As featured in The Wall Street Journal, Money Magazine, and more!

Search: complaints

I’ve spent the last decade of my life focused on my finances. I started because I had no money and a job that was taking more from me than it was providing in income. I knew I had to make some changes if I wanted to build any kind of future for myself. Soon into this journey, I founded this website, where I’ve written about my own financial situation and tracked my balances on a monthly basis.

Over the years, my financial situation has improved. Rather than focusing on and tracking every cent as I was doing in 2003, a necessary step to train myself to save money and value everything I was earning, I now am significantly more relaxed. I still track my bank account balances. Eventually, I stopped tracking every cent I spent with cash. Cash spending became such a small percentage of each month’s income that it became unnecessary for me to enter every receipt (or every remembered transaction for those where no receipt was provided) into Quicken. I have been using credit cards for most expenses. (I was using credit cards to take advantage of rewards, which I didn’t start doing until I was out of debt, spending less than I was earning, and making conscious spending decisions.) The credit cards helped me carefully track my expenses.

My ability to improve my financial condition has been partly due to my public tracking. When my numbers are published online, I have to admit to my mistakes and accept criticism from readers when it’s due. Knowing that I will be reporting the details of my bank accounts helps me to continue making good decisions with my money.

At the end of the year, I take the chance to look at my life from a broader perspective. I now have ten years of history in my Quicken file. I’ll be thirty-six years old in a couple of months, so my finances have been a focus for almost all of my adult life. And for those of you, readers, who know me only through this site, only as “Flexo” or Luke Landes, you may think that an obsession with personal finance rules my life. The good news is that this isn’t true; outside of Consumerism Commentary, when I see my friends and family, personal finance is not usually a topic of discussion.

With ten years of history in Quicken, I can easily see my own financial progress over time. At the end of 2001, the world was still shaking from terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C., and my life was uncertain. With no money, no job, no girlfriend, and no place to live, I knew I needed to make changes in my life. That’s what I did.

Continue reading to see the numbers. Read the full article →

{ 17 comments }

Last November, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau began to take shape after being a part of a bill in Congress signed into law in July 2010. Now, a year later, the bureau is ready to launch. Elizabeth Warren was appointed by President Obama to assemble the bureau, and in this role, Congress pressed her on the bureau’s powers and accountability. In the end, though Elizabeth Warren is suited for the role of director, it became clear that moving her from the role of establishing the bureau to the role of its director would be politically difficult.

The President has nominated Richard Corddray, former Ohio Attorney General, to the role of director of the Consumer Financial Bureau. As director, after being approved by Congress, he’ll oversee consumer issues including credit cards, credit bureaus, payday lenders, mortgage brokers, student loan companies, debt collection, banks, and credit unions.

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is charged with being an advocate for consumers in an industry that is often suspected of misleading customers. The playing field isn’t level; with complicated financial products, even the most studious consumers can get caught up in products with terms that are unfavorable. When there’s another news story about a financial company whose salespeople mislead, intentionally confuse, omit important details, pressure customers for their signatures, or outright lie, trust in the industry among the general public decreases. If the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau works as planned, consumers will be armed with more and better information about financial products and will gradually learn to trust the industry again.

This bureau will have the ability to issue new rules for financial companies and some non-financial companies, but there are many things the bureau will not be able to do. For example, it will not have the power to limit payday loan fees. These fees, which when viewed as interest rates can be equivalent to 100% APR loans, are beyond the reach of the bureau. It will, however, be able to redesign product documents that outline the terms and conditions of financial products, so customers can easily understand and evaluate their products. Credit card companies have already redesigned statements, which help customers see the actual cost of debt.

The bureau will also handle hundreds of thousands of complaints filed by consumers.

Government agencies tend not to work as planned, however. The financial industry lobbies hard to ensure the government doesn’t stand in the way of profits, and while the industry does agree that consumer protections are important, it would prefer to work with the many government agencies already charged with industry oversight. Many politicians will side with the financial industry, moving forward more legislation to limit the role of the new bureau even further.

{ 10 comments }

Chase Sapphire Card Review

This article was written by in Credit. 11 comments.

With the summer months quickly approaching, credit card issuers are scrambling to create incentives on their travel reward credit cards. It’s no secret that a good bonus attract thousands of new cardholders, and Chase has decided to go after customers by increasing one of their cards’ bonus offers. For a limited time only, Chase is offering a 25,000 point bonus for new holders of the Chase Sapphire® Card, which is redeemable for $250 in cash or travel rewards. Chase will add these bonus miles to your account after you make $3,000 in purchases within the first three months of card ownership. When you take a look at what other credit cards are offering, the $250 and additional perks is about as good as you’re going to find.

Chase Sapphire® CardChase is not including an introductory offer such as a 0% APR for a certain amount of months with the Chase Sapphire® Card. The standard purchase and balance transfer rate is an average 15.24% APR and the rate for cash advances is 19.24%. If you default on your payments to Chase, the bank will penalize you with a rate of 29.99% APR. There is no annual fee. You’ll need excellent credit for Chase to approve your application.

The rewards program on the Chase Sapphire® Card is fairly straightforward, offering points on two different types of purchases. Points never expire and there is no limit to the amount of points that you can earn each year. Here is the breakdown for the points:

  • Two points for every dollar spent on dining
  • One point for every dollar spent on all other purchases

Live representatives answer all customer service calls. I recently shared by experience dealing with Chase customer service related to a different card. No matter the time of call, a human being will always be on the other end. One of the largest complaints customers have about credit cards is the inability for automated response systems to provide useful information, so this is not an issue with the Chase Sapphire® Card.

When looking for an overall credit card, the important aspects for most customers include the interest rate, rewards program, annual fee and bonus offer. This card comes out on top in all four areas plus a big positive for customer service. If you’re looking at applying for the Chase Sapphire® Card and the limited time $250 cash back bonus or would like to find more information about the card, visit the card’s secure application page.

{ 11 comments }

If you’re a celebrity, politician, or otherwise in the public eye, you may be on VIP lists maintained by the credit reporting bureaus, granting you a different level of customer service. According to lawyers who have sworn testimony from employees, this two-tiered system favors the well-connected by granting them access to immediate corrections on erroneous reports, unlike most customers whose requests are handled by automated systems.

Though some credit reporting agencies are denying this list exists, consumer advocates seem to have proof that the best customer service is reserved for those whose credit reports are deemed to require more accuracy by the bureaus. For the rest of us:

Their complaints are often electronically ferried to a subcontractor overseas, where a worker spends, on average, about two minutes figuring out the gist of the matter, boiling it down to a one-to-three-digit computer code that signifies the problem — “account not his/hers,” for example — and sending a dispute form to the creditor to investigate… Consumers who have trouble fixing errors through the dispute process can quickly find themselves trapped in a Kafkaesque no man’s land, where the only escape is through the court system.

Charging a higher fee for better customer service is a legitimate way of operating, although some might argue that even this method of operation unfairly discriminates against those who can’t afford the service. Despite some objections, offering VIP service to anyone who pays for it is usually justified. But in this case, VIP service is not differentiated by cost.

Credit reporting is something most people cannot opt out of — without major changes to their finances that involve never using debt of any sort, including a mortgage. Credit reports and credit scores are services for businesses researching individuals, not for individuals, so the companies’ first priority is serving their real customers — those who pay for access to other people’s reports and scores. The credit reports and scores in the systems are commodities, being purchased by companies evaluating creditworthiness or other factors.

It’s in a credit reporting bureau’s best interest to provide accurate data, because if they didn’t people deemed creditworthy would end up as bad customers for the agency’s clients at a higher rate. There is a threshold, however, at which point the cost of ensuring accuracy outweighs the benefit of increasing that accuracy. From a business standpoint, “accurate enough” is all that is necessary to maintain happy customers, so the bureaus can find a way to limit service to the secondary customers whose only concern is the accuracy of their personal data.

New York Times

{ 8 comments }

Podcast 101: The Squeaky Wheel, Guy Winch

by Flexo

Today’s guest on the Consumerism Commentary Podcast is Dr. Guy Winch, author of The Squeaky Wheel: Complaining the Right Way to Get Results, Improve Your Relationships and Enhance Self-Esteem. Guy received his doctorate in clinical psychology from New York University in 1991 and completed a postdoctoral fellowship in family and couples therapy at NYU Medical ... Continue reading this article…

4 comments Read the full article →

Chase Increasing ATM Fee to $5

by Flexo

Chase Bank can’t seem to stay out of the news. Last week, I mentioned that the bank was considering limiting debit card transactions to $50 or $100 as a protest against the industry’s regulation of interchange (swipe) fees. Today, there is news that the bank has increased the ATM fee for non-customers to $5 in ... Continue reading this article…

17 comments Read the full article →

Federal Taxes on Bonus Pay

by Flexo

With the holidays approaching, many companies are preparing their bonus checks, and employees who are looking forward to their bonuses are concerned about tax consequences. I gave up this “extra” part of my corporate pay for the benefit of working for myself when I left my day job last year. If this year were anything ... Continue reading this article…

39 comments Read the full article →

Podcast 95: Behind the Scenes at a Bank

by Flexo

Today’s guest on the Consumerism Commentary Podcast is Tom Dziubek, frequent host of this podcast and a recent customer service representative at one of the U.S.’s ten largest savings banks. Tom, Flexo and Bryan discuss what it was like behind the scenes, dealing with customers and working in a call center. Consumerism Commentary Podcast #95 ... Continue reading this article…

7 comments Read the full article →
Page 1 of 512345