As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: cents

Podcast 159: The 7% Solution

This article was written by in Podcast. Add a comment.


Today on the Consumerism Commentary Podcast, Jay Frosting speaks with John Graves, author of The 7% Solution: You Can Afford a Comfortable Retirement.

They discuss the unique challenges baby boomers face when planning for retirement.

Consumerism Commentary Podcast
The 7% Solution: S07E03 / 159

DownloadRSSiTunes

Table of contents

[00:00] Introduction from Jay Frosting
[00:33] Interview with John Graves
[00:44] The four money lessons baby boomers probably already know
[03:08] 40% of people close to retirement aren’t prepared
[04:19] Make the most of your last years of work and put off Social Security income
[06:12] Look at income sources aside from a typical salary
[07:11] Managing your own portfolio vs. using a financial advisor
[10:34] How to research stocks and be a value investor
[14:21] This system isn’t right for everybody
[15:34] Health is more important than wealth
[17:35] Giving back through volunteer work
[18:17] End

We always welcome feedback from listeners. If you have any comments for this episode or for any other, or if you have suggestions for future episodes, please leave us comments here or email us at podcast at this domain name.

Theme music by Mindcube.

{ 0 comments }

A new survey by the Pew Research Center shows women have surpassed men in placing value on career advancement. Among 18 to 34-year-olds, 66 percent of women consider being successful in a high-paying career or job is one of the most important things or very important, compared to 59 percent of men. In 1997, 56 percent of women had the same response, almost even with men, at 58 percent.

This change doesn’t come at the expense of the importance of being a good parent or having a solid marriage. Marriage and family are strong priorities today for both men and women, with a score of over 90 percent. For men aged 18 to 34, 29 percent now list marriage as a top priority, down from 37 percent in 1997.

Career womanThe workplace has changed throughout the last century. The shift from traditional gender roles to shared responsibility in the workplace and at home is considered a beneficial change for the country. 73 percent of Americans agree that the trend of an increased role for women across professions is better for society as a whole, and 62 percent believe that shared responsibility at home leads to a more satisfying marriage. At the same time only 21 percent of Americans believe mothers of young children working outside the home is a positive approach to life, and 37 percent believe this is bad for society.

While women’s role in careers have increased, so have their wages and salaries compared to men’s. Women aged between 16 and 34 now earn more than 90 cents for every dollar earned by men in the same age range. Women, however, surpass men in education; women are more likely to have bachelor degrees, with 36 percent of women aged 25 to 29 having advanced education compared to 28 percent of men in the same age group.

This is a significant increase for women in education over the past several decades, and it’s somewhat reflected in the increase in salary parity. But women still are more likely to pause their careers for family reasons, although this is less often the case than in the past. This likely contributes to the fact that women as a group still do not match or exceed men in compensation.

Women in today’s workforce who do marry and have children are not necessarily leaving their careers to do so. Today’s woman often balances her career with her husband and children. Fully 48% of married couples in 2010 consisted of two breadwinners. The share of dual-employed couples was slightly higher in 1997 (53%). Back in 1975, however, the share of families with both a husband and wife in the labor force was only 34%.

If these trends continue, I expect sometime in the future for women’s salaries to exceed men’s salaries. Women will continue to be higher educated and will be qualified for higher-paying careers. Women will continue to increase the value they place on their career. Men will continue to pursue a stronger role in family.

Photo: @yakobusan Jakob Montrasio
Pew Research Center

{ 10 comments }

The End of the Cent (in Canada)

This article was written by in Economy. 5 comments.

In 2011, the United States government lost over $60 million through the minting of pennies. One-cent pieces now cost the government 2.41 cents, each, to produce. When the American cent was introduced in 1793, a typical annual salary for a teacher may have been about $60, so a cent would represent 0.016 percent of this person’s salary. That may seem insignificant at first, but a cent today represents 0.000025 percent of a teacher’s salary of $40,000 today.

In 1793, you might have expected a loaf of bread to cost about 4 cents. Today, a loaf of bread from my supermarket’s bakery is being sold for $2.69. The cent played a much more significant role in life when it was introduced in this country alongside the other coins and currency.

CentsA few years ago, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago proposed an odd solution to the problem caused by the rising costs of producing the cent. The Chicago Fed suggested revaluing the cent to be worth five cents, like the nickel. Canada has offered what is probably the best solution for this particular dilemma: halting production of one-cent pieces entirely.

This fall, Canada will no longer produce the cent. Retailers will need to adjust prices for cash transactions, rounding to the nearest five cents. Electronic transactions will continue to be processed in one-cent increments, so no rounding will be necessary for debit or credit card transactions in Canada. All cents in Canada will eventually be pulled from circulation.

One concern is that the lack of cash prices in one-cent increments and the necessity of rounding will cause prices to increase overall, but Canada’s Ministry of Finance points to other countries that have eliminated the cent and have not experienced rising prices.

This is clearly the path the United States should take. The cent is a nuisance, and is expensive for the government (and public) to produce, and should be eliminated. A price difference of one cent is meaningless in today’s economy.

Photo: Robert Couse-Baker
CoinWorld

{ 5 comments }

I’m excited to be participating in today’s Roth IRA movement. There’s more information about this movement towards the bottom of this article.

I wish someone told me about Roth IRAs when I got my first real job. I was a teenager, working in a local Radio Shack store, even though I didn’t even know what a soldering gun was. So many years later, it’s hard to know what would have gone through my mind if someone were to start talking to me about investing part of the money I was earning. I had a bank account, but I’m sure most of the money I earned from working was spent on entertainment with friends. I wasn’t thinking about the future, and I’m not convinced that someone pointing me to an article about a Roth IRA would have changed my approach.

But it might have.

It would have been impossible for me, anyway, unless I had been visited by a time-traveler or I had received a book from the future.

Roth IRAs weren’t invented until years later, while I was in college. (This detail isn’t that germane to the point, as traditional IRAs were available and would have in most respects been appropriate for saving for the future.) Anything other than stock trading was missing from my understanding of investing. Considering Roth IRAs existed by the time I graduated college, why didn’t I know about Roth IRAs when I started my first job after that point? Well, they still weren’t widespread by then, and I was earning too little money to even conceive of dedicating some of it to my future.

I would have been wrong, of course, but I only know that now with hindsight. The problem with trying to educate young people about investing for the future is that it’s easy for them to be stuck in the mindset that other pressing needs deserve attention above investing for the future. Until someone’s mind is open to the possibility of financial security in the future with today’s sacrifice, any information about investing for the future, with Roth IRAs or not, just won’t have a strong effect.

Today, though, there are ways to make this transition easier. The benefits of investing for the future no matter how little an amount have been discussed on Consumerism Commentary ad nauseum, but they bear repeating. I’m not really discussing retirement as a goal. Most discussion about investing for the future revolves around retirement, but it’s unclear that the traditional concept of retirement will be relevant thirty, forty, or fifty years from now.

  • Investing in a Roth IRA with your first job creates a new habit that lasts your entire life.
  • The Roth IRA, with its ease of access, is a perfect gateway to investing for the future.
  • When you intentionally invest in a Roth IRA with every paycheck, you can easily see the effect your choices have on your wealth.
  • When you create an automated transfer plan from your checking account to your Roth IRA, you take some of the stress out of investing.

Good investing habits start with the Roth IRA because it’s so easy. There’s no concern about tax-related issues, because you invest with “after-tax” money. Minimum balances at brokerages are typically low for Roth IRAs because these companies know that these types of accounts are best used by people new to investing. The one step, opening a Roth IRA, opens a world of financial possibilities, and it’s possible to open an account with as little as $100 per month.

It’s easy to blame ignorance when we see young people in their first jobs, earning money but not saving for the future. Here are some typical anti-youth misunderstandings:

  • “If only they had a financial education and understood that the earlier they invest in the stock market, the wealthier they’d be four or five decades in the future, they’d want to invest immediately.”
  • “Today’s kids are focused only on the ‘now’ and don’t think about their future needs.”
  • “The public educational system is to blame for the lack of solid financial knowledge among today’s youth.”
  • “Why can’t parents take some responsibility for instilling good financial habits in their children?”
  • “Get off my lawn!”

There is some relevance to at least four of these misunderstandings, but what makes them misunderstandings is that the point is really about cognitive development. By the time most teenagers have their first jobs at fifteen, sixteen, or seventeen years old, their brains are not yet equipped to consider the concepts of investing for the future. Of course, different individuals experience different rates of cognitive development, but attempting to feed someone knowledge before his or her brain is ready to grasp some of the higher concepts necessary for full understanding is a waste of time.

You can hope that some of the ideas stick with a child long enough for the connections to be made later in develop. That’s why some parents teach and model good financial habits with their children starting in kindergarten or earlier, but when it comes to the practical side of investing, adolescents in their first jobs are often not mentally prepared. As teenagers seeing for the first time how they have control over their lives outside of their parents’ house, there’s a tendency to want to make decisions independently, and without the influence of an adult preaching about prudent financial habits.

In their minds, adolescents may have already weighed the benefits of keeping more of their income for use today against the benefits of saving for the future and decided, independently, that their immediate needs are more pressing. They may believe they’ve already made the right decision.

I don’t know if I can propose a solution. Investing in a Roth IRA is a critical step towards financial freedom because of its ease, accessibility, and habit-making features, but if a young individual doesn’t apply this approach during the critical time when he or she first begins earning income, the barrier grows with time and it can be more difficult to start later on. The numbers have always been obvious; a five- or ten-year head start in investing in the stock market almost always pays significant dividends when it comes time to draw upon that nest egg, but these words are meaningless to young people who have other concerns.

Taking a slice of the paychecks from the first job can be done with little encroachment on expenses; directing 5 percent of each paycheck to a Roth IRA would hardly hurt at all. With a minimum investment of $100 each month, any working kid could find a way to make it happen, if not immediately, then after saving up for a few months and starting with a lump-sum rather than a periodic investment.

It’s not going to happen on its own, though, and it’s still unlikely to happen even after reading an article extolling the virtues of investing and saving for the future. It’s going to happen when the synapses in the brain fire in such a way that saving for the future makes sense and when sacrifice, no matter how small, is an acceptable option. In some ways, the latest guidelines that encourage automatic enrollment in 401(k) plans see this problem and have arrived at a solution: you’re busy thinking about other things, so we’ll get you started automatically. There’s always the argument that this policy benefits the financial industry more than the investors, but it does benefit the investors.

How do you propose encouraging young individuals in their first jobs to begin saving for the future with a Roth IRA?

Thanks to Jeff Rose, a Certified Financial Planner, who initiated today’s Roth IRA movement, involving more than 130 partners, all of whom are taking time today to discuss Roth IRAs on their websites, newsletters, or other publications.

Photo: stevendepolo

{ 13 comments }

Weekend Reading

by Flexo

Here are a few articles I’ve spotted recently. Are you superstitious? Superstitions can extend into your finances; the belief that the stock market’s performance on January 1 signals the performance for the entire year can be classified as a superstition. Frugal Zeitgeist offers a compilations of several superstitions and their origins. I’m a customer of ... Continue reading this article…

6 comments Read the full article →

Wealth Gap: Young Vs. Old

by Flexo
First Base

The wealth gap is growing, and if the Occupy Wall Street and its satellite protests are any indication, those not within the top one percent of income earners are not happy with their circumstances or the policies that help foster the wealth of those at the top. It’s been called class warfare, but there are ... Continue reading this article…

18 comments Read the full article →

How to Handle Meeting Hundreds of Colleagues

by Flexo

My experience with the first Financial Blogger Conference This past weekend has been a whirlwind. On Friday, for the first time I took advantage of using accrued frequent flyer miles to upgrade to first class on Continental. I will write more on that experience later. For now, I want to concentrate on what happened after ... Continue reading this article…

43 comments Read the full article →

Earn More Money: Online Surveys

by Flexo
Pen and Paper: Online Surveys

This is the fourth article in a series about finding methods of earning incremental income. Some people have a desire to earn more money without the available time to learn a new skill or start a new business. I’ve written about becoming a mystery shopper, selling items on eBay, and teaching and tutoring. The key ... Continue reading this article…

10 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 1412345···Last »