puts numbers behind the theory to &#8220;prove&#8221; it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/rich-people-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-income-tax-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-184875</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4274#comment-184875</guid>
		<description>This is kind of a pointless study since the conclusion is obvious.  It&#039;s nearly impossible for many &quot;poor&quot; people to cheat on their taxes since all of their income is reported on a W-2. Wealthy people have more deductions thus more opportunity to under-report income or over-report expenses. 

Further, since most poor people don&#039;t pay taxes at all, it isn&#039;t too surprising that they have no incentive to cheat.  Rich people would have far more incentive.

But, in any event, the solution is easy,--simplify the tax code so there are fewer deductions.  But Congress doesn&#039;t want to do that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is kind of a pointless study since the conclusion is obvious.  It&#8217;s nearly impossible for many &#8220;poor&#8221; people to cheat on their taxes since all of their income is reported on a W-2. Wealthy people have more deductions thus more opportunity to under-report income or over-report expenses. </p>
<p>Further, since most poor people don&#8217;t pay taxes at all, it isn&#8217;t too surprising that they have no incentive to cheat.  Rich people would have far more incentive.</p>
<p>But, in any event, the solution is easy,&#8211;simplify the tax code so there are fewer deductions.  But Congress doesn&#8217;t want to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/rich-people-are-more-likely-to-cheat-on-income-tax-returns/comment-page-1/#comment-184874</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/?p=4274#comment-184874</guid>
		<description>I wonder what criteria is used for &quot;under-reporting income.&quot;  Inflating deductions or not reporting Schedule C income is obvious, but is sheltering rental income, for example, really illegal or immoral?

And what about servers/bartenders?  I&#039;ve never met a single one who reported or paid taxes on more than the bare minimum assumed on their tips.  Since their tips aren&#039;t represented on any W-2, their compliance is likely to be over-stated in this study.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what criteria is used for &#8220;under-reporting income.&#8221;  Inflating deductions or not reporting Schedule C income is obvious, but is sheltering rental income, for example, really illegal or immoral?</p>
<p>And what about servers/bartenders?  I&#8217;ve never met a single one who reported or paid taxes on more than the bare minimum assumed on their tips.  Since their tips aren&#8217;t represented on any W-2, their compliance is likely to be over-stated in this study.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

