<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Roth 401(k): It&#8217;s Official</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/roth-401k-its-official/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/roth-401k-its-official/</link>
	<description>A premier personal finance blog, established 2003. Within, Flexo discusses his own experiences with money, and he and other authors comment on a wide range of personal finance topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 02:26:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kitty</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/roth-401k-its-official/comment-page-1/#comment-129005</link>
		<dc:creator>kitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/18/roth-401k-its-official/#comment-129005</guid>
		<description>When I tried to use this calculator, I noticed a problem with it -- even thought I specified my 28% tax bracket and max allowed 401K contribution, it still calculated my invested tax savings value as $0. How can 28% (actually more if you add NY State taxes, but the calculator didn&#039;t include it) of 15500 invested for many years until I retire is $0? Interestingly when I played with other numbers, I still got the same result - $0 for tax savings that I get to invest myself. All of these savings I can put in Roth IRA on my own. I brought it up in the thread, but I don&#039;t think anybody replied.

Have you checked your results from the calculator to make sure your results weren&#039;t affected by the same bug?

At any rate, I am staying with regular 401K. If I sell some stocks, this may be the only thing that keeps me from being hit by the AMT, and if I don&#039;t sell stocks, this 401K deduction may keep my income low enough to be able to put something to Roth IRA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I tried to use this calculator, I noticed a problem with it &#8212; even thought I specified my 28% tax bracket and max allowed 401K contribution, it still calculated my invested tax savings value as $0. How can 28% (actually more if you add NY State taxes, but the calculator didn&#8217;t include it) of 15500 invested for many years until I retire is $0? Interestingly when I played with other numbers, I still got the same result &#8211; $0 for tax savings that I get to invest myself. All of these savings I can put in Roth IRA on my own. I brought it up in the thread, but I don&#8217;t think anybody replied.</p>
<p>Have you checked your results from the calculator to make sure your results weren&#8217;t affected by the same bug?</p>
<p>At any rate, I am staying with regular 401K. If I sell some stocks, this may be the only thing that keeps me from being hit by the AMT, and if I don&#8217;t sell stocks, this 401K deduction may keep my income low enough to be able to put something to Roth IRA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Dollar Plan</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/roth-401k-its-official/comment-page-1/#comment-128798</link>
		<dc:creator>My Dollar Plan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/18/roth-401k-its-official/#comment-128798</guid>
		<description>Yay Flexo! I am in love with the Roth 401k! My company just announced this week that we are getting one too. I&#039;ll be switching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay Flexo! I am in love with the Roth 401k! My company just announced this week that we are getting one too. I&#8217;ll be switching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/roth-401k-its-official/comment-page-1/#comment-128788</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.consumerismcommentary.com/2007/12/18/roth-401k-its-official/#comment-128788</guid>
		<description>Yea - my company was one of the first to offer the Roth and I am so glad, the benefits of it are great - and I think a lot of people will be better off with the Roth than the traditional</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea &#8211; my company was one of the first to offer the Roth and I am so glad, the benefits of it are great &#8211; and I think a lot of people will be better off with the Roth than the traditional</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.020 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 415/415 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via N/A

Served from: www.consumerismcommentary.com @ 2012-05-29 06:39:02 -->
